Identification of Effective Factors Creating Space in Periphery of Cities (Case Study: Urmia City)

Document Type : Research article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Environmental Planning and Design, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran

2 PhD Student in Geography and Rural Planning, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Peripheral urban space is part of the environment formed by living spaces with different characteristics. Peripheral urban space includes built areas, network of connecting routes, headquarters, industrial enterprises, transportation companies, orchards, and places for entertainment and games. This means that it is part of the space that is available for residents of the areas around the cities. Geographical theories state  that production of space around the cities, in addition to physical factors, are dependent upon some other factors including perceptions, beliefs, opinions, ideologies, cultural features, level of awareness, way of thinking, and cultural, economic and political systems.
A glance at the history of Urmia City in the Northwest Iran, West Azarbaijan, shows that production of peripheral urban space in Urmia is resulted from some factors such as groups and social, economic and political classes, multiple sources of income, proximity to the city center, land speculation, achieving greater profits and so on. This indicates that creation of residential, industrial, service, and communication spaces not only led to the concentration of capital, activity and population, but also developed speculative activities and bribery culture. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to investigate the process of production of space in the areas around the cities. Using satellite images, we attempt to identify the areas developed within the radius of 15 kilometers from the city of Urmia during the years 2000-2014. Then, we try to identify the factors and mechanisms leading to the production of space in the areas around the cities. 
Methodology
The present study is a mixed research using qualitative and quantitative approachs in terms of methodology through continuous explanatory research project. This study is an applied research due to its methods and library and field methods for data collection. In analysis of data in quantitative phase of this research, we examined the generated spaces by satellite images of TM and OLI Landsat Satellite during two time series of years 2000 and 2014. The statistical population is the agencies related to urban and rural affairs including Agriculture Organization, Office of Governor General, Office of Governor, Office of District Governing, etc. Sampling was non-randomly based on snowball sampling. In collecting data, we used in-depth and semi-structured interviews and direct observation.
Results and discussion
The analysis obtained by classifying spaces indicates that in 2000 and 2014, the area of residential, industrial, green, empty and barren spaces and connecting networks is about 115245.949 hectares. Among the studied spaces, residential (3069.28 hectares), industrial (4736.73 hectares) and connecting (0.1866 hectares) spaces have increased in production. This is resulted from decreases in green spaces (farms, orchards, pasture and forests) and empty and arid spaces. Increase in the area of the producted spaces in the study area had been due to changes occurred in many spaces. After identifying the areas around the city of Urmia, the foundations affecting the production of space in these areas were discussed during the period of the study. In order to achieve the factors influencing the production of space in the areas around the city, we used the method of Grand Theory. As a result of grounded theory method, the factors affecting the production of peripheral urban space include: Suburbanization, economic diversification, inefficient management, Weak laws, modernization policiesand capitalism system such as the Commission on Article 100 of municipalities.  
Conclusion
The spaces generated in the study area including the economy, politics, culture, society, and nature.According to the analysis and school of political economy of space, the most important factors affecting space production around the cities are suburbanization, economic diversification, inefficient management, weak legistation, modernization policies and capitalism system. The produced spaces in the areas around the cities are developed to provide basic needs and achieve higher profits. The spaces had some consequences including increased migration from village to city, rising inflation and the government's inability to solve the high inflation, impairment in planning system, overloaded variety of activities in the lands, mass production of varieties of space, capital accumulation and commodification of land, increase in the culture of bribery, destruction of green spaces, exploitation of natural resources, increase in social and economic deseases, components of space caused by capitalism, including speculation in the production of space, and the segregation of space due to it and so on. Today peripheral urban areas are separated and divided with manipulation for sale as a commodity. Results also have revealed speculative and rent-seeking tendencies in the areas around the cities. Unless this trend stops to continue, it will cause irreparable damage to the natural ecosystem of the area. Therefore, it can be concludded that the areas around the cities are considered as the consequences and initiatives of capitalism. 

Keywords

References

  1. Adib Hajbagheri; M., P., and Mahvash S., 2007; Qualitative Research Methods, Bashari Publications, Second Edition. [In Persian]
  2. Afrakhteh, H., Hajipour, M., 2015, Political Economy of Space and regional equilibrium of Iran, space economics and Rural Development journal , Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 14, pp. 110-87. [In Persian]
  3.  Afrouh, I., 1998, Space and Social Inequality:   Study of Spatial Separation and the concentration of poverty in residential neighborhoods of Tehran, PhD. in Sociology, Supervisor: Hossein Shokouie, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran. [In Persian]
  4.  Amiri, N., Rezapur, A., 2012, Henry Lefebvre and Social Production of Space, Media Culture Journal, Vol 1, No. 4, pp. 16-1. [In Persian]
  5. Babbie E., 2002, the basics of social research. 2nd ed. ed. Belmont, Calif; London: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
  6. Buxton, M. A., Andrew Butt, S. F., Danny O., 2008,  Planning Sustainable Futures for Melbourne Peri-urban Region, RMIT University, and Melbourne.
  7. Borekpour, N., Asadi, I., Basirat, M., 2010, Typology of privacy and global experiences in planning and managing, Shahr-Negar's two-letter paper, No. 57-56, pp. 38-17. [In Persian]
  8. Castells, M., 1977, the Urban Question. UK. Cambridge, the MIT Press.
  9. Cohen, G. A., 1978, Karl Marx’s Theory of History, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

10. Cuthbert, Alexander R., 2006, the Form of Cities: Political Economy and Urban Design. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

11. Daneshpour, Z., 2006, Analysis of spatial inequality in peri-urban environments An attempt to use strategic planning and management approach in Tehran, Fine Arts, No. 28, pp. 14-5. [In Persian]

  1. 12.  Dananifard, H., 2005, Theorization using a deductive approach:  The conceptualization Strategy Grounded Theory,   Shahid University Journal, Vol 12, No. 11, pp. 70-57. [In Persian]
  2. 13.  Dolphos, O., 1995, Geographical Space, Translation of Cyrus Sahami, Nika Publishing, Second Edition, Mashhad. [In Persian]

14. Dávila, J. D., 1999,  A Review of policies and strategies affecting the peri-urban interface, Strategic Environmental Planning and Management for the Peri-urban Interface Research Project, Development Planning Unit (DPU) University College London, 1999.

15. Harold, C., 1989, the Study of Urban Geography, 3rdEdition. http://www.iribnews.ir/NewsText.aspx?ID=1657118, 1989.

16. Harvey, D., 1998, the role of planning in capital societies (Athari, K. Trans.), Architecture and Urbanism, 7(45&46), 73-75.

17. Harvey, D., 1997, City and The Justice (Hesamian, F. , &Haeri. M.R. , & Monadizadeh, B. : Trans.). Tehran: Publication of Pardazesh va barnamerizi Shahri

18. Harvey, D., 1978, Urbanization under Capitalism: a Framework for Analysis, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 2, pp. 101-31.

19. Hataminejad, H., Abdi, N., 2007, Political Economy and Urban Space, Economic - Policy Journal, No. 238-237, pp. 205-196. [In Persian]

  1. 20.  Imani Sh. J., Rafieian, M., Dadashpour, H., 2016, Urban Propaganda and Spatial Divergence Analysis of Spatial Transformations of Tehran Metropolis Based on Oil Economy, Geopolitics Journal,  Vol 12, No. 1, pp. 135-104. [In Persian]

21. Jalalian, H., 2013, Urban Creep Analysis and Land Use Change (Comparative Study of Urmia and Isfahan),   Spatial - physical planning Journal, Vol 2, No. 4, pp. 98-73. [In Persian]

22. Katouzian, M. A., 2003,   Iran's political economy from onstitution to the end of the Safavi Dynasty Translation by Mohammad Reza Nafisi and Kambiz Azizi, Ney Publication, Ninth Edition, Tehran. [In Persian]

23. Lefebvre, H., 1976, the Survival of Capitalism. New York: St. Martin Press.

24. Lefebvre, H., 2009, State, Space, World, Selected Essays, Edited by Neil Brenner and Stuart Elden, Translated by Gerald Moore, Neil Brenner, and Stuart Elden, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis  London.

25. Mobaraki, O., Mohammadi, J. Zarabi, A., 2013, Presentation optimal physical-spatial pattern of Urmia, Geography and Development Journal, No. 32, pp. 88-75. [In Persian]

26. Mohamli Abyane, H. R., 2011, Comparative Comparison Urban Morphology Studies in order to complete it based on the analytical system of the Political Economy of Space, Arman Shahr Journal, No. 7, pp. 171-159. [In Persian]

27. Mohammadpour, A., 2010, meta-method Philosophical and practical foundations mixed research method in social and behavioral sciences,   Sociologists Publications, Third Edition, and Tehran. [In Persian]

28. Norberg-Schulz, Ch., 1974, Being, Space and Architecture, translated by Hassan Hafezi, Tehran Publishing House and Bookstore. [In Persian]

29. Marshall, F., Waldman, L., MacGregor, H., Mehta, L. and Randhawa, P. 2009, On the Edge of Sustainability: Perspectives on Peri-urban Dynamics, STEPS Working Paper 35, and Brighton: STEPS Centre.

30. Parsi, H. R., 2002, Recognition of Urban Space Content, Fine Arts, No. 11, pp. 49-41. [In Persian]

  1. 31.  Papeli Yazdi, M. H., Rajabi Sanaajerdi, Hossein, 2011, Theories of the City and the Periphery, Samat Publishing, Tehran. [In Persian]

32. Rahnema, M., Zabihi, J., 2011, Analysis of the Distribution of Urban Public Facilities for Spatial Justice with Integrated Access Model in Mashhad, Geography and Development Journal, No. 23, pp. 26-5. [In Persian]

33. Sa'idi, A., 2010, Environment, Space and the development of a discussion on the necessity of integrated rural-urban development, Housing and rural environment Journal, No. 131, pp. 12-3. [In Persian]

  1. 34.  Shokouidi, H., 2007, New Thoughts in Geography Philosophy (Vol. I), Ninth Edition, Gitashnasi Publications, Tehran. [In Persian]
Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR)
Volume 6, Issue 1
April 2018
Pages 23-54

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics