گذر از گفتمان «پاسخگویی» به «محیط گرایی» در برنامه ریزی شهری، مبتنی برانعطاف پذیری

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی - بنیادی

نویسندگان

1 گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده هنر و معماری، واحد مشهد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی مشهد، ایران

2 گروه معماری اسلامی، دانشکده هنر و معماری اسلامی، دانشگاه بین المللی امام رضا ع، مشهد، ایران

10.22059/jurbangeo.2023.354044.1779

چکیده

توجه برنامه‌ریزان معاصر به عوامل محیطی و افزایش آگاهی و ارتباط انسان با محیط پیرامونی‌اش، موجب افزایش لایه‌ها و عوامل تعریف‌کننده مفاهیم طراحی و برنامه‌ریزی گشته است. به‌گونه‌ای که مسئله مشترکی با موضوع توانایی‌های محیطی برای پاسخگویی را پیش روی برنامه ریزان قرار داده بود. مجموعه نظریات ارائه‌شده در این دوران، در قالب برنامه‌ریزی پاسخگو، با تمرکز بر استفاده حداکثری از قابلیت‌های محیطی بوده است. درحالی‌که ضرورت پیدایش گفتمانی جامع برای غلبه بر کثرت عوامل، تعاریف و روش‌های طراحی در رشته‌های محیطی، کمتر موردتوجه بوده است. بر این اساس پژوهش جاری با هدف سازمان‌دهی هدفمند نظریات شاخص در این زمینه، به دنبال ارتقاء مبتنی بر هم‌افزایی آن‌ها است. سؤال ساختار بخش به این پژوهش، معانی، مصادیق و زمینه‌های معنی‌داری انعطاف‌پذیری در وجوه و مقیاس‌های مختلف برنامه‌ریزی شهری است. روش تحقیق بکار گرفته‌شده، تحلیل تماتیک کیفی با کمک هوش مصنوعی در نرم‌افزار MAXQDA در فرایند پردازش 6 مرحله‌ای است. کاربرد مهم این پژوهش، موجب ساختاربخشی به اذهان برنامه ریزان این عرصه برای کاهش معضلات پراکنده و درون رشته‌ای بودن منابع است. نتایج این پژوهش، ابعادی همچون تشخص و تشخیص پذیری، تنوع و تغییرپذیری، تطبیق و گسترش‌پذیری، توزیع، تفکیک و تداوم پذیری، سازمان‌دهی و سازگاری را در بخش انعطاف‌پذیری، آشکار و با بخش‌های متناظر در برنامه‌ریزی شهری مرتبط کرده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Transition from "Responsiveness" to "Environmental Eco-Friendliness" in Urban Planning Based on Flexibility

نویسندگان [English]

  • Toktam Hanaee 1
  • Hadi Farhangdoust 2
1 Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
2 Department of Islamic Architecture, Faculty of Islamic Art and Architecture, Imam Reza International University, Mashhad, Iran
چکیده [English]

ABSTRACT
The attention of contemporary planners to environmental factors and increasing awareness and communication of man with his surrounding environment has increased the layers and defining factors of design and planning concepts. In such a way, a common problem with the issue of environmental capabilities to respond was put in front of the planners. The collection of ideas presented in this era was in the form of responsive planning, focusing on the maximum use of environmental capabilities. The necessity of the emergence of a comprehensive discourse to overcome the plurality of factors, definitions and design methods in the environmental fields has been given less attention. Based on this, the current research aims to organize the leading theories in this field in a targeted manner and seeks to improve them based on their synergy. The structural question of this research is the meanings, examples and meaningful contexts of flexibility in various aspects and scales of urban planning. The research method used is qualitative thematic analysis with the help of artificial intelligence in MAXQDA software in a 6-step processing process. The important application of this research is to structure the minds of the planners of this field to reduce the scattered and interdisciplinary problems of the resources. The results of this research revealed dimensions such as identification and recognizability, diversity and changeability, adaptability and expandability, distribution, separation and continuity, organization and compatibility in the field of flexibility and related to the corresponding parts in urban planning
 
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Responsiveness-based design and planning emphasizing the maximum use of environmental capacities to meet users' needs implicitly cause a targeted improvement of environmental quality. As the environmental awareness of contemporary man has expanded and the platforms have become more diverse, many challenges are raised in the field of environment-oriented in the field of infrastructure quality and service provision. Urban developments and new developments in cities should be interpreted with integrated conceptualization. The conceptualization of interpretive flexibility in the planning and designing of public spaces in the city is used as an interdisciplinary perspective in urban space design to open and discuss its connection and potential as an approach to strengthening social cohesion and inclusion.
The general definition of flexibility is that it can create places with new forms of meaning and be used for different groups to strengthen its coherence and multidisciplinary inclusion in terms of design and planning of space and body. On this basis, the concept of flexibility is proposed as a principle in the context of design and planning due to its wide range of effects on background phenomena. The history of such a role can be seen in the diversity of users' needs. In such a way, it is impossible to express the specific time and area of the need to pay attention to this concept. This is in line with Oldenburg's theory of "social public spaces," in which being in public space, communicating with people and the environment through observing the streets, sidewalks, squares, and parks of the city is a necessary step for people as a part of their social life. The meaningfulness of the design of the artificial environment was considered. In any case, in the contemporary era, on the one hand, at the same time as the quantitative and qualitative increase of human environmental awareness, there is no longer any phenomenon in the eyes of contemporary man arising from a unique aspect and range of factors. On the other hand, his life needs in the individual and collective dimensions have seen a high diversity, which has led to the formation of multiple semantic domains of past flexibility.
The meaning of flexibility in such an interdisciplinary platform and basic design refers to the concept of understanding and responding quickly and efficiently to environmental changes. Such a holistic definition for this broad field of environmental design means the implicit acceptance of the role of scale in the meaningful domain of these concepts. On a macro scale, it means making design options to increase the presence, participation, and power of choices of users of the environment in participatory urban planning and design methods, and on a small scale, it means making design options to increase spatial quality and, as a result, the quality of activities. The daily activities of environmental users are through selection against the "dominant space." Flexibility at different scales is crucial for dimensional optimization, shaping, and structuring spatial features, leading to improved performance of space components and spaces.
The development of the concept of "flexibility" from various studies in metropolitan to micro scales, such as interior architecture, allows it to pass the discourse of responsiveness to provide a broad approach to environmental design in which different values, interests, and priorities are prioritized. As a result, the issue of flexibility in environmental design has been raised as a multi-dimensional field in the design and planning of the basic environment. The breadth and complexity of this concept have made the researchers of this field deal with it in one or more ways, and it has been avoided to provide a comprehensive framework about the nature and structuring processes. The current research presents a structured view of flexibility in architecture and urban planning with an environmental approach.
 
Methodology
The methodology to achieve this goal is to use the macro research method and achieve a comprehensive framework by combining categorized interpretations. In such a way that by sorting and categorizing these concepts and bases in a new way, he has found a new level of theoretical findings, which will be a suitable answer for the gaps in scientific knowledge and scientific methods created in this field. In this context, the research method "thematic analysis" has been used with a qualitative approach and the use of library resources. Also, to overcome the breadth and complexity of these concepts and the multi-layer networking of concepts in this research method, artificial intelligence has been used in MAXQDA research assistance software.
 
Results and discussion
In the meantime, attention should also be paid to the fields of influence and application of the results of this research because designers refer to flexibility as the creator of environmental qualities, including dynamism. Also, since flexibility, along with the principles of readability and adaptability, affect the lifestyle and behavioral patterns of the audience of environmental design in architecture and urban planning, it will also be effective in dealing with the challenge of complexity in environmental design factors. One of the key questions for achieving research goals on this issue is how flexibility in environmental design impacts the relationship between flexibility and scale.
 
Conclusion
The most important finding of this research suggests that first, it requires a focus on the conditions under which the processes of perceiving human abilities and discovering the needs of the human audience can manifest. The theoretical framework arises from a comparative approach between design disciplines. These conditions are independent of the final state of the design product, and strengthening the environmental capacities will lead to a direction and an area that includes environmental flexibility. By responding to new situations, the construction of the space and the body within a space building can be adapted to various configurations. Even though the environment may remain constant, the designed place will continue functioning as a strong living system over time.
 It also seems that the nature of issues related to flexibility has complexity. Considering that the quality of flexibility in urban planning and architecture is significant in multilevel and multifaceted scales from micro to macro, it is important to pay attention to the scale of different variables. In order to reduce this problem, the consistency and adjustment of the scale of the variables measured in a specific analysis should be considered in the first step.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Locationism
  • Behaviorism
  • Performanceism
  • Activity
  • Qualityism

مراجع

  1. بنتلی، ای‌ین. (1398). محیط‌های پاسخ‌ده: کتابی راهنما برای طراحان. چاپ چهاردهم، با ترجمه مصطفی بهزادفر. تهران: دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران.

