ارزیابی عوامل مؤثر بر حضورپذیری پارک‌های شهری به روش تحلیل محتوا مطالعه موردی: شهر خرم‌آباد

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی - بنیادی

نویسنده

گروه مهندسی شهرسازی، دانشکده فنی و مهندسی، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم‌آباد، ایران

10.22059/jurbangeo.2024.380543.1976

چکیده

در طول قرن گذشته، جمعیت مناطق شهری به‌طور قابل‌توجهی افزایش‌یافته و امروزه شهرها، با کاهش کیفیت زندگی و رفاه انسانی مواجه هستند. به‌این‌ترتیب، اکوسیستمها در مناطق شهری نقش کلیدی فزاینده‌ای در رفاه ساکنان ایفا می‌کنند. یکی از مهم‌ترین اکوسیستم‌های شهری، پارک‌ها و فضاهای سبز در شهرها هستند. هدف اصلی از انجام این پژوهش، شناسایی عواملی است که باعث افزایش حضور شهروندان در پارک‌های شهری خواهد شد. برای این منظور شهر خرم‌آباد برای مطالعه انتخاب شد. روش انجام این پژوهش از نوع تحلیل محتوا و در چارچوب روش‌های کیفی قرار دارد. در پژوهش حاضر محتوای صحبت‌هایی که با شهروندان در شهر خرم‌آباد انجام شد، موردبررسی قرار گرفت. بر اساس مصاحبه با 200 نفر از شهروندان، 180 واحد تحلیل به دست آمد. بر اساس تحلیل جمع‌بندی واحدهای تحلیل، 140 کد و عبارت کلیدی از مصاحبه‌های شهروندان به دست آمد. بر اساس فرایند تحلیل محتوا، در سطح دوم کدهای مشابه و مرتبط با یک موضوع در قالب مفاهیم دسته‌بندی شدند. بر اساس مدل پیشنهادی، 20 مفهوم شناسایی شد. این مفاهیم نیز در سطح سوم و در قالب مقوله‌های مشترک دسته‌بندی شدند که 6 مقوله مشترک استخراج گردید. بر اساس یافته‌های تحقیق شش عامل اصلی بر افزایش حضور شهروندان در پارک‌های شهری تأثیر دارند. این عوامل عبارت‌اند از: عدالت و برابری، جذابیت بصری، فرهنگ شهروندی، فرصت‌ها و دارایی‌ها، مدیریت و نگهداری پایدار و مدیریت زیست‌محیطی.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of influencing factors in the Presence of urban parks by content analysis method: A case study of Khorramabad city

نویسنده [English]

  • Seyed Reza Azadeh
Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Engineering, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran
چکیده [English]

ABSTRACT
Over the last century, the population of urban areas has grown considerably. Today, cities are facing a decline in the quality of life and human well-being. In this regard, ecosystems in urban areas play an increasingly key role in the well-being of the inhabitants. One of the most important urban ecosystems are parks and green spaces in cities. The main purpose of this research is to identify the factors that will increase the presence of citizens in urban parks. For this purpose, Khorramabad city was selected for study. The method of this research is content analysis, which is in the framework of qualitative methods. In the current research, the content of the conversations held with the citizens of Khorramabad was investigated. In this research, based on interviews with 200 citizens, 180 units of analysis were obtained. In the next step, duplicate codes were removed, and finally, 140 codes and key phrases were obtained from citizen interviews. Based on the content analysis process in the second level, similar codes related to a topic were categorized in the form of concepts. Based on the proposed model, 20 concepts were identified. These concepts were also categorized in the third level and the form of common categories. Therefore, based on the research findings, six main factors have an effect on increasing the presence of citizens in city parks. These factors include Justice and equality, Visual appeal, Citizenship culture, Opportunities and assets, Sustainable management and maintenance, and Environmental management.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Over the last century, the population of urban areas has grown considerably. By 1950, these areas accounted for 30% of the world's population, nowadays reaching 50%, and it is estimated to grow above 65% by 2050. Urban areas only cover about 2.4% of the land area, thus having a very high population density. In this way, ecosystems in urban areas play an increasingly key role in the well-being of the inhabitants. One of the most important urban ecosystems are parks and green spaces in cities. Urban green spaces can support human well-being by providing a healthy living environment free of noise or pollution and places to be physically active, socialize, and restore. In previous studies, issues such as access to urban parks, spatial distribution, and the benefits of being in urban green spaces have been studied a lot. However, identifying factors and indicators affecting urban parks has been studied much less. Therefore, the main purpose of this research is to identify the factors that will increase the presence of citizens in urban parks. For this purpose, Khorramabad city was selected for study.
 
