Explaining the theoretical model of the relationship between social-spatial segregation and the formation of gated communities in Iranian cities

Document Type : Research article

Authors

1 Department of Urban planning, Faculty of Arts and Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Arts and Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

10.22059/jurbangeo.2024.380520.1974

Abstract

ABSTRACT
Due to the necessity of investigating the relationship between the formation of enclosed or gated communities and spatial-social separation in Iranian cities, this topic has not been well studied so far. For this purpose, this research was conducted with the aim of investigating the relationship between these two issues and the indicators affecting their formation in the cities of the country. In this research, systematic review, content analysis, and structural analysis were used. The findings of the research show that social indicators are the most frequent indicators in previous studies, followed by economic indicators, indicators related to housing, and physical indicators, respectively. Also, the indicators of employment, income, and education are the influencing variables that affect social-spatial segregation and, consequently, the formation of gated communities in Iranian cities. These factors are directly and indirectly effective in social-spatial segregation and, consequently, in the formation of gated communities through the promotion of social distance. Also, inequality in urban environments has an effect on the formation of gated communities through the impact of social-spatial segregation, and gated communities intensify social-spatial segregation by creating inequality in urban environments and promoting physical distance and social distance. As a result, it seems that social distance and inequality in the city environment mediate the relationship between gated communities and social-spatial segregation in Iranian cities.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
In recent years, many cities and metropolises of the country have faced a significant increase in the number of gated communities as a new manifestation of social-spatial segregation. These communities have played a big role in the country's housing market; many types have been created or are being built. This issue has become a major concern for managers, planners, designers and citizens. However, this issue has not been well studied so far due to the necessity of examining the relevance of this type of residential construction under the title of enclosed or gated communities and social-spatial separation. For this purpose, this research has been conducted to investigate the relationship between these two issues and the indicators affecting their formation in the country's cities. In fact, this research seeks to answer the following questions:
-What is the relationship between social-spatial segregation and the formation of gated communities in Iranian cities?
-What are the key indicators affecting the formation of these two concepts in the country?
 
Methodology
The research methods used in this study were systematic review, content analysis, and structural analysis. In fact, it has been tried to answer the research questions in four basic steps. First, in the first step, using a systematic review of previous studies, it was identified in several stages and screened using the Prisma technique (2009) and based on the works of his colleagues (2015) until the most relevant studies were identified for content analysis and identification of indicators and categories. At this stage, the characteristics of previous studies (37 articles related to social-spatial segregation and 9 articles related to gated communities (introduced in the research background section)) in terms of author, year, publication, case, approach and keywords have been checked and analyzed by the software (VOS viewer). Then, in order to identify the relationship between the two concepts of social-spatial segregation and gated communities and the indicators affecting them, the content analysis of these studies using the software (MAXQDA) was done in the second step, and the indicators and codes showing the relationship between segregation spatial-social selection and gated communities have been identified. In the third step, due to the fact that the most important indicators affecting spatial and social segregation in Iranian cities are not known, the most key indicators have been identified from the experts' point of view using the structural analysis and software method (MICMAC). Finally, in the fourth step, the theoretical model of the research (relationship between social-spatial segregation and gated communities in Iranian cities) is presented, according to the previous three steps. The data collection method combined library studies and consensus based on an expert panel (in structural analysis of indicators).
 
Results and discussion
The findings show that employment, income, and education are influential variables that are the main effective indicators of social-spatial segregation and, consequently, the formation of gated communities in Iranian cities. Their effectiveness is much higher than their effectiveness. They are considered key indicators that are effective in reducing social-spatial segregation. These factors are effective both directly and through influencing people's personal preferences on social-spatial segregation and consequently on the formation of gated communities through promoting social distance. Also, inequality in urban environments has an impact on the formation of gated communities through social-spatial segregation, and gated communities intensify spatial segregation by creating inequality in urban environments and improving physical and social distance. Moreover, it has become a social phenomenon in the city. As a result, according to the theoretical model of the research, it seems that social distance and inequality in the city environment mediate the relationship between gated communities and social-spatial segregation. Of course, these two are not completely distinguishable because gated communities' manifest optional spatial separation by people who, due to social distance, have tried to separate their living space from other people by emphasizing differences such as employment, income, and education.
 
Conclusion
As a result, social-spatial segregation and gated communities are not completely distinguishable because gated communities are equivalent to separation, and the manifestation of social-spatial segregation is optional by people who, due to social distance, emphasize differences such as Employment, income and education have separated their living space from other people. However, social distance and inequality in the city environment seem to mediate the relationship between gated communities and social-spatial segregation.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

Keywords


  1. Afarakhta, H., & Abdoli, A. (2009). Spatial separation and social anomalies of worn-out fabric: Case study of Baba Taher neighborhood of Khorram Abad city. Applied Research Journal of Geographical Sciences, 9(8), 53-81. [In Persian]
  2. Akbari, R., Esmaeilpoor, N., & Motalebzadeh, S. (2021). An Explanation of the Effective Factors on Spatial Segregation in Rural-Urban Areas. Urban Structure and Function Studies, 8(29), 213-243. doi: 10.22080/usfs.2021.3450. [In Persian].
  3. Asar, S., Jalalpour, S., Ayoubi, F., Rahmani, M., & Rezaeian, M. (2016). PRISMA; Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. JRUMS, 15(1), 68-80. [In Persian].
  4. Attar, M. A. (2019). Simulation of urban segregation by Agent-Based Modeling Case study: Shiraz Metropolis. Geographical Planning of Space, 9(32), 121-136. doi: 10.30488/gps.2019.93934. [In Persian].
  5. Azam Azadeh, M. (2003). How to choose residential segregation in Tehran city. Al-Zahra Human Sciences, 12-13(44-45), 25-50. [In Persian].
  6. Azhdari, A., Sasani, M. A., and Soltani, A. (2018). Exploring the relationship between spatial driving forces of urban expansion and socioeconomic segregation: The case of Shiraz. Habitat International, 81, 33–44, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.09.001.
  7. Azhdari, A., Taghvaei, A. A., & Zahirinajad, A. (2015). Analyzing Socio-spatial Segregation of Educational and Occupational Groups in Shiraz Metropolitan Area. Motaleate Shahri, 4(16), 67-80. [In Persian].
  8. Azhdarinezhad, A. (2018). Measuring the impact of industrial spaces on the quality of life in neighborhoods enclosed in this function (Case study: Vilashahr neighborhood in District 21 of Tehran). Iranian Urbanism, 1(1), 35-49. [In Persian].
  9. Babaei Aghdam, F., Attar, M. A., Roshan Roodi, S., & Motidoost, A. (2015). Measuring Urban Ecological Segregation by One Group Measures (Case Study: Takab City). Human Geography Research, 47(3), 477-491. doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2015.51235. [In Persian].
  10. Babaei Aghdam, F., Roshan Roodi, S., Motidoost, A., Attar, M. A. (2017). Analysis of the relationship between ethnicities economic and social status with their segregation in the districts of Takab city. journal of police Geography, 5(19), 113-132. doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2015.51235. [In Persian].
  11. babaei, F., Motidoost, A., Attar, M., & roshan roodi, S. (2018). A Study of the relationship between Socio-Economic Status of urban zones and Spatial Segregation in Takab City. Journal of Geography and Planning, 22(65), 63-81. [In Persian].
  12. Balali, E., & Makhdoomi, K. (2021). Spatial Segregation or Social Segregation? A Comparative Study of Marriage Patterns of Women in the High and Low-Class Regions of Hamadan Province. Journal of Applied Sociology, 32(2), 129-150. doi: 10.22108/jas.2021.122682.1896. [In Persian].
  13. Bandauko, E., Arku, G., & Nyantakyi-Frimpong, H. (2022). A systematic review of gated communities and the challenge of urban transformation in African cities. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 37, 339–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-021-09840-1
  14. Dadashpoor, H., & zahirnejad, A. (2019). Examining the Impact of Socio-Spatial Segregation of occupational and educational groups on Spatial Structure of Tehran Metropolitan Region. Geographical Planning of Space, 9(33), 249-264. doi: 10.30488/gps.2019.91922. [In Persian].
  15. Farash, N., Rabiei Dastjardif, H., & Sadeghi, R. (2018). A review of spatial segregation in demography. Iranian Journal of Official Statistics, 30(2), 429-460. [In Persian]
  16. Ghalehnoee, M., & Sabet, S. (2020). Socio-Spatial Segregation Factors in Isfahan. Geography and Urban Space Development, 6(2), 71-88. doi: 10.22067/gusd.v6i2.69168. [In Persian].
  17. Ghazaie, M., Pakshir, A., Lotfi, S., Soltani, A., Goli A. (2017). Studying the Urban Segregation of different groups In Mashhad with an emphasis on residential features. Journal of Geographical Space,16 (56), 33-51. [In Persian].
  18. Ginting, S. W., Noerwasito, V. T., & Santoso, E. B. (2022). Analysis of the relationship between the gated community Citraland Surabaya’s spatial configuration and social segregation. ARTEKS, 7(3).
  19. Hajinejad, A., Yaghfori, H., Paidar, A., & Sanjari, A. (2015). Study the ecological effects of segregation on social sustainability (case study: Anbarabad city). journal of police Geography, 3(10), 35-60. [In Persian].
  20. Hajipour, K., Payab, A., & dadoutabar, M. (2018). A Study of the Effects of the Formation of Second Homes on Spatial Separation in New Towns (Case Study: Sadra New Town). Urban Planning Knowledge, 2(3), 35-56. doi: 10.22124/upk.2019.11252.1129. [In Persian].
  21. Hammad, A., Li, M., & Vrcelj, Z. (2024). The rise of gated communities in Amman from the old to the modern: Socio-spatial impact on the surrounding. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 19(2), 433-442.
  22. Hashemi Ghoochani, Y., & Dadashpoor, H. (2023). Socio-Spatial Cohesion: A Study of Structural, Interactive, and Subjective Dimensions in Mashhad Metropolitan Region, Iran. Social Indicators Research, 165, 843–866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-03032-2
  23. Hedayatifard, M., & Kheyroddin, R. (2017). A Genealogy of Exclusive Spaces in Suburban Areas of the Caspian Sea South Coast; from Quiddity to Role-Taking in Law-Making and Planning Systems. Soffeh, 27(3), 75-104. [In Persian].
  24. Hedayatifard, M., & kheyroddin, R. (2019). Explanation of Exclusive Space Production Mechanisms in Coastal Peri-Urban Areas (Case Study: Southern Coast of Caspian Sea). Iranian Journal of Anthropological Research, 9(1), 157-181. doi: 10.22059/ijar.2019.73484. [In Persian].
  25. Hedaytifard, M., & Kheyroddin, R. (2017). Developing a Conceptual framework for exclusive spaces in coastal pre-urban areas: Coastal areas of Southern part of Caspian Sea: From Sari to Mahmoud Abad. Town and Country Planning9(2), 303-332. doi: 10.22059/jtcp.2017.239729.669775. [In Persian].
  26. Hosseini, S. (2022). Analysis of the Impact of the location of Ambassadors and Foreigners in the Evolution of the Socio-Spatial Segregation Structure of Tehran During the Qajar Era. Quarterly Journals of Urban and Regional Development Planning, 7(23), 121-151. doi: 10.22054/urdp.2022.68623.1451. [In Persian].
  27. Imani Shamloo, J., Rafiean, M., & Azhdari, A. (2022). Explaining of the Socio-Occupational Segregation in Space Organization of Tehran Metropolis (From the Perspective of Neoliberal Restructuring of Space). Human Geography Research, 54(2), 437-456. doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2020.258095.1007703. [In Persian].
  28. Imani Shamloo, J., & Rafieian, M. (2022). Spatial Segregation in Tehran: A Curse of an Oil-Led Economy in the Context of Globalization, Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 148(2), 1-25. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000827.
