ارزیابی وضعیت زیست‌پذیری کلان‌شهرها بر اساس ادبیات جهانی زیست‌پذیری مطالعه موردی: کلان‌شهر تبریز

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی - کاربردی

نویسندگان

گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشکده برنامه‌ریزی و علوم محیطی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران

10.22059/jurbangeo.2024.370143.1901

چکیده

زیست‌پذیری یکی از بزرگ‌ترین ایده‌های برنامه‌ریزی شهری در دوران معاصر است و تحقق آن در میان شهرهای جهان سوم مسئله‌ای نگران‌کننده می‌باشد. از همین رو، اهمیت مطالعه زیست‌پذیری شهری به‌عنوان یکی از وظایف جدید برنامه‌ریزی شهری، مسئولیت آن ارتقاء کیفیت زندگی است. پژوهش حاضر با رویکرد – توصیفی تحلیل در پی آن بوده که وضعیت زیست‌پذیری کلان‌شهر تبریز را در 3 بعد اجتماعی، اقتصادی و زیست‌محیطی بر اساس ادبیات جهانی زیست‌پذیری بررسی نماید. جهت ارزیابی وضعیت زیست‌پذیری کلان‌شهر تبریز (در قالب 3 بعد، 15 شاخص و 158 گویه) ابتدا پرسشنامه مربوطه طراحی، پس از تعین نمونه آماری در سطح مناطق 10 گانه تبریز با استفاده از روش کوکران (383 نمونه) و تائید روایی و پایایی پرسشنامه، اطلاعات مربوطه جمع‌آوری‌شده است. جهت تجزیه‌وتحلیل اطلاعات مربوطه از روش آنتروپی شانون برای وزن‌دهی شاخص‌ها و گویه‌های پژوهش و از روش موریس اصلاحی برای تعیین وضعیت زیست‌پذیری مناطق بر اساس ادبیات جهانی در 5 سطح استفاده‌شده است. یافته‌های پژوهش بیانگر آن است که بعد اقتصادی با وزن 429/0 دارایی درجه اهمیت بیشتری نسبت به دو بعد اجتماعی و زیست‌محیطی می‌باشد. همچنین وضعیت زیست‌پذیری کلان‌شهر تبریز مناسب نمی‌باشد زیرا از 10 منطقه کلان‌شهر تبریز بیشترین تعداد مناطق یعنی 8 منطقه 4، 6، 10، 9، 7، 1، 3 و 8 در وضعیت زیست‌پذیری نامطلوب قرار دارند و تنها منطقه 2 در وضعیت قابل‌قبول قرار دارد. همچنین منطقه 5 نیز در وضعیت زیست‌پذیری متوسطی قرارگرفته است. بنابراین نتایج گویایی آن است که بیشتر مناطق شهری تبریز نیازمند توجه ویژه مدیران شهری هستند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Assessment of the livability condition in metropolises based on the global livability literature: A case study of Tabriz Metropolis

نویسندگان [English]

  • Borhan Veysi nab
  • Fereidoon Babaei Aghdam
Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Planning and Environmental Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
چکیده [English]

ABSTRACT
Livability is one of the most significant urban planning ideas in the contemporary era, and its realization among the cities of the third world is a worrying issue. Therefore, the importance of studying urban livability is one of the new tasks of urban planning; its responsibility is to improve the quality of life. So, the current research with a descriptive-analysis approach aims to investigate the livability of Tabriz metropolis in social, economic, and environmental dimensions based on the global livability literature. In order to evaluate the livability of Tabriz metropolis (in the form of 3 dimensions, 15 indicators, and 158 items), first, a relevant questionnaire was designed after determining the statistical sample at the level of the 10 Regions of Tabriz using Cochran's method (383 samples) and validating and reliability of the questionnaire, relevant information has been collected. In order to analyze the relevant information, Shannon's entropy method was used to weigh the indicators and research subjects, and the modified Morris method was used to determine the livability Condition of the regions based on the global livability literature at 5 levels. The research findings show that the economic dimension, with a weight of 0.429, is more important than social and environmental dimensions. Also, the livability Condition of Tabriz metropolis is not suitable because in the 10 Regions of Tabriz metropolis, the largest number of regions, 8 regions such as 4, 6, 10, 9, 7, 1, 3, and 8, are in an unfavorable livability Condition. Only Region 2 is in full favorability (acceptable) Condition. Also, Region 5 has a moderate livability condition. Thus, the results show that most urban regions of Tabriz need special attention from city managers
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Experts, specialists, and managers in the field of planning have accepted the concept of livability as one of the new concepts in urban planning that is closely related to the sustainability of cities and improving the quality of life. The main goal of livability is to improve the quality of urban spaces on a human scale in cities. The livability of a city, which includes social, economic, and environmental dimensions, assumes a fundamental role in determining the quality of life. A city can achieve sustainable urban growth only through coordinated development in these areas. The increase in population in Iran in various dimensions (economic, social, and environmental) has caused adverse effects such as unfavorable physical-spatial development of cities, intense rural-urban migrations, high costs of transportation and urban services, etc. Tabriz metropolis is the sixth most populous city in Iran, which was once known as the healthiest city in the country. Today, it has moved away from its once-brilliant past and faces numerous social, economic, and environmental issues. Therefore, the current research is conducted based on the need for planning in the area of urban livability and improving the quality of life in Tabriz metropolis, and while specifying the criteria of livability in social, economic, and environmental dimensions, the state of this explains what is important at the level of the city and different regions in mental dimensions (residents' perceptions).
 
Methodology
The current research is applied in terms of the type and purpose of the research, and in terms of the data collection method, it is survey, descriptive-analytical. In this research, urban livability has been evaluated in the subjective dimension (residents' perception). First, livability indicators were extracted in the subjective dimension by studying the research literature. The statistical population includes residents of 10 areas of Tabriz metropolis (68,898 households, 1,558,693 people), who were selected based on the Cochran formula, 383 people (in the present study, the statistical population of the study is the number of households in Tabriz city). Citizens' answers to the desired questions were collected and entered into SPSS21 software, and the average of each index in the region was calculated. Then, the Shannon entropy method was used to weigh the indicators, and the raw matrix in the Shannon entropy method is the average response of citizens in each region. Finally, the livability condition of Tabriz metropolitan regions was determined using the modified Morris method and based on the global livability literature.
 
Results and discussion
In a general summary of the findings of the research, it can be said that among the dimensions examined related to livability, social, economic, and environmental; the economic dimension has a higher degree of importance than other dimensions, which is the case with the results of the studies: Aseraei et al. (2022), Emdadi et al. (2022), Vahidifar et al. Mojtabi-Zadeh (2019), Ali Akbari et al. (2019), Veysi Nab et al. (2018), Isalou et al. (2013), Yi et al. (2021) who considered the economic dimension of urban livability to be more important than other dimensions are in line. Also, the livability assessment of Tabriz metropolis shows its unfavorable condition. In the Tabriz metropolis, out of 10 regions, 8 are in poor condition, while only Regions 2 and 5 have acceptable and average livability conditions, respectively. This case is consistent with the findings of Mousavi et al. (2023), Thaqbi et al. (2022), Nazm Far et al. (2022), Piri et al. (2021), Ali Akbari et al. (2019), Khazaee Nezhad et al. (2017) who evaluated the livability of the studied areas as unsuitable, is consistent. The present research results can be used in urban planning to increase services, facilities, and reforms in the 8 Regions of Tabriz metropolis to increase livability and reduce social anomalies. This article, together with the low amount of urban livability in social, economic, and environmental dimensions, points to the need for proper planning to increase livability in Tabriz metropolis as an international metropolis.
Conclusion
Examining the livability of Tabriz metropolis shows the fact that this metropolis is far from a livable city. If today the essential solutions to improve the livability and reduce the many challenges of this metropolis, And if the relevant planning is not done, we can expect that in the not too distant future, we will face a metropolis full of problems that even life in this metropolis is difficult. Therefore, making the challenged regions livable can help solve the countless problems of Tabriz metropolis caused by the city's horizontal expansion and inappropriate land use patterns.
 
Funding
This research is supported by the research grant of the University of Tabriz (number ص/1157)
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Urban livability
  • Global livability literature
  • Tabriz metropolis
  1. احدنژاد، محسن؛ رسولی، محمد؛ شیخ محمدحسن آباد، خضر و سعید پور، َشراره. (1398). ارزیابی شاخص‌های زیست پذیری شهری در سطح محلات شهر سردشت با مدل کوپراس. جغرافیا و روابط انسانی، 1(4)، 266-249. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.26453851.1398.1.4.26.7
  2. اسرایی، محمدباقر؛ ارغان، عباس و زندمقدم، محمدرضا. (1401). ارزش‌گذاری شاخصه‌های زیست پذیری و ارتقای کیفیت زندگی در کلان‌شهر کرج به‌منظور افزایش پایداری شهری. فصلنامه پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، 13 (51)، 166-155. doi: 10.30495/jupm.2021.28104.3898
  3. امدادی، حامد؛ ثبوتی، هومن، اصلانیان، یاشار. (1401). واکاوی عوامل مؤثر بر زیست پذیری اقتصادی در فضاهای ناکارآمد پیراشهری (مورد: کوی فاطمیه شهر زنجان). توسعه فضاهای پیراشهری، 4 (2)، 84-67. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.26764164.1401.4.2.4.7
  4. پوراحمد، احمد؛ دربان آستانه، علیرضا؛ زنگنه شهرکی، سعید و پورقربان، شیوا. (1399). ارزیابی و تحلیل عوامل مؤثر بر زیست‌پذیری شهری جزیره کیش. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای برنامه‌ریزی شهری، 8 (1)، 22-1. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2019.260659.927
  5. حافظ نیا، محمدرضا. (1398). مقدمه‌ای بر روش تحقیق در علوم انسانی. تهران: انتشارات سمت. تهران.
  6. حسین زاده دلیر، کریم. (1393). برنامه‌ریزی ناحیه‌ای. تهران: انتشارات سمت.
  7. حکمت نیا، حسن؛ موسوی، میرنجف؛ سبحانی، نوبخت و سلمان زاده, سینا. (1400). تأثیر آسیب‌های اجتماعی بر زیست پذیری در فضاهای شهری (مطالعه موردی: شاهین‌دژ). پژوهش‌های جغرافیای برنامه‌ریزی شهری، 9 (1)، 50-29. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2021.301572.1273
  8. خراسانی، محمدامین. (1391). تبیین زیست‌پذیری روستاهای پیرامون شهری با رویکرد کیفیت زندگی (مطالعه موردی شهرستان ورامین). رساله دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه تهران.
  9. خزاعی نژاد، فروغ؛ سلیمانی مهرنجانی، محمد و زنگانه، احمد. (1397). ارزیابی زیست پذیری محله‌های منطقه 12 شهر تهران. جغرافیا و توسعه فضای شهری، 5 (1)، 70-45. doi: 10.22067/gusd.v5i1.65128
  10. زیاری، کرامت اله؛ حاتمی، احمد و صفرپور، ابولحسن. (1400). ارزیابی ابعاد و مؤلفه‌های زیست پذیری در نواحی شهری با رویکرد توسعه پایدار (نمونه موردی نواحی شهر خرم‌آباد). فصلنامه چشم‌انداز شهرهای آینده، 2 (2)، 33-50.
  11. سازمان آمار ایران. (1395). سرشماری عمومی نفوس و مسکن 1395.
  12. سلیمانی مهرنجانی، محمد؛ تولایی، سیمین؛ رفیعیان، مجتبی؛ زنگانه، احمد و خزائی نژاد، فروغ. (1395). زیست‌پذیری شهری: مفهوم، اصول، ابعاد و شاخص‌ها. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای برنامه‌ریزی شهری، 4(1)، 50-27. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2016.58120
  13. صادقی روش محمدحسن. (1395). کاربرد مدل آنتروپی شانون در پهنه‌بندی توسعه‌یافتگی شهرستان‌های استان یزد از دیدگاه بیابان‌زدایی. فضای جغرافیایی، 16 (54)، 133-113.
