Measurement and evaluation of urban sprawl (Case study: Sari city)

Document Type : Research article

Authors

1 Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Mazandaran University, Babolsar, Iran

2 Department of geography and urban planning, Humanities and Social Sciences, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

Abstract

The accelerated and uneven physical spatial development of Iranian cities in the last few decades has brought adverse social, economic and physical effects and consequences. The exorbitant costs of city transportation and services, energy waste, waste of material and social capital in the city are considered to be the most important problems of cities in the discussion of unfavorable development of physical space and low density of cities. The purpose of the current research is to investigate the phenomenon of scattered urban sediments and to measure the amount of dispersed sediments in Sari city. In terms of the type of method, it has a quantitative methodology of the factor analysis type. Exploratory factor analysis was done to identify the correlation and hidden structure between each of the research variables. The research showed that 16 effective indicators in urban sprawl in Sari city can be categorized into 6 factors: density, accessibility, net density, irregularity of built areas, activity space and construction parts. Also, the total scattered index in the areas of Sari city showed that 176.60 hectares of the area and 18124 people of the population from the city of Sari are in the scattered area, and also 598.31 hectares of the area and 74540 people from the city of Sari are in the scattered area. There are too many. The two factors of density and accessibility have a high effect on scattered land and also in the areas that have witnessed the highest amount of land scattered from the social and economic point of view, they have drawn a vision of poverty, illegal land use change, lack or shortage of infrastructure services and public services and caused the formation of and the expansion of inefficient urban tissues.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
The accelerated and uneven physical spatial development of Iranian cities in the last few decades has brought adverse social, economic, and physical effects and consequences. The exorbitant costs of city transportation and services, energy waste, and waste of material and social capital in the city are considered to be the most critical problems of cities in the discussion of unfavorable development of physical space and low density of cities. The city of Sari is one of the cities of Iran whose rapid and accelerated growth and development in recent decades due to population growth, rapid migrations, urban land policies, parts of urban land remaining unused, low density, expansion of peripheral suburbs and centralized urban system have led to the breakdown of the spatial organization and the traditional neighborhood system. In addition, until a few decades ago, it was formed in a limited, organic, and coherent space, but today it has expanded a lot and is caught in a porous, unbalanced, and scattered structure. Based on this, the current research seeks to measure the amount of scattered precipitation at the level of the districts and identify the most important factors that cause it in the whole city so that it can provide a favorable ground for creating a spatial balance and expanding the city in a guided way. The current research aims to measure the amount of scattered water in Sari. This research is descriptive-analytical and practical in terms of purpose and applying the results.
 
Methodology
This research is descriptive-analytical in terms of its purpose and practical in terms of applying the results. Also, in terms of methodology, it is quantitative and a factor analysis type. In order to analyze the data, the factor analysis method was exerted. For this purpose, 16 effective indicators in urban sprawl were determined using background, research, and library studies. In the following, each of these 16 indicators was calculated using the data of the statistical blocks of Sari city as well as the data of the master plan of Sari in 2017 in the GIS software environment. Then, using the extracted data, exploratory factor analysis was performed to identify the correlation and hidden structure between the research variables. Moreover, each of these 16 indicators should be presented in a more limited number of indicators and in the form of a general category. These categories were examined according to each urban area. Finally, by combining these indicators, the amount of scattered sediment was calculated according to the areas.
 
Results and discussion
Based on the results of the current research by conducting factor analysis, 16 research indicators were placed in the majority of 6 general factors of density, access, gross population density, activity space, construction parts, and irregularity, which explain a total of 89% of the variance of the urban sprawl phenomenon. In other words, each of these factors explains 26, 21, 15, 11, 9, and 7.5 percent of the urban sprawl phenomenon's variance. Among the factors, density and access have a high effect on urban sprawl, which should be considered more in the formation and rooting of this phenomenon. In District 2, the highest amount of dispersal zone can be seen, which covers an area of 535.545 hectares with a population of 28,624 people. Then District 4, which includes the city's central core, with an area of 184.79 hectares and a population of 14,740 people, and also in District 3, an area of 166.227 hectares and a population of 15,257 people, are located in a very dispersal zone. In general, 176.60 hectares of the area and 18124 people of the city of Sari are in the very low dispersal zone, and 31.598 hectares of the area and 74540 people of the city of Sari are in the very high According to the final map, out of a total of 20 districts, 15 districts have high and very high dispersal.
 
Conclusion
According to the results, the urban sprawl of Sari city can be presented based on three different spatial patterns, which include:

The pattern of continuous low-density development can be seen in areas 3 and 4 of District 2 on the eastern edge of the Tajan river and in the areas of Imamzadeh Abbas and Zoghalchal. These areas were rural areas that had recently been added to the city limits.
The marginal development pattern is seen in District 1 of District 4 in the area of Dokhaniat and adjacent to the famous area of Rahband with a unique and inefficient texture.
The pattern of internal development that can be seen in District 4 and the city's central district.

The fields of formation and creation of each of these patterns have been different, so each of them has different characteristics, and different approaches should be taken to organize them.

Keywords


  1. Abdoli, Ebrahim, Kalantari Khalilabad, H., & Peyvastegar, Y. (2019). An analysis of the effective factors in the dispersion of urban areas (case example: Yasouj city). Scientific-Research Quarterly of Urban Research and Planning, 10(36), 101-116‌. [In Persian].
  2. Amini, S., Rahmani, B., & Majidi Khamene, B. (2016). Economic consequences of changes in land use in peri-urban villages - Case: Dehistan Ji villages in Isfahan city. Space Economy and Rural Development Quarterly, 6(2), 17-40. [In Persian].
  3. Arvin, M., Pourahmad, A., & Zanganeh Shahraki, S. (2016). Evaluation of barren lands for the purpose of integrated development using integrated decision-making techniques. Geographical Survey of Space, 7(26), 42-61. [In Persian].
  4. Bagheri, B., & Tousi, S. N. (2018). An explanation of urban sprawl phenomenon in Shiraz Metropolitan Area (SMA). Cities, 73, 71-90. [In Persian].
  5. Banai, R., & Depriest, T. (2014). Urban sprawl definitions, data, methods of measurement, and environmental conseqences. journal of sustainability education, 7,854-882.
  6. Bhatta, B. (2010). Analysis of Urban Growth and Sprawl from Remote Sensing Data, Advances in Geographic Information Science.
  7. Cobbinaha, P., & Aboagye, H. (2017). A Ghanaian twist to urban sprawl. Land Use Policy, 5(3), 124-143.
  8. Cutsinger, J., Galster, G., Wolman, H., Hanson, R., & Towns, D. (2005). Verifying the multi-dimensional nature of metropolitan land use: Advancing the understanding and measurement of sprawl. Urban Affairs, 27(3), 235-259.
  9. Duany, A., Plater-Zyberk, E., & Speck, J. (2001). Suburban Nation: The Rise of Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream. North Point Press, New York.
  10. Ewing, R. H., Pendall, R., & Chen, D. D. (2002). Measuring sprawl and its impact. Washington. DC: Smart Growth America, 1, 55-76.
  11. Ewing, R., Brownson, R. C., & Berrigan, D. (2006). Relationship between urban sprawl and weight of United States youth. American journal of preventive medicine, 31(6), 464-474.
  12. Ewing, R., Tian, G., & Lyons, T. (2018). Does compact development increase or reduce traffic congestion?. Cities, 72 (A), 94-101.
  13. Frenkel, A., & Ashkenazi, M. (2008). The integrated sprawl index: measuring the urban landscape in Israel. The Annals of Regional Science, 42(1), 99-121.
  14. Galster, G., Hanson, R., Ratcliffe, M. R., Wolman, H. Coleman, S., & Freihage, J. (2001). Wrestling sprawl to the ground: defining and measuring an elusive concept. Housing policy debate, 12(4), 681-717.
  15. Gielen, E., Riutort-Mayol, G., Palencia-Jiménez, J. S., & Cantarino, I. (2018). An urban sprawl index based on multivariate and Bayesian factor analysis with application at the municipality level in Valencia. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 45(5), 888-914.
  16. Gutfreund, Owen D. (2004). Twentieth Century Sprawl: Highways and the Reshaping of the American Landscape. Oxford University Press.
  17. Hamidi, S., & Ewing, R. (2014). A longitudinal study of changes in urban sprawl between 2000 and 2010 in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 128, 72-82.
  18. Hamidi, S., Ewing, R. (2014). A longitudinal study of changes in urban sprawl between 2000 and 2010 in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 128, 72–82.
  19. Hess, G. R. (2001). just what is sprawl, anyway?, ncsu.edu/grhess.
  20. Hosseini, S. H. & Hajilou, M. (2019). Drivers of urban sprawl in urban areas of Iran.  Regional Science, 98(2), 1137-1158.
  21. Hutchison, R. (2016). Encyclopedia of Urban Studies.University of Wisconsin. Green Bay, a sage reference publication.
  22. Kamanroudi Kejouri, M., & Gholinia, S. (2018) scattered over the city of Babylon and changing the leadership role of the surrounding villages. spatial economy and rural development, 4(30), 118-99. [In Persian].
  23. Liu, Z., Liu, S., Qi, W., & Jin, H. (2018). Urban sprawl among Chinese cities of different population sizes. Habitat International, 79, 89-98.
  24. Moadi, M. (2016). Measuring urban sprawl and analyzing factors affecting it (case example: Birjand city). Shiraz University Master's thesis, supervisor: Dr. Hassan Izadi. [In Persian].
  25. Moradi, A., Teymuri, H., Dezhkam, S. (2013). Monitoring the physical changes of the land surface of Karaj using synoptic analysis and satellite images. Space Planning and Planning Quarterly, 19(4), 146-127. [In Persian].
  26. Movahed, A., Mostafavi Sahib, S., Ahmadi, M. (2013). Explaining the spatial-physical expansion pattern of Saqqez city with the approach of sustainable urban form. Urban Planning Studies Quarterly, 2(5), 55-77. [In Persian].
  27. Nazarnia, N., Schwick, C., & Jaeger, J. A. (2016). Accelerated urban sprawl in Montreal, Quebec City, and Zurich: Investigating the differences using time series 1951–2011. Ecological indicators, 60, 1229-1251.
  28. Nedai Tusi, S., Bagheri, B. (2016). Explaining the urban sprawl in metropolitan areas; The research case of Shiraz Metropolitan Region. Geography and Development, 47, 185-212. [In Persian].
  29. Qian, Y., Chen, Y., Lin C., & Wang, Z. (2019). Physicis and Chemistry of the Earth Contents Lists Available at Science Direct, 1-7.
  30. Rostami Gole, F., Shad, R., & Ghaemi, M. (2014), forecasting the horizontal development of cities using Fuzzy Cellular Automata (FCA) to achieve sustainable urban development in the GIS geographic information system) (case study of Mashhad city). National civil engineering and architecture conference with an approach on sustainable urban development. [In Persian].
  31. Shirvani Moghadam, S., & Saidi Mofard, S. (2019). Measuring the phenomenon of urban sprawl using the F'ANP model, a case study: Mashhad metropolis. Journal of Geography and Environmental Studies, 8(30), 49-58. [In Persian].
  32. Soleimani, M., Movahed, A., Zanganeh, A., Sahraian, Z. (2016). Recognizing and evaluating the degree of urban sprawl based on the factor analysis model (case study: neighborhoods of Shiraz city). Journal of Urban Research and Planning, 8(30), 23-38. [In Persian].
  33. Tagvai, Masoud, Saraei, Hossein. (2004). Horizontal expansion of cities and land capacity. Geographical Research, 73, 42-58. [In Persian].
  34. Taminani, R., & Soltani, A. (2012). The effect of scattered development of urban areas on the daily travel patterns of city residents (case study: District of Shiraz metropolis). Regional Planning Quarterly, 3(10), 61-70. [In Persian].
  35. Tian, L., Li, Y., & Yan, Y. (2017). Measuring urban sprawl and exploring the role planning plays: A shanghai case study. Land Use Policy, 67, 426–435.
  36. Un-Habitat (2008). Meeting the Urban Challenges. Sellive, 15-16.
  37. Weilenmanm, B., Seidi, I., & Schulz, T. (2017). The socio- economic determinants of urban sprawl between 1980 and 2010 in Switzerland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, 468-482.
  38. Williamson, T. (2010). Sprawl, Justice, and Citizenship: The Civic Costs of the American Way of Life. Published: Oxford University Press.
  39. Yue, W., Zhang, L., & Liu, Y. (2016). Measuring sprawl in large Chinese cities along the Yangtze River via combined single and multidimensional metrics. Habitat International, 57, 43-52.
  40. Zebardast, E., & Habibi, S. (2009). Investigating the urban sprawl phenomenon and its causes in Zanjan city. Journal of Fine Arts. Architecture and Urbanism, 1(38), 115-123. [In Persian].
  41. Zebardast, E., Ghanoni, H. (2017). Analysis of urban sprawl using factor analysis technique (case study: Qazvin city districts). Scientific-Research Quarterly of Economics and Urban Management, 7(26), 59-78. [In Persian].
  42. Zebardast, E., Shad Zaviyeh, H. (2013), Identifying factors affecting urban sprawl and its relationship with the spatial structure of the city (the case study of Uromiye city). Art University Quarterly, 7, 90-112. [In Persian].
  43. Zhang, B. (2004). Study on Urban Growth Management in China, Xinhua Press,
  44. Zhang, C., Miao, C., Zhang, W., & Chen, X. (2018). Spatiotemporal patterns of urban sprawl and its relationship with economic development in China during 1990–2010. Habitat International, 79, 51-60.