ارزیابی اثرات مگامال سیتی‌سنتر اصفهان بر کالبد محیط پیراکلانشهری با استفاده از تحلیل فضایی زمانی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی - کاربردی

نویسندگان

گروه برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

10.22059/jurbangeo.2025.391416.2044

چکیده

در دهه‌های اخیر، به‌ویژه مگا مال‌ها، به‌عنوان کانون‌های چندمنظوره فعالیت‌های تجاری، تفریحی و اجتماعی، نقشی محوری در شکل‌دهی به فضاهای شهری و محیط پیرامونی خود ایفا کرده‌اند. این پژوهش به بررسی پیامدهای کالبدی ناشی از احداث سیتی‌سنتر اصفهان به‌عنوان یکی از کانون‌های نوین تجاری-تفریحی می‌پردازد که در پی گسترش شهرنشینی و تغییر الگوهای مصرف پدید آمده است. هدف اصلی، شناسایی و تحلیل این پیامدها بین سال‌های 1385 تا 1403 با استفاده از رویکرد تحقیق ترکیبی (کیفی-کمی) است. داده‌ها از طریق مطالعات اسنادی و بررسی‌های میدانی گردآوری‌شده و برای تحلیل کمی، از سیستم اطلاعات جغرافیایی و روش تصمیم‌گیری چندمعیاره ویکور بهره گرفته‌شده است. محدوده موردمطالعه در پهنه پیراکلانشهری اصفهان، با تأکید بر موقعیت مگامال سیتی‌سنتر، بر اساس پیمایش‌های میدانی پیش از آغاز پژوهش، شناخت قبلی پژوهشگران از منطقه، محدودیت‌های جغرافیایی و شبکه معابر اصلی از جمله اتوبان شهید دستجردی و بزرگراه خلیج‌فارس، و همچنین نقاط ورودی به سیتی‌سنتر، به‌طور دقیق تعیین و تثبیت شد؛ امری که در طراحی روش تحقیق و تحلیل یافته‌ها نقشی اساسی ایفا کرده است. تحلیل‌ها بر اساس پنج شاخص کلیدی صورت گرفته است: مطلوبیت کاربری اراضی (شامل تغییرات ماتریس سازگاری، وابستگی و ظرفیت)، بافت کالبدی (تغییرات الگوی بافت)، الگوی شبکه معابر (فاصله دوربرگردان‌ها، تقاطع‌ها، ورودی‌ها، سلسله‌مراتب و کیفیت روسازی معابر)، توزیع تأسیسات و زیرساخت‌های شهری (دسترسی به خدماتی نظیر آتش‌نشانی، مراکز درمانی و فضاهای سبز) و سیمای شهری (تأثیر بر دیدهای موجود و خط آسمان). یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد که احداث سیتی‌سنتر منجر به بهبود دسترسی به خدمات شهری، ارتقای کیفیت معابر (سلسله‌مراتب و روسازی) و افزایش مطلوبیت کاربری اراضی (ظرفیت و وابستگی) شده است. این نتایج می‌تواند راهگشای برنامه‌ریزی بهتر برای توسعه مراکز مشابه در بسترهای شهری باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluating the Impact of Isfahan City Center Mega Mall on the Physical Form of the Peri-Urban Environment Using the VIKOR Model and Spatio-Temporal Analysis

نویسندگان [English]

  • Homayoon Nooraie
  • Sara Ramezani
  • Ali Asgari
  • Alireza Gholipour
  • Aref Ghadiri
  • Saeed Noori
Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
چکیده [English]

ABSTRACT
This research aims to assess the spatial impacts of the Isfahan City Center, a key commercial hub, on its surrounding built environment. The study focuses on the period between 2006 and 2024, examining the consequences of this development as a case study of urban growth and commercial infrastructure. The study area is carefully defined through field surveys, prior spatial knowledge, and the functional structure of major roadways. A mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative and quantitative analysis, was employed. Data collection involved documentary research and field surveys. GIS and the VIKOR multi-criteria decision-making method were used to analyze the spatial effects based on key indicators, including land use suitability, urban texture, road network pattern, and accessibility to urban services. The analysis revealed that the establishment of the Isfahan City Center improved access to urban services, enhanced road quality (including road hierarchy and surfacing), and increased the suitability of land use. It also revealed changes in land use patterns, with a notable increase in commercial and residential activities around the center, thereby promoting urban development and reshaping the surrounding areas. The findings suggest that mega-malls, such as the Isfahan City Center, have significant implications for urban planning, potentially offering valuable insights for the development of similar urban projects. They emphasize the importance of sustainable urban planning practices in effectively managing such large-scale developments and their associated environmental impacts.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
In recent decades, urbanization has profoundly reshaped the spatial structure, functional organization, and morphology of cities. Rapid population growth, evolving consumption patterns, and technological advancements have driven the emergence of new spatial typologies and urban functions. Large commercial complexes, particularly mega malls, have significantly influenced urban spaces and their surrounding contexts. These developments have generated both positive and negative effects, altering land values, traffic patterns, and social dynamics. This study examines the Isfahan City Center, one of Iran’s most prominent commercial mega-malls, and investigates its impact on the adjacent built environment. The period from 2006 to 2024 was selected to capture the Isfahan City Center’s construction and operational phases alongside significant urban development in transportation, land use, and green space expansion. The primary objective is to assess the long-term effects of Isfahan City Center development, propose strategies for sustainable urban growth, and contribute to enhancing the quality of life in nearby communities.
 
Methodology
This research adopts a descriptive-analytical approach, integrating both qualitative and quantitative methods. First, relevant theoretical frameworks and previous studies on the impacts of mega malls were reviewed. The study area encompasses the Isfahan City Center and its surrounding neighborhoods, situated between Isfahan and Baharestan. This area was delineated based on (1) initial field observations of land use patterns, traffic flow, and infrastructure, (2) the researchers’ prior knowledge of regional urban growth, and (3) key infrastructure elements, such as main roads and primary access points. This multi-faceted approach ensured a boundary definition that reflects both physical and socio-spatial factors.
To evaluate the impact of the Isfahan City Center, the study employed indicators including land-use suitability, urban texture, road network structure, accessibility of urban services, and visual quality. Spatial analysis was conducted using GIS tools, while the VIKOR multi-criteria decision-making model prioritized the relative significance of each factor.
Data collection combined document reviews, field surveys, and satellite imagery analysis for the years 2006, 2015, and 2024. The VIKOR model facilitated the ranking of impacts based on the weighted importance of each indicator, enabling a balanced assessment of both beneficial and adverse changes over time.
 
Results and Discussion
The findings reveal several key impacts of the Isfahan City Center on its surrounding urban context.
Land Use Suitability: The construction of the Isfahan City Center has altered the surrounding land use patterns. Areas around the complex have become increasingly suitable for both commercial and residential development, as reflected in changes to land-use suitability matrices. Between 2006 and 2024, the proportion of land classified as “relatively suitable” for commercial use rose markedly, underscoring the Isfahan City Center’s role in revitalizing adjacent zones. Conversely, industrial and agricultural uses have declined, while areas deemed “inappropriate” for development remained essentially unchanged.
Urban Texture: The surrounding urban texture has evolved from an organic pattern to a more planned structure, with the proportion of planned urban texture increasing from 32% to 34% between 2006 and 2015. By 2024, further expansion of semi-organized structures, particularly in southern sections, reflects the ongoing influence of modern commercial development on urban form.
Road Network and Accessibility: The quality and hierarchy of the road network have improved, enhancing connectivity around the Isfahan City Center. Analysis of intersections, roundabouts, and entry/exit points reveals increased accessibility, with the number of access points rising from 26 in 2006 to 30 in 2024. However, localized congestion and traffic flow challenges persist, highlighting the need for continued improvements in road design and traffic management.
Urban Services: The Isfahan City Center’s presence has facilitated better access to key urban services, including emergency, medical, and fueling facilities, which are now more evenly distributed throughout the area. This demonstrates a positive influence on local infrastructure. Nonetheless, service disparities remain, particularly in southern and eastern neighborhoods, where gaps persist.
Visual Quality: The development has introduced significant changes to the area’s visual character. Taller buildings and a transformed skyline have partially obstructed views of nearby natural features, such as the surrounding mountains. This shift from low-rise to high-rise structures has created a distinctly modern urban landscape. Analysis of visual corridors indicates new dominant sightlines shaped by the Center’s presence, though some valued natural vistas have been lost.
 
Conclusion
The Isfahan City Center has substantially transformed its surrounding built environment. While the complex has improved accessibility, urban services, and land use suitability, it has also generated challenges, including traffic congestion, visual impacts, and uneven service provision in some areas. These findings underscore the critical importance of comprehensive urban planning to ensure the sustainable integration of large-scale commercial developments. Future studies should examine the long-term socio-economic impacts on local communities and devise strategies to mitigate adverse outcomes, particularly those affecting urban mobility and environmental quality. Recognizing both the opportunities and constraints of mega malls is essential for guiding future urban development in similar contexts.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Mega Malls
  • Physical Environment
  • VIKOR Method
  • Urban Development
  • Impact Assessment
  1. ابراهیم‌نیا، وحیده و اسدی، شهاب‌الدین. (۱۳۹۹). ارزیابی اثرات اجرای ابر پروژه بین‌الحرمین شیراز بر اجتماع محلی پیرامونی آن. مسکن و محیط روستا، ۳۹ (۱۷۲)، ۹۰-۷۷. https://doi.org/10.22034/39.172.77
  2. ایمانی شاملو، جواد و عزتی‌مهر، محمدرضا. (1401). بررسی تأثیرات مگا مال‌ها بر روی محدوده‌های پیرامونی (نمونه موردی: لاله پارک، ستاره‌باران و ایپک پالاس شهر تبریز). اقتصاد و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، ۳ (۴)، ۹۸-۱۱۳. https://doi.org/10.22034/uep.2022.365581.1289
  3. حبیبی، لیلا و محمودی پاتی، فرزین. (۱۳۹۶). از بازار تا پاساژ: تحلیلی بر سیر تحولات فضاهای تجاری مدرن در شهر تهران. باغ نظر، ۱۴ (۴۹)، ۴۳-۵۲.
  4. دیاریان، نیره و نوریان، فرشاد. (۱۴۰۱). جایگاه مفهوم منفعت عمومی در فرایند شکل‌گیری مگامال: یک نظریه زمینه‌ای در خصوص تجربه ساکنین بافت‌های پیرامونی. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای برنامه‌ریزی شهری، ۱۰ (۱)، ۱۲۱–۱۴۲. https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2021.324419.1528
  5. زنگانه، احمد؛ کرمی، تاج‌الدین و یدالهی صابر، رقیه. (1400). ارزیابی اثرات زیست‌محیطی بزرگراه طبقاتی صدر تهران بر محله‌های پیرامون. تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی، ۲۱ (۶۲)، ۳۱۹-۳۳۸.
  6. ساسانپور، فرزانه؛ موحد، علی؛ سلیمانی مهرنجانی، محمد و دلفان آذری، زهرا. (1401). تحلیل اثرات مگا مال‌ها بر پایداری جوامع محلی (مطالعه موردی: شهرهای شهرستان عباس‌آباد). جغرافیا و توسعه ناحیه‌ای، ۲۰ (۳)، ۱-۳۳. https://doi.org/10.22067/jgrd.2023.69315.1024
  7. شیرودی، مرتضی. (۱۳۸۳). ایران: تلاشی طولانی برای الحاق به سازمان تجارت جهانی. پژوهشنامه اقتصادی، ۴ (۱۲)، ۱۸۷–۲۰۳.
  8. شیعه، اسماعیل و حاجیانی، مهسا. (۱۳۹۸). تأثیرات مگا مال‌ها بر هویت محله‌ای در شهر تهران؛ مطالعه موردی: اطلس مال نیاوران. مطالعات شهر ایرانی اسلامی، ۹ (۳۶)، ۶۹–۷۹. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.2228639.1398.9.36.6.5
  9. فعال، احمد؛ زیباکلام، صادق و توحیدفام، محمد. (۱۴۰۲). تبارشناسی توسعه در ایران معاصر با تکیه بر تحلیل ناپیوستگی مدرنیته و مدرنیزاسیون. مطالعات اجتماعی ایران، ۱۷ (۲)، ۵۷–۷۹. https://doi.org/10.22034/jss.2024.2010279.1794
  10. قاسمی، یارمحمد. (۱۳۸۷). ارزیابی نحوه مدیریت توسعه در ایران. نامه علوم اجتماعی، ۱۶ (۱).
  11. معاونت حمل‌ونقل وزارت راه و شهرسازی. (۱۳۹۹). تند راه‌ها و تبادل‌های شهری: آیین‌نامه طراحی معابر شهری. معاونت پژوهشی دانشگاه تهران.
  12. نوری، شیوا و رفیعیان، مجتبی. (۱۳۹۵). سنجش اثرات کیفی ناشی از اجرای مگا پروژه‌های شهری بر ارتقای اقتصاد محلی (مورد پژوهی: دریاچه شهدای خلیج‌فارس واقع در منطقه ۲۲ شهر تهران). صفه، ۲۶ (۷۳)، ۱۰۵–۱۲۲. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.1683870.1395.26.2.6.1
  13. یوسفی، علی؛ مولایی هشجین، نصرالله و رضایی، پرویز. (۱۴۰۱). تبیین عوامل مؤثر بر تغییرات کاربری اراضی روستاهای پیراشهری رشت. توسعه فضاهای پیراشهری، ۴ (۱)، ۴۷-۶۶. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.26764164.1401.4.1.3.4
  14. Abutaleb, A., McDougall, K., Basson, M., & Al-Ameri, M. (2020). The Impact of Transit-Oriented Shopping Mall Developments (TOSMDs) on Metro Station Ridership: Dubai Metro Redline. Urban Rail Transit, 6, 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40864-020-00129-0
  15. Almeida, R., Brandão, M., Torres, R., Patrício, P., & Amaral, P. (2021). An assessment of the impacts of large‐scale urban projects on land values: The case of Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Papers in Regional Science, 100(2), 517-560. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12572
  16. Brynhildsen, M. (2021). The retail evolution and urban transformation: An analysis of challenges, social implications, and municipal adaptation in Malmö City. Thesis for master's degree, Department of Human Geography, Lund University. http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9048164
  17. Chan, E. (2023). Take back our city: reclaiming shopping malls in Hong Kong. City, 27(5–6), 778–794. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2023.2256527
  18. Chapple, K., & Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2019). Transit-oriented displacement or community dividends? Understanding the effects of smarter growth on communities. MIT Press.
  19. Chen, D., Xiang, P., Jia, F., Zhang, J., & Liu, Z. (2020). An Indicator System for Evaluating Operation and Maintenance Management of Mega Infrastructure Projects in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24), 9589. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249589
  20. Daunfeldt, S. O., Mihaescu, O., & Rudholm, N. (2021). The Decline of Small Cities: Increased Competition from External Shopping Malls or Long-Term Negative Trends? International Regional Science Review, 45(2), 225-257. https://doi.org/10.1177/01600176211034133
  21. Dayarian, N., & Nourian, F. (2022). The role of public interest in megamall formation: A constructivist grounded theory of the neighboring residents’ experiences. Geographical Urban Planning Research, 10(1), 121-142. https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2021.324419.1528 [In Persian]
  22. del Cerro Santamaría, G. (2021). Megaprojects, infrastructure, and sustainability in emerging markets. In S. Rana & A. K. Shrivastava (Eds.), Doing Business in Emerging Markets. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003199168-1
  23. Ebrahimnia, V., & Asadi, S. (2021). Assessment of the Impact of Beinolharamein Megaproject on the Neighboring Community in Shiraz. Journal of Housing and Rural Environment, 39(172), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.22034/39.172.77 [In Persian]
  24. Faal Mohamadali, A., Zibakalam, S., & Tohidfam, M. (2023). Genealogy of Development in Contemporary Iran: Relying on the Discontinuity Analysis of Modernity and Modernization. Iranian Social Studies, 17(2), 57-79. https://doi.org/10.22034/jss.2024.2010279.1794. [In Persian]
  25. Garau, C., & Pavan, V. M. (2018). Evaluating Urban Quality: Indicators and Assessment Tools for Smart Sustainable Cities. Sustainability, 10(3), 575. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030575
  26. Ghasemi, Y. (2008). The Pathology of Development Management in Iran. Sociological Review, 16(1). [In Persian]
  27. Goodman, R., & Kroen, A. (2019). Assessment of retail model in greenfield development settings: The social and health impacts of the form of shopping centres in new suburbs. Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Victoria State Government.
  28. Goworek, H., & McGoldrick, P. (2015). Retail Marketing Management: Principles and Practice. Pearson Education. https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1121647
  29. Habibi, L. and Mahmoudi Paty, F. (2017). From Bazaar to Shopping Centers: Analysis of the Evolution of Modern Commercial Spaces in Tehran. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar14(49), 45-56. [In Persian]
  30. Hardaker, S., Appel, A., & Rauch, S. (2022). Reconsidering retailers' resilience and the city: A mixed method case study. Cities, 128, 103796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103796
  31. Hart, J.F. (1991). The perimetropolitan bow wave. Geographical Review, 81(1), 35-51. https://doi.org/10.2307/215175
  32. Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Macmillan Press Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25538-2
  33. Imani Shamloo, J., & Ezzati Mehr, M. R. (2022). Examining The Effects Of Megamalls On The Surrounding Areas (Case Study: Laleh Park, Setareh Baran & Ipak Palace in Tabriz). Urban Economics And Planning, 3(4), 98-113. [In Persian]
  34. Leyzerova, A., Sharovarova, E., & Alekhin, V. (2015). Sustainable strategies of urban planning. Procedia Engineering, 150, 2055-2061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.299
  35. Metaxas, T. (2024). Mega projects and sustainable city image: evidence from Nuevo Norte Project of Madrid. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 16(1), 108–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2024.2327318
  36. Mitoula, R., & Papavasileiou, A. (2023). Mega infrastructure projects and their contribution to sustainable development: the case of the Athens Metro. Economic Change and Restructuring, 56, 1943–1969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-023-09493-w
  37. Müller, R., Drouin, N., & Sankaran, S. (2019). Modeling Organizational Project Management. Project Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972819847876
  38. Mylonas, C., & Xenidis, Y. (2018). Megaproject development in the context of sustainable urban regeneration. International Journal Of Real Estate And Land Planning, 1, 377-384.
  39. Nefs, M., & Daamen, T. (2022). Behind the Big Box: understanding the planning-development dialectic of large distribution centres in Europe. European Planning Studies, 31(5), 1007–1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2057792
  40. Neiva, S., Prasath, R. A., Lima, A., Barbosa, S. B., Ribeiro, J. M. P., Ceci, F., Schneider, J., Deggau, A. B., & Guerra, A. (2021). Sustainable urban development: Can the balanced scorecard contribute to the strategic management of sustainable cities? Sustainable Development, 29(6), 1155-1172. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2215
  41. Noori, S., & Rafieian, M. (2016). Assessing the Impacts of Urban Megaprojects on Local Economy: the Case of the Persian Gulf Martyrs Lake, Tehran. Soffeh, 26(2), 105-122. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.1683870.1395.26.2.6.1 [In Persian]
  42. Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. (2007). Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 178(2), 514-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.020
  43. Ortuño Padilla, A., Alarcón Hermosilla, A., & Tomás Ozores, O. (2017). The impact of out-of-town shopping centres on town-centre retailers and employment: The case of the Region of Murcia. Land Use Policy, 65, 277-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.014
  44. Sasanpour, F., Movahed, A., Soleimani Mehranjani, M., & Delfan Azari, Z. (2022). The Analysis of the Impacts of Megamalls on the Sustainability of Local Communities (Case Study: Towns of Abbasabad County). Journal of Geography and Regional Development, 20(3), 33-1. https://doi.org/10.22067/jgrd.2023.69315.1024 [In Persian]
  45. Shieh, E., & Hajiani, M. (2019). The Impact of Megamalls on the Neighborhood Identity in Tehran Case Study: Atlas Mall. Studies On Iranian Islamic City, 9(36), 69-79. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.2228639.1398.9.36.6.5 [In Persian]
  46. Shin, H. B., & Gimm, D. W. (2025). Situating megaprojects in Asia's political economy of urbanization. In H. B. Shin & D. W. Gimm (Eds.), The political economy of megaprojects in Asia: State power, land control, financial flows, and dispossession (pp. 1-13). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315115078-1
  47. Shiroudi, M. (2004). Iran: A long effort for accession to the World Trade Organization. Economics Research, 4(12), 187-203. [In Persian]
  48. Sorkin, M. (2011). All over the map: Writing on buildings and cities. Verso.
  49. Vice-Presidency for Transportation, Ministry of Roads and Urban Development. (2020). Expressways and urban interchanges: Urban thoroughfare design guidelines. Research Vice-Presidency of University of Tehran. [In Persian]
  50. Wu, G., Qiang, G., Zuo, J., Zhao, X., & Chang, R. (2018). What are the Key Indicators of Mega Sustainable Construction Projects?—A Stakeholder-Network Perspective. Sustainability, 10(8), 2939. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082939
  51. Wu, S., & Lo, S. (2018). Events as community function of shopping centers: A case study of Hong Kong. Cities, 72, 130-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.017
  52. Yosefi, A., Molaeih, N., & Rezaei, P. (2022). Explaining the factors affecting land use changes in suburban villages of Rasht. Peripheral Urban Spaces Development, 4(1), 47-66. [In Persian]
  53. Zanganeh, A., Karami, T., & Yadollahi Saber, R. (2021). Environmental impact assessment of Tehran's Sadr Elevated Highway on surrounding neighborhoods. Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, 21(62), 319-338. [In Persian]
  54. Zhang, L., Zhou, J., & Hui, E. C. M. (2020). Which types of shopping malls affect housing prices? From the perspective of spatial accessibility. Habitat International, 96, 102118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102118