Advocacy planning approach in urban planning (case study: Golestan Neighborhood of Sabzevar City)

Document Type : Research article

Authors

1 Prof., Dep. Of Urban planning, Tarbiat Modares University

2 Ph.D. Candidate in geography and urban planning, Institute for humanities and social studies

3 Ph.D. Candidate geography and urban planning, Institute for humanities and social studies

Abstract

. This paper aims at investigating the Paul Davidoff’s approach to advocacy planning as one of the first intellectual foundations of social and cultural issues proposals in the field of urban planning with reference to the development of urban planning theories.This study library, field studies, interviews and questionnaires, and the answers to these questions: Advocacy planning in the evolution of urban planning theories and principles of how a place has and what the requirements are? How it works, how it operates and what problems are faced in the valley? Case Study Area in Sabzevar, Iran continued to seek answers to the question Whether Advocacy planning in this area can be effective in improving the quality of life of its residents? Finally, the results of this paper only way to reconcile professional advantage (specialization) and political responsibility Davidoff introduces the concept of representation The views and opinions is one of the most important pioneers in the field of attention to social issues and participation present. We conclude that the Golestan district of sustainable development can be achieved if the first residents to do a variety of joint projects, the viewpoint of economics social, and cultural the physical aspects of environmental expediencies lead; Second, the current urban management must abandon their former views, with an eye towards a system of integrated urban management and administration of the local authority to take steps.

Keywords

References

اجلالی، پرویز؛ رفیعیان، مجتبی؛ عسگری، علی؛ (1391). نظریۀ برنامه‌ریزی: دیدگاه‌های سنتی و جدید، نشر آگه، تهران.
اسدی، ایرج؛ سعیدنیا، احمد؛ (1389). نظریه‌های برنامه‌ریزی و زمینه‌های شکل‌دهندۀ آنها: از اوایل قرن بیستم تا اواسط دهۀ 1970، نامۀ معماری و شهرسازی، دوفصلنامۀ دانشگاه هنر، شمارۀ چهار، بهار و تابستان.
ادارۀ کل راه و شهرسازی خراسان رضوی، طرح جامع شهر سبزوار، (1391).
پوپر، کارل؛ (1369). جامعۀ باز و دشمنان آن، ترجمه علی‌اصغر مهاجری، شرکت سهامی انتشار، تهران.
پیران، پرویز؛ (1374). برنامۀ جامع آگاه‌سازی همگانی: شهروندمداری، دفتر پژوهش‌های فرهنگی، تهران.
شکویی، حسین؛ (1377). فلسفۀ سیاسی، جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی، جغرافیا در ایران، تهران.
Allmendinger, P; (2002). Towards a Post positivist Typology of Planning Theory, Planning Theory
 Birkland, jenis; (1992). Community Participation in urban ProjectAssessment an Ecofeminist Analysis. University Of Wollongony.
Campbell, S.; Fainstein, S.; (1996). Reading in Planning Theory, Oxford, Blackwell.
Campbell, S.; (1997). Reading in Planning Theory, Oxford.
Davidoff, P.; (1965). Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning, In Campbell, S and Fainstein, S (1996)(eds), Readings in Planning Theory, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Davidoff, P.; (1996). Introducing Urban Design, Interventions and Responses, NewYork.
Faludi, A.; (1973). A Reader in Planning Theory, Oxford: Pergamon.
Faludi, A.; (1982). Three Paradigms of Planning Theory, in Healey et al (eds), Planning Theory,Oxford: Pergamon.
Gulling Worth, J. B.; (1997). Planning in USA. London: Routledge.
Healey, P.; McDougall, G.; Thomas, M. J.; (1982). Theoretical Debates in Planning: towards a
Coherent Dialogue, in Healey et al. (eds) Planning Theory, Oxford: Pergamon.
Hall, P.; (1989). Urban and Regional Planning, 2nd ed., Unwinhyman, London.
Hall, P.; (1996). The City of Theory, In Richard, T. LeGates and Fredric. S, (eds), The City Reader, Routledge.
Neuman, M.; (1998). Does Planning Need the Plan, Journal of the American planning Association, Vol. 64, No. 2.
Taylor, N.; (1999). Town Planning Social not Just Physical Planning.
Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR)
Volume 2, Issue 3 - Serial Number 3
October 2014
Pages 277-301

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics