Analyzing spatial linking of environmental factors and the Ssocial status of Tehran’s residents viewed from environmental justice

Document Type : Research article

Authors

Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

10.22059/jurbangeo.2024.379275.1964

Abstract

ABSTRACT
This research aimed to investigate the relationship between the spatial distribution of socio-economic classes and environmental benefits and burdens in Tehran. The components of the independent variable include green space coverage, the number of clean days, and the environment's health. With equal Euclidean distance, 62866 random points are the basis for preparing data and creating information layers for each GIS index. Spatial analysis (Interpolation-IDW), Spatial Join, and Fuzzy Overlay functions in ArcGIS are employed to analyze the data. Findings show that the correlation between the distribution of social classes and the distribution of the number of days with clean air is direct, and it has an inverse relationship with green space coverage and environmental health. In general, there is an inverse relationship between the spatial distribution of economic classes and environmental factors in Tehran. Spatially, in the west of the city, the areas with the highest correlation are located next to the areas with the lowest correlation. Over time, the spatial relation between economic classes distribution and environmental benefits and burdens has been moderated.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Cities are usually characterized by various socio-economic groups based on income, social status, gender, job, race, ethnicity, age, and ability. The poorer and lower-income classes, as well as ethnic and racial minorities, are usually pushed towards the more dangerous, vulnerable, and crowded areas of cities, and this condition increases their vulnerability to environmental threats. It also provides them with fewer opportunities to enjoy facilities and services. The unequal distribution of environmental benefits and burdens has raised the concept of environmental justice. Environmental justice can be defined as equal access to a clean environment and protection from environmental damage regardless of race, income, class, or any other distinguishing socio-economic characteristic. This paper aimed to determine the extent of environmental justice in Tehran and to determine to what extent the spatial distribution of social classes is compatible with the environmental benefits and burdens.
 
 Methodology
This is a descriptive-analytical research. The data on housing price (HS), as one of the dependent variables (DVs), is extracted from the Ministry of Roads and Urban Development website (the price of one square meter of residential building in February 2024). Another variable is the residential area per capita (RAP). The data is obtained by calculating the GIS file of the 2016 Iranian Public Census of Population and Housing statistical blocks; household economic data, especially income and expenditure data, is not available, considering that housing and its price is a suitable indicator of the households’ economic groups, the multiplication of the two variables of HS and RAP are selected as dependent variables. It is named housing credit (HC). The components of the independent variable (IDV) and their sources of the data are as follows: green space coverage (GSC) (GIS file that is received from Tehran Municipality (TM), number of clean days (measurements from 35 air quality measurement stations of TM), environmental health (information about the number of sweeping workers, waste collection centers, carrier vehicles, recyclable waste buyer centers (received from the Urban Services Organization of TM).
The Z-Score formula is used to normalize the figures. Data collection is based on 352 points representing the geometric center of each neighborhood.  Interpolation-IDW is used to drive zoning maps. The vector layers are converted into Raster layers to make point layers with coordinates corresponding to 352 points. ArcGIS software and Spatial Analyst, Spatial Join, and Zonal Statistic functions are used to generate the required data in digital layers. Analytical models include Geography Weighted Regression and Ordinary Least Square. Band collection statistics tools are also used to calculate the correlation. Tehran, with an area of 615 km2 and a population of about 7.8 million people, is the area studied in this research.
 
Results and discussion
The zoning maps of HS show that it increases from south to north. The highest HS belong to the municipality districts (MDs) of 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and districts 20, 14, and 18, respectively, have the lowest residential housing prices among the total of 22 MDs. There is a 13.8 times difference in the average price between District 1, the northernmost district, and District 20, the southernmost district of the municipality. The housing area per capita (HAP) increases from west to east and south to north. The average HAP in Tehran is 23.41 m2. The three districts of TM with the highest figures of HC are District 3, District 2, and District 1, respectively. Also, the lowest RAP belongs to Districts 12, 19, and 9, respectively. There is a difference of about 21.2 times between districts 3 and 12.
In the fringe parts of the west, south-west and south of the city, the HC is lower than other parts. In general, if we divide the city into two halves of south-west and north-east, the HC is much lower in the south-west half. Among the MDs, the three districts with the highest figures are Districts 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
Overall, in the areas where higher income classes live, ecological indicators are in a weaker situation. Here, the green space coverage shows the highest inverse correlation figure. Also, the lowest correlation figures belong to the indicators of health and cleanliness of the environment, which show an inverse correlation. Higher-income households live in parts of the city where the number of days with clean air per year is higher. In the western corner of the city,  the areas with the lowest correlation between DP and IDP are next to the areas with the highest correlation.
 
Conclusion
Tehran has long been known for adapting to the geographical and socio-economic north. However, since the revolution of 1978, changes happened that have disrupted the situation to a great extent. Since these years, urban management's control over urban planning has been weakened, and some rules and regulations have been revoked. The chaotic conditions during the imposed war led to the arrival and settlement of various economic households of low-income immigrants who could create informal settlements anywhere, including in the city's northern half. The construction of residential complexes anywhere in the northern areas of the city by worker and employee housing cooperatives and especially military organizations' coopratives, during the war and after it, caused a large number of employees and soldiers as middle and lower economic groups to be settled in the northern half of Tehran.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
 We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

Keywords


  1. Abdollahi, M. (2015). 73% growth of Tehran's green space happened  during 10 years. Interview as the chief mannager of Tehran Parks and Green Space Organization on: 8/16/2015. Received 7/11/2024 from: https://www.mashreghnews.ir/news  [in Persian]
  2. Adger, N., Brown, K., Conway, D., and Hug, S. (2013). Adaptation to Climate Change in the Developing World. Progress in Development Studies. 3(3), 176-195. DOI:10.1191/1464993403ps060oa
  3. Anand, R. (2017). nternational Environmental Justice: A North-South Dimension. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315252049
  4. Bahmanpour, H., & Moharamnezhad, N. (2006). Sustainable development of urban green spaces in Tehran. National conference on the optimization of the urban environmentTehran. [in Persian]
  5. Beretta, I. (2012). Some Highlights on the Concept of Environmental Justice and its Use. e-cadernos CES (Centro de Estudos Sociais da Universidade de Coimbra) 17(17), 132-136. DOI:10.4000/eces.1135
  6. Bernardini Papalia, R., and Scognamiglio, G. (2023). Environmental justice: geostatistical analysis of environmental hazards and socioeconomic factors—the case of Italy. GeoJournal. 88 (6), 1-26. DOI:10.1007/s10708-023-10966-8
  7. Carmona, M. (2010).  Contemporary public spaces: critique and classification, part one: critique. Journal of urban design, 15(1),123-148. DOI:10.1080/13574800903435651
  8. Charlton, M., Fotheringham, S., and Brunsdon, C. (2005). Geographically Weighted Regression. Esrc National Centre for Research Methods NCRM Methods Review Papers NCRM/006.
  9. Combera, A., Brunsdon, C., and Green, E. (2018). Using a GIS-based network analysis to determine urban greenspace accessibility for different ethnic and religious groups. Landscape and Urban Planning. 86(1), 103-114. DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.01.002
  10. Cutter, S.L. (1995). Race, class and environmental justice. Progress in Human Geography. 19(1), 111-122. doi:10.1177/030913259501900111
  11. Dawson, N., Martin, A., & Danielsen, F. (2017). Assessing equity in protected area governance: approaches to promote just and effective conservation. Conservation Letters, 11(2). DOI:10.1111/conl.12388
  12. Dawson, N., Coolsaet, B., & Martin, A. (2018). Justice and equity: Emerging research and policy approaches to address ecosystem service trade-offs. Ecosystem Services and Poverty Alleviation. 22-38.
  13. De Planhol, X. (2006). Observations on the human geography of northern Iran. Translated in Persian by Sahami, S. Mashhad University Publication. [in Persian]
  14. Dovidio, J.F., Hewstone, M., Glick, P., & Esses, M.V. (2020). Prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination: Theoretical and empirical overview.  The SAGE Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination. 3-28. DOI:10.4135/9781446200919.n1
  15. Elliott, MR., Wang, Y., Lowe, RA., & Kleindorfer, PR. (2014). Environmental justice: frequency and severity of US chemical industry accidents and the socioeconomic status of surrounding communities. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 58 (1), 24-30. DOI: 10.1136/jech.58.1.24
  16. Evans, GW., & Kantrowitz, E. (2022). Socioeconomic status and health: the potential role of environmental risk exposure. Annual Review of Public Health. 23(1), 303-331. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.112001.112349