    پورجعفر، علی و امیر صدرایی. (1394). تحلیل تطبیقی تیمچه‌های با فضای مرکزی غیر مسقف به‌عنوان فضای شهری تجاری در بازار با تأکید بر ویژگی‌های تیمچه صرافیان در استان فارس. مدیریت شهری 14 (40)، 7-22.

    توسلی، محمود. (1401). اصول و روش‌های طراحی شهری و فضاهای مسکونی در ایران. تهران: مرکز مطالعات و تحقیقات شهرسازی و معماری ایران.

    جعفری، محمدحسین؛ علی بورونی، پریسا و کامران کسمایی، حدیثه. (1400). اصول طراحی داخلی ساختمان‌های مسکونی در چهارچوب پارادایم انعطاف‌پذیری. معماری شناسی 3 (18)، 120-128.

    جلیلی، محمد؛ عینی‌فر، علیرضا و طلیسچی، غلامرضا. (1392). فضای باز مجموعه‌های مسکونی و پاسخ‌دهی محیطی: مطالعه تطبیقی سه مجموعه مسکونی در شهر همدان. هنرهای زیبا، 18 (4)، 57-68.  doi:10.22059/jfaup.2013.51682

    جهانی، رضا، و تازیکه لمسکی، ایمان. (1395). اصول طراحی فضاهای انعطاف‌پذیر شهری با رویکرد مدیریت بحران. فصلنامه دانش پیشگیری و مدیریت بحران 6 (2)، 97-107.

    چگنی، فرهاد؛ دیده بان، محمد و حصاری، پدرام. (1399). تبیین مدل فرآیند علّی مؤلفه‌ها و استراتژی‌های انعطاف‌پذیری. دو فصلنامه اندیشه معماری 4 (8)، 68-55. doi:10.30479/AT.2020.12619.1440

    سیدین، سید امین و عقلی مقدم، کسری. (1394). تأثیر بلندمرتبه‌سازی بر انعطاف‌پذیری محیط و پایداری آن. آرمان‌شهر (15)، 235-243.

    طغیانی، سمیه و شبانی، امیرحسین. (1394). بازنگری انعطاف‌پذیری حیاط‌های ایرانی در طراحی مجموعه‌های بلندمرتبه مسکونی. پنجمین کنفرانس بین‌المللی توسعه پایدار و عمران شهری. اصفهان: مؤسسه آموزش عالی دانش‌پژوهان.

    عینی فر، علیرضا. (1382). الگویی برای تحلیل انعطاف‌پذیری در مسکن سنتی ایران. هنرهای زیبا (13)، 64-77.

    فرهنگدوست، هادی. (1400). ظرفیت‌های فناوری مدل‌سازی اطلاعات ساختمانی (BIM) در بهره‌گیری از مبانی نظری رسته ابنیه با محوریت رشته معماری. چشم‌انداز شهرهای آینده 2 (4)، 75-98.

    فرهنگدوست، هادی؛ فرکیش، هیرو و طبسی، محسن. (1400). خاستگاه و ماهیت نظریه مولد، مبتنی بر تئوری طراحی، با تمرکز بر طراحی در رشته معماری. نشریۀ معماری، مرمت و شهرسازی رف، 1(2)، 98-123.

    فعلی، شیما و سلطان‌زاده، حسین. (1395). کاربست مفهوم انعطاف‌پذیری در مدارس دورة اسلامی. مطالعات شهر ایرانی اسلامی، 7 (25)، 17-28.

    قدس، حسین؛ بمانیان، محمدرضا و مرادی نسب، حسین. (1397). واکاوی مؤلفه‌های ساختاری تعاملات اجتماعی در فضاهای اجتماع‌پذیر. برنامه‌ریزی توسعه شهری و منطقه‌ای، 3 (5)، 55-80.

    قنبرزادگان، حسن. (1392). طراحی نمایشگاه بین‌المللی مرکز تجارت منطقه آزاد باکو با رویکرد انعطاف‌پذیری. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد- دانشگاه هنر اسلامی تبریز.

    کارمونا، ماتئو؛ تیم هیت، تنراک و استیون تیسدل. (1394). مکان‌های عمومی، فضاهای شهری: ابعاد گوناگون طراحی شهری. سوم. ترجمه اسماعیل صالحی، مهشید شکوهی، فریبا قرائی و زهرا اهری. تهران: دانشگاه هنر.

    گروتر، یورگ کورت. (1395). زیبایی‌شناسی در معماری. چاپ ششم. با ترجمه مجتبی دولتخواه و سلماز همتی. تهران: کتاب آبان.

    گلابچی، محمدرضا و ماستری‌فراهانی، نجمه. (1393). طراحی مفهومی ساختمان‌های بلند. تهران: موسسه چاپ و انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.

    گلابچی، محمود. (1380). معیارهایی برای طراحی و ساخت بناهای بلند. هنرهای زیبا، (9)، 52-62.

    محمودی، محمدمهدی. 1392. توسعه مسکن همساز با توسعه پایدار. ویرایش دوم. تهران: موسسه چاپ و انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.

    مردمی، کریم، و مهسا دلشاد. (1389). محیط یادگیری انعطاف‌پذیر (جهان کودک تجربه پذیر، سیستم آموزشی تغییرپذیر). معماری و شهرسازی ایران، 1 (1)، 118-109. doi: https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2010.61930

    لنگ، جان. (1397). آفرینش نظریه معماری: نقش علوم رفتاری در طراحی محیط. چاپ دهم، ترجمه علیرضا عینی‌فر، تهران: موسسه چاپ و انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.