  29. Izadi, M. S., Masoud, M., & Moazezi Mehr-e-Tehran, A. M. (2016). Designing a holistic framework in studying urban segregation. Motaleate Shahri, 5(20), 79-91. [In Persian].
  30. Jafari, M., Siavashpuor, B., & Askari, A. (2019). The Effects of Spatial Configuration on Social Segregation in Old city of Golestan, Sabzevar. Motaleate Shahri, 8(32), 33-46. doi: 10.34785/J011.2019.106. [In Persian].
  31. Jalili, M., Einifar, A., Madani, R., & Judd, B. (2021). The Effects of Residential Communities’ Physical Boundaries on Residents’ Perception of Fear of Crime: A Comparison Between Gated, Perceived Gated, and Non-Gated Communities in Ekbatan Neighborhood, Tehran. Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism(JIAU), 12(2), 189-204. doi: 10.30475/isau.2021.196767.1273. [In Persian].
  32. Jalilisadrabad, S., Shieh, E., & Behzadfar, M. (2018). Software Analysis of Social-spatial Segregation in Urban Neighborhoods, Case Studies: Geo Segregation Analyzer Software in Fadak & Kerman Neighborhoods. Naqshejahan- Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning, 8(1), 17-23. [In Persian].
  33. Jami Odulo, M., Yazdani, M. H., & Jalili Sadrabad, S. (2022). Measuring the Residential Segregation of Ardabil City Using Multi-Group Measurement Index. Geography and Territorial Spatial Arrangement, 12(44), 145-170. doi: 10.22111/gaij.2022.42596.3036. [In Persian].
  34. jami odulo, M., yazdani, M., & jalilisadrabad, S. (2023). Analysis and ranking of factors affecting economic concentration and segregation in Ardabil city. Geographical Planning of Space, 13(1), 73-94. doi: 10.30488/gps.2022.312714.3469. [In Persian].
  35. Jami, M., yazdani, M. H., & jalili, S. (2022b). Assessing the social spatial Segregation of educational and occupational groups in the city of Ardebil. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 10(2), 73-92. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2022.344959.1711. [In Persian].
  36. Javaheri, H., Hataminejad, H., Ziari, K., & PourAhmad, A. (2015). Social segregation of Kamyaran city: an analysis on spatial dissimilarity and spatial isolation. Geography and Territorial Spatial Arrangement, 5(16), 1-18. doi: 10.22111/gaij.2015.2159. [In Persian].
  37. Khairuddin, R. (2012). A research on spatial-physical translation of Islamic concept of justice with cartographic analysis of spatial balance in 112 districts of Tehran metropolis. Islamic Architecture Research, 1 (1), 41-56. [In Persian].
  38. Kheyroddin, R., & Hedayatifard, M. (2017a). Social Segregation to Exclusive Public Shoreline Access: Coastal Gated Communities on the Middle Shoreline of the Caspian Sea in Northern Iran, Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 143(3), 5017006. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000363.
  39. Kheyroddin, R., & Hedayatifard, M. (2017b). The production of exclusive spaces in coastal pre-urban areas: Causes and motivations: Middle shoreline of Caspian Sea in north of Iran. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 21, 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-017-0510-z
  40. lotfi, S., & ghazaie, M. (2019). Studying The Role of Segregation in the Emerging of Deteriorated Urban Fabrics Case Study: ‘Qāssem-Ābād’ District (Mashhad, Iran). Geography and Development, 17(54), 15-36. doi: 10.22111/gdij.2019.4349. [In Persian].
  41. Meshkini, A., & Rahimi, H. (2011). Spatial separation in the mother cities: An analysis of the social geography of the mother city of Tehran. Planning and Preparation of Space, 15(4), 87-107. [In Persian]
  42. Miahi, M., & Vasigh, B. (2022). Analysis of the effect of sense of place in Gated communities complexes (Case study of Ahvaz oil town). Haft Hesar J Environ Stud, 11 (41), 31-52. [In Persian].
  43. Mirabadi, M., rajabi, A., & mahdavi hajiloei, M. (2018). Explanation and Analysis of spatial imbalance and measuring the effective factors on spatial concentration and segregation in the city of Mahabad. Journal of Geographical Space, 18(62), 255-274. [In Persian].
  44. Mirgholami, M., Shokrani Dizj, M., Sediq Far, A., & Mousaviyan, S. (2015). Evaluating security in gated communities of Urmia city, using location quotients and hotspots methods. Motaleate Shahri, 4(16), 55-66. [In Persian].
  45. Mousavinia, S. F. (2020). Relationship between perceived density, sense of safety, and social interactions in gated and non-gated communities. Motaleate Shahri, 9(34), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.34785/J011.2021.487 [In Persian].
  46. Piri, I. (2016). The Role of Good Governance in Reducing Spatial Segregation (Case Study: Tabriz Metropolitan). Geography and Urban Space Development, 3(1), 121-132. doi: 10.22067/gusd.v3i1.28222. [In Persian].
  47. Rafieian, M., & Zahed, N. (2020). Measuring urban spatial segregation in the city of Qom and its relation with the urban spatial structure. Geographical Planning of Space, 10(35), 217-238. doi: 10.30488/gps.2020.102605. [In Persian].
  48. Rafieian, M., Ghazaie, M., & Ghazi, R. (2018). Studying the Socio-Spatial Segregation of Migrants in Mashhad. Quarterly of Social Studies and Research in Iran, 7(1), 151-178. doi: 10.22059/jisr.2018.239125.547. [In Persian].
  49. Saremi, H., & Ghazaie, M. (2021). Studying the role of segregation in the formation of neighborhoods, based on Islamic, Iranian and Western thoughts. Urban Planning Knowledge, 5(4), 325-343. doi: 10.22124/upk.2021.16199.1439. [In Persian].
  50. Schnell, I., & Benjamini, Y. (1999). Socio-spatial lifestyles and segregation. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography, Espace, Société, Territoire, Document 94. https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.4856
  51. Teimoori, I., Hadili, B., & Saberi, H. (2017). Symbolic Consumerism and Spatial Segregation in Tabriz City Case study: Kooye Ferdovs and Valiasr. Geography and Development, 15(47), 1-16. doi: 10.22111/gdij.2017.3180. [In Persian].
  52. Turok, I., Visagie, J., & Scheba, A. (2021). Social Inequality and Spatial Segregation in Cape Town. In: van Ham, M., Tammaru, T., Ubarevičienė, R., Janssen, H. (eds) Urban Socio-Economic Segregation and Income Inequality. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64569-4_4.
  53. Yazdani, M. H., Soltani, A., Nazmfar, H., & Attar, M. A. (2016). The Measure of Residential Segregation of Socio-Economic Groups by Using Multigroup Indices in Shiraz City. Journal of Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, 16 (42), 197-222. [In Persian].
  54. yazdani, M., jami odluo, M., & Abbasi Taghi Dizaj, R. (2023). Analyzing segregation in rural-urban areas with an emphasis on inclusive development (case study: rural-urban areas of Ardabil city). Geography and Human Relationships, 5(4), 715-741. doi: 10.22034/gahr.2023.394286.1856. [In Persian].
  55. Yazdanniaz, A., Behzadfar, M., & Daneshpour, A. (2023). Analysis of Social-Spatial Separation Space in Inefficient Urban Contexts (Case Study: Qaitarieh Neighborhood of Tehran Metropolis). Urban Economics and Planning, 4(1), 158-179. doi: 10.22034/uep.2023.386146.1331. [In Persian].
  56. Zahirnejad, A., & Dadashpoor, H. (2018). Examining socio-spatial segregation of educational and occupational groups in Isfahan metropolitan region. Physical Social Planning, 5(1), 25-44. doi: 10.30473/psp.2018.4829. [In Persian].