Presentation of a Conceptual Model for Women's Right to City and its Causal Structure Analysis in Ahvaz

Document Type : Research article

Authors

1 Department of Geography, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

2 Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

10.22059/jurbangeo.2023.352562.1768

Abstract

ABSTRACT
Right to the city is one of the most important citizenship rights that can be reduced for women under different circumstances. In this mixed research, with in-depth and semi-structured interviews, a conceptual model has been presented to explain the causal, contextual and interventional conditions effectively reducing women's right to the city. Then, with the structural equation modeling, the causal conditions affecting the right to the city have been investigated. Family, ethnicity, and physical and mental conditions were the most important background conditions that 32 women living in Ahvaz pointed to in order to influence the right to the city. Also, the participants considered politics and government institutions, law, and spatial policies as the most important intervention in the women's right to the city. City security, favorable actions with the city space, space-positive gender performance, and social welfare were among the most important causal conditions that the participants mentioned in increasing women's right to the city. Causal modeling showed that the most influential reason for reducing women's right to the city of Ahvaz is urban space security, followed by urban policies and designs. By multiplying the causal path, it is 0.84, followed by urban planning and design with a coefficient of 0.79. Governmental and executive institutions should pay more attention to women's right to the city through the establishment of better laws, the design of suitable spaces with individual differences, especially gender, and, of course, with an emphasis on women. The creation of safer places in the city for women while increasing the livability of the city for citizens improves women's rights in urban spaces
Extended abstract
Introduction
The right to the city is a universal right consisting of several instances. Since the right to the city enables the city inhabitants to access and enjoy the urban life benefits freely, it is tantamount to the right to freedom. The right to the city, the right to freedom of building and rebuilding cities, is one of the most valuable and, at the same time, the most neglected human rights. Among governments, NGOs (Non-Governmental Organizations) and political activists in all scales, the right to the city is often conceived in a legal meaning. In this sense, the right to city includes a set of distinct rights to urban resources and services, shelter, public space, clean water, and education that must be available to all, regardless of social or economic status, the bearers of such rights are urban dwellers and their guarantor is the government. This legal conception of the right to the city emphasizes universal and individual rights in the global liberal institutional order. The ultimate normative purpose of a legal right to the city is that the government legally encodes and enforces the set of rights constituting the right to the city. Justice and equality have been considered since long ago; however, injustice and discrimination are still visible in cities. Among all kinds of injustices and discrimination, gender equality has been a subject marginalized in all ages. In Iran, the need for urban spaces for women in accordance with the civil needs of citizens in daily life is felt. In Iran, factors such as various types of urban violence and insecurity, which generally make women victims, have reduced the possibility and desire for their presence and participation in public. Because the spatial, temporal, official and unofficial divisions in the city have caused some spaces to remain far from the reach of women. In this research, we intend to deal with the most important factors that cause women not to enjoy one of their most essential human rights, which is the right to the city.
 
Methodology
This research, which is practical in terms of purpose, has been done with a confirmatory mixed method; first, it tried to present the most important contextual, interventional, and causal factors effective in reducing the right to the city of women in the form of a conceptual model by the approach of grounded theory, and then confirming the defined causal structure with the help of structural equations modeling. The population in this research is Iranian women who are exposed to gender injustice and do not have the right to a desirable city. Research participants have a deep experience of undermining their right to the city and are interested in sharing it and cooperating with the researcher. Sampling was purposefully selected from women with the least amount of the right to the city. The qualitative sample of the research was 32 people, and the quantitative sample was 420 people. Due to the mixed nature of the research and the use of the data-driven theory approach and, afterwards, structural equations to collect the data, the interview was used in the qualitative phase and questionnaires in the quantitative phase. The interviews were done in-depth, face-to-face and semi-structured. The open-ended interview questions were conducted in a calm environment without the presence of a third person, and the time of the interviews varied according to the conditions of the interviewee. The questionnaire used in the research has ascertained an instrument that evaluates the contextual and causal components and factors related to the right to the city in the form of self-declaration items. The data obtained from the interview, after being implemented in the form of text, were analyzed and classified with the help of directed content analysis. In order to investigate the causal structure of the right to the city, structural equation modeling would have been helpful. Analyzes were performed with the help of LISREL 8.8. To estimate the causal path coefficients, the iterated maximum likelihood method was used and the overall fit of the causal structure model of women’s right to the city was carried out by Chi-square statistic. And, of course, the most important fit indexes of the model, such as absolute fit indexes, incremental fit indexes and Parsimonious Normed Fit Indexes (PNFI).
 
Results and discussion
Directed content analysis helped us to identify the factors reducing the right to the city and its subclasses of Iranian women. Conditions affecting women's right to the city are divided into underlying conditions, causal conditions, and intervening conditions. The most critical underlying conditions were family, age, ethnicity, and physical and mental characteristics. At the same time, environment security, urban actions, social welfare, and space gender functions constituted the essential intervening conditions, and politics, governmental institutions, law, and city spatial policies included the most important intervening conditions. Causal modeling also showed that the factors influencing women's right to the city are the most influential to the least influential in the form of (1) security of the city environment, (2) urban policy-making, (3) gender function of space, and (4) interaction with the city. Security is one of the most important and influential factors that can decrease or increase the right to the city for women.
 
Conclusion
The right to the city, which is considered one of the most fundamental rights of citizens, is trampled or reaches its lowest level due to underlying reasons such as the gender of individuals or their families. In this case, women are more vulnerable than the men. In such a way, causal conditions such as environmental security or urban actions and, of course, welfare have made this gender difference in the use of city space deeper and more complicated. Meanwhile, the role of governments and sovereignty in legislation and policies should not be neglected to reduce the right to city for women. Our explicit suggestion is for governmental institutions and executive agencies to pay more attention to women’s right to the city through the establishment of better laws, the design of more suitable spaces in the city, the design of urban spaces away from any gender discrimination only with the view of equal access for all and the creation of safer places for the women living in Ahvaz.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific.
 

