Analysis of the Spatial Distribution of Recreational and Leisure Activities in Shiraz

Document Type : Research article

Authors

1 Department of Urban Planning and Design, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

2 Department of Urban Design, Faculty of Art, Eram Institute of Higher Education, Shiraz, Iran

10.22059/jurbangeo.2025.393355.2055

Abstract

ABSTRACT
The balanced development of recreational and leisure spaces within urban areas is among the primary concerns of urban planners, aimed at enhancing tourism potential, promoting social vitality, and improving citizens' quality of life. This study seeks to analyze the spatial distribution patterns of recreational and leisure facilities in the city of Shiraz. The data were collected through both documentary and field-based methods. To examine the spatial distribution of recreational activities, the study employed the Nearest Neighbour Index, Kernel Density Estimation, and Standard Deviation Ellipse techniques.. Following a review of the relevant literature, 36 types of recreational and leisure activity sites were identified and categorized across Shiraz. Based on a survey distributed among residents, seven main types of recreational venues—namely, restaurants, coffee shops, cinemas, shopping centers, swimming pools, parks, and sports clubs—were recognized as the most popular destinations for leisure activities in the city. The findings indicate that the spatial distribution of recreational and leisure activities in Shiraz initially followed a centralized pattern, with a major concentration of facilities located in the city center.. Over time, this centralized configuration evolved into a more decentralized pattern, with several smaller recreational clusters emerging in the western and northwestern sectors of Shiraz. Overall, the development of such facilities has been more prominent in the northwestern parts of the city, while the southern and southeastern zones exhibit a lower concentration of recreational and leisure venues.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
The issue of leisure time and the ways it is spent constitutes one of the central dimensions of contemporary urban life.. In Western societies, leisure studies represent one of the earliest branches of the social sciences, with a history spanning over a century.. In today’s world, individuals seek to optimize how they utilize their leisure time. The significance of leisure time primarily lies in its impact on quality of life, as both mental and physical health are influenced by how individuals spend their free time.. Recent approaches emphasize accessibility to activity spaces in relation to the spatial distribution of available facilities within the urban environment. Integrating the Activity Accessibility Index with the Needs-Based Index offers a more comprehensive perspective on the amenities an urban environment can provide to its residents. Due to its central role and significant socio-economic capacities, Shiraz—like other major Iranian metropolises—has long served as a key hub for regional population attraction. Moreover, its rich cultural and historical heritage, strategic geographical location, and favorable climate position it as a prominent destination for both domestic and international tourism. Accordingly, the primary objective of this study is to examine the needs and preferences of Shiraz residents in selecting recreational and leisure spaces across the city.
 
Methodology
This study adopts a descriptive–analytical research approach. For the sampling procedure, the Fishnet random sampling technique was employed using ArcGIS software. In line with the research objectives, following the collection of relevant data and the identification of selected recreational and leisure activity sites, appropriate spatial analysis techniques were applied. Consequently, the Nearest Neighbour Index (NNI), Kernel Density Estimation (KDE), and Standard Deviational Ellipse (SDE) methods were employed for spatial data analysis.
 
 
Results and discussion
A survey conducted among Shiraz residents indicated that restaurants, coffee shops, cinemas, shopping centers, swimming pools, parks, and sports clubs collectively constitute approximately 50% of the city's most popular leisure activities. Spatial analysis reveals that these activities are predominantly concentrated in a limited number of zones, particularly in the city center (Districts 1, 3, and 8) and District 6, with a notable cluster along Dr. Shariati Street (Maali Abad). Restaurants and coffee shops display similar spatial distribution patterns, with clusters situated slightly north of the city’s geometric center. In contrast, cinemas are more strongly concentrated toward the northern edge of the city, adjacent to its administrative boundary. Overall, the Standard Deviational Ellipse (SDE) for commercial–entertainment centers shows the smallest spatial dispersion, whereas the SDE for parks exhibits the largest spatial coverage. Despite variations in quantity, distribution patterns, density, and standard deviation, the spatial orientation of all seven categories of recreational and leisure facilities is consistent. They exhibit a shared northwest–southeast dispersion axis that corresponds with Shiraz’s overall urban morphology and the alignment of its arterial spatial organization. The centers of the Standard Deviational Ellipses for the seven recreational and leisure facility types are not spatially concentrated. Although all are situated within Shiraz’s District 1 and relatively close to the city’s geographic center, they do not lie along a single linear axis. This indicates a non-uniform spatial distribution across the study area. This uneven spatial distribution underscores the need for more equitable leisure infrastructure planning in underserved areas of Shiraz.
 