  14. صفوی، مریم. (1392). سنجش و ارزیابی قابلیت زیست پذیری در شهر تهران و ارائه راهکارهایی جهت ارتقا آن (نمونه موردی: منطقه 2 تهران، محله درکه). پایان‌نامه ارشد جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشگاه بین‌المللی امام رضا (ع).
  15. ضرابی، اصغر؛ علی زاده، جابر؛ رنجبرنیا، بهزاد؛ کاملی فر، محمدجواد و احمدیان، مهدی. (1394). ارزیابی سطح رضایت شهروندان از کیفیت محیط شهری (نمونه موردی: مناطق شهری ده‌گانه کلان‌شهر تبریز). نشریه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی، 19 (51)، 219-193.
  16. علوی، سید علی؛ صمدی، محمد و بناری، سجاد. (1400). سنجش و رتبه‌بندی میزان زیست‌پذیری محلات شهری (نمونه موردی محلات منطقه 6 شهر تهران). پژوهش‌های جغرافیای اقتصادی، 2 (4)، 63-51. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.27173747.1400.2.2.4.2
  17. علی‌اکبری، اسماعیل؛ مختاری ملک‌آبادی، رضا و موسوی، سید چمران. (1399). تحلیل و ارزیابی شاخص‌های ادراکی زیست‌پذیری شهری (مطالعه شهروندان شهر یاسوج). پژوهش‌های محیط‌زیست، 11 (22)، 44-27. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20089597.1399.11.22.4.5
  18. موسوی، میرنجف؛ جهانگیر زاده، جواد؛ بایرام‌زاده، نیما؛ شهسوار، امین و امیدوارفر، سجاد. (1402). تحلیل بر وضعیت زیست پذیری در محیط‌های شهری (مطالعه موردی: محله کوی سالار ارومیه). برنامه‌ریزی و توسعه محیط شهری، 3 (11)، 18-1. doi: 10.30495/juepd.2023.1984805.1184
  19. میرزاحسین، سارا؛ احمدی، ملیحه و ذاکرحقیقی، کیانوش. (1400). ارزیابی زیست‌پذیری مبتنی بر متغیرهای حس تعلق به مکان (مطالعه موردی منطقه ۱ کلان‌شهر تهران). پژوهش‌های جغرافیای برنامه‌ریزی شهری، 9 (2)، 385-361. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2021.312004.1385
  20. نظم فر، حسین؛ شیرنیا پاریجانی، امین؛ شکری فیروزجا، پری و حاتمی خانقاهی، توحید. (1401). سنجش و ارزیابی اثرات زیست پذیری شهری بر تحقق شهر دوستدار سالمند (مطالعه موردی: شهر بابل). مطالعات علوم محیط‌زیست، 7 (2)، 5081-5073. doi: 10.22034/jess.2022.336542.1761
  21. نقوی، محمدرضا؛ دیوسالار، اسداله و ریاحی، وحید. (1397). سنجش کیفیت زندگی در شهرهای ساحلی با استفاده از مدل DEMATEL نمونه موردی: شهر ساحلی نور. نشریه جغرافیا و توسعه. 16 (52)، 226-211. doi: 10.22111/gdij.2018.4005
  22. وحیدی فر، پریوش؛ رضوانی، علی‌اصغر و نوری کرمانی, علی. (1401). ارائه مدلی برای تبیین عوامل مؤثر در دستیابی به شهر زیست‌پذیر (مطالعه موردی: منطقه 10 تهران). آمایش محیط، 15 (56)، 221-201. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.2676783.1401.15.56.10.9
  23. ویسی‌ناب، برهان؛ بابایی اقدم، فریدون و قربانی، رسول. (1398). شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی عوامل مرتبط با بعد اقتصادی زیست‌پذیری شهری (مطالعه موردی: کلان‌شهر تبریز). پژوهش‌های جغرافیای برنامه‌ریزی شهری، 7 (1)، 149-127. doi:10.22059/jurbangeo.2019.271201.1020
  24. Ahadnejad, M., Rasoli, M., SheikhMohammad Hasan Abad, K., & Saeid Poor, S. (2019). Evaluation of urban viability indicators at sardasht city neighborhoods with Coopers model. Geography and Human Relationships, 1(4), 249-266. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.26453851.1398.1.4.26.7 [In Persian]
  25. Alavi, S. A., Samadi, M., & Banari, S. (2021). Measuring and rating the rate of Livability of urban neighborhood (Case Study of Region 6 in Tehran). Journal of Economic Geography Research, 2(4), 51-63. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.27173747.1400.2.2.4.2 [In Persian]
  26. Alderton, A., Nitvimol, K., Davern, M., Higgs, C., Correia, J., Butterworth, I., & Badland, H. (2021). Building Capacity in Monitoring Urban Liveability in Bangkok: Critical Success Factors and Reflections from a Multi-Sectoral, International Partnership. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 (14), 7322. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147322
  27. Aliakbari, E., Mokhtari Malek Abadi, R., & Mousavi, S. (2021).Analysis and Evaluation of Cognitive Urban Livablety (Case Study of Citizens of Yasuj City). Environmental Researches, 11(22), 27-44. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20089597.1399.11.22.4.5 [In Persian].
  28. Antognelli, S., & Vizzari, M. (2017). Landscape liveability spatial assessment integrating ecosystem andurban services with their perceived importance by stakeholders. Ecological Indicators, 72, 703-725. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.08.015
  29. Aquilani, B., Silvestri, C., Ioppolo, Gi., & Ruggieri, Alessandro. (2017). The challenging transition to bio-economies: Towards a new framework integrating corporate sustainability and value co-creation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.153
  30. Aseraei, M., Arghan, A., & Zandmoghaddam, M. R. (2023). Evaluation of livability indicators and improving the quality of life in Karaj metropolis in order to increase urban sustainability. Journal of Research and Urban Planning, 13(51), 155-166. doi: 10.30495/jupm.2021.28104.3898 [In Persian]
  31. Bo, F., Yu, D. & Zhang, Y. (2019). The livable urban landscape: GIS and remote sensing extracted land use assessment for urban livability in Changchun Proper, China. Land Use Policy. 87. DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104048
  32. Cao, Y., Li, F., Xi, X., Bilsen, d. & Xu, l. (2021). Urban livability: Agent-based simulation, assessment, and interpretation for the case of Futian District, Shenzhen. Journal of Cleaner Production, 320, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128662
  33. Economist Intelligence Unit. (2018). A summary of the livability ranking and overview, EIU.
  34. Emdadi, H., Sobouti, H., & Aslanian, Y. (2022). Analyzing factors affecting economic viability in inefficient peri-urban spaces (Case study: Fatemiyeh neighborhood, Zanjan city). Preipheral Urban Spaces Development, 4(2), 67-84. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.26764164.1401.4.2.4.7 [In Persian]
  35. Evans, P. (2002). Liveable Cities? Urban Struggles for Livelihood and Sustainability. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California Press Ltd., Oakland, CA, USA, 2002.
  36. Ghasemi, K., Hamzenejad, M. & Meshkini, A. (2018). The spatial analysis of the livability of 22 districts of Tehran Metropolis using multi-criteria decision making approaches. Sustainable Cities and Society, 38, 382- 404. DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.018
  37. Hafiznia, M.R. (2019). Introduction to Research Methodology in Humanities. Tehran: Samat Publications. [In Persian]
  38. Hartz-Karp, J. (2005). A Case Study in Deliberative Democracy: Dialogue with the City. Journal of Public Deliberation. 1 (1), DOI:10.16997/jdd.27
  39. Hekmatnia, H., Mousavi, M., Sobhani, N., & Salman Zida, S. (2021). The effect of Social Pathology on Livability in Urban Areas: A Case Study of Shahindej. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 9(1), 29-50. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2021.301572.1273 [In Persian]
  40. Hosseinzadeh Dalir, K. (2014). Regional Planning. Tehran: Samat Publications. [In Persian]
  41. Kakridis, A. (2013). Rebuilding the Future: C. A. Doxiadis and the Greek Reconstruction Effort (1945-1950). The Historical Review/La Revue Historique, 10, 135–160. https://doi.org/10.12681/hr.309
  42. Khazaee Nezhad, F., Soleimani Mehrenjani, M., & Zanganeh, A. (2018). Assessment of the Status of Livability in Region 12 Neighborhoods of Tehran. Geography and Urban Space Development, 5(1), 45-70. doi: 10.22067/gusd.v5i1.65128 [In Persian].
  43. Khorasani, M. (2018). Comparative analysis and evaluation of the views of residents and local managers on the issue of viability In the Villages around the city of Varamin. Geography and Development, 16(51), 261-280. doi: 10.22111/gdij.2018.3877 [In Persian]
  44. Khorasani, M. A. (2012). Explaining the livability of peri-urban villages with a quality of life approach (a case study of Varamin city). PhD thesis in geography and rural planning, University of Tehran. [In Persian]
  45. Konstantinos, M. (2020). Commute satisfaction, neighborhood satisfaction, and housing satisfaction as predictors of subjective well-being and indicators of urban livability. Travel Behaviour & Society, 21, 265-278. 10.1016/j.tbs.2020.07.006
  46. Krzysztofik, S. (2017). Taking up residence near the garden as the substitute of the garden–city idea. Architecture Civil Engineering Environment, 10 (2), 13–19. DOI:10.21307/acee-2017-016
  47. Lee, K. (2021). Factors Influencing Urban liveability in Seoul, Korea: Urban Environmental Satisfaction and Neighborhood Relations. Social Sciences, 10 (4), 138. DOI:10.3390/socsci10040138
  48. Li, J. Hui, Q., Fei, R. & Qian, G. (2023). Evaluation of Urban Livability—A Case Study of Kunming City, China. In: Jeon, HY. (eds) Sustainable Development of Water and Environment. ICSDWE 2023. Environmental Science and Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42588-2_22
  49. Liu, J.J., Nijkamp, P., Huang, X.X. & Lin, D.R. (2017). Urban liveability and tourism development in China: Analysis of sustainable development by means of spatial panel data. Habitat International, 68, 99–107. DOI:10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.02.005
  50. Ma, J., Dong, G., Chen, Y., Zhang, W. (2018). Does satisfactory neighbourhood environment lead to a satisfying life? An investigation of the association between neighbourhood environment and life satisfaction in Beijing. Cities, 74, 229–239. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.12.008.
  51. Marans, R.W. (2003). Understanding environmental quality through quality of life studies: the 2001 DAS and its use of subjective and objective indicators. Landsc. Urban Plann, 65 (1–2), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-2046(02)00239-6.
  52. Mirzahossein, S., Ahmadi, M., & Zaker Haghighi, K. (2021). Estimating the livability based on the sense of place variables: A case study of Tehran metropolitan, district 1. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 9(2), 361-385. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2021.312004.1385 [In Persian]
  53. Mouratidis, K. (2020). Commute satisfaction, neighborhood satisfaction, and housing satisfaction as predictors of subjective well-being and indicators of urban livability. Travel Behaviour and Society. 21. 265-278. DOI:10.1016/j.tbs.2020.07.006.
  54. Mousavi, M., Jahangirzadeh, J., Bayramzadeh, N., Shahsavar, A., & Omidvarfar, S. (2023). An Analysis of the Livability Situation in Urban Environments (Case Study: Kouye Salar Neighborhood-Urmia). Urban Environmental Planning and Development, 3(11), 1-18. doi: 10.30495/juepd.2023.1984805.1184 [In Persian]
  55. Myers, D. (1988). Building Knowledge about Quality of Life for Urban Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 54(3), 347-358, DOI: 10.1080/01944368808976495
  56. Nagavi, M., Divsalar, A., & Reiahi, V. (2018). Measuring quality of life in coastal cities make decisions based on the scale test model DEMATEL (Case coastal city of noor). Geography and Development, 16(52), 211-226. doi: 10.22111/gdij.2018.4005 [In Persian]
  57. Nazm Far, H., shirnia parijani, A., Shokri Firoozjah,, P., & Hatami Khanghahi, T. (2022). Assessing and evaluating the effects of urban livability on the realization of an elderly-friendly city (Case study: City of Babool). Journal of Environmental Science Studies, 7(2), 5073-5081. doi: 10.22034/jess.2022.336542.1761 [In Persian]
  58. Norouzian-Maleki, S., Bell, S., Hosseini, S.B. & Faizid, M. (2015). Developing and testing a framework for the assessment of neighbourhood liveability in two contrasting countries: Iran and Estonia. Ecological Indicators, 48: 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.07.033
  59. Pourahmad, A., Darban Astaneh, A., Zanganeh Shahraki, S., & Pourghorban, S. (2020). Evaluating and analyzing the Effective Factors on the urban livability of Kish Island. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 8(1), 1-22. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2019.260659.927. [In Persian]
  60. Sadeghi Rosh, M. H. (2015). The application of Shannon's entropy model in the development zoning of the cities of Yazd province from the point of view of desertification. Geographical space, 16 (54), 113-133. http://geographical-space.iau-ahar.ac.ir [In Persian]
  61. Safavi, M. (2012). Measuring and evaluating livability in the city of Tehran and providing solutions for its improvement (case example: District 2 of Tehran, Darakeh neighborhood). MA thesis of geography and urban planning, Imam Reza International University. [In Persian]
  62. Soleimani Mehrenjani, M., Tavallai, S., Rafieian, M., Zanganeh, A., & khazaei Nezhad, F. (2016). Urban livability: the concept, principles, aspects and parameters. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 4(1), 27-50. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2016.58120
  63. Song, Y. (2011). A livable city study in china: using structural Equation models, thesis submitted in statistics, department of statistics Uppsala university.
  64. Statistical Centre of Iran. (2016). General Census of Population and Housing 2016. [In Persian]
  65. Stein, E.K. (2002). Community and Quality of Life, National Ational, Washington, D.C.
  66. Sujatha, V., Lavanya, G. & Prakash, R. (2023). Quantifying Liveability Using Survey Analysis and Machine Learning Model. Sustainability, 15, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021633
  67. Timmer, V., & Seymoar, N. K. (2005). The livable city. Vancouver working group discussion paper, the world urban forum 2006, Vancouver: UN Habitat– International Centre for Sustainable Cities.
  68. Tsuang, H.-C. & Peng, K.-H. (2018). The Livability of Social Housing Communities in Taiwan: A Case Study of Taipei City. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 6(3), 4–21. DOI:10.14246/irspsd.6.3_4
  69. Vahidifar, P., Rezvani, A. A., & Norikermani, A. (2022). A Model for Explaining Effective Factors in Accessing the Livable City (A Case Study of District 10 of Tehran). Quarterly Journal of Environmental Based Territorial Planning, 15(56), 201-221. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.2676783.1401.15.56.10.9 [In Persian]
  70. Veysi Nab, B., Babaei Aghdam, F., & Ghorbani, R. (2019). Identification and Leveling Related Factors in Urban Livability (Case Study: Tabriz Metropolis). Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 7(1), 127-149. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2019.271201.1020 [In Persian]
  71. Wang, F. & Wang, D. (2016). Place, geographical context and subjective well-being: State of art and future directions. In: Mobility, sociability and well-being of urban living. Springer, Berlin, pp. 189–230.
  72. Xiao, Y., Wang, J., & Huang, H. (2021). Does economic development bring more liveability? Evidence from Jiangsu Province, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293 (1), 126187. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126187
  73. Yi, X., Jue, W., Huan, H., (2021). Does economic development bring more livability? Evidence from Jiangsu Province, China. J. Clean. Prod. 293, 126187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126187.
  74. Zarrabi, A., Alizadeh, J., Ranjbarnia, B., Kamelifar, M. J., & Ahmadian, M. (2015). Evaluation the Rate of Citizen Satisfaction from the Quality of Urban Environment (Case study: 10 Zones of Tabriz City). Geography and Planning, 19(51), 193-219. [In Persian]
  75. Zayyari, K., Hatami, A. & Safarpoor, A. (2021). Evaluation of dimensions and components of livability in urban areas with sustainable development approach (Case study of Khorramabad urban areas). journal of Future Cities vision, 2 (2):33-50 http://jvfc.ir/article-1-100-fa.html [In Persian]
  76. Zhan, D., Kwan, M., Zhang, W., Fan, J., Yu, J., & Dang, Y. (2018). Assessment and determinants of satisfaction with urban livability in China. Citie, 72, 92-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.025