Keywords


  1. Althorpe, C., & Horak, M. (2021). The End of the Right to the City: A Radical-Cooperative View. Urban Affairs Review, 59(1), 14–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874211057815
  2. Bashevkin, S. (2005). Training a Spotlight on Urban Citizenship: The Case of Women in London and Toronto. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29, 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00567.x
  3. Bayat, B. (2013). Islamic approach to the city; Characteristics of the Islamic city. Scientific Journal of Social Theories of Muslim Thinkers, 4(1), 137-167. [In Persian].
  4. Bayat, B. (2014). Islamic approach to the city: Islamic City Characteristics. Journal of Social Theories of Muslim Thinkers, 4(1), 137-167. [In Persian]
  5. Behnam Morshidi, H., Quaid Rahmati, S., Ruknuddin Eftekhari, A. R., & Meshkini, A. (2021). The right to the city and the model of participatory planning (an analysis of the social production of urban spaces with an emphasis on large commercial complexes in Tehran). Journal of Geography and Development, 66(20), 1-34. doi: 10.22111/j10.22111.2022.6690
  6. Behnammorshedi, H., Gaed Rahmati, S., Eftakhari, R., & Meshkini, A. (2022). The Right to the City and the Pattern of Participatory Planning An Analysis of the Social Production of Urban Spaces with Emphasis on Megamalls of Tehran Metropolis. Geography and Development, 20(66), 1-34. [In Persian]
  7. Carmen, M. (2020). The more-than-human right to the city: A multispecies reevaluation, Journal of Urban Affairs, Published online: 03 Apr 2020. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429264429-3/human-right-city-marie-carmen-shingne
  8. Creswell J. W. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design (international student edition). 14. choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  9. Diaz-Parra, I., & Jover, J. (2021). Overtourism, place alienation and the right to the city: insights from the historic centre of Seville, Spain. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29(2–3), 158–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1717504
  10. Eshtiaghi, M., sharepor, M., & fazeli, M. (2021). Examining the Requirements of the Right to the City in the Policy-Making Process and Development Planning of the Cities: A Case Study of Tehran Transportation Development. Socio-Cultural Strategy, 10(2), 223-257. [In Persian]
  11. Gholamhosseini, R. (2014). investigation of the approach of gender justice in the construction of urban spaces. the 8th Iran Geopolitical Society, Tehran, Kharazmi University. [In Persian]
  12. Goussous, J., & Tayoun, L. (2020). A Holistic Approach to Slum Reduction: Finding Gaps in Cairo’s ‘How-to-Deal’model with International Collected Experience. Cities & Health, 31(4), 1-15.
  13. Habibnezhad, S. A., khosravi, A. (2022). The Right to the City and the Possibility of its Recognition in the Iranian legal system. Public Law Studies Quarterly, 52(1), 163-183. [In Persian]
  14. Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. Vol. null (null (ed.)).
  15. Hesketh, R. (2019). Using hybrid methods: biographic narrative interpretive method (bnim) with strauss and corbin's (1990) version of grounded theory to analyse the experience of gang members. SAGE Publications
  16. Hurubean, A. (2013). Gender Equality Policies, Social Citizenship and Democratic Deficit in the Post-communist Romanian Society. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 92, 403–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.692
  17. Irene, K., & Albine, M. (2017). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 2: Context, research questions and designs. European Journal of General Practice, 23(1), 274-279. DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375090
  18. Jabareen, Y. (2016). The right to the city’ revisited: Assessing urban rights: The case of Arab Cities in Israel. Habitat International, 41, 135-141.
  19. Jensen, R. (2022). Exploring causal relationships qualitatively: An empirical illustration of how causal relationships become visible across episodes and contexts. Journal of Educational Change, 23(2), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09415-5
  20. Kline, R. B., & Little, T. D. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
  21. Kohi, K. (2019). The pattern of reverse genderization of urban spaces in conflict with the rights and presence of women in Iran's legal system. the 6th International Conference on Management and Humanities Research in Iran. [In Persian]
  22. Lacasse, Y., Godbout, C., & Sériès, F. (2002). Health-related quality of life in obstructive sleep apnoea. European Respiratory Journal, 19(3), 499. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.02.00216902
  23. Lefebvrue, H. (2009). The urban revolution. Vol. null (null (ed.)).
  24. Lefebvrue, H., Kofman, E., & Lebas, E. (1996). Writings on cities: Henri Lefebvre. Vol. null (null (ed.)
  25. Lefebvur, H. (2000). Writing on Cities. 4th Editing, Oxford, Blackwell.
  26. Lesutis, G. (2020). Planetary urbanization and the “right against the urbicidal city. Urban Geography, Published online: 20 May
  27. Meriläinen, E. S., Fougère, M., & Piotrowicz, W. (2020). Refocusing urban disaster governance on marginalised urban people through right to the city. Environmental Hazards, 19(2), 187–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2019.1682492.
  28. Mitchell, D. (2003). The Right to the City, Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space. NewYork, The Guil Ford Press.
  29. Mundfrom, D. J., Shaw, D. G., & Ke, T. L. (2005). Minimum Sample Size Recommendations for Conducting Factor Analyses. International Journal of Testing, 5(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327574ijt0502_4.
  30. Pierce, J., Williams, O., Deborah, G., Martin, O (2016), Rights in places: An analytical extension of the right to the city. Geoforum, 70, 79-88.
  31. Rafiyan, M., & Alwandipour, N. (2014). conceptualization of the idea of the right to the city; In search of a conceptual model. Iranian Journal of Sociology, 16(2), 25-47.
  32. Rendell, J. (2000). "Introduction: Gender, Space" in Rendell, Penner & Borden, Gender, Space, Architecture: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. Routledge,
  33. Roumina, E., Teymori, G., & Ahmadipour, Z. (2018). Study the relationship between space and gender justice; Case Study: Region 6 of Tehrn. Research Political Geography Quarterly, 3(2), 141-162. [In Persian]
  34. Sanaei, M., Vafadar Sooraki, R., Aatefi, K. (2022). Assessment of Spatial Differences (Discrepancies) of Realization of Right to Participation and Assigning the City to Self in Light of the Notion of Right to City in Hachirood- Chalous Township. Urban Environmental Planning and Development, 2(5), 45-60. [In Persian]
  35. Sanai, M., Fafadar S., & Atefi, K. (2022). Measuring the spatial differences of the realization of the right to participation and assigning the city to oneself in the light of the idea of the right to the city in Hachiroud city - Chalus city. Urban Environment Policy Journal, 5, 47-60.
  36. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson: New York
  37. Waldron, J. (2020). Rights and Human Rights. In J. Tasioulas (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Law (Cambridge Companions to Law, pp. 152-170). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781316104439.009
  38. Zayyari, K., & Torkamanniya, N. (2013). Evaluating women use of urban transport system(Case study: 6th district of Tehran). Journal of Urban - Regional Studies and Research, 5(19), 149-168. [In Persian]