Causal-Layered Analysis of Environmental Considerations in the 2031 Program of Isfahan Municipality

Document Type : Research article

Authors

1 Department of Tourism, Faculty of Geographical Sciences and Planning, University of Isfahan, Iran

2 Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

3 Department of Urban Planning Geography, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

10.22059/jurbangeo.2025.386937.2022

Abstract

ABSTRACT
The city of Isfahan is facing multiple environmental challenges, including water scarcity, air pollution, and climate change, issues that severely threaten the quality of life for its residents and pose serious obstacles to achieving sustainable urban development. In this context, the “Isfahan 2031 Program,” a large-scale strategic plan initiated by the municipality, aims to improve environmental conditions, enhance quality of life, and increase the city’s resilience to environmental hazards. This study seeks to provide a deeper analysis of the underlying factors contributing to environmental crises and to identify effective, sustainable, and applicable solutions. Environmental issues are analyzed at four levels such as first, visible and everyday problems; second, structural and managerial factors; third, dominant policy-making paradigms; and fourth, cultural beliefs and symbols that shape public attitudes toward the environment. Data were collected through document review, analysis of municipal reports, citizen surveys, and interviews with 300 experts, scholars, and urban managers. The findings indicate that the 2031 Program faces fundamental challenges in its implementation and requires a comprehensive, system-oriented, participatory, and cross-sectoral approach to succeed. Key barriers include a lack of inter-agency coordination, insufficient financial resources, institutional fragmentation, and the neglect of community-based capacities. Moreover, the study reveals that without reforming managerial mindsets and rethinking urban governance models, achieving meaningful improvements in the city’s environmental status will not be feasible.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
In recent decades, cities have expanded rapidly and transformed into large urban centers. By 2030, it is predicted that 60% of the world’s population will live in urban areas, with one-third of them residing in cities with at least 50,000 inhabitants. This growth has made cities central to capital accumulation, political tensions, social development, service provision, and global connectivity. However, urban expansion has brought about numerous challenges, including pressure on natural resources, environmental degradation, and changes in energy consumption patterns. Moreover, cities face environmental challenges such as pollution, waste management issues, and biodiversity loss, which threaten both urban livability and global sustainability.
In response to these challenges, sustainable urban development has become a central focus, balancing economic growth, social justice, and environmental protection. In this context, urban planning that integrates environmental considerations is crucial, although it faces significant challenges, including economic pressures and the complexity of urban areas. Esfahan, as one of Iran's major cities, exemplifies these complexities. It faces issues such as air pollution, water scarcity, and environmental degradation, while also experiencing rapid urban growth. The Esfahan Strategic-Operational Plan 2031 aims to integrate environmental, social, and economic factors into urban development. However, questions remain about how well ecological concerns have been incorporated into this plan. This research, using Causal Layered Analysis (CLA), seeks to explore the ecological considerations embedded in the 2031 Plan. By examining the plan through multiple layers, observable factors, systemic causes, worldviews, and metaphors, this study aims to provide a deeper understanding of the role of environmental issues in Esfahan's future development and suggest improvements for the plan's ecological aspects.
This research aims to answer the following questions:
-To what extent have ecological considerations been integrated into the Esfahan 2031 Plan?
-How can the plan be improved from an ecological perspective?
The results may offer valuable insights for urban development strategies in other major cities across Iran.
 
Methodology
This applied, analytical-interpretive research focuses on the future study of Esfahan, aiming to identify and analyze environmental issues in the city. It follows a three-step approach such as identification and description, analysis and deepening, and recommendation. The participants include 300 experts, professors, managers, and elites selected for their experience and expertise in environmental issues. Data were collected from 25 documents, environmental analysis, interviews with academic and urban experts, surveys from Esfahan citizens, and social media analysis. Issues were identified through inductive content analysis. The Causal Layered Analysis (CLA) method, applied in four layers, litany, systemic causes, worldview/discourse, and myth/metaphor, was used for deeper analysis. This method integrates empirical, interpretive, critical, and action-learning perspectives, aiming to uncover alternative futures by decoding present and past issues, rather than predicting specific outcomes. The workshop approach of CLA facilitated a participatory and interactive environment, allowing for a comprehensive and strategic understanding of Esfahan's complex urban challenges.
 
Results and discussion
This study uses the layered causal analysis method to examine environmental and urban issues in the 2031 Strategic Plan of Isfahan Municipality. The findings reveal that the plan primarily focuses on superficial and short-term measures, such as reducing pollutants and improving air quality, which have not been effective in addressing structural and long-term problems. Issues like the water crisis and air pollution stem from deeper causes, including mismanagement of resources, misguided economic policies, and unsustainable consumption patterns. The layered causal analysis approach allows for the identification of more comprehensive solutions, such as policy reforms and changes in consumption behavior, to address these problems.
 
Conclusion
This study emphasizes that achieving sustainable urban development in Isfahan requires addressing the root causes of environmental issues, rather than relying on short-term solutions. The Causal Layered Analysis (CLA) method helps identify deeper, structural causes, offering long-term and sustainable solutions. For example, addressing the water crisis requires regulatory reforms, sustainable economic policies, technological investments, and collaboration between sectors. This approach aligns with prior research by Zobardast and Derskhan (2021) and Fouladi et al. (2022), which stress the importance of strategic analysis for improving environmental conditions. Reforming Isfahan’s 2031 Strategic Plan can turn it into a model for tackling environmental crises and promoting sustainable urban growth.
 
Funding
It is based on a research project with the Isfahan Municipality.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all those who helped us in conducting this research, especially those who assessed the quality of the articles.

Keywords


  1. Ahmadi Dehkah, F., Sajjadi, Z., & Vahidi Yeganeh, F. (2018). Assessing the feasibility of urban environmental culture in achieving sustainable urban development: A case study of Sanandaj city. Journal of Sustainable City, 1 (1), 1–13. [In Persian]
  2. Alavi, S. M. (2022). Biotic economy: A new economic paradigm in the age of global challenges and complexities. Iranian Journal of Biology, 6 (11), 1–25. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20089406.1401.6.11.3.0. [In Persian]
  3. Alessandrini, A., Delle Site, P., & Filippi, F. (2023). A new planning paradigm for urban sustainability. Transportation Research Procedia, 69, 203-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.02.163.
  4. Ameen, R. F. M., & Mourshed, M. (2017). Urban environmental challenges in developing countries—A stakeholder perspective. Habitat International, 64, 1-10.‌
  5. Ameen, R. F. M., & Mourshed, M. (2017). Urban environmental challenges in developing countries—A stakeholder perspective. Habitat International, 64, 1-10.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.04.002
  6. Asahabi, F., Fanni, Z., & Goudarzipour, S. (2021). Women and the dynamics of urban environmental management: A case study of Tehran metropolis. Biannual Journal of Sustainable Development of Geographical Environment, 3 (5), 178–192. [In Persian]
  7. Badii, L., Ezzatpanah, B., & Soltani, A. (2019). Explaining and analyzing sustainable urban development with an emphasis on environmental components: A case study of Sanandaj city. Quarterly of Urban Research and Planning, 10 (36), 75–86. [In Persian]
  8. Barati, E., Saberi, H., Khadem Hosseini, A., & Azani, M. (2021). Identification and analysis of factors influencing the achievement of an ecological city: A case study of Dorcheh city. Spatial Planning, 11 (4), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.22108/sppl.2022.132240.1636. [In Persian]
  9. Baud, I., Jameson, S., Peyroux, E., & Scott, D. (2021). The urban governance configuration: A conceptual framework for understanding complexity and enhancing transitions to greater sustainability in cities. Geography Compass, 15(5), e12562.
  10. Belali Eskoui, A., Heydari Turkmani, M., & Diba, F. (2019). Layered causal analysis of changes in the concept of neighborhood in relation to a sense of belonging and presenting alternative scenarios. Urban Planning Knowledge, 3(3), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.22124/upk.2019.14235.1275. [In Persian]
  11. Beşer, N. Ö., Tütüncü, A., Beşer, M., & Magazzino, C. (2024). The impact of air and rail transportation on environmental pollution in Turkey: a Fourier cointegration analysis. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal.‌
  12. Castel, C. (2018). Urban planning and urbanization in 3rd Millennium Syria. Tell Al-Rawda in context. Ebla and Beyond Ancient Near Eastern Studies after Fifty Years of Discoveries at Tell Mardikh, 75-105.‌
  13. Coskun, H. (2024). Sustainable transformation of historical city istanbul; industrial areas, recent large-scale ecological and regeneration projects. Case Rep Rev Open Access, 5(1), 140.‌
  14. Desa, U. N. (2014). World urbanization prospects: The 2014 revision, highlights. Retrieved from United Nations-Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Available online: http://esa. un. org/unpd/wup/Highlights/WUP2014-Highlights. pdf (accessed on 9 August 2016).
  15. Elmqvist, T., Fragkias, M., Goodness, J., Güneralp, B., Marcotullio, P. J., McDonald, R. I., ... & Tidball, K. (2013). Stewardship of the biosphere in the urban era. Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities: a global assessment, 719-746.‌
  16. Faghih Habibi, A. (2020). Desirable environmental governance and sustainable development. Islamic World Political Studies, 10 (3), 297–313. [In Persian]
  17. Firoozi, M., Mohammadi Dehcheshmeh, S., & Saeedi, J. (2017). Evaluation of environmental unsustainability indicators with emphasis on water pollution, soil pollution, and noise pollution using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method in Ahvaz metropolis. Environmental Sciences and Technology, 19 (3), 67–81. [In Persian]
  18. Fouladi, E., Behbahani Nia, A., Azadbokht, B., & Motahari, S. (2022). Developing a strategic urban development planning model to enhance environmental security: A case study of Tehran. Environmental Sciences and Technology, 24 (3), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.30495/jest.2022.64772.5584 [In Persian]
  19. Grossi, G., Meijer, A., & Sargiacomo, M. (2020). A public management perspective on smart cities:‘Urban auditing’for management, governance and accountability. Public Management Review, 22(5), 633-647.‌
  20. Heydari, M. T., Rahmani, M., Tahmasebi Moghadam, H., & Moharami, S. (2022). An analysis of environmental sustainability and the reproduction of urban space quality: A case study of Zanjan city. Human and Environmental Journal, 20 (3), 17–36. [In Persian]
  21. Hosseini, S. M., Rahnama, M. R., Ajzae Shokoohi, M., & Kharazmi, O. (2020). Analysis of factors influencing the green city model with a futures studies approach in Mashhad metropolis. Environmental Sciences and Technology, 22 (6), 323–336. [In Persian]
  22. Isfahan City Comprehensive Plan Steering Council. (2021). First stage report of the comprehensive plan for Isfahan city with a modern approach. Retrieved from [https://isfahanplan.ir/media/attachments/Final_Low.pdf]. [In Persian]
  23. Islam, M. Z., & Wang, S. (2023). Exploring the unique characteristics of environmental sustainability in China: Navigating future challenges. Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, 21(1), 37-42.‌ https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.28994
  24. Khatami, S. M., & Mousavi Nejad, F. S. (2022). Sustainable integration of city and nature through the design of public space networks: A case study of Noor city. Urban Structure and Function Studies, 9 (31), 69–100. https://doi.org/10.22080/usfs.2022.22409.2193 [In Persian]
  25. Khazaei, S., Nasrati, A., & Takloui, F. (2015). Investigating the phenomenon of Avatarism using the Layered Causal Analysis method. Public Administration Perspective, 6(1), 26-41. [In Persian]
  26. Khosravi, M., & Miramadi, T. (2019). The layers of the future and the formulation of human actions: An examination of the epistemological foundations of the Layered Causal Analysis method. Iranian Foresight Studies, 4(1), 101-116. https://doi.org/10.30479/jfs.2019.5969.1016. [In Persian]
  27. Mansourian, F., Khazai, S., Shari'at Panahi, S. P., & Mashfaq, M. (2015). Factors influencing population growth in metropolitan areas from the perspective of experts: A case study of Tehran. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 8 (1), 21–44. [In Persian]
  28. Mirza Zadeh Doostan, A. (2022). Investigating urban management and its role in urban sustainable development. Geography and Human Relations, 5 (2), 21–33. [In Persian]
  29. Mohammadi Dehcheshmeh, M., Fadaei Jazi, F., & Panahi, T. (2024). Assessing the mega challenges of environmental governance in Ahvaz metropolis. Natural Environmental Hazards, 13 (42), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.22111/jneh.2024.47243.2001. [In Persian]
  30. Nguyen, T. H., & Vu, G. H. T. (2023). Eco-city paradigm: Urban planning towards sustainable development goals. E3S Web of Conferences, 403, 01002. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340301002
  31. Orenstein, Daniel E., & Shach-Pinsley, D. (2017). A Comparative Framework for Assessing Sustainability Initiatives at the Regional Scale. World Development, Elsevier, 98(C),245- 256
  32. Rapoport, E., & Vernay, A. (2011). Defining the Eco-City: A Discursive Approach, in Management and Innovation for a Sustainable Built Environment MISBE 2011, Amsterdam, The Netherlands and June 20-23, 2011, CIB, Working Commissions W55, W65, W89, W112; ENHR And AESP.
  33. Revi, A., Satterthwaite, D., Aragón-Durand, F., Corfee-Morlot, J., Kiunsi, R. B., Pelling, M., ... & Sverdlik, A. (2014). Towards transformative adaptation in cities: the IPCC’s Fifth Assessment. Environment and Urbanization, 26(1), 11-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247814523539
  34. Sabokroo, D., Hemmati, M., & Mottaedin, H. (2022). Comparison and evaluation of the foundations of the human-nature relationship in ecology and landscape studies. Manzar Journal, 14(60), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.22034/MANZAR.2022.277940.2125. [In Persian]
  35. Salami, S., & Mazaheri, M. (2021). Urban management duties in realizing the environmental rights of citizens (with a focus on the resolutions of the Tehran City Council). Journal of Research and Development in Comparative Law, 4 (11), 84–111. https://doi.org/10.22034/law.2021.533814.1092. [In Persian]
  36. Salehi Qaleh Sari, A., Mobini, A., Ghazanchai, R., Esfandiari, M., & Balooei Jamkhaneh, Z. (2020). Investigating the development of urban environmental sustainability culture based on the model of some advanced cities in the world. Monthly Journal of Humanities Horizons, 4 (38), 1–21. [In Persian]
  37. Samadkulov, M. (2024). The Urbanization Economy: Difficulties And Approaches For Sustainable Growth. International journal of artificial intelligence, 4(03), 258-263.‌
  38. Serati Kish, A., Khademzadeh, M. R., & Nemati, A. (2022). The role and position of urban planning in environmental preservation. In 16th National Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture, and Urban Planning (pp. [1–12]). Shiran. [In Persian]
  39. Soleimani Moghadam, H., & Moghadam Shakhsi, M. (2023). Analysis of neotraditionalism with an emphasis on sense of place: A case study of District 2, Mashhad metropolis. Geography and Regional Development, 21 (2), 197–227. https://doi.org/10.22067/jgrd.2023.74340.1100. [In Persian]
  40. Song, K., Chen, Y., Duan, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2023). Urban governance: A review of intellectual structure and topic evolution. Urban Governance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2023.06.001
  41. Tabrizi, M. (2014). Qualitative content analysis from the perspective of deductive and inductive approaches. Journal of Social Sciences, 21(64), 105-138. https://doi.org/10.22054/qjss.2014.344(In Persian)
  42. Taghvayi, M., & Shafiee, M. (2022). Analysis of indicators and explanation of strategies for achieving urban smartization: A case study of Isfahan city. Spatial Planning, 12 (1), 51–80. https://doi.org/10.22108/sppl.2022.131222.1621. [In Persian]
  43. United Nations. (2018). The 2018 Revision of World Urbanization Prospects: Data Booklet (ST/ESA/SER. A/420). Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org. development. desa. pd/files/files/documents/2020/Jan/un_2018_worldcities_databooklet. pdf.
  44. Vafaee, A. (2022). Environmental sustainable development with a strategic planning approach: A case study of Kashan. Environmental Studies, 17 (3), 691–708. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.25385968.1401.17.3.11.5. [In Persian]
  45. Vardoulakis, S., Dear, K., & Wilkinson, P. (2016). Challenges and opportunities for urban environmental health and sustainability: the HEALTHY-POLIS initiative. Environmental health, 15, 1-4.‌
  46. Vardoulakis, S., Dear, K., & Wilkinson, P. (2016). Challenges and opportunities for urban environmental health and sustainability: the HEALTHY-POLIS initiative. Environmental health, 15, 1-4.‌ https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-016-0096-1.
  47. Zebardast, A., & Darskhan, R. (2021). Explaining the components for achieving environmental sustainability in the urban management structure of Tabriz metropolis. Sustainability, Development, and Environment, 2 (3), 21–40. (In Persian)
  48. Zhang, X. Q. (2011). The economic role of cities. Xing Quan Zhang.‌
  49. Zianpour, M., Khadem Alfoqaraei, M., Naji Esfahani, Z., & Jalali, M. (2023). Urban quality of life in Isfahan city: Priorities and constitutive themes. Applied Sociology, 34 (2), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.22108/jas.2023.135391.2333 [In Persian]