  17. Fasihi, H., Parizadi, T., & Hamidi, M. (2019). Analysising the accessibility to urban parks with an environmental justice approach(case study: Eslamshahr). Journal of urban structure and function. 6(21), 39-58.  [in Persian]
  18. Fasihi, H. (2021) Analyzing the availability and access to urban parks with a spatial justice approach (case study: District 20 of Tehran Municipality). Geography and Development. No. 65, 257-276. https://doi.org/ 10.22111/j10.22111.2021.6523[in Persian]
  19. Fielding, J. (2017). Socio-economic class of those at risk from flooding in England and Wales Environmental injustice or just the lie of the land: An investigation. Sociological Research Online. 12(4). https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1570
  20. Ghorbani, S., Salehi, E., Faryadi, Sh.,  & Jafari, H. (2019). Evaluation of environmental justice in Tehran based on the spatial distribution of air and noise pollution. Geography and environmental Sustainability, 32, 19-31. doi: 10.22126/GES.2019.3819.1982 [in Persian]
  21. Harlan, SL., Brazel, AJ., Prashad, L., and Stefanov, WL. (2016) Neighborhood microclimates and vulnerability to heat stress. Social Science and Medicine. 63 (11), 2847-2863. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.07.030
  22. Higgs, G., & Langford, M. (2019). GIScience, environmental justice, & estimating populations at risk: The case of landfills in Wales. Applied Geography. 29 (1), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.07.006
  23. Hölzl, C.E., Veskov, M., Scheibner, T., Le, T.T., & Kleinschmit, B. Vulnerable socioeconomic groups are disproportionately exposed to multiple environmental burden in Berlin - implications– for planning. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development. 13(2), 1-17. DOI:10.1080/19463138.2021.1904246
  24. Iranian Statistic Center (2016). The 2016 final results of Public  Census of  population and housing (Tehran). [in Persian]
  25. Jerrett, M., Burnett, RT., Kanaroglou, P., and Eyles, J. (2014). A GIS - environmental justice analysis of particulate air pollution in Hamilton, Canada. Environment and Planning. 33 (1), 955-973. DOI:10.1068/a33137
  26. Jiménez, A.M., & Angulo, J.V. (2009). Ntra-metropolitan imbalances and rebalances: Evaluation principles and analysis methodology. City And Territory Territorial Studies XLI. 160, 232-262.
  27. Johnson, C., Penning-Rowsell, E., and Parker, D. (2017). Natural and imposed injustices: The challenges in implementing 'fair' flood risk management policy in England. Geographical Journa. 173, 374-390. DOI:10.1111/j.1475-4959.2007.00256.x
  28. Kockler, H., Katzschner, L., Kupsk, S., Katzschne, A., & Pelz, A. (2008). Umweltbezogene Gerechtigkeit und Immissionsbelastungen am Beispiel der Stadt Kassel [online]. CESR-Paper 1, Kasse: Kassel University Press. doi:10.17170/kobra-202009101768
  29. König, C. (2024). Neighbourhood structure and environmental quality: A fine-grained analysis of spatial inequalities in urban Germany. Urban Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/004209802312242
  30. Kruize, H. (2017). On Environmental Equity: Exploring the Distribution of Environmental Quality among Socio-Economic Categories in The Netherlands. Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 99(5), 641-643. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2008.499_3.x
  31. Laurent, E. (2014). Environmental Inequality in France: A Theoretical, Empirical and Policy Perspective. Analyse and Kritik. 36(2), 251-262. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2014-0204
  32. Laurent, N. (2020). Environmental justice and environmental inequalities:A European perspective. Parice, France: FCE: Centre de Recherche en economic de SCIENCE PO.
  33. Liu, J., Farahani, H., & Serota, R. (2024). Exploring Distributions of House Prices and House Price Indices." Economies. 12 (2), 47-58. DOI:10.3390/economies12020047
  34. Martin, A., Coolsaet, B., & Corbera, E. (2019). Ustice and conservation: the need to incorporate recognition. Biological Conservation. 197, 254-261. DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2016.03.021
  35. Mennis, J.L., & Jordan, L. (2003). The distribution of environmental equity: Exploring spatial nonstationarity in multivariate models of air toxic releases. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 95(2), 249-268. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00459.x
  36. Mitchell, G. (2019). The Messy Challenge of Environmental Justice in the UK: Evolution, status and prospects. Natural England Commissioned Reports. Number 273.
  37. Moin, M. (1992). Moin Persian Dictionary. Tehran: Amirkabir Press.[in Persian]
  38. Municipality of Tehran(2006). About Tehran. Received 6/25/2024 from: https://www.tehran.ir/[in Persian]
  39. Organization of Information and Communication Technology of Tehran Municipality(2023). Statistics of Tehran city:The 2022 Statistical Yearbook  of Tehran. www.tehran.ir [in Persian]
  40. Pachauri,A., Pathak, D., Mittal, K., Thomas, M., Ayala, N., Sevilla, N., Magdalene A, Ph., Vázquez, V. (2021). Environmental Justice and Equity: An Exploration through the POP Movement. Cadnus: Promoting leadership in thouth that leads to action, 4 (5), 72-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.05.039
  41. Pearce, JR., Richardson, EA., Mitchell, RA., & Shortt, NK. (2020). Environmental justice and health: the implications of the socio-spatial distribution of multiple environmental deprivation for health inequalities in the United Kingdom. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 35(4), 522-539. DOI:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00399.x
  42. Pearce, JR, Richardson, EA., Mitchell, RA., & Shortt, NK. (2010). Environmental justice and health: the implications of the socio-spatial distribution of multiple environmental deprivation for health inequalities in the United Kingdom. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 35 (4), 522-539. DOI:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00399.x
  43. Pelling, M. (2015). The Vulnerability of Cities: Natural Disasters and Social Resilience. London: Earthscan. DOI:10.4324/9781849773379
  44. Raddatz, L., and Mennis, J. (2013). Environmental justice in Hamburg, Germany. The Professional Geographer. 65(3), 495-511. DOI:10.1080/00330124.2012.700500
  45. Reckien, D., Lwasa, S., Satterthwaite, D., Mcevoy, D., Creutzig, F., Montgomery, M., Schensul, D., Balk, D., Khan, I. A., Fernandez, B., Brown, D., Osorio, J. C., Tovar-restrepo, M., De Sherbinin, A., Feringa, W., Sverdlik, A., Porio, E., Nair, A., Mccormick, S., & Bautista, E. (2022). Equity, Environmental Justice, and Urban Climate Change. Climate Change and Cities: Second Assessment Report of the Urban Climate Change Research Network. 173-224.
  46. Schlosberg, D. (2004). Reconceiving environmental justice: global movements and political theories. Environmental Politics. 13(13),  517-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964401042000229025
  47. Schlosberg, D. (2007) Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature Oxford University Press. DOI:10.1111/j.1747-7093.2008.00164.x
  48. Shrestha, R., Flacke, J., Martinez, J., and van Maarseveen, M. (2016). Environmental Health Related Socio-Spatial Inequalities: Identifying Hotspots of Environmental Burdens and Social Vulnerability. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 13 (7). DOI:10.3390/ijerph13070691
  49. Sobotta, RR., Campbell, H.E., and Owens, B.J. (2017). Aviation noise and environmental justice: The barrio barrier. Journal of Regional Science . 125-154. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2007.00503.x
  50. Venter, ZS., Figar, H., Krange, O., and Gundersen, V. (2023). Environmental justice in a very green city: Spatial inequality in exposure to urban nature, air pollution and heat in Oslo, Norway. Sci Total Environ. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160193
  51. Wackernagel, H. (2003). Multivariate geostatistic. New York: Springer Verlag Berlin.
  52. Walker, G. (2018). Environmental Justice: Concepts, Evidence and Politics. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. DOI:10.4324/9780203610671
  53. Walker, G, G Mitchell, J Fairburn, and G Smith. (2015). Industrial pollution and social deprivation: Evidence and complexity in evaluating and responding to environmental inequality. Local Environment. 10 (4), 361-377. DOI:10.1080/13549830500160842
  54. Wheeler, D.C., and Paez, A. (2010). Geographically Weighted Regression. Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis. 461-486. DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-03647-7_22
  55.  Yazdani, M. (2021). The final situation  of green space per capita in the capita city of Iran. Interview as  the deputy of urban services of Tehran Municipality on 8/21/2021, Received: 7/11/2024 from: https://donya-e-eqtesad.com [in Persian]