تحلیل میزان تمایل شهروندی به تحقق کشاورزی شهری از دیدگاه شهروندان شهر رشت

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی - کاربردی

نویسندگان

گروه شهرسازی، واحد شهر قدس، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شهر قدس، ایران

10.22059/jurbangeo.2025.384165.2005

چکیده

توسعه شهری مبتنی بر تحقق کشاورزی شهری، گامی کلیدی در جهت پایداری شهرها خصوصاً در شهرهای مستعد کشاورزی است. هدف پژوهش حاضر سنجش میزان قابلیت پیاده‌سازی کشاورزی شهری در شهر رشت از نظر شهروندان است که با استفاده از روش توصیفی- تحلیلی صورت گرفته است. گردآوری اطلاعات پژوهش در خصوص میزان تمایل شهروندان بر تحقق کشاورزی شهر رشت با استفاده از توزیع 383 پرسشنامه در میان شهروندان شهر رشت و بر اساس روش دلفی صورت گرفته است. در این زمینه ابعاد اقتصادی، اجتماعی، زیرساخت‌ها و امکانات و نقش دولت در بسترسازی توسعه کشاورزی شهری به‌عنوان عوامل مؤثر بر میزان تمایل شهروندی به تحقق کشاورزی شهری در شهر رشت با بهره‌گیری از مدل معادلات ساختاری و با تحلیل PLS انجام‌شده است. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که عامل جبران دستمزد یا حقوق کم از شغل فعلی بیش‌ترین تأثیر را در عامل اقتصادی دارد، به عبارتی پاسخگویان معتقدند که بیشترین نقش تمایل به کشاورزی شهری از نظر تأثیر بر عامل اقتصادی از طریق تمایل به کشاورزی شهری برای جبران دستمزد و حقوق پایین شغل فعلی شهروندان است؛ همچنین اثر تمایل به تأمین نیروی کار از میان شهروندان و علاقه‌مندان بیش‌ترین وزن در عامل اجتماعی داشته و پس‌ازآن تلاش مدیران دولتی و شهری برای ترویج کشاورزی شهری بیش‌ترین تأثیر در عامل نقش دولت دارد، عوامل دسترسی به منابع انسانی و حمایت از تخصیص فضای شهری به فضای کشاورزی شهری دیگر عوامل مؤثر بر تحقق این امر در شهر رشت است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Analysis of Citizens' Willingness to Realize Urban Agriculture from the Point of View of Citizens of Rasht'

نویسندگان [English]

  • Amirhosein Pourjohari
  • maryam bagheri kachlami
  • Maliheh Ahmadi
Department of Urban Planning, ShQ.C., Islamic Azad University, Shahr-e-Qods, Iran
چکیده [English]

ABSTRACT
Urban development based on the realization of urban agriculture is a crucial step towards the sustainability of cities, particularly in urban areas with a history of agriculture. The current research aims to assess the feasibility of implementing urban agriculture in Rasht city from the perspective of Rasht city's citizens, employing a descriptive-analytical method. A study was conducted to collect research information on the degree of desire among citizens to pursue agriculture in Rasht city, using the Delphi method to distribute 383 questionnaires among Rasht city residents. In this context, the economic, social, and infrastructural dimensions, as well as the role of the government in facilitating the development of urban agriculture, are factors influencing the degree of citizens' tendency to adopt urban agriculture in Rasht city. These factors have been examined using the structural equation model and PLS analysis. The results of the research showed that the factor of compensating wages or low salaries from the current job has the greatest effect on the economic factor; also, the effect of the desire to provide labor from among citizens and interested people has the most weight in the society, and after that, the efforts of government and city managers to promote urban agriculture has the most effect on the role of the government, the factors of access to human resources.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Currently, the challenges caused by urban development mainly occur in developing countries. In the mid-20th century, only 17.8% of the population in developing countries lived in cities, but this percentage is expected to reach 60% by 2030. The rapid growth of urbanization and high population growth pose serious threats to the sustainability of global cities, as land is considered the most important and sensitive urban resource, crucial for human needs. On the other hand, the growth of the urban population has led to a decline in agricultural production in rural areas while increasing the demand for food in cities. One way to address this problem is to incorporate urban agriculture into sustainable urban development. In Iran, due to issues such as the lack of codified policies, specific laws, and necessary incentives, as well as the undefined nature of land use and the unclear roles of responsible and custodian institutions in this field, addressing this issue is necessary. Considering that Rasht is the most populous city in northern Iran among the three marginal provinces bordering the Caspian Sea, and given the region's climate and significant agricultural potential, this city has been selected as a case study. Agricultural capacity exists at various levels throughout this city, in the form of different types of urban agriculture. Therefore, it is necessary to provide a model that enables urban agriculture to be incorporated into the city's implementation plans. The purpose of this research is to measure the feasibility of implementing urban agriculture in Rasht city from the citizens' point of view. In this regard, the current research aims to identify the key factors influencing the degree of desire to adopt urban agriculture among citizens.
 
Methodology
This research is quantitative, with an applied purpose, and employs a descriptive approach in terms of data collection. Data collection was conducted through a researcher-designed questionnaire comprising 5 sections as economic (6 items), social (5 items), government roles (6 items), infrastructure and facilities (8 items), and the degree of desire for urban agriculture (3 items). To design the questionnaires, we conducted a comprehensive review of the literature on the subject of the research, analyzed the results, and consulted with experts. We employed the techniques of field observation and informal interviews to gain a general view of the citizens and ultimately prepared the initial questionnaire. After evaluating the questionnaire's validity with specialists and experts, the reliability of the research tool was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient for Likert scale questions, which yielded an alpha coefficient of 0.916, a very high value. Data analysis was conducted using Smart-PLS software and the structural equation modeling technique of confirmatory factor analysis.
 
Results and discussion
The research findings show that the factor loadings of all indicators exceed the numerical value of 0.6. In 9 indicators, this value exceeds 0.8, indicating that the structures are well explained by the selected indicators. In this regard, compensating for the low wages or salaries of the current job has the greatest effect on the economic factor; in other words, the respondents believe that the most important role of the desire for urban agriculture in terms of impact on the economic factor is through the desire to urban agriculture to compensate for the low wages and salaries of the current job of the citizens. Moreover, with a very low margin, there is a lack of job opportunities from the point of view of citizens, which affects their desire for urban agriculture. Also, the effect of the desire to provide labor from among citizens and interested people has the most weight in explaining the variance of the social factor; if the desire for urban agriculture increases in the cities, it can lead to the improvement of the social situation of the city by attracting the interested workforce for the citizens, and since the indigenous culture of the province requires that those interested in this field in Rasht city can be a strong point and a suitable opportunity for the development of urban agriculture. Additionally, the efforts of government and city managers to promote urban agriculture have the most significant effect in explaining the variance in the role of the government, in that the desire for urban agriculture can be increased and influenced by these efforts to promote agriculture at the city level. In addition, access to human resources (experts, labor, sellers, marketers, etc.) has the greatest effect in explaining the variance of the factor of infrastructures and facilities so that, according to citizens, the most infrastructures and facilities are needed to encourage engagement in urban agriculture. It is based on the expert, laborforce, seller, and marketer that, if provided, we can expect to advance the goal of this research
 
Conclusion
This research aimed to measure the feasibility of implementing urban agriculture in Rasht city, from the point of view of citizens and concluded that an urban space based on the realization of urban agriculture with a flexible use planning approach could provide a legal basis for urban agriculture by using various types of use mixing, economic, infrastructural, governmental, social, etc., to be an effective step in increasing the quality of life of citizens in the city. The findings of this research indicate that the development of urban agriculture can be observed through the involvement of an interested workforce in urban agriculture and the interest of native citizens of Gilan in economic growth opportunities within the field, who possess the necessary mental background and skills to farm native and local products.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
 We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Green City Development
  • Urban Agriculture
  • Rasht City
  1. بازگیر، سعید؛ فیروزی، زهرا؛ شمسی‌پور، علی‌اکبر و مقبل، معصومه. (1398). تحلیل فضایی شرایط محیطی کشاورزی شهری در کلان‌شهر تهران. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای برنامه‌ریزی شهری، 7 (1)، 111-125. doi:  10.22059/jurbangeo.2019.262056.939  
  2. حسینی‌نیا، غلامحسین؛ مقدس فریمانی، شهرام و رحیمی مشکین، فهیمه. (1395). تبیین مؤلفه‌های کسب‌وکار کشاورزی شهری: موردمطالعه بام سبز شهری. علوم ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی ایران، 12 (1)، 101-85. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.20081758.1395.12.1.6.7
  3. رحیمی، اکبر و دهری، مهدیه. (1401). کشاورزی شهری و اثر آن در توسعه پایدار شهری. دانش کشاورزی و تولید پایدار، 32(4)، 285-301.
  4. زندیه، مهدی و آقاجانی خنکدار، رقیه. (1398). بررسی تأثیرات کشاورزی شهری بر افزایش کیفیت زندگی ساکنان شهرها. اولین کنفرانس معماری، عمران، محیط‌زیست و کشاورزی.
  5. زیاری، کرامت‌اله؛ بشارتی‌فر، صادق و رشیدی‌فر، سیدنعمت‌اله. (1389). ارزیابی کاربری اراضی شهری در دهدشت. برنامه‌ریزی سرزمینی مبتنی بر محیط‌زیست. آمایش محیط، 3(10)، 1-22.
  6. سازمان برنامه‌وبودجه استان گیلان. (1395). سالنامه آماری استان گیلان.. https://amar.org.ir/statistical-information/catid/3792/types/2
  7. شمشیری، سجاد. (1395). کشاورزی شهری با رویکرد مشارکتی. مطالعات علوم محیط‌زیست، 1 (2)، 50-41.
  8. صحرائی جویباری، احد و ابراهیم‌زاده، عیسی. (1394). برنامه‌ریزی کاربری اراضی و مکان گزینی بهینه در محلات شهری با استفاده از سیستم اطلاعات جغرافیایی. فصلنامه اطلاعات جغرافیایی سپهر، 24 (94)، 77-93. https://doi.org/10.22131/sepehr.2015.14478
  9. فرزین، سامان؛ خلیل‌نژاد، سید محمدرضا؛ مرادزاده‌میرزایی، سعیده و زارعی، علی. (1399). ویژگی‌های منظر چند عملکردی در باغ ایرانی. منظر، 12 (52)، 6-17. https://doi.org/10.22034/manzar.2020.241872.2076
  10. کرمی، رؤیا و صلاحی‌اصفهانی، گیتی. (1399). نوع شناسی کشاورزی شهری و نقش آموزش آن در توسعه پایدار شهری استان زنجان. آموزش محیط‌زیست و توسعه پایدار، 9(1)، 153-170.
  11. ملکی‌نژاد، حسین؛ محمدزاده، فاطمه و طاهرپور، مهشید. (1399). جایگاه کشاورزی شهری در ارتقاء بهره‌وری کشاورزی و امنیت غذایی. سامانه‌های سطوح آبگیر باران، 8(3)، 43-58.
  12. یادآور، حسین؛ لطیفی، سمیه؛ خرازی، شهریر و نامی، مینا. (1399). تحلیل ظرفیت‌های کشاورزی شهری از دیدگاه دانشجویان دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه تبریز.  علوم ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی ایران، 16 (1)، 183-19. doi: 10.22034/iaeej.2020.210183.1478
  13. Azunre, G. A., Amponsah, O., Peprah, C., Takyi, S. A., & Braimah, I. (2019). A review of the role of urban agriculture in the sustainable city discourse. Cities, 93, 104–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.006
  14. Bazgeer, S., Firoozi, Z., Shamsipour, A., & Moghbel, M. (2019). Spatial analysis of environmental conditions for urban agriculture in Tehran metropolis (Case study: District 5). Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 7(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2019.262056.939 [In Persian]
  15. Bjørkhaug, H., & Richards, C. A. (2008). Multifunctional agriculture in policy and practice? A comparative analysis of Norway and Australia. Journal of Rural Studies, 24(1), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.06.003
  16. Blasi, E., (2009). From the concept of multifunctional agriculture to the measure of multifunctional farming. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.57503
  17. Bourque, M. (2000). Policy options for urban agriculture. In Growing cities, growing food: Urban agriculture on the policy agenda. A reader on urban agriculture (pp. 119–145). https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/20003032309
  18. Contesse, M., van Vliet, B., & Lenhart, J. (2021). Is urban agriculture urban green space? A comparison of policy arrangements for urban green space and urban agriculture in Santiago de Chile. Land Use Policy, 71, 566–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.006
  19. DeVries, B. (2000). Multifunctional agriculture in the international context: A review. The Land Stewardship Project, 15, 483–493. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.57503
  20. Dona, C., Mohan, G., & Fukushi, K. (2021). Promoting urban agriculture and its opportunities and challenges: A global review. Sustainability, 13(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179609
  21. Farzin, S., Khalilnezhad, S. M. R., Moradzadeh Mirzaei, S., & Zarei, A. (2020). Investigation on recognition of the type of multifunctional landscape in Persian garden (Case study: Akbariyeh World Heritage Garden). MANZAR, the Scientific Journal of Landscape, 12(52), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.22034/manzar.2020.241872.2076 [In Persian]
  22. Ferreira, A., Guilherme, R., Ferreira, C., & Oliveira, M. (2018). Urban agriculture: A tool towards more resilient urban communities. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 5, 93–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2018.06.004
  23. Ghafouri, A., & Weber, C. (2020). Multifunctional urban spaces: A solution to increase the quality of urban life in dense cities. Manzar, The Iranian Academic Open Access Journal of Landscape, 12(51), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.22124/upk.2024.26702.1922
  24. Gharipour, M. (2004). Healing gardens: An examination of the relationship between healing and the natural environment. Environmental Sciences, 1(4), 36–52. [In Persian]
  25. Glaeser, E. L. (2013). A nation of gamblers: Real estate speculation and American history. American Economic Review, 103(3), 1–42.
  26. Grădinaru, S. R., Triboi, R., Iojă, C. I., & Artmann, M. (2018). Contribution of agricultural activities to urban sustainability: Insights from pastoral practices in Bucharest and its peri-urban area. Habitat International, 82, 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.09.005
  27. Halloran, A., & Magid, J. (2013). Planning the unplanned: Incorporating agriculture as an urban land use into the Dar es Salaam master plan and beyond. Environment and Urbanization, 25(2), 541–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247813500903
  28. Horst, M., McClintock, N., & Hoey, L. (2024). The intersection of planning, urban agriculture, and food justice: A review of the literature. In Planning for equitable urban agriculture in the United States (pp. 89–120).
  29. Hosseininia, G. H., Moghaddas Farimani, S., & Rahimi Meshkin, F. (2016). Explanation of urban agricultural business components: A case study of rooftop farming. Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal, 12(1), 85–101. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.20081758.1395.12.1.6.7 [In Persian]
  30. Langemeyer, J., Lopez, C., Beltran, A., & Mendez, G. (2021). Urban agriculture: A necessary pathway towards urban resilience and global sustainability. Landscape and Urban Planning, 210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104055
  31. Lin, Y., Liu, Z., Luan, H., Sun, M., Rao, S., & Liu, S. (2015). Modeling relation paths for representation learning of knowledge bases. https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.00379
  32. Malekinejad, H., Mohammadzade, F., & Taherpoor, M. (2020). The role of urban agriculture in increasing agricultural productivity and food security. Journal of Rainwater Catchment Systems, 8(3), 43–58. [In Persian]
  33. Rahimi, A., & Dahri, M. (2023). Urban agriculture and its effect on urban sustainable development (Case study: Tabriz city). Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 32(4), 285–301. [In Persian]
  34. Ruggles, D. F. (2008). Islamic gardens and landscapes. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press
  35. Sahraei Juibari, A., & Ebrahimzadeh, I. (2015). Land use planning and optimal location in urban districts using GIS (Case study: district 47 of Zahedan city). Scientific-Research Quarterly of Geographical Data (SEPEHR), 24(94), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.22131/sepehr.2015.14478 [In Persian]
  36. Shamshiri, S. (2016). Urban agriculture with a participatory approach (Case study: Seyyed Jamal al-Din Asadabadi University Campus). Environmental Science Studies, 1(2), 41–50. [In Persian]
  37. Statistical Yearbook of Guilan Province. (2016). https://amar.org.ir/statistical-information/catid/3792/types/2 [In Persian]
  38. Tehran Chamber of Commerce, Industries, Mines and Agriculture. (2018). https://en.tccim.ir/ [In Persian]
  39. Temmerman, J. D. (2013). Feasibility of urban agriculture in Brussels: A qualitative multi-stakeholder analysis (Doctoral dissertation).
  40. Yadavar, H., Latifi, S., Kharazi, S., & Nami, M. (2020). Analysis of urban agriculture capacities based on Tabriz University agricultural students’ viewpoint. Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal, 16(1), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.22034/iaeej.2020.210183.1478 [In Persian]
  41. Zandiyeh, M., & Aghajani Khonokdar, R. (2019). Studying the effects of urban agriculture on increasing the quality of life of urban dwellers. In 1st Conference on Architecture, Civil Engineering, Environment and Agriculture. [In Persian]
  42. Zhang, X. Q. (2016). The trends, promises, and challenges of urbanisation in the world. Habitat International, 54, 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.11.018
  43. Ziari, K., Besharatifar, S., & Rashidifard, N. (2010). An evaluation of urban land use in Dehdasht. Environmental Based Territorial Planning (Amayesh), 3(10), 1–22. [In Persian]