Finding effective stress reduction factors in small local parks in districts 1 and 4 of Tehran metropolis

Document Type : Research article

Authors

1 Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture & Urban Design, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, University Name, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and architecture, University of Tarbiat Modares, Tehran, Iran

10.22059/jurbangeo.2023.359378.1823

Abstract

ABSTRACT
In today's fast-paced urban lifestyle, individuals are increasingly exposed to heightened stress. Stress can give rise to a multitude of physical and mental health issues. The presence of green spaces within urban environments significantly impacts residents' overall quality of life. Beyond environmental advantages, green spaces offer citizens substantial health benefits, particularly in reducing stress and alleviating mental strain. This research pursues a practical objective and adopts an exploratory and descriptive-analytical approach. The primary aim of this study is to investigate various factors contributing to stress reduction in small-scale district parks. The research instrument employed is a 45-item questionnaire structured in accordance with the content objective table derived from theoretical and documentary research. Factor analysis was utilized to validate the data, and the Cronbach's alpha coefficient was computed. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test results indicated the sample size's adequacy, while Bartlett's Test of Sphericity affirmed that the data could be subjected to factor analysis. Employing the principal component analysis extraction method, an exploratory factor analysis revealed eight distinct factors as sociability, participation, readability, responsiveness, sense of belonging, attractiveness, variety, and security. Notably, the sociability factor explained more than 12% of the factors influencing park stress reduction. Landscape designers should consider these factors, and urban open space decision-makers should evaluate them in their plans, ultimately equipping cities with landscapes that play a more substantial role in mitigating the stress experienced by their inhabitants. Future studies should explore the intricate connections between these factors, paving the way for the creation of urban landscapes with greater role in improving the quality of life
Extended Abstract
Introduction
The global population has been experiencing rapid growth, especially in developing countries, leading to an increased disconnect from natural environments. The fast-paced urban lifestyle has contributed to elevated stress levels, which can result in various physical and mental health ailments. Air pollution, noise, and a lack of restorative environments are more profound in cities than rural areas. This condition leads to stress symptoms in a significant portion of urban populations. Because urbanization is predicted to double over the next 30 years, stress will most probably increase in city dwellers.
Urban greenery is crucial in enhancing the overall quality of life, contributing to improved city climates, and offering spaces for social activities and leisure. In addition to their environmental benefits, green spaces provide substantial health advantages, such as stress reduction, and offer opportunities for daily interaction with nature. Studies have demonstrated that when people are psychologically stressed or fatigued, they recover faster in natural areas than in urban environments. Although consensus exists about the positive health benefits of urban green spaces, more knowledge is needed about the mechanisms behind why and how green spaces reduce stress. The present study focuses on small urban public parks, specifically on how they should be designed to promote a potential for psychological restoration. This study aims to identify the key factors responsible for reducing stress in small-scale urban parks, which have been established by transforming underused and abandoned site parks to meet the growing demand for green and recreational spaces in response to urbanization.
 
Methodology
This research has a practical objective and employs an exploratory and descriptive-analytical approach. The primary research tool is a 45-item questionnaire based on a content objective table derived from theoretical and document studies. The study's sample comprises students from Shahid Beheshti University and Shahid Rajaee Tarbiat University who frequent small local parks around their campuses, including Negin Park, Golrizan Park, Golestan 1 Park, and Shabanlu Park in Tehran's Districts 1 and 4. The study's sample size encompasses 210 participants, and data collection was facilitated through the distribution of online surveys via social networks. Data validation was performed through factor analysis, and Cronbach's alpha coefficient was computed.
 
Results and discussion
The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test affirmed the adequacy of the sample size (KMO=0.814), and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity indicated that the data was suitable for factor analysis. After rotation, the data analysis revealed 13 significant factors contributing to stress reduction in small urban parks, accounting for approximately 70.10% of the overall variance. Following Varimax rotation, eight primary factors were identified. Sociability, with an eigenvalue of 5.569 and a variance percentage of 12.376, emerged as the most influential component in stress reduction. Sociability denotes versatile spaces that support multiple daily activities and social interactions. The second factor, participation, characterized by a specific value of 2.861 and a variance percentage of 6.357, reflects people's engagement in park spaces and their environmental impact. The third factor, readability, displayed a variance percentage of 5.773 and a specific value of 2.647, encompassing physical environmental qualities and human perception. The fourth factor, environmental responsiveness, with a variance percentage of 5.709 and an eigenvalue of 2.569, provides settings to meet physiological and psychological needs. The fifth factor, sense of belonging, with a variance percentage of 4.838 and a specific value of 2.177, highlights the relationship between humans and their environment, influenced by physical attributes and social activities. Attractiveness, diversity, and security had variance percentages of 4.827, 4.255, and 4.219, with specific values of 2.172, 1.915, and 1.899, respectively. These factors encompass spatial appeal, variation, and safety, all contributing to an enhanced quality of life in urban areas. The spatial structure and elements, such as adequate nighttime lighting, readability, and sociability, can foster a sense of security and stress reduction.
 
Conclusion
Urban parks have many functions and benefits. These functions and benefits are essential for improving life quality in urban areas. With the ongoing growth of urbanization and the resulting rise in stress levels, it is crucial to address the factors that alleviate stress in urban parks, especially small-scale ones. This study has identified the principal elements contributing to stress reduction in small parks, providing valuable insights for landscape architects and designers to enhance the effectiveness of green open spaces in mitigating stress. The research findings, including factors like readability and attractiveness, are consistent with those of other researchers like Kaplan. Future studies should explore the intricate connections between these factors in greater depth, paving the way for creating urban landscapes with a more pronounced role in stress reduction and improved quality of life.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
 We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

Keywords

References

  1. Aldwin, C. M. (2007). Stress, coping, and development: An integrative perspective. 2nd ed (pp. xvi, 432). Guilford Press.
  2. Aletta, F., Oberman, T., & Kang, J. (2018). Associations between Positive Health-Related Effects and Soundscapes Perceptual Constructs: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15 (11), 1-12.
  3. Alizade Asl, J., Saidpour, Sh.& Ashery, A. (2016). Evaluation of affecting factors on urban parks and its optimal site selection (case study: city of saqqez). Journal of spatial planning, 6(1 (20)), 59-77 [In Persian].
  4. Alvarsson, J. J., Wiens, S., & Nilsson, M. E. (2010). Stress Recovery during Exposure to Nature Sound and Environmental Noise. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7 (3), 1036–46.
  5. Armato, F. (2017). Pocket Park: Product Urban design. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S1869–S1878. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352705
  6. Arnberger, A., & Eder, R. (2015). Are urban visitors’ general preferences for green-spaces similar to their preferences when seeking stress relief?. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(4), 872–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.005
  7. Balai Kerishnan, P., & Maruthaveeran, S. (2021). Factors contributing to the usage of pocket parks―A review of the evidence. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 58, 126985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.126985
  8. Berman, M. G., Jonides, J., & Kaplan, S. (2008). The Cognitive Benefits of Interacting With Nature. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1207–1212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x
  9. Bowler, D.E., Buyung-Ali, L.M., & Knight, T.M. (2010). A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health 10, 456. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-456
  10. Chiesura, A. (2004). The Role of Urban Parks for the Sustainable City. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68(1), 129-38.
  11. Chong, S. A., Abdin, E., Vaingankar, J. A., Heng, D., Sherbourne, C., Yap M., Lim, Y. W., Wong, H.B., Ghosh-Dastidhar, B., & Kwok, K. W. (2017). A population-based survey of mental disorders in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singap, 41(2), 49.
  12. Cohen, D. A., Marsh, T., Williamson, S., Han, B., Derose, K. P., Golinelli, D., & McKenzie, T. L. (2014). The Potential for Pocket Parks to Increase Physical Activity. American Journal of Health Promotion : AJHP, 28(30), S19–S26. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.130430-QUAN-213
  13. Conniff, A., & Craig, T. (2016). A methodological approach to understanding the wellbeing and restorative benefits associated with greenspace. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 19, 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.06.019
  14. Coutts, A. M., Tapper, N. J., Beringer, J., Loughnan, M., & Demuzere, M. (2013). Watering our cities: The capacity for Water Sensitive Urban Design to support urban cooling and improve human thermal comfort in the Australian context. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 37(1), 2–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133312461032
  15. Daneshgarmoghaddam, G., & Eslampour, M. (2013). Study of the Affordance Theory Based on Gibson’s Point of View and Its Effects on Studies of Human-Built Environment. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 5(9), 73-86. [In Persian].
  16. Danford, R. S., Strohbach, M. W., Warren, P. S., & Ryan, R. L. (2018). Active Greening or Rewilding the city: How does the intention behind small pockets of urban green affect use?. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 29, 377–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.11.014
  17. Dijkstra, K., Pieterse, M. E., & Pruyn, A. (2008). Stress-reducing effects of indoor plants in the built healthcare environment: The mediating role of perceived attractiveness. Preventive Medicine, 47(3), 279–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.01.013
  18. Gholipour, S., Mahdinezhad, J., & Saleh Sedghpour, B. (2022). Construction, Normalisation and Validation of Urban Park Environmental Security Scale based on users’ preference (Case study: Mellat Park, Tehran, Iran). Motaleate Shahri, 11(41), 59-72. doi: 10.34785/J011.2021.513[In Persian].
  19. Grahn, P., & Stigsdotter, U. A. (2003). Landscape planning and stress. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1078/1618-8667-00019
  20. Grahn, P., & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2010). The relation between perceived sensory dimensions of urban green space and stress restoration. Landscape and Urban Planning, 94(3), 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.10.012
  21. Hansen, K. B., & Nielsen, T. A. S. (2006). Nearby nature and green areas encourage outdoor activities and decrease mental stress. CAB Abstracts Archive.
  22. Hartig, T., & Staats, H. (2006). The need for psychological restoration as a determinant of environmental preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(3), 215-226
  23. Hartig, T., Evans, G. W., Jamner, L. D., Davis, D. S., & Gärling, T. (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00109-3
  24. Hassan, A., Qibing, C., Tao, J., Bing-Yang, L., Nian, L., Li, S., Tng, L. Y., Li, J. Z., Ziyue, S. G., & Tahir, M. S. (2018). Effects of Plant Activity on Mental Stress in Young Adults. Hort Science, 53(1), 104–109. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI12447-17
  25. Hosseini, S.B,. Bagheri, M., Hassanpour, K., Heidarzadeh, M. (2012). Environmental psychology: an introduction. Tehran: Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University [In Persian].
  26. Jafari, P. & Talebzadeh, F. (2010). Presenting a model for vitality and happiness in elementary schools in Tehran. Educational Leadership and Management, 4(4), 9-32 [In Persian].
  27. Jalili, M., Einifar, A. & Talischi, Gh. (2014). Open space of residential complexes and environmental responsiveness: a comparative study of three residential complexes in hamadan. Memari-va-shahrsazi (honar-ha-ye-ziba), 18(4), 57-68 [In Persian]
  28. Javan forouzande, A., & motalebi, G. (2011). The concept of place attachment and its elements. Hoviateshahr, 4(8), 27-37 [In Persian].
  29. Javan forouzande, Ali, & Motalebi, G. (2011). The concept of place attachment and its elements. Hoviateshahr, 4(8), 27-37 [In Persian].
  30. Jiang, B., Chang, C.-Y., & Sullivan, W. C. (2014). A dose of nature: Tree cover, stress reduction, and gender differences. Landscape and Urban Planning, 132, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.005
  31. Jiang, S., Deng, L., Luo, H., Li, X., Guo, B., Jiang, M., Jia, Y., Ma, J., Sun, L., & Huang, Z. (2021). Effect of Fragrant Primula Flowers on Physiology and Psychology in Female College Students: An Empirical Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.607876
  32. Kaplan, R. (1993). The role of nature in the context of the workplace. Landscape and Urban Planning, 26(1), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(93)90016-7
  33. Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: towards an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169-182.
  34. Kondo, M. C., Fluehr, J. M., McKeon, T., & Branas, C. C. (2018). Urban Green Space and Its Impact on Human Health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(3), Article 3.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15030445
  35. Korpela, K., Borodulin, K., Neuvonen, M., Paronen, O., & Tyrväinen, L. (2014). Analyzing the mediators between nature-based outdoor recreation and emotional well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 37, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.11.003
  36. Labuz, R. (2019). Pocket Park – A New Type of Green Public Space in Kraków (Poland). IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 471(11), 112018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/11/112018
  37. Lee, K. E., Williams, K. J. H., Sargent, L. D., Williams, N. S. G., & Johnson, K. A. (2015). 40-second green roof views sustain attention: The role of micro-breaks in attention restoration. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.04.003
  38. Lee, M., Lee, J., Park, B.-J., & Miyazaki, Y. (2015). Interaction with indoor plants may reduce psychological and physiological stress by suppressing autonomic nervous system activity in young adults: A randomized crossover study. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 34(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40101-015-0060-8
  39. Lin, W., Chen, Q., Jiang, M., Zhang, X., Liu, Z., Tao, J., Wu, L., Xu, S., Kang, Y., & Zeng, Q. (2019). The effect of green space behaviour and per capita area in small urban green spaces on psychophysiological responses. Landscape and Urban Planning, 192, 103637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103637
  40. Mahdinezhad, J., Saleh Sedghpour, B., & Najjari, R. (2019). Construction and Validation and Standardization of the Questionnaire for Socialization in the traditional Iranian Bazaar with approaching to learn of traditional architecture. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), 13(3), 536-549. doi: 10.22061/jte.2019.3761.1936  [In Persian].
  41. Mesimäki, M., Hauru, K., & Lehvävirta, S. (2019). Do small green roofs have the possibility to offer recreational and experiential benefits in a dense urban area? A case study in Helsinki, Finland. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 40, 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.10.005
  42. Moghani Rahimi, K., Behzadfar, M., & Jalilisadrabad, S. (2023). Explaining the Conceptual Model of Stress Relief Urban Planning. Urban Economics and Planning, 4(1), 52-75. doi: 10.22034/uep.2023.383058.1321 [In Persian].
  43. Naghibi, M., Ekhlassi, A. & Faizi, M. (2022). Provision of Intervention Strategies to Convert Leftover Spaces to Pocket Parks, with an Emphasis on User Preferences. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 14(37), 269-282. doi: 10.22034/aaud.2020.240898.2269 [In Persian].
  44. Najafi, M., & Shariff, M. K. B. M. (2011). The Concept of Place and Sense of Place In Architectural Studies. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(8), 1054–1060.
  45. Nazmfar, H., Alavi S., & Eshghi, A. (2018). The assessment of security in urban public spaces (Case Study: Tehran city parks). MJSP, 22 (2),133-165. [In Persian].
  46. Neuvonen, M., Sievänen, T., Tönnes, S., & Koskela, T. (2007). Access to green areas and the frequency of visits – A case study in Helsinki. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6(4), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2007.05.003
  47. Nielsen, T. S., & Hansen, K. B. (2007). Do green areas affect health? Results from a Danish survey on the use of green areas and health indicators. Health & Place, 13(4), 839–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.02.001
  48. Nordh, H., Alalouch, C., & Hartig, T. (2011). Assessing Restorative Components of Small Urban Parks Using Conjoint Methodology. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 10(2), 95–103.
  49. Nordh, H., Hartig, T., Hagerhall, C. M., & Fry, G. (2009). Components of small urban parks that predict the possibility for restoration. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 8(4), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.06.003
  50. Okhovat, H. &Taqhvaii, A. A. (1387). Evaluating the cultural and psychological effects of urban parks on citizens (case study: Tehran). Shahr Nagar, 9(50), 53-46 [In Persian].
  51. Ottosson, J., & Grahn, P. (2005). A Comparison of Leisure Time Spent in a Garden with Leisure Time Spent Indoors: On Measures of Restoration in Residents in Geriatric Care. Landscape Research, 30(1), 23–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142639042000324758
  52. Peschardt, K. K., & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2013). Associations between park characteristics and perceived restorativeness of small public urban green spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning, 112, 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.12.013
  53. Peschardt, K. K., Schipperijn, J., & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2012). Use of Small Public Urban Green Spaces (SPUGS). Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11(3), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.04.002
  54. Pretty, J., Peacock, J., Sellens, M., & Griffin, M. (2005). The mental and physical health outcomes of green exercise. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 15(5), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603120500155963
  55. Qiu, L., Chen, Q., & Gao, T. (2021). The Effects of Urban Natural Environments on Preference and Self-Reported Psychological Restoration of the Elderly. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020509
  56. Rogge, E., Nevens, F., & Gulinck, H. (2007). Perception of rural landscapes in Flanders: Looking beyond aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 82(4), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.006
  57. Saif, A.A. (2004). Modern Educational Psychology: Psychology of Learning and Education. Tehran: Agah [In Persian].
  58. Shakibaei, S. & Saeedi, S. (2021). The Impact of Urban microclimates on the Environmental Comfort in Public open spaces (Shohada sq. in Mashhad). Motaleate Shahri, 10(40), 59-72 doi: 10.34785/J011.2021.434  [In Persian].
  59. Shashua-Bar, L., & Hoffman, M. E. (2000). Vegetation as a climatic component in the design of an urban street: An empirical model for predicting the cooling effect of urban green areas with trees. Energy and Buildings, 31(3), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(99)00018-3
  60. Siddiqui, A., Maithani, S., Jha, A., Kumar, P.,&Srivastav, S. (2018). Urban growth dynamics of an indian metropolitan using CA Makov and Logistic Regression. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 21(3), 229-236.
  61. Tian, Y., & Jim, C. Y. (2012). Development potential of sky gardens in the compact city of Hong Kong. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11(3), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.03.003
  62. Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7
  63. Velarde, M. D., Fry, G., & Tveit, M. (2007). Health effects of viewing landscapes – Landscape types in environmental psychology. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6(4), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2007.07.001
  64. Villeneuve, P. J., Jerrett, M., G. Su, J., Burnett, R. T., Chen, H., Wheeler, A. J., & Goldberg, M. S. (2012). A cohort study relating urban green space with mortality in Ontario, Canada. Environmental Research, 115, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2012.03.003
  65. Wang, R., Zhao, J., Meitner, M. J., Hu, Y., & Xu, X. (2019). Characteristics of urban green spaces in relation to aesthetic preference and stress recovery. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 41, 6–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.03.005
  66. Wang, X., Rodiek, S., Wu, C., Chen, Y., & Li, Y. (2016). Stress recovery and restorative effects of viewing different urban park scenes in Shanghai, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 15, 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.12.003.
Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR)
Volume 11, Issue 3
October 2023
Pages 99-118

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics