Role of Evolutions and Political Divisions on Urban Development Using SAR Model (Case Study: Golestan Province)

Document Type : Review article

Author

Associate professor of political Geography, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar Branch, Garmsar, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Nowadays, governments and their decisions are one of the most influential factors in formation of habitational hierarchy process and relations. Most of urban planners believe that effective influence of governmental investments in megacities’ construction make governments able to affect the growth of medium sized citiesthrough decentralization or aggregation to create a more balanced distribution of urban population and creational- economical endeavors (sarafi, 1998:132). Country divisions, due to its nature and performance, are a type of spatial organization for dividing the country’s spaces and would facilitate the sovereignty of the government. In addition, regional preparation programs are present to synchronize the existing resources with different purposes in any environment in order to achieve the best utilization of the equipment available. Golestan province was detached from the Mazandaran province in 1997 and became acknowledged as a new province in the hierarchy system of the country. After that the city of Gorgan as the center of this province has received many enjoyments in sustainable development in all its aspects. The goal of this present study is to evaluate the level of political divisions of the country’s effectivity (Golestan becoming a province) on urban development amongst the cities of the Golestan province which is conducted through the descriptive- analytic and field study method. Hence, the main question of the study is that the political divisions of the country have been effective on urban development amongst the cities of the province after detachment of Golestan and acknowledging it as a single province. 
 
Methodology
The methodology in this study is a combination of analytic and discovery methods using field studies and surveying techniques to conduct the evaluation of dispersion coefficients utilizing indicators in the area of economic, social, cultural, political, and environmental structures in the province by multiple objective decision making methods. This was conducted by rating of the areas using the rate of acquiring development criteria for each of these regions. The data collection method is conducted using field study and the main source is the net data information of statistical yearbook of Golestan province. To indicate the total information from families’ states, the sustainability principles and criteria of the areas were examined. Eventually, the GIS software was used to demonstrate the locational and spatial results of the study.
 
Results and discussion
In order to evaluate the effectivity of developments and political divisions in the Golestan province and the level of its effectivity on urban development, we analyzed the six aspects of development including economic, social, cultural, political, human issues and urban infrastructure development and its effectivity in fourteen townships of this province. In fact, the purpose of this research was to address the impacts of new administrative divisions, by which Golestan become an independent province,on development level and the rate of effectivity of development planings. Based on the SAR method, the Gorgan City as the center of the province with the score equal to 0.6 has the highest level of development and the Kalaleh City with the coefficient equal to 5.24 has the least level of development amongst the cities of Golestan province.
 
Conclusion
According to the results of the research, it can be conducted that the political administration development and divisions has significant unfluence on urban development in the Golestan province. This study indicated that multiple objective decision making methods and the analytic model of SAR can successfully evaluate the level of effectivity of new political developments of Golestan province on the development process through six aspects. Finally, based on the SAR method it was determined that the Gorgan City with the coefficient equal to 0.6 had the highest level of development and after that the cities of Bandar Turkmen and Gonbad-e- Kavoos are in the next rates in development. Also the Kalaleh City with the coefficient equal to 5.24 had the lowest level of development amongst the cities of the Golestan province.

Keywords


  1. Ahmadipoor, Z; Rahmati, M & hafez nia, mohammd reza. (2012), Effect of improving the political spatial level on extension of Ardebil Province’s tourism, space preparation planning, 16th period, number 1: 121-147.
  2. Ali akbari, E & Faraji Darabokhani, M.  (2006), administrative- political cities and urban unsustainability, geography and regional development, number 6: 155-178.
  3. Ardeshiri, M. (2000), sustainable development and urban management, urban management, 1st period, number 3: 1-14.
  4. Azizi, M.M & Yar mohammadi, S. (2014), the effect of the newest regional political divisions on urban dispersion (case study: the city of bojnurd), aesthetic arts, 19th period, number 2: 103-116.
  5. Borhani, K. (2013), spatial analysis of the effect of political management improvement of space in regional balances, M.A. theses, tarbiat modarres university, Tehran.
  6. Ebrahimzadeh, E. (2007), Analytic model in organizing the zonal spaces case study: Yasangan of Khash area, Geographical studies, 39th period, number 7: 35-53.
  7. Ejlali, P; Rafiian, M & Asgari, A (2013), planning theory: traditional and modern viewpoints, Tehran: agah publications.
  8. Eskandari, Z. (2017), Evaluating the place of political organization of space in regional preparation of sistan and baluchestan province, M.A. Theses, Ferdowsi university, mashhad.
  9. Etaat, J & Mousavi, S. Z. (2008), country divisions and sustainable development case study: Iran, Geopolitics, 4th period, number 3: 57-74.
  10. Geldermann. J;  & Rentz. O. (2000). Bridging the Gap between American and European MADMapproaches? Proceeding of 51st meeting of the European working group”multi-criteria aid for decisions”.
  11. Hafez nia, M. R. (2000), social political information principles, first volume, Qom, Islamic schools and high education organization publication.
  12. Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, London: Macmillan.
  13. Imani jajromi, H. (2016), critical evaluation of policies and urban development programs in Iran, social studies and researches in Iran, 5th period, number 1: 79-102.
  14. Imani shamloo, J; rafiian, M & dadash poor, H. (2016), urban business and spatial divergence of spatial developments analytics of Tehran megacity based on oil economy, Geopolitics, 12th year, number 1: 104-135.
  15. Lotfi, H. (2016), Political organization of spaces based on the sustainable development criteria in the spatial distribution of regional inequalities in the three provinces of great Khorasan, Great khorasan’s research journal, 7th year, number 24: 75-90.
  16. Mohammad poor jaberi, M. (2014), spatial political divisions and balance in the urban system of the area, Khorasan Razavi province, Geography and urban planning studies, 2nd period, number 4: 559-575.
  17. Momeni, M. (2003), Choosing the efficient method of transferring water to sugar cane farms in the khoozestan province, modarres magazine, 7th period, number 3: 123-136.
  18. Panahi, M. H. (1996), cultural system, its functions and alteration, in the research letter, number 2 and 3.
  19. Panahi, M. H. (2014), cultural development, necessity of economic, social and political development, 3rd conference of Islamic Iranian progress pattern, June, Tehran.
  20. Parsi poor, H & Razavian, M. T. (2012), an analysis on the urban networking system in the new subareas derived from the division of Khorasan province, regional planning, 2nd period, number 6: 43-55.
  21. Pile var, A. A. (2008), regional centrality promotion and structural- applicable developments of the city; case study Bojnurd, Ph.D. theses of geography and urban planning, tarbiat moallem university, literature and human sciences faculty.
  22. Poor taheri, M. (2010), application of multi objective decision making methods in geography, samt publication, Tehran.
  23. Rahnamaii, M. T. (1994), government and urbanization; a criticism on the theory of old urban elements and exploitation capitalism of hans bobek, geographical studies, ninth period, number 1: 17-26.
  24. Rashidi, M; Ali poor, A; Hossein vand shokri, R & Said zade, M. (2016), Geopolitics pathology of Iran’s political divisions from the manner of regional preparation. Political geography researches, 1st year, number 3: 155-186.
  25. Saiidi, A. (2009), urban and rural management encyclopedia, country’s municipalities and rural organization.
  26. Sarrafi, M. (1998), regional planning principles, planning and budget organization publication, Tehran.
  27. Sarrafi, M; Tavakoli nia, J & Ostadi sisi, M. (2009), urban development strategy based on sustainable development (case study: city of shabestar), Geography (Iran’s geography association magazine), seventh period, number 22: 65-82.
  28. Shafii far, M. (2015), the political development progress in Islamic republic of Iran, politics quarterly, 45th period, number 1: 103-123.
  29. Taghvaii, A. A & Mahmoudi Nejad, H. (2006), sustainable urban development and citizens’ social welfare, urban planning, number 15 and 16: 36-47.
  30. UNDP. (2004), Report of development and challenges in developing country, UNDP general report. First press 125.
  31. Zakki, Y; Tahmoorth heydari, M & Rahimi, H. (2014), the role of political management of space in the urban development programs; with emphasis on Iran, the seventh congress of Iran’s Geopolitics forum (urban political geography), Tehran, Iran’s geopolitical forum, Kharazmi university.