Methodology
The method of this research is content analysis, which is in the framework of qualitative methods.  The current research investigated the content of the conversations held with the citizens of Khorramabad. In this regard, in-depth interviews were conducted with 200 citizens present in the urban parks. Each interview was extracted in the form of a text. These texts were the units of analysis. In the next step, codes or keywords were extracted. In the next step, these codes were refined, and similar codes were identified in the form of concepts. In the following, the concepts were summarized in the form of a number of categories. In the final stage, the final report was compiled.
 
Results and discussion
In this research, based on interviews with 200 citizens, 180 units of analysis were obtained. The analysis units were categorized into code, concept, and category. In the next step, duplicate codes were removed, and finally, 140 codes and key phrases were obtained from citizen interviews. Based on the content analysis process in the second level, similar codes related to a topic were categorized in the form of concepts. Based on the proposed model, 20 concepts were identified. These concepts were also categorized in the third level, and the form of common categories and 6 common categories were extracted. Therefore, based on the research findings, six main factors have an effect on increasing the presence of citizens in city parks. These factors include Justice and equality, Visual appeal, Citizenship culture, Opportunities and assets, Sustainable management and maintenance, and Environmental management. Justice and equality are one of the main categories that influence the presence of citizens in urban parks. According to the research results, justice is important in different dimensions. Gender justice, spatial justice, fair access to urban parks, and the inclusiveness of space are among the most important concepts. The research findings showed that the facilities and welfare services in urban parks have an effect on increasing visits to urban parks. In fact, the citizens in the case study, emphasized on three main concepts, i.e., furniture, facilities, and cultural opportunities. The content analysis of citizens' conversations showed that the park management method is one of the categories influencing the increase in citizens' visits to urban parks. In this context, three main concepts were extracted, including management supervision, ensuring the safety of women and children, and the safety of people. The content analysis of citizens' conversations in Khorramabad city showed that the beauty of urban parks considering concepts such as color diversity, flower and plant diversity, water spaces, the combination of artificial and natural environment, and, on the other hand, visual signs and artistic creation, has an effect on the presence of urban parks. Based on the results of content analysis, citizenship culture and the behavior of fellow citizens in relation to the surrounding environment and the behavior of citizens with each other play an important role in the presence of urban parks. Another influential category in increasing the presence of urban parks is improving and promoting environmental management in the mentioned spaces. The research results showed that environmental management includes two main concepts, i.e., environmental cleanliness and health, as well as climate comfort.
 