    1. Allan, P., & Bryant, M. (2010). The Critical Role of Open Space in Earthquake Recovery: A Case Study. Proceedings of the 2010 NZSEE Conference. Nueva Zelandia.
    2. Ardeshiri, M., Esteghlal, A., & Etesam, I. (2016). Explaining the Concept of Flexibility in Urban Spaces. International Journal of Applied Arts Studies (IJAPAS), 1(1). Retrieved from http://www.ijapas.ir/index.php/ijapas/article/view/33
    3. Beisi, J. (1995). Adaptable housing or adaptable people? Experience in Switzerland gives a new answer to the questions of housing adaptability. Architecture & Comportement/Architecture & Behaviour, 11(2), 139-162.
    4. Bentley، I. (2019). Responsive environments: a manual for designers. Translator: Mustafa Behzadfar. Fourteenth edition,Tehran: Publishing Center Of Iran University of Science and Technology. [In Persian]
    5. Calderon, C. (2020). Unearthing the political: differences, conflicts and power in participatory urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 25(1), 50-64. doi:10.1080/13574809.2019.1677146
    6. Carmona, M., Heath,T., Taner Oc Tiesdell, S. (2015). Public places urban spaces the dimensions of urban design (third version). (A. Tavakoli, Editing, A. Salehi, M. Shokouhi, F. Qarai, & Z.i, Translator) Tehran: Art University. Doi:10.4324/9781315158457 [In Persian]
    7. Chegeni, F., Didehban, M., & Hessari, P. (2020). Explaining the causal process model of flexibility components and strategies. Journal of Architectural Thought, 4(8), 55-68. doi:10.30479/at.2020.12619.1440 [In Persian]
    8. Christopherson, S., Michie, J., & Tyler, P. (2010). Regional resilience: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Economics, 3, 3-10. doi:10.1093/CJRES/RSQ004
    9. Collins, D., & Shantz, B. -M. (2009). Public Spaces, Urban. In R. Kitchin, & N. Thrift (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (pp. 517-522). Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-008044910-4.01099-3
    10. Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S., Giardina, M. D., & Cannella, G. S. (Eds.). (2023). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. (Sixth Edition ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
    11. Einifar, A. (2003). A model for analyzing flexibility in traditional Iranian housing. Fine Arts (honarhaye ziba) (13), 64-77. [In Persian]
    12. Eizenberg, E., Jabareen, Y., Arviv, T., & Arussy, D. (2022). Urban space of recognition: design for ethno-cultural diversity in the German Colony, Haifa. Journal of Urban Design, 27(2), 205-224. doi:10.1080/13574809.2021.1985395
    13. Feli, SH., & Soltanzadeh, H. (2016). Experience of Purporst of Flexibility in Islamic Era Schools Case Study: Schools of Qazvin. Journal of Studies On Iranian - Islamic City, 7(25), 17-28. [In Persian]
    14. Forty, A. (2004). Words and Buildings: A Vocabulary of Modern Architecture. London: ‌ Thames & Hudson.
    15. Friedman, A. (2002). The Adaptable House: Designing Homes for Change. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional.
    16. Friedman, A. (2006). The Grow Home. Montreal, Ontario, Canada: McGill-Queen's University Press.
    17. Geirbo, H. C., Harboe, L., Hoelscher, K., & Petersen, S. A. (2022). Interpretive Flexibility as an Approach to Designing Inclusive Urban Space: Learning from Medellín and Beirut. Nordic Journal of Urban Studies, 2(2), 141–160. doi:10.18261/njus.2.2.4
    18. Ghanabarzadehghan, H. (2013). Design of International Exhibition of Baku Free Zone Trade Center with flexibility approach. MSc Thesis- Islamic Art University of Tabriz [In Persian]
    19. Ghods, H., Bemanian, M., & moradinasab, H. (2018). Investigating the Components of Social Interaction in Urban Communities (Sattarkhan Street from Sadeghieh 1st Square to Sadeghieh 2nd Square). Journals of Urban and Regional Development Planning, 3(5), 55-80. doi: 10.22054/urdp.2020.42908.1129 [In Persian]
    20. Gibson, J. (1983). The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems (Revised ed ed.). Westport, Connecticut, USA: Praeger.
    21. Golabchi, M. (2001). Criteria for designing and building tall buildings. Fine Arts (Honarhaye ziba) (9), 52-62 [In Persian]
    22. Golabchi, M., & Masteri Farahani, N. (2014). Conceptual design of high rise buildings. Tehran: Tehran University Press and Publication Institute [In Persian]
    23. Gross, M. D. (1986). Design as exploring constraints. Thesis (Ph. D.), Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture.
    24. Gross, M. D. (1990). The Electronic Design Studio: Architectural Education in the Computer Era. (2nd Printing edition ed.). (M. McCullough, W. J. Mitchell, & P. Purcell, Eds.) Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
    25. Grütter, J. K. (2020). Basics of Perception in Architecture. New York: Springer Vieweg.
    26. Grutter, J., K. (2016). Asthetik der Architektur: Grundlagen der Architektur-Wahrnehmung. Translators: Mojtaba Dolatkhah, Solmaz Hemmati, Editor: Mani Farsai, Sixth Edition, Tehran: Aban Book [In Persian]