Conclusion
Understanding how the surrounding environment and the spatial distribution of recreational and leisure spaces influence individuals’ participation in such activities remains an underexplored topic. Inadequate provision of urban recreational and leisure infrastructure leads to public dissatisfaction and diminished quality of urban life. Need-driven urban development—coupled with monitoring technological advancements and engaging with contemporary theoretical frameworks—can address urban challenges through comprehensive and flexible planning that is attuned to the actual needs of both the city and its residents. The spatial configuration of leisure activities in Shiraz generally aligns with the city’s developmental trajectory, expanding predominantly toward the northwest, whereas the southern and southeastern districts remain underserved in terms of access to such facilities.
Shiraz comprises four distinct recreational and leisure zones, each exhibiting a high concentration of related facilities. The largest leisure and recreational hub is situated in central Shiraz, corresponding with the historical urban fabric. Over time, additional, smaller recreational zones have emerged in the western and northwestern parts of the city and continue to expand. These emerging zones have reshaped the formerly centralized spatial structure, indicating a shift toward decentralization. However, this transition remains uneven, as the southern, eastern, and southeastern districts continue to lack sufficient recreational infrastructure and access. To effectively guide the spatial evolution of Shiraz, the three policy instruments—regulation, infrastructure investment, and taxation—must be strategically aligned and internally coherent. In addition to developing recreational spaces that respond to citizens’ needs, attention must be given to ensuring adequate access via public transportation, connectivity to major thoroughfares, and the provision of nearby parking facilities. Linking these centers through transportation corridors—such as metro lines, BRT systems, and multifunctional boulevards—can promote citizen use and enhance the economic viability of such spaces.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

Keywords


  1. Altug Turan, İ., Sönmez Türel, H., Malkoç True, E., Aktaş, E,. & Özeren Alkan, M. (2024). Determination of the Most Preferred Daily Recreational Spaces in a Metropolitan City. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 15(8), 102862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2024.102862.
  2. Biabani, S., Pour Taheri, M., & Roknedin Eftekhari, A. (2022). Analysis of Spatial Distribution of Leisure Land Use in Rural Areas Case Study: Maragheh Township. Journal of Sustainable Urban & Regional Development Studies (JSURDS), 3(1), 23-43. [In persian]
  3. Chen, C., Feng, X., Yao, J., & Xiong, X. (2025). Perceived leisure service benefits of peri-urban community green Spaces: Impact of visual environment during day and night. Landscape and Urban Planning, 259, 105338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105338
  4. Fancourt, D., Aughterson, H., Finn, S., Walker, E., & Steptoe, A. (2021). How leisure activities affect health: a narrative review and multi-level theoretical framework of mechanisms of action. The lancet. Psychiatry, 8(4), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30384-9
  5. Gao, S., Li, C., Rong, Y., Yan, Q., Liu, W., & Ma, Z. (2022). The Places–People Exercise: Understanding Spatial Patterns and the Formation Mechanism for Urban Commercial Fitness Space in Changchun City, China. Sustainability, 14(3), 1358. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031358
  6. Ghadami, M., Mohammadi, K., Azimi, A. & Faraji, A. (2013). Analysis of physical and functional quality of recreational - leisure uses in tourism cities (case study: Babolsar). Geographical Research28(108), 36-54. [In persian]
  7. Ghanbari, Y. and HasanKhani, B. (2016). Examining the Condition and Vulnerability of Cultural- Recreational Centers and Places of Leisure (Case Study: Shahinshahr City). Journal of Urban Social Geography, 3(1), 117-134. doi: 10.22103/juas.2016.1853. [In persian]
  8. Ghasemi, K., Behzadfar, M., & Borhani, K. (2023). Spatial analysis of leisure land uses in Tehran: Assessing inequity using the MARCOS method within a GIS framework. Heliyon, 9(9), e19691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19691
  9. Gidlow, C., Cerin, E., Sugiyama, T., Adams, M. A., Mitas, J., Akram, M., Reis, R. S., Davey, R., Troelsen, J., Schofield, G., & Sallis, J. F. (2019). Objectively measured access to recreational destinations and leisure-time physical activity: Associations and demographic moderators in a six-country study. Health & Place, 59, 102196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102196
  10. Goldberg-Miller, S. B. D. (2019). Creative city strategies on the municipal agenda in New York. City, Culture and Society, 17, 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2018.08.004
  11. Gura, D. A., Gura, A. Y., Volkova, T. A., & Lipilin, D. A. (2020). Recreational space as a factor of sustainable development of coastal geosystems of the Krasnodar region. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 579(1), 012007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/579/1/012007
  12. Hasanalizadeh, M., Ahadnejad Reveshty, M. and Meshkini, A. (2024). Spatial Justice Analysis in the Distribution and Access to joy-generating Land Uses (Case Study: Babol City). Urban Economics and Planning, 5(1), 172-185. doi: 10.22034/uep.2024.462734.1503. [In persian]
  13. Hu, C., Jin, C., Zhang, Z., & Shao, H. (2025). Spatial association patterns of restaurant locations in Chinese and American megacities: A comparison of Shanghai and New York. Cities, 159, 105747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.105747
  14. Jafari, Sh,. Rajabi, S,. Najafi, Z & Pezhhan, Ali. (2007).  Iran culture and leisure classification, Iranian Journal of Official Statistics Studies, 18(2), 15-42. [In persian]
  15. Jalali Farahani, M. (2013). Leisure and Recreational Sport Management. Tehran: Tehran University Publishing Institute. [In persian]
  16. Jim, C. Y., & Chen, W. Y. (2009). Leisure Participation Pattern of Residents in a New Chinese City. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99(4), 657–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045600903066482
  17. Jing, Y., Liu, Y., Cai, E., Liu, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Quantifying the spatiality of urban leisure venues in Wuhan, Central China – GIS-based spatial pattern metrics. Sustainable Cities and Society, 40, 638–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.05.015
  18. Karaderi, B. (2021). Leisure Time Spending Tendencies of University Students: The Case of TRNC. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(3), 41. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i3.14524
  19. Kim, E. J., Park, S. M., & Kang, H. W. (2022). Changes in leisure activities of the elderly due to the COVID-19 in Korea. Frontiers in public health10, 966989. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.966989
  20. Koppen, G., Ode Sang, A., & Sundli Tveit, M. (2014). Managing the Potential for Outdoor Recreation: Adequate Mapping and Measuring of Accessibility to Urban Recreational Landscapes. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 13(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.11.005
  21. Liu, H., Remme, R. P., Hamel, P., Nong, H., & Ren, H. (2020). Supply and demand assessment of urban recreation service and its implication for greenspace planning-A case study on Guangzhou. Landscape and Urban Planning, 203, 103898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103898
  22. Liu, S., Long, Y., Zhang, L., & Liu, H. (2021). Quantifying and Characterizing Urban Leisure Activities by Merging Multiple Sensing Big Data: A Case Study of Nanjing, China. Land10(11), 1214. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10111214
  23. Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., Jin, S. T., & Liu, Y. (2020). Spatial pattern of leisure activities among residents in Beijing, China: Exploring the impacts of urban environment. Sustainable Cities and Society, 52, 101806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101806
  24. Ma, L., & Xiu, C. (2021). Spatial Structure of Urban Residents’ Leisure Activities: A Case Study of Shenyang, China. Chinese Geographical Science, 31(4), 671–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-021-1216-6
  25. Manshour, S. (2025). Utilizing the Potential of Public Spaces for the Development of Urban Leisure and Tourism Areas (Case Study: Zargandeh Neighborhood Central District). Current Opinion, 5(1), 1073–1095. https://doi.org/10.52845/currentopinion.v5i1.345
  26. Mohammadi, H., & Miri, Z. )2013(. Cultural Components Affecting Leisure Spaces in Shiraz. National Conference on Architecture, Culture and Urban Management, March 12th 2013, Karaj Municipality Scientific-Applied Educational Center, 1-16. [In persian]
  27. Mohammdi Dehcheshmeh, M., sajadian, N., Shjaean, A. & gheysari, N. (2017). An Analysis of the Production Probability of Travel by Leisure Spaces in the Metropolis of Ahvaz. Journal of urban tourism, 4(3), 33-48. doi: 10.22059/jut.2018.135245.141. [In persian]
  28. Mokras-Grabowska, J. (2018). “New Urban Recreational Spaces. Attractiveness, Infrastructure Arrangements, Identity. The Example of the City of Łódź.” Miscellanea Geographica, 22(4), 219–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2018-0017
  29. Nalej, M., & Lewandowicz, E. (2024). An Analysis of Recreational and Leisure Areas in Polish Counties with the Use of Geographically Weighted Regression. Sustainability16(1), 380. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010380
  30. Nguyen-Dinh, N., & Zhang, H. (2025). Do Positive Environmental Changes Impact Residents’ Intention of Rural Development? Role of Leisure and Quality of Life. Sustainability, 17(3), 1245. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031245
  31. Nicholls, S., & Kim, J. (2022). Spatial Is Special: The Need to Consider Spatial Effects in Leisure Research. Leisure Sciences, 44(4), 476–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2019.1600441
  32. PourAhmad, A., Rezaienia, H., Hosseini, A., Andisheh, S., & Amini, Milad. (2021). Analyzing the Level of Access to Leisure Spaces within the City Using Network Analysis Method: The Case Study of Neighborhoods in District 9 of Tehran. Journal of Environmental Science & Technology, 23(4(107)), 1-20. [In persian]
  33. Rahmanipour., R & Pazukinejad, Z. (1401). Evaluation of the leisure situation in the Iranian family. Monthly Journal of Expert Reports of the Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly, 30(10), 1-38. [In persian]
  34. Rodrigues, C., Veloso, M., Alves, A., & Bento, C. L. (2025). Socioeconomic and functional zoning characterization in a city: A clustering approach. Cities, 163, 106023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.106023
  35. Różański, T. (2020). The Leisure Time of Older People in Light of Activity Theory. Studia Paedagogica Ignatiana, 133-148.
  36. Schlich, R., Schönfelder, S., Hanson, S, & Axhausen, K. W. (2004). Structures of Leisure Travel: Temporal and Spatial Variability. Transport Reviews24(2), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144164032000138742
  37. Shamaei, A., Vaisi, R. and Ahmadi, S. (2014). A comparative analysis of land use for leisure purposes in the districts of Esfahan city inthe 1996-2006 period. The Journal of Geographical Research on Desert Areas, 1(2), 147-171. [In persian]
  38. Strömblad, E. (2025). Everyday leisure travel: Understanding car use for social and recreational trip purposes [Elektronisk resurs]. Department of Technology and Society, Lund University.
  39. Zhang, X., Rui, J., Xia, G., Yang, J., Cai, C., & Zhao, W. (2025). Revealing disparities and driving factors in leisure activity segregation of residents and tourists: A data-driven analysis of smart phone data. Applied Geography, 176, 103513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103513
  40. Zhou, Y., & He, S. (2025). Transmission risks of airborne respiratory infectious disease and their influencing factors in and around urban outdoor recreational spaces. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 114, 107919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107919
  41. Zhu, H., Liu, J., Chen, Ch., Lin, J., & Tao, H. (2015). A Spatial-Temporal Analysis of Urban Recreational Business Districts: A Case Study in Beijing, China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 25(12), 1521–1536. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11442-015-1249-9