Conclusion
In the era of rapid urbanization, the importance of urban ecosystem services such as urban parks, cannot be ignored. From mitigating climate change to increasing public health and well-being, these urban spaces play a vital role in creating sustainable and resilient cities. The issue that should be mentioned as the result of the work is that politicians, urban managers, and urban planners have paid more attention to the quantity of urban parks than the quality of urban parks. Paying attention to quantity will not result in attendance. Rather, it is possible to increase the presence of urban parks when the quality of service in these public spaces improves. Therefore, in addition to increasing the urban green space area and per capita, a step forward should be taken to improve the quality of urban parks.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
 We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Urban Park
  • Presence
  • Khorramabad Public Space
  1. آذر، علی. (1402). نقش پارک‌ها در ارتقای شاخص‌های اجتماعی - سلامتی شهروندان با تأکید بر عوامل دافعه محیط‌های سکونتی و جاذبه فضاهای سبز؛ مطالعه موردی پارک‌های منطقه‌ای تبریز. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای برنامه‌ریزی شهری، 11(1)، 1-26.
  2. Doi:10.22059/JURBANGEO.2023.355510.1797
  3. آزاده، سید رضا و ابی‌زاده، سامان. (1401). اولویت‌های اجرایی در ارتقای مطلوبیت مساکن جدید شهری مطالعه موردی: مجتمع‌های مسکونی شهر رشت. جغرافیا و توسعه، 20(67)، 250-275.  Doi :10.22111/J10.22111.2022.6918
  4. پوراحمد، احمد؛ زیاری، کرامت‌اله؛ حاتمی نژاد، حسین و رضایی‌نیا، حسن. (1397). تحلیلی بر کنترل فضای عمومی در پارک‌های شهر تهران. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای برنامه‌ریزی شهری، 6(4)، 649-673. Doi :10.22059/JURBANGEO.2018.260642.937
  5. جنگی، حسن؛ توکلی‌نیا، جمیله و رضویان، محمدتقی. (1399). چارچوبی مشارکتی به مفهوم زیبایی‌شناسی چشم‌انداز در خدمات فرهنگی اکوسیستم (مطالعة موردی: منطقه 22 تهران). پژوهش‌های جغرافیای برنامه‌ریزی شهری، 8(4)، 671-693. Doi:10.22059/JURBANGEO.2021.307808.1354
  6. حسنعلی پور، عباس. (1400). مدیریت شهری و فرهنگ شهرنشینی. نشریه پژوهش در مهندسی عمران و معماری ایران، 22، 28-40.
  7. علی‌اکبری، کیمیا و رحیمی، اکبر. (1400). ارزیابی رضایتمندی شهروندان ایلامی از قابلیت‌ها و اثربخشی پارک جنگلی چغاسبز شهر ایلام. فرهنگ ایلام، 22(73)، 54-72.. Doi:0.22034/FARHANG.2022.149138
  8. غفاری گیلانده، عطا؛ واعظی، هما و دده‌زاده، پروین. (1399). واکاوی کیفیت اثرگذاری مؤلفه‌های هنر شهری بر ارتقای مردم‌گرایی پارک ساحلی اردبیل. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای برنامه‌ریزی شهری، 8(3)، 557-575.
  9.   Doi :10.22059/JURBANGEO.2020.298339.1236
  10. فرازنده مهر، محیاسادات؛ طیبی ثانی، سید مصطفی؛ سهامی، سوسن و فهیمی‌نژاد، علی. (1401). ارزیابی شاخص‌های ایمنی در کاربری‌های ورزشی مستقر در بوستان‌های شهری (مطالعه موردی: منطقه 4 شهرداری تهران). مطالعات مدیریت شهری، 14(52)، 109-122. Doi: 10.30495/UMS.2023.21832
  11. ملکی، سعید؛ رحیمی، وحید؛ نوری، ادریس و حاتمی، داود. (1394). ارزیابی شاخص‌های اجتماعی فضاهای سبز شهری از دیدگاه شهروندان نمونه موردی: ایرانشهر. جغرافیا و توسعه، 13(40)، 19-42. Doi:10.22111/GDIJ.2015.2096
  12. Alaimo, L. S., & Maggino, F. (2020). Sustainable development goals indicators at territorial level: Conceptual and methodological issues—The Italian perspective. Social Indicators Research147(2), 383-419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02162-4
  13. Arvanitidis, P. A., & Papagiannitsis, G. (2020). Urban open spaces as a common: The credibility thesis and common property in a self-governed park of Athens, Greece. Cities97, 102480.
  14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102480
  15. Aytur, S. A., Jones, S. A., Stransky, M., & Evenson, K. R. (2015). Measuring physical activity in outdoor community recreational environments: Implications for research, policy, and practice. Current cardiovascular risk reports9, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12170-014-0423-4
  16. Ayala-Azcárraga, C., Diaz, D., & Zambrano, L. (2019). Characteristics of urban parks and their relation to user well-being. Landscape and urban planning189, 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.04.005
  17. Azar, A. (2023). Role of Parks in Promoting Social and Health Indicators of Citizens, Focusing on the PushFactors of Residential Environments and the Pull Factors of Green Spaces, A case study of Zonal Parks in Tabriz. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR)11(1), 1-26. Doi:10.22059/JURBANGEO.2023.355510.1797 [in persian]
  18. Azadeh, S. R., & Ebizadeh, S. (2022). Executive Priorities in Promoting the Quality of New Urban Housing Case Study: Rasht City. Geography and Development20(67), 250-275.  Doi:10.22111/J10.22111.2022.6918 [in persian]
  19. Azadeh, R., Mohammadi, J., & Doost, H. T. N. (2019). The relationship between urban environmental quality and mental health (depression scale): evidence from Iran. Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering13(2), 285-293. DOI:10.4090/juee. 2019.v13n21.285293
  20. Aliakbary, K., & Rahimi, A. (2022). Evaluation of the Level of Satisfaction of Ilami Citizens with the Capabilities and Effectiveness of Choghasabz Forest Park. a scientific journal of ilam culture22(72.73), 54-72. Doi:10.22034/FARHANG.2022.149138 [in persian].
  21. Bock, J., Nesbitt, L., Mavoa, S., & Meitner, M. J. (2024). ATTRIBUTES AND BENEFITS OF Urban Green Space Visits–Insights From The City of Vancouver. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 128399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128399
  22. Bodnaruk, E. W., Kroll, C. N., Yang, Y., Hirabayashi, S., Nowak, D. J., & Endreny, T. A. (2017). Where to plant urban trees? A spatially explicit methodology to explore ecosystem service tradeoffs. Landscape and Urban Planning157, 457-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.08.016
  23. Bratman, G. N., Hamilton, J. P., & Daily, G. C. (2012). The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health. Annals of the New York academy of sciences1249(1), 118-136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06400.x
  24. Chawla, L. (2015). Benefits of nature contact for children. Journal of planning literature30(4), 433-452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412215595441
  25. Chen, S., & Knöll, M. (2024). Environmental Justice in the Context of Access to Urban Green Spaces for Refugee Children. Land13(5), 716-735.  https://doi.org/10.3390/land13050716
  26. Chen, S., Sleipness, O., Xu, Y., Park, K., & Christensen, K. (2020). A systematic review of alternative protocols for evaluating non-spatial dimensions of urban parks. Urban forestry & urban greening53, 126718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126718
  27. Dennis, M., Barker, A., Anderson, J., Ashton, J. C., Cavan, G., Cook, P. A., ... & Lindley, S. (2023). Integrating knowledge on green infrastructure, health and well-being in ageing populations: Principles for research and practice. Ambio52(1), 107-125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01765-5
  28. Dizdaroglu, D. (2022). Developing design criteria for sustainable urban parks. Journal of contemporary urban affairs6(1), 69-81. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2022.v6n1-7
  29. Ely, M., & Pitman, S. D. (2014). Green Infrastructure: Life support for human habitats. https://books.google.com/books/about/Green_Infrastructure.html?id=84xjrgEACAAJ
  30. Escobedo, F. J., & Nowak, D. J. (2009). Spatial heterogeneity and air pollution removal by an urban forest. Landscape and urban planning90(3-4), 102-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.10.021
  31. Farazandeh Mehr, M., Tayebisani, S. M., Sahami, S., & Fahimi, A. (2023). Evaluation of safety indicators in sports uses located in urban parks (Case study: District 4 of Tehran Municipality). Urban Management Studies14(52), 109-122. Doi:10.30495/UMS.2023.21832 [in persian].
  32. Feldman, A., Foti, R., & Montalto, F. (2019). Green infrastructure implementation in urban parks for stormwater management. Journal of sustainable water in the built environment5(3), 05019003. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSWBAY.0000880
  33. Fang, X., Li, J., & Ma, Q. (2023). Integrating green infrastructure, ecosystem services and nature-based solutions for urban sustainability: A comprehensive literature review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 104843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104843
  34. Fontaine, P., Minner, S., & Schiffer, M. (2023). Smart and sustainable city logistics: Design, consolidation, and regulation. European Journal of Operational Research307(3), 1071-1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.09.022
  35. Ghafari Gilandeh, A., Vaezi, H., & Dadazadeh, P. (2020). Exploring the Quality of the Effect of Urban Art Components on Promoting the Populism of Ardebil Saheli Park. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR)8(3), 557-575. Doi:10.22059/JURBANGEO.2020.298339.1236 [in persian].
  36. Hasanalipour, A. (2021). Urban management and urban culture. Journal of research in civil engineering and architecture of Iran, 22, 28-40. [in persian
  37. Halecki, W., Stachura, T., Fudała, W., Stec, A., & Kuboń, S. (2023). Assessment and planning of green spaces in urban parks: A review. Sustainable Cities and Society88, 104280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104280
  38. Houlden, V., Weich, S., Porto de Albuquerque, J., Jarvis, S., & Rees, K. (2018). The relationship between greenspace and the mental wellbeing of adults: A systematic review. PloS one13(9), e0203000. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203000
  39. Haluza, D., Meyer, I., Strüver, A., & Exner, A. (2024). Introducing a Scale for Measuring Attachment to Urban Green. Urban Science8(2), 62, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci8020062
  40. Hayward, D. G., & Weitzer, W. H. (1984). The public's image of urban parks: Past amenity, present ambivalance, uncertain future. Urban Ecology8(3), 243-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4009(84)90038-X
  41. Hughey, S. M., Walsemann, K. M., Child, S., Powers, A., Reed, J. A., & Kaczynski, A. T. (2016). Using an environmental justice approach to examine the relationships between park availability and quality indicators, neighborhood disadvantage, and racial/ethnic composition. Landscape and Urban Planning148, 159-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.12.016
  42. Jangi, H., Tavakolinia, J., & Razavian, M. T. (2020). A participatory framework in the concept of landscape aesthetic in Cultural Ecosystem Services. Case Study: District 22 of Tehran. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR)8(4), 671-693. Doi:10.22059/JURBANGEO.2021.307808.1354 [in persian]
  43. Kothencz, G., & Blaschke, T. (2017). Urban parks: Visitors’ perceptions versus spatial indicators. Land use policy64, 233-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.012
  44. Loughran, K. (2020). Urban parks and urban problems: An historical perspective on green space development as a cultural fix. Urban Studies57(11), 2321-2338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018763555
  45. Lloyd, K., Burden, J., & Kiewa, J. (2008). Young Girls and Urban Parks: Planning for Transition Through Adolescence. Journal of Park & Recreation Administration26(3), 678–700
  46. McCormack, G. R., Rock, M., Toohey, A. M., & Hignell, D. (2010). Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use and physical activity: A review of qualitative research. Health & place16(4), 712-726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.03.003
  47. More, T. A., & Payne, B. R. (1978). Affective responses to natural areas near cities. Journal of leisure research10(1), 7-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1978.11969329
  48. Mexia, T., Vieira, J., Príncipe, A., Anjos, A., Silva, P., Lopes, N., ... & Pinho, P. (2018). Ecosystem services: Urban parks under a magnifying glass. Environmental research160, 469-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.023
  49. Maleki, S., Rahimi, V., Nouri, E., & Hatami, D. (2015). Evaluation of Social Indicators of Urban Landscape from the Perspective of Citizens Case Study: Iranshahr. Geography and Development13(40), 19-42. doi:10.22111/GDIJ.2015.2096 [in persian].  
  50. Niemelä, J., Saarela, S. R., Söderman, T., Kopperoinen, L., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Väre, S., & Kotze, D. J. (2010). Using the ecosystem services approach for better planning and conservation of urban green spaces: a Finland case study. Biodiversity and Conservation19, 3225-3243. Doi:10.1007/s10531-010-9888-8
  51. oglu Huseynov, E. F. (2011). Planning of sustainable cities in view of green architecture. Procedia Engineering21, 534-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2048
  52. Orsega-Smith, E., Mowen, A. J., Payne, L. L., & Godbey, G. (2004). The interaction of stress and park use on psycho-physiological health in older adults. Journal of leisure research36(2), 232-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2004.11950021
  53. Payne, L., Orsega-Smith, E., Roy, M., & Godbey, G. C. (2005). Local Park use and personal health among older adults: an exploratory study. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration23(2), 1-20.
  54. Pourahmad, A., Ziari, K., Hataminejad, H., & Rezaeinia, H. (2019). Analysis of Public Space Control in the Parks of Tehran. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR)6(4), 649-673.  Doi:10.22059/JURBANGEO.2018.260642.937  [in persian]
  55. Russo, A., & Cirella, G. T. (2024). Urban Ecosystem Services in a Rapidly Urbanizing World: Scaling up Nature’s Benefits from Single Trees to Thriving Urban Forests. Land13(6), 786-795. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13060786
  56. Rigolon, A. (2016). A complex landscape of inequity in access to urban parks: A literature review. Landscape and urban planning153, 160-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.017
  57. Sullivan, W. C., Kuo, F. E., & Depooter, S. F. (2004). The fruit of urban nature: Vital neighborhood spaces. Environment and behavior36(5), 678-700. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X04264945
  58. Sturm, R., & Cohen, D. (2014). Proximity to urban parks and mental health. The journal of mental health policy and economics17(1), 19.
  59. Tianyuan, S. H. O. U., Ke, L. I., Yongjun, L. I., Yuchun, N. I., Dongdong, L. U., & Jiaxing, W. E. I. (2024). How do contextual factors mediate and moderate the association between green infrastructure and respiratory health? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 128392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128392
  60. Veitch, J., Salmon, J., & Ball, K. (2007). Children's perceptions of the use of public open spaces for active free-play. Children's geographies5(4), 409-422. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733280701631874
  61. Wu, Y., Zhou, W., Zhang, H., Liu, Q., Yan, Z., & Lan, S. (2024). Relationships between Green Space Perceptions, Green Space Use, and the Multidimensional Health of Older People: A Case Study of Fuzhou, China. Buildings14(6), 1544. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061544
  62. Wolch, J. R., Byrne, J., & Newell, J. P. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landscape and urban planning125, 234-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
  63. Xie, J., Luo, S., Furuya, K., & Sun, D. (2020). Urban parks as green buffers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability12(17), 6751. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176751
  64. Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., Teimouri, R., Degirmenci, K., & Alanjagh, F. A. (2020). Association between park visits and mental health in a developing country context: The case of Tabriz, Iran. Landscape and Urban Planning199, 103805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103805