Explaining the Current Pattern and Presenting the Optimal Model of Urban Governance in Jiroft City

Document Type : Research article

Authors

1 Department of Geography and Urban Planning, University of Jiroft, Jiroft, Iran

2 Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Earth Sciences Faculty, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

10.22059/jurbangeo.2023.354548.1787

Abstract

ABSTRACT
Scientific evaluation is one of the significant factors that influence the effectiveness of urban management. Jiroft, like many other cities in Iran, doesn't have a written history of planning based on scientific evaluations. This matter has led to deficiencies in the full recognition and understanding of the citizens' needs and their satisfaction by managers. In response to this need, with a systematic approach and field method using an electronic questionnaire, this research studied and explained the current pattern of urban management in Jiroft with the ultimate goal of providing an optimal model of urban governance within this city. The research findings showed that the urban management model in Jiroft is inefficient with low effectiveness. Analytical findings also showed that the evaluation of the urban management model is influenced by three factors such as problems related to services and facilities in the living area, safety and feeling of security in urban areas, and citizens' participation in urban management. Citizens' assessment of the urban management model has positively affected their desire to migrate from the neighborhood/city, with the opposite effect, on the sense of belonging and pride in the neighborhood and the desire to invest in the neighborhood/city. ‏According to the findings, the following measures should be taken to achieve the optimal model of urban governance in Jiroft through the plans, views, and approaches should be ongoing in charge of commitment to the principles such as "fair distribution and provision of services and facilities in urban areas," "cooperation with entrepreneurs," "financial clarification," "creative plan for urban development," "interaction and empathy of city managers," "responding to people's problems and needs.".
 
Extended Abstract
Introduction
‏Scientific evaluation is one of the significant factors that influence the effectiveness of urban management. Jiroft, like many other cities in Iran, doesn't have a written history of planning based on scientific evaluations. This matter has led to deficiencies in the full recognition and understanding of the citizens' needs and their satisfaction by managers. In response to this need, this research studied and explained the current pattern of urban management in the city of Jiroft to provide an optimal model of urban governance within this city. This research has benefited from explanatory and enlightening theoretical literature on urban management, good urban governance, services, needs assessment and satisfaction, evaluation, urban participation, and smart city. According to the research questions, in the research theoretical model, the influencing and explanatory factors of the urban management model, including "use of services and facilities," "problems related to services and facilities in the neighborhood," "evaluation of safety and security in the neighborhood," "evaluation of citizens' participation in urban management"; and effective factors of the urban management model, including "tendency to migrate from the neighborhood/city," "feeling of place attachment and pride in the neighborhood of life," "tendency to invest in the neighborhood/city" were studied and analyzed with a systematic approach.
 
Methodology
‏The monitoring method with subjective evaluation of the beneficiaries using a structured electronic questionnaire has been used on the platform of the Digi form website. Also, in terms of the nature of evaluation and the plurality of institutions and organizations involved in urban management, it is limited to the evaluation of the components of the overall urban management that are related to the duties of the municipality and city council, the evaluation of other components of urban management in the field of other services urban institutions and organizations, have been measured as influencing factors on the evaluation of urban management. The content validity technique was used to ensure the validity of the research tools; the reliability test results show the main conceptual constructions' high reliability (Cronbach's alpha coefficient, above 0.7). Data was collected by the participation of citizens aged 15 years and older living in the city of Jiroft who actively use social media. The sample size was determined to be 310. In order to analyze data with an urban planning approach, the scope of citizens' lives based on criteria such as neighborhood and physical similarity of living quarters, availability of services and facilities, type of social structure, etc., were categorized into 12 specific urban areas.
 
Results and discussion
‏The descriptive findings of the research showed that the urban management model in Jiroft is inefficient with low effectiveness. Analytical findings also showed that the evaluation of urban management model is influenced by three factors as problems related to services and facilities in the living area, safety and feeling security in urban areas, and citizens' participation in urban management. Citizens' assessment of the urban management model has positively affected their desire to migrate from the neighborhood/city, with the opposite effect on the sense of belonging and pride in the neighborhood and the desire to invest in the neighborhood/city. These findings are in line with previous studies in this field.
 
Conclusion
‏According to the findings, the following measures should be taken to achieve the optimal model of urban governance in Jiroft:
‏1) Through the plans, views, and approaches of experts and organizations should be ongoing in charge of commitment to the principles such as "fair distribution and provision of services and facilities in urban areas," "cooperation with entrepreneurs and those who are trying to start or develop a job," "clarification and maintaining financial health," "creative plan and program for urban development," "interaction and empathy of city council and municipality members," "responding to people's problems and needs." Moreover, in addition to this matter, creating a scientific center for evaluation and monitoring the urban management plans to achieve good urban governance.
‏2) Plan-based action and formulation of strategic plan in different areas of urban management.
‏3) Revision of land use in the city and suburbs.
‏4) Interact and coordinate with law enforcement and security institutions to improve physical-spatial indicators affecting social security and safety in urban areas.
‏5) Any plan/project and change in the design of city roads should consider reducing the interference of pedestrian traffic with vehicles and reducing the traffic of motor vehicles in residential contexts.
‏6) Necessary actions and programs to increase the sense of place attachment and pride in the neighborhood as one of the components of the urban management system among the citizens.
‏7) Creating and developing platforms for achieving human and financial capital. Apart from physical acts and plans, this requires managing the psychological atmosphere that governs the society and strengthening the sense of pride in the assets of the city where one lives.
‏8) While promoting a sense of security in the city, it provided investment platforms for entrepreneurs and their participation, preventing capital from leaving the city.
‏9) Finally, in order to achieve a good model of urban governance in this city, we should:
‏a. While presenting creative plans, responding to needs, etc.
‏b. To provide platforms, contexts, and incentives for citizens' participation.
‏c. Providing platforms and facilitating entrepreneurship for economic dynamism with a new look and plan.
‏d. Financial and administrative transparency and removal of corruption platforms in urban management using smart city management capacities.
‏e. Balanced distribution of services and facilities in the city according to the priority problems of the city or neighborhood.
‏f. Adoption of mechanisms among city managers for consensus and empathy in advancing organizational goals, regardless of personal preferences (thoughtful and knowledge-based opinion should be replaced instead of personal and group opinion).
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific.

Keywords


  1. Abtahi, S. H., & Shtiani, M. (2021). The Study of People’s Participation Obstacles in Tehran’s Urban Management: A Qualitative Content Analysis. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (RURAL AND URBAN COMMUNITIES) (TOWSEE ROSTAEI), 12(2), 643-665. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrd.2021.319833.668632
  2. AGHAJANI, HOSSEIN, & TAGHVAEI, MASOUD. (2019). Spatial analysis of sustainable city indices in Mashhad metropolis. ARID REGIONS GEOGRAPHIC STUDIES, 10(37), 23-39. [In Persian].
  3. Ahvenniemi, H., Huovila, A., Pinto-Seppä, I., Airaksinen, M. (2017). What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities?. Cities, 60, 234-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.009
  4. ALAVI MATIN, Y., DADJOUAIN, A.R., & NEZHADIRANI, F. (2009). EVALUATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF TABRIZ ISLAMIC CITY COUNCIL (CASE STUDY OF TABRIZ MUNICIPALITY’S CONSTRUCTIONAL PROJECTS). PRODUCTIVITY MANAGEMENT (BEYOND MANAGEMENT), 3(10), 189-218. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.27169979.1388.3.3.8.3 [In Persian]
  5. ALVANI, S. M., AKHAVAN ALAVI, S. H., & MAHMELI ABYANEH, H. (2018). A DETAILED STUDY OF RESEARCH ROLE AND UTILIZATION IN THE URBAN MANAGEMENT CASE STUDY: TEHRAN URBAN MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. BAGH-E NAZAR, 15(63), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2018.67363 [In Persian].
  6. Amanpour, S., Safaipour, M., & Abbaspour, M (2014). Investigating citizens' satisfaction with the performance of Handijan Municipality. Zagros Landscape Geography and Urban Planning Quarterly, 7(23), 53-72. [In Persian]
  7. BANIASADI, M., ZARE MEHRJORDI, M.R., & VARMAZYARI, H. (2013). ECONOMIC FACTORS AFFECTING RURAL MIGRATION IN IRAN. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS RESEARCH, 5(1), 183-196. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20086407.1392.5.17.10.5 [In Persian]
  8. BARAK POUR, N., GOHARI POUR, H., & KARIMI, M. (2010). EVALUATION OF MUNICIPALITY PERFORMANCE BASED ON CITIZEN SATISFACTION WITH URBAN PUBLIC SERVICES IN CITY OF TEHRAN. URBAN MANAGEMENT, 8(25), 203-218. [In Persian]
  9. BARAKPOUR, N., & M Keivani, R. (2020). The Typology of Urban Management System in Iran, Trend of Changes and Prospect of Reforms. MEMARI-VA-SHAHRSAZI (HONAR-HA-YE-ZIBA), 24(4), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2019.292694.672370 [In Persian].
  10. Boswell, W. R. & Boudreau, J. W. (2002) Seperating the developmental & Evaluative performance appraisal uses. Journal of Bussiness and Psychology, 16, 391-412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1012872907525
  11. Calabrese, A., Castaldi, C., Forte, G., & Levialdi, N. (2018) Sustainability-oriented service innovation: An emerging research field. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.073
  12. Chang, J., Lin, Z., Vojnovic, I., Qi, J., Wu, R., & Xie, D. (2023) Social environments still matter: The role of physical and social environments in place attachment in a transitional city, Guangzhou, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 232, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104680
  13. Chu, A., Lin, Y.C., & Chiueh, P.T. (2017). Incorporating the effect of urbanization in measuring climate adaptive capacity. Land Use Policy, 68, 28-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.019
  14. Cruz, S. & Paulino, S. (2019) Active mobility challenges under public services perspective: Experiences in the city of São Paulo, Urbe, Rev. Bras. Gest. Urbana, 11, Article e20190026.
  15. Cruz, S.R.S., Paulino, S.R., & Paiva, D. (2017) Verification of outcomes from carbon market under the clean development mechanism (CDM) projects in landfills. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142 (Part 1), 145-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.022
  16. Danesh Far, E., Tabibian, M., & Moinifar, M. (2022). Investigation and Evaluation of Urban Management Position in Iran Based on Indicators Good Governance (Case Study: Karaj City). JOURNAL OF REGIONAL PLANNING, 12(45), 67-82. https://doi.org/10.30495/jzpm.2022.4325
  17. Danladi, M. H., Mohd Rusli, Y., & MakmomAbdullah, A. (2019). Delphi exploration of subjective well-being indicators for strategic urban planning towards sustainable development in Malaysia. Journal of Urban Management, 8 (1), 28-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2018.08.001
  18. Engin, Z., Dijk, J., Lan, T., & Longley, P. A. (2019). Treleavena, Philip; Battyc, Michael; Pennd, Alan. (2020) “Data-driven urban management: Mapping the landscape. Journal of Urban Management, 9 (2), 140-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2019.12.001
  19. Eyvazlou, D., & Razavian, M. T. (2018). Assessment of Metropolises Urban Management Based on Urban Good Governance Indexes, Case Study: Tehran Metropolis. GEOGRAPHY AND DEVELOPMENT, 16(52), 175-192. https://doi.org/10.22111/gdij.2018.4003 [In Persian]
  20. Falahi, K., & Monavarian, A. (2008). Examining the factors of elite migration (human capital) and providing suitable strategies to prevent this phenomenon. Knowledge and Development, 15(24), 103-132. [In Persian]
  21. GOLCHINI, SAHAR, MORADI, ESKANDAR, & Khezrnejad, Pakhshan. (2021). Investigating the Good Urban Governance Within the Framework of the Urban Management System (A Case Study of Sanandaj, Iran). ENVIRONMENTAL BASED TERRITORIAL PLANNING (AMAYESH), 14(52), 45-64. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.2676783.1400.14.52.3.7 [In Persian].
  22. Haarstad, H. (2016) Constructing the sustainable city: Examining the role of sustainability in the 'smart city'discourse. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 19 (4), 423-437. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1245610
  23. Habibi, D., & Mahbobi, S. (2020). Explain the relationship between good urban governance and citizens' satisfaction with municipal performance (Study Sample: Dogonbadan City). Haft Hesar J Environ Stud, 8 (30), 47-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/hafthesar.8.30.6 [In Persian].
  24. HOSSEINZADEH BAHREYNI, M.H. (2004). THE FACTORS OF INVESTMENT SECURITY IN IRAN. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ESSAYS, 1(2), 109-156. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-3369.011.e20190026 [In Persian]
  25. Li, S. M., Zhu, Y., & Li, L. (2013). Neighborhood type, gatedness, and residential experiences in Chinese cities: A study of Guangzhou. Urban Geography, 33(2)237–255. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.33.2.237
  26. Li, X., Kleinhans, R., & van Ham, M. (2018). Ambivalence in place attachment: The lived experiences of residents in danwei communities facing demolition in Shenyang, China. Housing Studies, 34(6), 997–1020. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2018.1509948
  27. Lima, E.G., Chinelli, C.K., Guedes, A.L.A., Vazquez, E.G., Hammad, A.W.A., Haddad, A.N., & Soares, C.A.P. (2020) Smart and sustainable cities: The main guidelines of city Statute for increasing the intelligence of Brazilian cities. Sustainability, 12(3), 1025. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031025
  28. Lotfi, S., Bordi, A. R., & Vahedi, H. (2014). Evaluation of the physical components of public spaces and its impact on the feeling of social security of the citizens of Babolsar. Strategic Researches of Social Issues of Iran (Strategic Researches of Security and Social Order), 4(1), 131-152. [In Persian]
  29. Maleki, S., Ārvin, M., & Bazrafkan, S. (2019). The role of good urban governance in the realization of the resilient city (A case study of Ahwāz city). Urban Planning Knowledge2(4), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.22124/upk.2019.12195.1162 [In Persian].
  30. Meijer, M.P.R. Bolívar (2016). Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82 (2), 392-408, https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308
  31. Mirfakhredini, S. H., & Abolhasani, S. (2014). Evaluation of the performance of processes in the field of urban services using TOPSIS and DIMTEL, the fourth national conference on management and sustainable economy with a strategic approach, Shiraz. [In Persian].
  32. Mohammadi Deh Cheshmeh, P. (2020). The Study of urban viability indicators status in Shahrekord, based on the position of urban management. JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCES, 20(57), 205-222. https://www.doi.org/10.29252/jgs.20.57.205 [In Persian].
  33. MOHAMMADI, P., ZIYARI, Y., & TAVAKOLAN, A. (2020). Analysis of the role of urban management in Shahrekord's Livability. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 52(3), 1055-1069. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22286462.1398.9.3.34.2 [In Persian]
  34. Monfaredzade, T., & Krueger, R. (2015) Investigating social factors of sustainability in a smart city. Procedia Engineering, 118, 1112-1118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.452
  35. MORADI, D., & SALEHI NAJAF ABADI, M. (2017). AN ANALYSIS OF CITIZEN’S NEEDS AND SATISFACTION LEVEL TO BE APPLIED IN URBAN DEVELOPMENT PLANNING (CASE STUDY: CITIZENS OF JOOZDAN). JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 1(1), [In Persian].
  36. Motamedi, M., Qulinejad Mirabbasi, A., Thabit Kushkinian, M., & Hataminejad, H. (2013). Geographical survey on the location of urban waste landfills (case study: Faruj city). Geographic Information, 23(90-91), 106-112. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.25883860.1393.23.901.13.9 [In Persian]
  37. MOVAHED, A., GHASEMI KAFROUDI, S., KAMANRODI, M., & SASANPOUR, F.. (2015). INVESTIGATION INTO URBAN NEIGHBORHOODS DEVELOPMENT WITH EMPHASIS ON GOOD URBAN GOVERNANCE PATTERN (CASE STUDY: REGION 19 OF TEHRAN MUNICIPALITY). SPATIAL PLANNING (MODARES HUMAN SCIENCES), 19(1), 147-179. [In Persian].
  38. NAZMFAR, H., Alavi, S., & Eshghi, A. (2018). spatial analysis of security in parks in Tehran. GEOGRAPHICAL URBAN PLANNING RESEARCH, 6(3), 491-510. [In Persian].
  39. Polese, F., Barile, S., Caputo, F., Carrubbo, L., & Waletzky, L. (2018) Determinants for value cocreation and collaborative paths in complex service systems: A focus on (smart) cities. Service Science, 10 (4), 397-407. https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.2018.0218
  40. Rahmati Dalir, Soraya, & Malekhoseini, Abbas. (2019). The Survey of Compliance of Iran Urban Management in Relation to the Principles of Urban Good Governance (The Case Study: the city of Kongavar). ISLAMIC ART, 15(33), 164-189. https://doi.org/10.22034/ias.2019.91561 [In Persia].
  41. RAJABI, A. (2011). THE METHODS OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN THE PROCESS OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT. ENVIRONMENTAL BASED TERRITORIAL PLANNING (AMAYESH), 4(12), 101-116. [In Persian]
  42. Riki, J., Miri, Gh. R., & Hafez Rezazadeh, M. (2021). Analysis of citizen participation in different substrates in urban area management (Case study: Zahedan city). JOURNAL OF HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 13(3), 215-234. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.66972251.1400.13.3.11.4 [In Persian].
  43. Rohollah Salar, Hamid Mostajabi, Mohsen Rezaei, Saied Ramezanzadeh, (2020). The Impact of Urban Management Interaction on Social Security. Order & Security Research Journal, 13(1), 1-26. 
  44. Rostaei, S., & Andesta, F. (2018). The Feasibility Study of Participatory Urban Governance Model in the Neighborhood (NBN Program) in Tabriz (Case study: Zone 2). Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR)6(4), 675-694. https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2018.239041.764 [In Persian].
  45. Khosravi, S., Kalantari, M., & Tavakolinia, J. (2022). Assessing the performance of the community council in Tehran’s neighborhood management with emphasis on good urban governance. Urban Economics and Planning, 3(2), 138-152. [In Persian].
  46. SATARIFAR, M., ZAREI, H/, & SHOKRI, N. (2014). THE EFFECTS OF IMMIGRATION AND URBANIZATION ON INFORMAL EMPLOYMENT IN DIFFERENT REGIONS OF IRAN: MULTI INDICATOR-MULTI CAUSES (MIMIC) APPROACH. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS (FINANCIAL ECONOMICS AND DEVELOPMENT), 8(29), 49-70. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.25383833.1393.8.29.3.5 [In Persian]
  47. Shakoui, H. (2012). New ideas in the philosophy of geography environmental philosophies and geographical schools. 7th edition, Tehran: Gitashenasi. [In persian]
  48. Stren R. (1993). Urban management in development assistance. Cities, 10 (2), 125-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-2751(93)90044-J
  49. Sun, Y., Fang, Y., Yung, E. H. K., Chao, T. Y. S., & Chan, E. H. W. (2020). Investigating the links between environment and older people’s place attachment in densely populated urban areas. Landscape and urban Planning, 203, Article 103897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103897
  50. Tavakolinia, J., Imani Jajarmi, H., & Yadolahnia, H. (2021). An Analysis of Good Governance Status in Urban Management Performance (A Case Study of Babol). ENVIRONMENTAL BASED TERRITORIAL PLANNING (AMAYESH), 14(53), 85-108. dor:20.1001.1.2676783.1400.14.53.5.1 [In Persian].
  51. UN DESA. (2013). World population projected to reach 9.6 billion by 2050. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Uninted Nations. https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/un-report-world-population-projected-to-reach-9-6-billion-by-2050.html
  52. United Nations. (2016). Policies on spatial distribution and urbanization. Booklet Urbanization Policies.pdf, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3799687
  53. United Nations. (2018). Revision of world urbanization prospects. Booklet Urbanization Policies.pdf, https://population.un.org/wup/publications/Files/WUP2018-Report.pdf
  54. Valera, S., & Guàrdia, J., (2014). Perceived Insecurity and Fear of Crime in a City with Low Crime, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.02.002
  55. VARESI, H.R., & SARVARI, Z. (2006). AN ANALYSIS OF MUTUAL RELATION OF DEVELOPMENT AND MIGRATION IN IRAN. JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHY AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, (6), 179-196. https://doi.org/10.22067/geography.v4i6.3097 [In Persian].
  56. Zangi Abadi, A., Yilaghi, M., & Mohammadi, B. (2014). Analysis of factors affecting citizens' satisfaction with urban management using factor analysis and multiple regression methods", Geographical Sciences, 23, 1-19. [In Persian].