تحلیل تاب‌آوری فردی ساکنین سکونتگاه‌های غیررسمی در مقابل مخاطرات محیطی (مطالعۀ موردی:شهر ارومیه)

نوع مقاله: پژوهشی - کاربردی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری دانشکدۀ برنامه‌ریزی و علوم محیطی، دانشگاه تبریز

2 دانشجوی دکتری گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری دانشکدۀ برنامه‌ریزی و علوم محیطی، دانشگاه تبریز

3 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری دانشکدۀ برنامه‌ریزی و علوم محیطی، دانشگاه تبریز

چکیده

تاب‌آوری فردی ساکنان سکونتگاه‌های غیررسمی در مقابل مخاطرات طبیعی ممکن است از ویژگی‌های اجتماعی-اقتصادی این سکونتگاه‌ها تأثیر بپذیرد؛ یعنی گروه‌های انسانی با ویژگی‌های اقتصادی-اجتماعی متفاوت، سطح تاب‌آوری فردی متفاوتی را تجربه می‌کنند. از این‌رو، تحقیق حاضر با هدف تحلیل تفاوت شاخص‌های اقتصادی-اجتماعی و میزان تاب‌آوری فردی ساکنان سکونتگاه‌های غیررسمی شهر ارومیه انجام یافته است. تحقیق از لحاظ هدف کاربردی و از لحاظ ماهیت و روش توصیفی-تحلیلی بوده و به‌منظور جمع‌آوری اطلاعات و داده‌ها از روش اسنادی و میدانی (پرسشنامه) استفاده شده است. محدودة مورد مطالعه در این پژوهش سکونتگاه‌های غیررسمی مناطق حاجی پیرلو، وکیل‌آباد و اسلام‌آباد 2 شهر ارومیه در استان آذربایجان غربی است. از این‌رو، برای تکمیل پرسشنامه از بین خانوارها براساس فرمول اصلاح‌شدة کوکران ۳۸۰ خانوار برای نمونة آماری به‌منظور انجام‌دادن تحقیق و تکمیل پرسشنامه انتخاب شد. همچنین، به‌منظور تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها از روش تحلیل واریانس یک‌طرفه (ANOVA) استفاده شد. نتیجة این تحقیق نشان داد از بین شاخص‌های اقتصادی مورد بررسی، شاخص اشتغال با مؤلفه‌های «خوداتکایی» و «احساس منحصربه‌فردبودن» به‌ترتیب با 000/0 sig و 002/0 sig، شاخص درآمد با مؤلفه‌های «خودکارآمدی» و «اعتمادبه‌نفس» به‌‌‌ترتیب با 002/0 sig و 000/0 sig، شاخص مالکیت مسکن با مؤلفة «عواطف مثبت» با 000/0 sig و شاخص مالکیت خودرو با مؤلفة «احساس اجتماعی‌بودن» با 001/0 sig، تفاوت معنی‌داری را نشان می‌دهند. همچنین، از بین شاخص‌های اجتماعی-جمعیتی مورد بررسی فقط شاخص تحصیلات با مؤلفه‌های «خوداتکایی» و «اعتماد» به‌ترتیب با 000/0 sig و 001/0 sig، تفاوت معنی‌داری را نشان داد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

