تحلیل عوامل مؤثر کالبدی و اجتماعی بر تحقق‌پذیری شهر دوستدار سالمند مطالعه موردی: شهر ورامین

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی - کاربردی

نویسندگان

1 گروه جغرافیای انسانی، دانشکده علوم جغرافیایی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

2 گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

10.22059/jurbangeo.2024.368274.1883

چکیده

در عصر حاضر یکی از مهم‌ترین مسائل کشورها، سالخوردگی جمعیت و پیامدهای ناشی از آن است. افزایش طول عمر همراه با کاهش نرخ موالید در ایران نیز وضعیت مشابهی را طی سال‌های اخیر موجب شده است و پیش‌بینی می‌شود بسیاری از شهرهای بزرگ و کوچک نظیر شهر ورامین در آینده با این وضعیت را تجربه کنند. پژوهش حاضر با هدف تحلیل مؤلفه‌های کالبدی و اجتماعی بر تحقق‌پذیری شهر دوستدار سالمند در فضای شهری ورامین انجام‌شده است. داده‌ها و اطلاعات این پژوهش از طریق مطالعه منابع کتابخانه‌ای و پیمایشی جمع‌آوری‌شده و از شیوه‌های کیفی و کمی برای تحلیل آن‌ها بهره گرفته‌شده است. نتایج پژوهش حاکی از آن است که بالاترین رتبه در مؤلفه‌ها مربوط به "مشارکت اجتماعی" و پایین‌ترین میانگین مربوط به مؤلفه "تکریم سالمندان و احترام اجتماعی" است و به ترتیب بیشترین درصد نارضایتی سالمندان مربوط به کمبود خدمات پزشکی متعارف، مشاور خانوادگی و دسترسی به شبکه حمل‌ونقل ایمن برای سالمندان می‌باشد. همچنین یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که میانگین همه معیارهای موردبررسی در حد استاندارد نبوده و تا رسیدن به سطح مطلوب فاصله زیادی دارند. همچنین به‌منظور شناسایی عوامل مؤثر به‌منظور تحقق‌پذیری شهر دوستدار سالمند ورامین، از روش تحلیل عاملی استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که دو عامل "حمل‌ونقل و فعالیت‌های اجتماعی" و "زیر بنایی-کالبدی" با تبیین 12 گویه، بیشترین اهمیت را در این زمینه داشته‌اند. سایر عوامل به ترتیب عبارت‌اند از: خدمات اجتماعی – درمانی، ایمنی، سرزندگی شهری – حامی، فرهنگی، مشارکت، دسترسی، مسکن

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Analysis physical and social effective factors on the attainment of an age-friendly city - case study: Varamin city

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ahmad Zanganeh 1
  • Hamid Reza Talkhabi 1
  • Mehdi Abbas zadeh soorami 2
  • Mahdi Mah abadi 1
1 Department of Human Geography, Geographical science faculty, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Geography and Urban Planning, PNU University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

 ABSTRACT
The increase in life expectancy, along with the decrease in the birth rate in Iran, has caused a similar condition in recent years, and it is expected that many big and small cities, such as Varamin, will experience this condition in the future years. The current research was conducted to analyze the physical and social components of attaining an age-friendly city in the urban space of Varamin. The present research method is descriptive-analytical and, according to the purpose, is among applied studies. The data and information of this research were collected through the study of library and survey sources, and qualitative and quantitative methods were used for their analysis. The results of the research indicate that the highest rank in the components is related to "social participation," and the lowest average is related to the component "respect for the elderly and social respect," and respectively, the highest percentage of dissatisfaction of the elderly is related to the lack of conventional medical services, family counselors, and access to a safe transportation network for the elderly. Also, the findings of the research showed that the average of all the examined criteria is not at the standard level, and they are far from reaching the desired level. Also, in order to identify the factors effective for the age-friendly city of Varamin, the factor analysis method was used, which explains 64.05% of the total variance of 26 items out of 10 factors obtained with an eigenvalue higher than 1. Among them, 2 factors "Transportation and social activities" and "Physical infrastructure" have been the most important in this field with the explanation of 12 items.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
One of the prominent characteristics of the 21st century is the rapid movement of the world population toward aging, which has emerged as a biological, social, and cultural reality in the last century. While it has been the source of significant developments and changes, it has been recognized as a major challenge. The number of people aged 65 and over worldwide is projected to more than double from 761 million in 2021 to 1.6 billion in 2050. Statistical indicators show that the process of population aging has started in our country, and it is predicted that in the next 20 years, from 2006 to 2026, 10 years should be added to the average age of the country's population. Iran is also experiencing the transition phase of the population's age structure from youth to old age. Before the intentions, it shows that after UAE and Bahrain, Iran is the third country in the world in terms of population aging speed, and this condition adds to the importance of the issue in the country.
Demographic changes show that the population of Iranian elderly increased almost 4 times between 1976 and 2016, and it is predicted that in 2035 and 2050 order 11 and 17 percent of the country's total population. In Tehran, people over 60 years old are about 10.3 Percent. Surveys of the population condition of Varamin city indicate that 4.7% of Varamin area population and 7.6% of Varamin city's population are elderly. The current research seeks to answer the following questions:
1) In line with the attainment of the age-friendly city of Varamin, what are the physical and social dimensions?
2) Which components of the physical and social dimensions have the most significant effect on attaining an age-friendly city?
 
Methodology
The research method is descriptive-analytical. Physical dimensions (Public spaces and buildings, transportation and traffic safety, housing, medical and health services) and social dimensions (respect for the elderly and social respect, social participation, cultural and welfare indicators) have been used. Statistical population by sample method is a possible intake of 120 people. The data collection tools in this part of the researcher-made questionnaire included 31 items, of which 5 items are related to the characteristics of the respondents and 26 items are related to the physical and social components of the age-friendly city. In order to statistically analyze the data, SPSS software was used by T-TEST and factor analysis models. Varamin is the center of the Varamin district, located in Tehran province, 35 kilometers southeast of Tehran. The area of Varamin city is 20,400 hectares, and the city's population, according to the statistics 2016, is equal to 225.628. The population of Varamin in Iran Statistics Center in 2016 shows that the population of men 60 years and older was 8786, and the population of women 60 years and older was 8398. The results of the general population and housing census conducted from 1956 to 2016 indicate that the population of Varamin city has increased more than 40 times during this period.
 
Results and discussion
Based on the results of the KMO test, the value of which equals 0.622. Research data can be reduced to the number of sub-structural and fundamental factors. Also, the result of Bartlett's test (871.589), which has an error level of less than 0.001, is significant and shows that the correlation matrix is not the same as the unit. Moreover, on the other hand, there is a high correlation between each factor, and from the other side, some objects with the object. No correlation is observed with other factors in this research; rotation, and Arimax have been used to obtain significant factors. According to the process of factor analysis, only factors whose eigenvalue is higher than one are extracted. In the present research, 10 factors have an eigenvalue higher than 1. Therefore, 10 factors can be made from the total of 26 items. These 10 factors explain 64.049% of the total variance of 26 items.
 
Conclusion
The results of the research showed that the average of all the criteria of the case of the examination (physical and social) was lower than the standard level, which means that they are not even up to the level of meeting the basic needs of the elderly. The only component, "community participation," with an average, is more favorable. Also, the research results show the status of some indicators of the case review, like conventional and free medical services for the elderly and family counselors with a focus on the elderly and access to a convenient transportation network. Safety is more critical than other indicators, with the most dissatisfaction among the elderly and Varamini. Therefore, effective measures and planning should be done in the city development planning in line with the welfare of the elderly. Improving the physical and social components of the elderly of Varamin city, who will account for a large part of the elderly population in the coming years, is one of the important pillars of the city's progress and sustainability. Urban spaces should be designed so elderly people can benefit from urban services without dependence and by receiving minimal assistance. Since the elderly have different needs in society, during their old age, the relationship between them and society becomes weak, and this issue causes many emotional problems and even fuels family disputes. According to this research, Varamin is weak and unable to provide social and physical services to the elderly.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Physical and Social factors
  • Age-Friendly City
  • Varamin City
  1. پروایی، شیوا و آزاد ارمکی، تقی. (1400). جامعه‌شناسی سالمندی: سالمندی و زندگی روزمره. چاپ اول، تهران: انتشارات آگاه.
  2. تلخابی، حمیدرضا، گلی، راحله. (1396). کلان‌شهری برای کلان‌سال‌ها. ماهنامه ندای گویا، 1(9)، 9.
  3. حسینقلی زاده، علی، جلوخانی نیارکی، محمدرضا، نخسین روحی، مهسا، حاجیلو، فخرالدین. (1399). تحلیل مکانی و ارزیابی فضاهای شهری از منظر شهر دوستدار سالمند (مطالعه موردی: منطقه 6 تهران). پژوهش‌های جغرافیای برنامه‌ریزی شهری، ‌ 8(2)، 371-389. https://doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2020.295771.1215
  4. رنی شورت، جان. (1401). شهر نابرابر، اقتصاد، جامعه و شهرنشینی در عصر سرمایه‌داری. ترجمه حمیدرضا تلخابی و فریدون گازرانی، چاپ دوم، تهران: انتشارات آگاه.
  5. زارع، بیژن و زارع، مرضیه. (1391). سالمندان جمعیت و ضرورت سیاست‌گذاری و برنامه‌ریزی. ماهنامه کتاب ماه علوم اجتماعی، 16(58)، 41-49.
  6. زرقانی، هادی؛ خوارزمی، امیرعلی؛ جوهری، لیلا. (1394). ارزیابی شاخص‌های شهر دوستدار سالمند در شهر مشهد با تأکید بر شاخص‌های فرهنگی–اجتماعی. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی، 47(4)، 688– 67. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2015.51385
  7. شرقی، علی، قنبران، عبدالحمید، صالحی کوسالاری، فرزانه. (1398). مروری بر نظریه‌های سالمندی و بازتاب آن در ویژگی‌های معماری منظر خانه‌های سالمندان. انسان و محیط‌زیست، ۱۸ (۴)، ۷۰-۵۵. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.15625532.1399.18.4.5.6
  8. شیرازی ایرائی، شقایق. (1399). مطالعه شهر دوستدار سالمند مطالعه موردی: شهر آمل. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد رشته جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، به راهنمایی صدیقه لطفی، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه مازندران.
  9. صیامی، قدیر، و خلیق، علی. (1396). تأثیر اختلاط کاربری‌ها بر تولید سفرهای پایدار در محلات شهری (مطالعه موردی: محلات میعاد, تربیت و هاشمی در شهر مشهد. نگرش‌های نو در جغرافیای انسانی (جغرافیای انسانی)، 9(3)، 65-78. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.66972251.1396.9.3.16.1
  10. ضابطیان، الهام، و تقوایی، علی‌اکبر. (1388). شاخص‌های مناسب‌سازی فضاهای شهری دوست دار سالمندان با استفاده از رویکرد مشارکتی. مسکن و محیط روستا، 28(128)، 60-71.
  11. کلانتری، عبدالحسین، حسینی زاده، سید سعید، نیازی، محسن. (1399). احساس تنهایی در شهر: علل و پیامدها. چاپ اول. تهران: مرکز مطالعات و برنامه‌ریزی شهر تهران.
  12. کیائی، مژگان؛ مطلبی، سیده آمنه؛ میرزاده، منیرالسادات و محمدی، فاطمه. (1398). ارزیابی شاخص‌های شهر دوستدار سالمند شهر قزوین: فضاهای باز شهری، ساختمان‌ها و مکان‌های عمومی. مجله علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی قزوین، 23(5)، 430-439. https://doi.org/10.32598/JQUMS.23.5.430
  13. مرکز آمار ایران، 1397، نتایج سرشماری عمومی نفوس و مسکن (1395-1335).
  14. مرکز آمار ایران، 1395، نتایج کلی سرشماری عمومی نفوس و مسکن.
  15. مهندسین مشاور پژوهش و عمران. (1393). طرح جامع ورامین. تهران: وزارت راه و شهرسازی.
  16. میرزایی، محمد، و شمس قهفرخی، مهری. (1386). جمعیت‌شناسی سالمندان در ایران بر اساس سرشماری‌های 1385-1335. مجله سالمند، 2(5)، 326-331.
  17. نیک پور، عامر و حسنعلی زاده، میلاد. (1399). تحلیل فضایی شاخص‌های سالمندی در نواحی شهری و روستایی ایران. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی (پژوهش‌های جغرافیایی)، 52(3)، 921-937. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2019.256357.1007696
  18. وحدانی نیا، مریم سادات؛ گشتاسبی، آزیتا؛ منتظری، علی و مفتون، فرزانه. (1384). کیفیت زندگی مرتبط با سلامتی در سالمندان: مطالعه‌ای جمعیتی. نشریه پایش، 4(2)، 113-120. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.16807626.1384.4.2.5.0
  19. یاوری، کاظم، باسخا، مهدی، صادقی، حسین، و ناصری، علیرضا. (1394). نگاهی بر آثار اقتصادی پدیده سالمندی، نشریه سالمند، 10(1)، 92-105.
  20. Buckner, S., Pope, D., Mattocks, C., Lafortune, L., Dherani, M., & Bruce, N. (2019). Developing age-friendly cities: an evidence-based evaluation tool. Journal of Population Ageing12(23), 203-223.‌ https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-017-9206-2
  21. Buffel, T., & Phillipson, C. (2018). A manifesto for the age-friendly movement: Developing a new urban agenda. Journal of aging & social policy30(2), 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2018.1430414
  22. Buffel, T., and Phillipson, C. (2016). Can global cities be ‘age-friendly cities’? Urban development and ageing populations. Cities, 55, 94–100. https://doi: 10.1016/j. cities.2016.03.016
  23. Buffel, T., Phillipson, C., & Scharf, T. (2012). Ageing in urban environments: Developing ‘age-friendly’cities. Critical Social Policy, 32(4), 597-617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018311430457
  24. Cavill, S., & Sohail, M. (2004). Strengthening accountability for urban services. Environment and Urbanization16(1), 155-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780401600113
  25. Chai, H. W., & Jun, H. J. (2017). Relationship between ties with adult children and life satisfaction among the middle-aged, the young-old, and the oldest-old Korean adults. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development85(4), 354-376.‌  https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415016685834
  26. Detailed results of the (2018). national population and housing census. Tehran: Statistical Center of Iran. [in Persian].
  27. Fitzgerald, K. G., & Caro, F. G. (2014). An overview of age-friendly cities and communities around the world. Journal of aging & social policy26(1-2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2014.860786
  28. Hosseingholizadeh, A., Jaloukhani Neyarki, M. R., Nakhshineh Roozi, M., Hajiilou, F. (2020). Spatial analysis and evaluation of urban spaces from the perspective of age-friendly city (Case study: District 6 of Tehran). Journal of Urban Planning and Geography Research, 8(2), 371-389. https://DOI: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2020.295771.1215 [in Persian].
  29. Kalantari, A. H., Hosseinizadeh, S. S., & Niazi, M. (2020). Feeling of loneliness in the city: Causes and consequences (1st ed.). Tehran Urban Studies and Planning Center. [in Persian].
  30. Kiaee, M., Motalebi, S. A., Mirzadeh, M., & Mohammadi, F. (2019). Evaluation of age-friendly city indicators in Qazvin: Open spaces, buildings, and public places. Journal of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, 23(5), 430-439. https://doi.org/10.32598/JQUMS.23.5.430 [in Persian].
  31. Kim, Y., Byon, Y. J., & Yeo, H. (2018). Enhancing Healthcare Accessibility Measurements Using GIS: A Case Study in Seoul, Korea. PloS One, 13(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193013
  32. Kinsella, K. G., & Phillips, D. R. (2005). Global aging: The challenge of success (Vol. 60, No. 1, p. 3). Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.‌
  33. Klicnik, I., & Dogra, S. (2019). Perspectives on active transportation in a mid-sized age-friendly city:“You stay home”. International journal of environmental research and public health16(24), 4916.‌ https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16244916
  34. Kumar, R. (2016). walk ability of neighborhoods, Lambert Academic publishing.
  35. Martin, L. G. & Preston, S. H., (Eds.). (1994). Demography of aging. National Academies Press.‌
  36. Mirzaei, M., & Shams Ghahfarokhi, M. (2007). Demographics of the elderly population in Iran based on the 1956-2006 censuses. Iranian Journal of Ageing, 2(5), 326-331. [in Persian].
  37. Nations, U. (2017). Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2017). World population prospects: the 2017 revision, key findings and advance tables. In Working Paper No ESA/P/WP/248 (p. 46).‌
  38. Nikpour, A., & Hasanalizadeh, M. (2021). Spatial analysis of aging indices in urban and rural areas of Iran. Human Geographical Research (Geographical Researches), 52(3), 921-937. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2019.256357.1007696 [in Persian].
  39. Parvai, Sh., & Azadaramaki, T. (2021). Sociology of aging: Aging and everyday life. Agah Publications, 1st Edition, Tehran. [in Persian].
  40. Pham, V. T., Chen, Y. M., Van Duong, T., Nguyen, T. P. T., & Chie, W. C. (2020). Adaptation and validation of active aging index among older Vietnamese adults. Journal of Aging and Health32(7-8), 604-615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264319841524
  41. Rennie Short, J. (2022). The unequal city: Capitalism, society, and urban life (H. R. Talkhabi & F. Gazrani, Trans., 2nd ed.). Agah Publications, Tehran. [in Persian].
  42. Research and Civil Engineering Consultants. (2014). Comprehensive plan for Varamin. Tehran: Ministry of Road and Urban Development. [in Persian].
  43. Seyami, Gh., & Khaligh, A. (2017). The effect of mixed land uses on generating sustainable trips in urban neighborhoods: A case study of Miad, Tarbiat, and Hashemi neighborhoods in Mashhad. New Attitudes in Human Geography (Human Geography), 9(3), 65-78. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.66972251.1396.9.3.16.1 [in Persian].
  44. Sharghi, A., Ghanbaran, A., & Salehi Kousalari, F. (2020). A review of aging theories and its reflection in the landscape architectural features of nursing homes. Human & Environment18(4), 55-70.‌ https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.15625532.1399.18.4.5.6 [in Persian].
  45. Shirazi Iraei, Sh. (2020). A study of age-friendly city: A case study of Amol city (Master's thesis in Urban Geography and Planning, under the supervision of Sadigheh Lotfi). Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Iran. [in Persian].
  46. Statistical Center of Iran. (2016). General results of the national population and housing census. [in Persian].
  47. Talkhabi, H. R., & Goli, R. (2017). A metropolis for the elderly. Nedaye Goya Monthly, 1(9), 9. [in Persian].
  48. Tijs, F. (2019). Age-related changes in Achilles tendon and impact on activities. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 27(2), 155-182. https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2017-0359
  49. United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Population Division. (2017). World population ageing: 2017 highlights. UN.‌
  50. Vahdaninia, M. S., Goshtasbi, A., Montazeri, A., & Moftoun, F. (2005). Health-related quality of life in elderly population: A population-based study. Payesh, 4(2), 113-120. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.16807626.1384.4.2.5.0 [in Persian].
  51. World Health Organization. (2007). Global age-friendly cities: A guide. World Health Organization.‌
  52. World Health Organization. (2012). World report on ageing and health. World Health Organization.‌
  53. World Health Organization. (2017). Prevention and control of outbreaks of seasonal influenza in long-term care facilities: a review of the evidence and best-practice guidance: January 2017. Prevention and control of outbreaks of seasonal influenza in long-term care facilities: a review of the evidence and best-practice guidance: January 2017.‌
  54. World Health Organization. (2019). The global network for age-friendly cities and communities: Looking back over the last decade, looking forward to the next (No. WHO/FWC/ALC/18.4). World Health Organization.‌
  55. World Health Organization. (2023). Global age-friendly cities: A guide. World Health Organization Press.
  56. Xie, L. (2018). Age-friendly communities and life satisfaction among the elderly in urban China. Research on aging40(9), 883-905. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027518757760
  57. Xu, X., Zhao, Y., Zhang, X., & Xia, S. (2018). Identifying the impacts of social, economic, and environmental factors on population aging in the Yangtze River Delta using the geographical detector technique. Sustainability10(5), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051528
  58. Yavari, K., Basakha, M., Sadeghi, H., & Naseri, A. (2015). Economic aspects of ageing. Iranian Journal of Ageing10(1), 92-105.‌ [in Persian].
  59. Zabetian, E., & Taghvaei, A. A. (2009). Appropriate indicators for age-friendly urban spaces using a participatory approach. Housing and Rural Environment, 28(128), 60-71. [in Persian].
  60. Zachary, A. (2019). Loneliness as a Predictor of work Disability in 14 countries. Journal of – geing and health, 9(1), 8–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0898264319836549
  61. Zare, B., & Zare, M. (2012). The elderly population and the necessity of policymaking and planning. Social Sciences Book Monthly, 16(58), 41-49. [in Persian].
  62. Zarghani, H., Khavarazmi, A. A., & Johari, L. (2015). Evaluating age-friendly city indicators in Mashhad with an emphasis on socio-cultural indicators. Human Geography Research Quarterly, 47(4), 67-688. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2015.51385 [in Persian].