    27. Habraken, N. J. (2000). The Structure of the Ordinary: Form and Control in the Built Environment. (Revised edition ed.). (J. Teicher, Ed.) Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    28. Habraken, N. J. (2008). Design for flexibility. Building Research & Information, 36(3), 290-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210801995882
    29. Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation Analysis (2nd edition ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity.
    30. Jacobs, J. (1992). The Death and Life of Great American Cities (Reissue edition ed.). Vintage.
    31. Ja'fari, M., Ali Boroni, P., Kamran Kasmaei, H. (2021). The principles of interior design of residential buildings within the framework of flexibility paradigm. Architectural Journal, 4 (18), 120-128. [In Persian]
    32. Jahani, R., & Tazike Lamsaki, E. (2016). Principles of Designing Urban Flexible Spaces with Disaster Management Approach (Case study: Old Contexts of Gorgan). Disaster Prev. Manag. Know, 6 (2), 97-107. [In Persian]
    33. Jalili, M., Einifar, A., & Talischi, G. (2013). Open Space of Residential Complexes and Environmental Responsiveness: A Comparative Study of three Residential Complexes in Hamadan. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Memary Va Shahrsazi, 18(19), 57-68. doi: 10.22059/jfaup.2013.51682 [In Persian]
    34. Jayakody, C., Amaratunga, D., & Haigh, R. P. (2016). The use of Public Open Spaces for Disaster Resilient Cities. 12th International Conference of the International Institute for Infrastructure Resilience and Reconstruction. Kandy, Sri Lanka: University of Peradeniya.
    35. Kamelnia, H. (2018). Design grammer of learning environments. 2nd Edition, Tehran: Hampa. [In Persian]
    36. Kamelnia, H., & Mahdavinejhad, M. (2022). Explanation contemporary architecture from east to west: Investigating the foundations. concepts and roots of its formation. Tehran: Fekre No [In Persian]
    37. Karimieyvanaki, F. (2020). CLIMATE SOLUTIONS FOR DESIGNING FLEXIBLE HOUSING IN INTERIOR DESIGN. PJAEE, 17 (12), 202-2019.
    38. Ke-rong, S., & Hai, W. (2006). Study on the Flexible Paradigm of Urban Planning. JOURNAL OF CHONGQING JIANZHU UNIVERSITY, (1), 4-7.
    39. Khale Ismaili, n. (2008). School without borders. Master's Degree, Islamic Azad University of Qazvin. [In Persian]
    40. Khodadad, M., & Sanei, M. (2017). Necessity of Collaboration between Technology and Architectural Design in Order to Develop the Urban Space Quality. World Journal of Engineering and Technology, 5(4), 574-584. doi:10.4236/wjet.2017.54049
    41. Koolhaas, R., & Mau, B. (1995). S, M, L, XL: Small, Medium, Large, Extra Large. (J. Sigler, Ed.) New York: The Monacelli Press.
    42. Lang, J. (1987). Creating Architectural Theory: The Role of the Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design. NewYork: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
    43. lang, J. T. (2018). Creating architectural theory: the role of the behavioral sciences in environmental design. Translated by: Alireza Einifar, Tenth Edition, Tehran: University of Tehran, Publishing and Printing [In Persian]
    44. Lewicka, M. (2010). What makes neighborhood different from home and city? Effects of place scale on place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 35-51. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.05.004
    45. Lin, B., Yu, Q., Li, Z., & Zhou, X. (2013). Research on parametric design method for energy efficiency of green building in architectural scheme phase. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 2(1), 11-22. doi:10.1016/j.foar.2012.10.005
    46. Mahmoudi, M. (2013). Housing development in agreement with sustainable. Second Edition Tehran: Tehran University Press and Publication Institute [In Persian]
    47. Marks, D. F., & Yardley, L. (Eds.). (2003). Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications Ltd.
    48. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2019). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (4th Edition ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
    49. Norberg-Shulz, Ch. (2022). The concept of dewlling: on the way to figurative architecture. Translator: Mahmoud Amir Ahmadi, Eleventh Edition, Tehran: Agah. [In Persian]
    50. OECD. (2016). Resilient Cities. Paris, OECD: OCDE.org. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/fr/gov/politique-regionale/resilient-cities.htm
    51. Oldenburg, R. (1999). Great Good Place (3rd edition ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Marlowe & Company.
    52. Ostuzzi, F., Couvreur, L. D., Detand, J., & Saldien, J. (2017). From design for one to open-ended design: experiments on understanding how to open-up contextual design solutions. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S3873-S3883. doi:10.1080/14606925.2017.1352890
    53. Pena, W. M., & Parshall, S. A. (2012). Problem Seeking: An Architectural Programming Primer (5th edition ed.). New York: Wiley.
    54. Poddubiuk, M. (1983). The Spectre of a Canadian Architecture. A Canadian Architecture, 3(3/4), 2-2.
    55. Pourjafar, A., Sadraee, A. (2015). Comparative Analyses Of Various Types Of Uncovered Timchehes With Emphasis On Timcheh Sarafian. Urban Management, 14(40), 7-21. [In Persian]