An Analysis of Individual Resilience of Informal Settlement Residents against Environmental Hazard (Case study: Urmia City)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hadi Hakimi 1
  • Mohammad Taghi Mabudi 2
  • Parya Alizadeh 3
1 Assistant Professor of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Geography, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran
2 PhD Student in Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Geography, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran
3 MA in Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Geography, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction
The cities in all stages of development are faced with the pressures due to globalization, urbanization, climate change, and resource depletion. Environmental threats (climate change, earthquakes, floods, landslides, etc.), environmental degradation, and resource shortages are just some of the threats that are different in nature and affections. Some of them may cause long-term changes in urban systems (such as lack of resources) and some other can create shock to the city (such as earthquakes, hurricanes, etc.). Hence, the ability to return to normal state in the face of these shocks of urban settlements is different and may have a direct correlation with socio-economic status dwellers. Informal settlements are one of the biggest challenges that the urban sustainable development threatens a global scale. The settlements  dependent upon socio-economic situation of residents and their physical characteristics are the most vulnerable cities against the environmental hazards. The urban poor as a most vulnerable group in natural hazards (floods, earthquakes, climate change, etc.) are a new dimension to the challenges and create more difficulties in achieving the millennium development goals.
Therefore, it can be said that in the event of environmental hazards, individual resilience of informal settlements is low. Given that individual resilience is one of the levels of social resilience that affects the mental characteristics of individuals, it can be affected by socio-economic characteristics. Hence, identification of the factors affecting individual resilience in informal settlements can lead to an increase in social resilience. In fact, explaining the resilience of societies against the threats is to understand how social, economic, institutional, political and executive capacities are influenced by the resilience of societies. 
 
 
 
Methodology
The purpose of the study is to analyze the differences in socio-economic indices and individual resiliency on the informal settlements residents in Urmia. This is an applied research by a descriptive and analytical method. We have used documentary and surveying (questionnaire) method to collect data. The study area of the research is Haji Pirlo, Vakilabad and Islamabad as 2 informal settlements of Urmia city, in the West Azarbaijan Province. Therefore, to complete the questionnaire on the basis of revised expenditure using Cochran, 380 households have been selected for the survey to respond questionnaire. To analyze the data, we have also used Analysis Of Variance (ANOVA).
 
Results and discussion
The purpose of this present research is to analyze the different aspects between the economic and social indicators in the resiliency of households in informal settlements of Urmia. Characteristics of respondents have been presented as followingin aspects of gender, 58.3% of the respondents are men and 41.3% are women, in aspect of age, 23.4% zre 19-30 years old, 27.1% 31-40 years old, 21.3% 41-50 years old, 28.2% more than 51 years old and in terms of education level, 26.3% of the respondents have diploma, most of the respondents are also illiterate (2.6%). In addition, among respondents in term of marital status, 83.4% are married, 16.1% were single and 0.5% of undeclared, in terms of staying time, 81.3% were residents here less than twenty years, 18.7% more than twenty years. In terms of gender of household, 95.3% were male and 4/7% women.
The result of this study showed that among the economic indicators, the employment index has relationship with the components of “Self-sufficiency” and “Feeling unique” in 0.000 sig and 0.002 sig, respectively. Income index is related with "Self-efficacy" and "self-confidence" components in 0.002 sig and 0.000 sig, respectively. Housing ownership index has also relationship with "positive emotions" component in 0.000 sig. and  car ownership index with "sense of sociality" component in 0.001 sig. These have indicated significant differences.Among the socio-demographic indicators, only the education index has relationship with the components of “Self-sufficiency" and “confidence", respectively.
 
Conclusion
Individual resilience is the primary level of social resilience that has been addressed in recent years in crisis management issues. This aspect of resilience is directly related to the economic, social, cultural, psychological, and social characteristics, beliefs, and so on. These characteristics can enhance or weaken an individual resilience. Therefore, individual resilience can be considered as the pillar of social resilience. Informal settlements in Iran, due to the weakness of physical structures as superstructures and socioeconomic structures as infrastructures, are more vulnerable to the environmental hazards than the formal part of the cities. Socioeconomic characteristics of inhabitants of these settlements, such as unemployment, informal employment, low incomes, lack of social services, etc. can undermine their individual resilience including confidence, anxiety control, problem solving, coordination, positive emotions, self-esteem, etc., against environmental hazards. Thus, this can lead to difficulties in returning to normal state. The results of the research showed that employment, income, housing ownership, automobile ownership and education of individuals with some of the components of individual resilience, such as self-efficacy, feeling of uniqueness, self-efficacy, self-confidence, positive emotions, social feeling and trust is a meaningful difference. This could make the settlement more vulnerable to natural hazards. Therefore, in order to increase the individual's resilience to residents of these settlements, the following suggestions are presented:
- Planning for job empowerment of these settlements as one of the important components i to achieve a resilience society, especially in informal settlements.
- Providing basic services such as health insurance and retirement communities.
- Preparing comprehensive crisis management program for informal settlements due to their different structure than the formal sector of the city.
- Training courses and informing the public about environmental hazards and the need to prepare for them.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • individual resilience
  • Informal Settlements
  • environmental hazard،Hajipirlo
  • Vakil Abad and Eslam Abad 2
  • رضایی، محمدرضا (۱۳89)، تبیین تاب‌آوری اجتماعات شهری به‌منظور کاهش اثرات سوانح طبیعی (زلزله)؛ مطالعه موردی: کلانشهر تهران،پایان‌نامة دکتری، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس تهران.
  • رضایی، محمدرضا (۱۳۹۲)، «ارزیابی تاب‌آوری اقتصادی و نهادی جوامع شهری در برابر سوانح طبیعی مطالعه موردی: زلزله محله‌های شهر تهران»، دوفصلنامۀ علمی و پژوهشی مدیریت بحران، سال2، شماره1،صص ۲۷- ۳۷.
    • A’verria Sirkin, M. Brian, D. Barton, W. P & Dilip V. J (2014), Development of a new multidimensional individual and interpersonal resilience measure for older adults, Aging & Mental Health, 19(1):32-45. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2014.909383.
    • Adger, W. N. (2000), Social and ecological resilience are they related? Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 24, No. 3: 347- 364.
    • Ahsan, S. M. M (2013), Resilient Cities for the Poor or by the Poor? A Case Study from Bangkok, MS Thesis, University of Technology, Berlin.
    • Alexander, D. E. (2013), Resilience and disaster risk reduction: An etymological journey, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., Vol. 13 No. 11: 2707– 2716.
    • Bastaminia, A., Rezaei, M. R. & Dastoorpoor, M. (2017), Identification and evaluation of the components and factors affecting social and economic resilience in city of Rudbar, Iran, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction,Vol. 22 No. 2: 269- 280.
    • Bonanno, G. A., Galea, S., Bucciarelli, A. & Vlahov, D. (2006), Psychological Resilience after Disaster: New York City in the Aftermath of the September 11th Terrorist Attack,Psychological Science,Vol. 17, No. 3: 181– 186.
    • Bruneau, M. et al. (2003), A Framework to Qualitatively Assess and Entrance the Seismic Resilience of Communities, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 19, No. 4: 737- 738.
    • Egeland, B., Carlson, E. & Sroufe, L. A. (1993), Resilience as process, Development and Psychopathology, Vol. 5, No. 4: 517- 528.
    • Fleming, J., Ledogar, R. J. (2008), Resilience, an evolving concept: A review of literature relevant to aboriginal research, Pimatisiwin, Vol. 6, No. 2: 7– 23.
    • Fletcher, D. & Sarkar, M. (2013), Psychological resilience: A review and critique of definitions, concepts, and theory, European Psychologist, Vol. 18, No. 1:12– 23.
    • Fletcher, D. & Scott, M. (2010), Psychological stress in sports coaches: A review of concepts, theory and research, Journal of Sports Sciences, Vol. 28 No.2: 127– 137.
    • Galderisi, A. (2014), Urban resilience: A framework for empowering cities in face of heterogeneous risk factors, ITU A|Z, Vol, 11, No,1: 36- 58.
    • Holling, C. S. (1973), Resilience and stability of ecological systems, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, Vol. 4, No. 4: 1- 23.
    • ICLE, (2012), Resilient Cities, Congress Report, Bonn, Germany.
    • Iftekhar, A. (2014), Factors in building resilience in urban slums of Dhaka, Bangladesh. Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 18 No. 1: 745- 753.
    • Kaplan, C. P. Turner, S. Norman, E. Stillson, K (1996), Promoting resilience strategies: A modified consultation model, Child Sch, Vol. 18, No. 3: 158- 168.
    • Lee, H. H. & Cranford, J. A. (2008), Does resilience moderate the associations between parental problem drinking and adolescents’ internalizing and externalizing behaviours? A study of Korean Adolescents, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Vol. 96 No. 3: 213–221.
    • Leipold, B. & Greve, W. (2009), Resilience: A conceptual bridge between coping and development, European Psychologist, Vol. 14 No. 1: 40– 50.
    • Linnenluecke, M. K., Griffiths, A. & Winn, M. (2012), Extreme weather events and thecritical importance of anticipatory adaptation and organizational resilience in responding to impacts, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 21 No. 1: 17–32.
    • Moberg, F. & Hauge Simonsen, S. (2011), What is resilience? An introduction to social-ecological research, Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm.
    • Pitrenaite, B. Z. & Torresi, F. (2014), Integrated approach to a resilient city: Associating social, environmental and infrastructure resilience in its whole, European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Vol. 6, No. 2: 1- 13.
    • Pitrenaite-Zileniene, B. & Torresi, F. (2014), Integrated approach to a resilient city: Associating social, enviromental and infrasttucture resilience in its whole, EUROPEAN Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Vol. 6, No. 2: 1- 13.
    • Polk, L. V. (1997), Toward a middle-range theory of resilience, ANS Adv Nurs Sci, Vol. 19, No. 3:1- 13.
    • Ravallion, M., Chen, S. & Sangraula, P. (2007), New evidence on the urbanization of global poverty, Population and Development Review, Vol. 33, No. 4: 667- 701.
    • Rutter, M. (1987), Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, Vol 57 No. 3: 316– 331.
    • Saleebey, D. (1996), The strengths perspective in social work practice: Extensions and cautions, Soc Work, Vol. 41, No. 3: 296- 305.
    • Wikstorm, A. (2013), The Challenge of Change: Planning for social urban resilience an analysis of contemporary planning aims and practices, MS Thesis in Urban and Regional Planning, Department of Human Geography, Stockholm University.
    • Farzad Behtash, M. Kaynezhad, M. A. Pierre Babaei, M. Asgari, A (2013), Evaluation and analysis of dimensions and resiliency components of the metropolis of Tabriz, Journal of Fine Arts, Architecture and Urban Development, Vol. 18 No. 3: 33- 42.
    • Rafiean, M. Rezaei, M. R. Asgari, A. Parhizkar, A. Shayan, S (2010), Explaining resilience and indicating it in community-based disaster management (CBDM), Planning and Space Approach, Vol. 15 No. 4: 20- 41.
    • Rezai, M. R. (2010), Explaining the Resilience of UrbanCommunities in order to reduce the effects of natural disasters (earthquake); Case study: Tehran metropolis, PhD Thesis, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran.
    • Rezai, M. R. (2013), Evaluation of economic and institutional resilience of urban communities against natural disasters case study: Tehran's neighborhoods, Quarterly Journal of Crisis Management, Vol. 2 No. 1: 27- 37.
  • رفیعیان، مجتبی، رضایی، محمدرضا، عسگری، علی، پرهیزکار، اکبر و سیاوش شایان (۱۳۸۹)، «تبیین تاب‌آوری و شاخص سازی آن در مدیریت سوانح اجتماع‌محور (CBDM)»، برنامه‌ریزی و آمایش فضا، سال15، شماره4، صص ۲۰- ۴۱.
  • فرزاد بهتاش، محمدرضا، کی‌نژاد، محمدعلی، پیر بابایی، محمدتقی و علی عسگری (۱۳۹۲)، «ارزیابی و تحلیل ابعاد و مؤلفه‌های تاب‌آوری کلان‌شهر تبریز»، نشریۀ هنرهای زیبا-معماری و شهرسازی، سال18، شماره۳، صص ۳۳- ۴۲.