    56. Real Academia Española. (2014). Diccionario de la lengua Española. Vigesimotercera edición. Versión normal (NUEVAS OBRAS REAL ACADEMIA). RAE.
    57. Roulston, K. (2001). Data analysis and ‘theorizing as ideology. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 279–302. doi:10.1177/146879410100100302
    58. Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. (2000). Data Management and Analysis Methods. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd Edition ed., pp. 1143: 769-802). SAGE Publications, Inc.
    59. Sadat, A., Zargham, E., Khaki, A. (2015) A comparative study of sustainable architecture and compliance with the vernacular architecture of traditional houses in Iranian-Islamic. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Urban Design, 3(1), 15-30. [In Persian]
    60. Sanei, M., Khodadad, S., & Khodadad, M. (2018). Flexible Urban Public Spaces and their Designing Principles. Journal of Civil Engineering and Urbanism, 8(4), 39-43.
    61. Santos Cruz, S., Costa, J. T., de Sousa, S. Á., & Pinho, P. (2013). Urban Resilience and Spatial Dynamics. In A. Eraydin, & T. Taşan-Kok (Eds.), Resilience Thinking in Urban Planning (Vols. Part of the book series: GeoJournal Library (GEJL, volume 106), pp. XIV, 250: 53–69). Springer Dordrecht. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5476-8_4
    62. Sassen, S. (Ed.). (2002). Global Networks, Linked Cities. London: Routledge.
    63. Schneider, T., & Till, J. (2005). Flexible housing: opportunities and limits. arq: Architectural Research Quarterly, 9(2), 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135505000199
    64. Schnoedt, H. (1991). Cultural Parametrics. Reality and Virtual Reality (pp. 223-234). Los Angeles: ACADIA Conference Proceedings / ISBN 1-880250-00-4. doi:10.52842/conf.acadia.1991.223
    65. Schroeder, U. (1979). Variabel nutzbare Hauser und Wohnungen: Grundrisslosungen, anpassbar an Familiengrosse u. Lebensform (Planen + [i.e. und] wohnen). Berlin: Wiesbaden.
    66. Seyyedein, S. A., & Aghli Moghaddam, K. (2016). The Effect of High-rise Construction on the Environment's Robustness and Sustainability. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 8(15), 235-243. [In Persian]
    67. Sheller, M. (2016). Mobility, freedom, and public space. In S. Bergmann, & T. Sager (Eds.), The Ethics of Mobilities: Rethinking Place, Exclusion, Freedom and Environment (p. 296:).
    68. Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2015). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods (THIRD EDITION ed., p. 312). SAGE Publications Ltd.
    69. Tavassoli, M. (2022). Principles and Methods of Urban Design and Residential Spaces in Iran. (1). Tehran: Iranian Urban and Architecture Studies and Research Center. (In Persian)
    70. Terzidis, K. (2006). Algorithmic Architecture. New York: Architectural Press.
    71. Thompson, C. W. (2002). Urban open space in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 60(2), 59-72. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00059-2
    72. Tibbalds, F. (Ed.). (2000). Making People-Friendly Towns:Improving the Public Environment in Towns and Cities. London: Taylor & Francis. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203469521
    73. Till, J., & Schneider, T. (2005). Flexible housing: the means to the end. theory, 9(3-4), 287-296.
    74. Till, J., & Schneider, T. (2008). Flexible Housing. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315393582
    75. Turan, M. H. (2016). Environmental stress and flexibility in the housing process. In W. F. Preiser (Ed.), Environmental Design Research: Volume one selected papers (Routledge Revivals: Environmental Design Research) (p. 557). London: Routledge.
    76. Voordt, T. D., & Wegen, H. B. (2005). Architecture In Use: An introduction to the programming, design and evaluation of buildings. New York: Architectural Press.
    77. Warszawski, A. (2019). Industrialization and Automation in Building. In A. Warszawski, Industrialized and Automated Building Systems: A Managerial Approach (2nd ed., p. 484 (ABSTRACT)). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203223697
    78. Xu, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2013). Exploring Flexibility in Urban Planning Formulation of China. Architecture and Urban Planning. doi:10.7250/aup.2013.010
    79. Ye, J. (2019). Re-orienting geographies of urban diversity and coexistence: Analyzing inclusion and difference in public space. Progress in Human Geography, 43(3), 478–495. doi:10.1177/0309132518768405
    80. Zairul, M. N., & Geraedts, R. (2015). New business model of flexible housing and circular economy. In ETH Wohnforum, & ETH CASE (Ed.), Proceedings of the Future of Open Building Conference-The Future of Open Building Conference. Zurich, Switzerland. doi:10.3929/ethz-a-010581209
    81. Zhang, B. (2012). Emergence: Form Finding In Nonlinear Architecture. International Scientific Journal Architecture and Engineering, 1(1).
پژوهش‌های جغرافیای برنامه‌ریزی شهری
دوره 11، شماره 2
مرداد 1402
صفحه 133-152

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار