سنجش رضایتمندی شهروندان از محور غذا و تفریح در برندسازی شهری مطالعه موردی: شهرک‌توحید سبزوار

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی - کاربردی

نویسندگان

1 گروه برنامه ریزی اجتماعی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی. تهران. ایران.

2 گروه برنامه ریزی اجتماعی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی. تهران. ایران

چکیده

برندهای شهری ماندگار از بسترهای اجتماعی و برهم کنش جریانات تعاملی انسان و محیط شکل می‌گیرند و ملاک ارزیابی آن، میزان رضایتی است که در اثر تجربه محیط بر ذهن شهروندان ثبت می‌شود. هدف اصلی این پژوهش، سنجش میزان رضایت‌مندی شهروندان شهر سبزوار از تجربه طرح آزمایشی برندسازی خیابانی منتخب در شهرک‌توحید شهر سبزوار با عنوان"خیابان غذا و تفریح" می‌باشد. روش تحقیق این پژوهش ماهیتی تحلیلی-توصیفی دارد که در ابتدا، برای مشخص شدن بهترین خیابان جهت اجرای طرح آزمایشی برندسازی و بررسی دیدگاه شهروندان با تکیه بر مولفه‌های ترافیکی و کالبدی، از تکنیک تاپسیس استفاده شده است. بر این اساس، خیابان فردوسی به عنوان بستر آزمایش طرح برندسازی انتخاب و سپس با اجرای جشنواره آزمایشی خیابان غذا و تفریح به ثبت میزان رضایت و شناسایی نیازهای اصلی شهروندان در صورت تداوم طرح، پرداخته شد. در این راستا، از طریق فرمول کوکران، 384 پرسشنامه بین تمامی شهروندان، توزیع و طبق آزمون کرونباخ پایایی و اعتبار این پرسشنامه‌ها 713/0 محاسبه شد. در نهایت داده‌های گردآوری شده با آزمون تی تک نمونه مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت بر این اساس سطح معنای مولفه‌ها از 05/0 کمتربوده و فرضیه رضایتمندی شهروندان از طرح پیشنهادی با عنوان خیابان غذا و تفریح تائید شد. تنها مولفه‌ای که از منظر شهروندان نیاز به توجه بیشتر در طرح‌های آتی دارد، بحث آسایش اقلیمی با سطح معنای 10/0 است. در نهایت نیز از طریق آزمون فریدمن مولفه‌های رضایت‌مندی کاربران از طرح برندسازی، به ترتیب در 4 سطح: رضایت از کیفیت‌های اجتماعی، کیفیت‌های عملکردی-کالبدی، کیفیت‌های مدیریتی و کیفیت‌های زیست‌محیطی رتبه‌بندی شدند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Assessing citizens' satisfaction with the food and entertainment axis in urban branding (Case study: Shahrak-Tohid of Sabzevar)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Neda Partanian 1
  • Mahmoud Jomehpour 2
1 Department of social planning, Faculty of Social Science, Allameh Tabataba’i University. Tehran.Iran.
2 Department of Social, Planning., Faculty of Social Science, Allameh Tabataba’i University. Tehran.Iran
چکیده [English]

A B S T R A C T
Sustainable urban brands are formed from social contexts and interactions between humans and ‎the environment. The evaluation criterion is the level of satisfaction recorded in the ‎minds of citizens as a result of environmental experience. This study aims to measure citizen ‎satisfaction with the selective street branding trial project in Tohid-Shahr of Sabzevar, entitled ‎‎"Food and Recreation Street." This study uses a descriptive-analytical approach in which, at first, ‎the TOPSIS technique was exerted to determine which street would be the best to implement a ‎pilot branding plan and to analyze citizens' perspectives based on traffic patterns and physical ‎characteristics. Accordingly, Ferdowsi Street was selected as a trial platform for the branding ‎plan. Then, through the Food and Recreation Street pilot festival, the level of satisfaction ‎and identification of citizens' main needs, if the project continues, was measured. In this regard, ‎through Cochran's formula, 384 questionnaires were distributed among all citizens, and ‎according to Cronbach's test, the validity of these questionnaires was calculated to be 0.713. ‎Finally, the data collected was evaluated by a t-test. Accordingly, the components' meaning level was less than 0.05, and the hypothesis of citizens' satisfaction with the proposed ‎plan was confirmed. The only component that needs more attention in plans is ‎climatic comfort, with a level of meaning of 0.10.  Finally, the Friedman test ranked user ‎satisfaction's four categories for the branding plan: satisfaction with social attributes, ‎functional-physical attributes, managerial attributes, and environmental attributes
 
Extended Abstract
Introduction
The subject of branding has long been a competitive tool in the world to attract an audience ‎and highlight the unique features of a product, region, or place. The most critical goal in ‎branding is to create a distinguished identity. While in harmony with its similar cases, it has ‎significant differences that have separated it from its homogeneous context as a pattern. In branding, we face the audience's perception of the environment to analyze their level ‎of satisfaction. This recorded image in the minds of users, which is due to the experience of the ‎environment, can be the result of external and internal forces of each person's mind, which ‎ultimately leads to highlighting a place or product with a positive feeling, in this way the ‎audience of the brand will continue to reuse it; Or by recording an unpleasant image on the ‎mind, it creates a kind of negative emotions arising from the brand for users, so it destroys the ‎desire of the audience to reuse that product or place‏. Sustainable urban brands are formed from social contexts and interactions between humans and ‎the environment. The evaluation criterion is the level of satisfaction recorded in the ‎minds of citizens as a result of environmental experience‏. ‏This study aims to measure citizen satisfaction with the selective street branding trial project in ‎Tohid-Shahr of Sabzevar, entitled "Food and Recreation Street‏."
 
Methodology
The methodology of this research is descriptive-analytical in nature. In order to choose the best ‎street in the Tohid Shahr district for the implementation of the trial branding plan, the traffic ‎and physical indicators of the streets have been weighed with the interposition of experts, using ‎the TOPSIS technique. In order to measure the citizen's satisfaction with the qualities presented in the ‎trial project, 384 questionnaires were distributed among the project visitors, which were ‎analyzed with a one-sample t-test and Friedman test through SPSS software‏.
 
Results and discussion
In evaluating citizens' opinions on creating food and entertainment streets, the validity of the ‎questions was evaluated with expert views and after frequent corrections during meetings ‎between the mayor and NGO members. Likewise, the reliability of this questionnaire was ‎calculated at 0.713 through Cronbach's alpha test. It should be noted that reliability higher than ‎‎0.700 confirms the appropriateness of the research questions. Initially, to select the best ‎platform for the trial project, the AHP method was used to weigh the traffic-performance ‎criteria of the streets. In this method, the validity of the calculated weights was confirmed ‎through the inconsistency rate (0.02). The TOPSIS weight matrix is calculated based on the ‎effect of the weight and type of criteria on the ratio of each street to its traffic-functional ‎component. Finally, the best platform for the experimental implementation of the food and entertainment street plan has been determined by determining the ideal and non-ideal options and calculating the distance ‎between the proposed options and the ideal solution. The results of ‎the TOPSIS technique indicate that Ferdowsi Street, with its large width, low branches, proximity ‎to the central green space of Shahrak-Tohid, short length, easy access of citizens, and less ‎traffic volume, was selected as the platform for the pilot project to become a food and ‎entertainment street‏.‏ To measure satisfaction, the study group is all citizens of Sabzevar, who are divided into four ‎groups: residents of Ferdowsi Street, Neighborhood Businessmen, residents of Shahrak-Tohid ‎, and residents of the central core of Sabzevar comprehend the needs of each group. Therefore, ‎among the respondents, 4.4% (17 people) are residents of Ferdowsi Street, 63.8% (245 people) ‎are residents of Shahrak- Tohid, 25.8% (99 people) are residents of the central core of Sabzevar ‎and 6% (23 people) local Businessmen‏. ‏ The sample t-test results show that the average of the sample population in all components ‎except environmental quality was more than the mean, and its significance level was less than 0.05. ‎It denotes that the conditions provided in the trial festival of the Food and Recreation Street ‎project have had a positive effect on citizens' perceptions and have been able to satisfy them. ‎Among all the proposed components, citizens consider the easy access to Ferdowsi Street and ‎the existence of various modes of transportation, with an average of 4.13 as the most significant ‎component in Ferdowsi Street, which is the most prominent executive advantage of the project ‎in Ferdowsi Street. Moreover, the readability of the environment, which is directly related to the ‎relationship between the nature and appearance of the festival, after access, has been the most ‎popular factor among food festival participants and has been influential in introducing the ‎potential of Ferdowsi Street to users‏.
 
Conclusion
According to the significant level of the components, which was less than 0.05, the hypothesis ‎of citizens' satisfaction with the proposed plan, called food and entertainment street, was ‎approved. The only component that needs attention from the citizens' point of view is the ‎climate comfort issues. In this street, the average of calculated satisfaction is lower than ‎the set average of 3, and its significant level was calculated at 0.10. The Friedman test is a suitable ‎tool for identifying the prioritization of environmental components by citizens and guides city ‎managers in diagnosing problems and providing solutions according to the real needs of users. ‎Users' priority of the qualities presented in the trial project includes social qualities, functional-‎physical qualities, managerial qualities, and environmental qualities. Finally, with 79.2% of the ‎votes, the citizens consider Ferdowsi Street a suitable platform for implementing the ‎food and entertainment street. With 67.9% of the votes, they declare they welcome the ‎proposed project if the plan continues. This shows that the food and entertainment ‎street brand, in general, has recorded a positive image in the minds of users and citizens. In order to increase ‎vitality in districts, such streets are needed for spending time‏.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Urban Branding
  • Place Experience
  • Citizen Satisfaction
  • Brand Value
  • Food and ‎Recreation Street
  1.  
  1. ابراهیمی، ابوالقاسم و منصوری، حسین. (1392). بررسی تأثیر تصویر ذهنی برند و کیفیت خدمات بر روی بازاریابی رابطه‌ای و تمایلات رفتاری مشتریان. نشریه چشم‌انداز مدیریت بازرگانی، 12(15)، 153-170
  2. امین، معصومه و دادرس، حسن. (1394). گردشگری غذای توسعه پایدار مقصدهای گردشگری نمونه موردی: استان گیلان. اولین همایش بین‌المللی و چهارمین همایش ملی گردشگری، جغرافیا و محیط‌زیست پایدار.
  3. تاج‌زاده نمین، ابوالفضل و اسمعیل مشرفی، فاطمه. (1392). اولویت‌بندی مؤلفه‌های ارزش ویژه برند در مقصد گردشگری از دیدگاه گردشگران داخلی. نشریه مطالعات مدیریت گردشگری، 8 (24)، 35-58.
  4. حسینی، میرزاحسن؛ حلوائیها، وحید رضا و رمضانی، سعید. (1389). بررسی تأثیر تصویر ذهنی برند بر وفاداری کارکنان. نشریه مدیریت توسعه و تحول، 5، 69-75.
  5. راپاپورت، ایماس. (1392). معنی محیط ساخته‌شده-رویکردی در ارتباط غیرکلامی. ترجمه: حبیب، فرح، چاپ سوم، تهران: انتشارات پردازش و برنامه‌ریزی شهری.
  6. رستمی زیتونی، انیس؛ عباسی، رسول؛ باباشاهی، جبار و عصاریان، ریحانه. (1399). نیازسنجی آموزشی مربیان فنی و حرفه‌ای. فصلنامه کارافن، 17(51)، 45-66.
  7. رفیعیان، مجتبی و خدائی، زهرا. (1388). بررسی شاخص‌ها و معیارهای موثر بر رضایتمندی شهروندان از فضاهای عمومی شهری. نشریه راهبرد، 18(53)، 227-248.
  8. طهماسبی، ارسلان؛ علیزاده، هوشمند و اصلانی، پرویز. (1397). مطالعه مؤلفه‌های شکل‌دهنده کیفیت معنایی- ادراکی محیط، مورد مطالعاتی: محله قطارچیان سنندج. نشریه معماری و شهرسازی آرمان‌شهر، 11 (25)، 111-124.
  9. گلکار، کورش. (1380). مؤلفه‌های سازنده کیفیت طراحی شهری. نشریه صفه، 11(32)، 38-65.
  10. محمدپور زرندی، حسین؛ حسنی، علی و امینیان، ناصر. (1395). عوامل مؤثر بر برند شهری و اولویت‌بندی آن‌ها از دیدگاه گردشگران بین‌المللی (مطالعه موردی: برج میلاد تهران). نشریه اقتصاد و مدیریت شهری، 4(14)، 115-135.
  11. محمدی بیدسردره، ایمان. (1397). تأثیر مکان سازی بر تجربه مکان توریستی، کنفرانس عمران, معماری و شهرسازی کشورهای جهان اسلام، تبریز.
  12. معتمدی مهر، اکبر و مصداقی، حسین .(1390). جغرافیای تغذیه، رویکردی نوین در گردشگری شرق گیلان. نشریه مطالعات برنامه‌ریزی سکونتگاه‌های انسانی، 6 (15)، 120-137.
  13. موظف رستمی، محمدعلی. (1380). اصول برنامه‌ریزی اوقات فراغت. چاپ دوم، تهران: انتشارات نسیم الهی.
  14. نجات، سهیل؛ شیرخدایی، میثم و بهمنی تبریزی، حسین (1396). بررسی تأثیر تجربه نوستالژیک، رضایت برند و بازاریابی پایدار بر عشق برند و پیامدهای آن. فصلنامه مدیریت برند، 4(12)، 13-39.
  15. Addo-Tham, R., Appiah-Brempong, E., Vampere, H., Acquah-Gyan, E., & Gyimah Akwasi, A. (2020). Knowledge on Food Safety and Food-Handling Practices of Street Food Vendors in Ejisu-Juaben Municipality of Ghana. Advances in Public Health, 2020, 1-7.
  16. Al-Hinkawi, W. Sh., & Zedan, S. K. (2021). Branding for cities: the case study of Baghdad. Series: Earth and Environmental Science.
  17. Amin, M., & Dadras, H. (2015). Food Tourism Sustainable Development Tourism Destinations (Case ‌Study: Gilan Province). The first international and the fourth national conference of tourism. ‌geography and stable environment. [In Persian]‌
  18. Aminian, N., & Hassani, A. (2016). Effective Factors on Urban Brand and Their Prioritization from ‌Perspective of International Tourists (Case Study: Tehran’s Milad Tower). IUESA, 4(14), 115-136. [In Persian]‌
  19. L. (2014). Foodborne Diseases: Prevalence of Foodborne Diseases in Africa. Encyclopedia of Food Safety, 1, 262-275.
  20. Ashworth, G J. (2009). The Instruments of Place Branding: How is it done?. European Spatial Research and Policy, 16(1), 9–22.
  21. Bellia, C., Pilato, M., & Seraphin, H. (2016). Street food and food safety: a driver for tourism?. Applied Ceremonial and Communication in Management, 17, 20-27.
  22. Bertella G., (2011). Knowledge in food tourism: the case of Lofoten and Maremma Toscana. Current Issues in Tourism, 14(4), 355-371.
  23. Blain, C, Levy, S.E., & Ritchie, B. (2005). Destination Branding: Insights and Practices from Destination Management Organizations. Travel Research, 43(4), 328-338
  24. Bonakdar, A., & Audirac, I. (2019). City Branding and the Link to Urban Planning: Theories, Practices, and Challenges. Planning Literature, 35(2), 147-160.
  25. Buscemi, S., Barile, A., Maniaci, V., Batsis, J. A, Mattina, A. & Verga, S. (2011). Characterization of street food consumption in Palermo: possible effects on health. Nutrition Journal, 10(119), 1-9.
  26. Ceyhun, S.A., & Şanlıer, N. (2016). Street food consumption in terms of the food safety and health. Human Sciences, 13(3), 4072- 4083.
  27. Coelho, A., Bairrada, C., Simão, L. & Barbosa, C. (2020). The Drivers of the City Brand Equity Comparing Citizens’ and Tourists’ Perceptions and Its Influence on the City Attractiveness: The Case of the City of Coimbra. Hospitality & Tourism Administration. 23(2), 242-268.
  28. De Chernatony, L. & Daniels, K. (1994). Developing a more effective brand positioning. Brand Management, 1(6), 373-379.
  29. Ebrahimi, A., & Mansouri, H. (2013). Investigating the effect of brand image and service quality on relationship marketing and customer behavioral tendencies. Business management prespective, 12(15), 153-170. [In Persian]
  30. Ellisa, A., Park, E., Kim, S., & Yeoman, I. (2018). What is food tourism?. Tourism Management, 68, 250-263.
  31. (2011). Street foods: the way forward for better food safety and nutrition. Summary of discussion no. 73 from 26 September to 14 October 2011.
  32. Golkar, K. (2001). Components of Urban Design Quality. Soffeh, 32, 38-65. [In Persian]
  33. Habib, K. R (2016). Understanding Challenges Faced by Street Food Vendors to Maintain Street Food Hygiene in Dhaka City. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 4(4), 78-85.
  34. Hankinson, G. (2007). The management of destination brands: Five guiding principles based on recent developments in corporate branding theory. Brand Management, 14(3), 240–254.
  35. Hosseini, M.H., Halvaeiha, V.R., & Ramazani, S. (2010).The Impact of Brand Image on Employee Loyalty. Development evolution management, 5, 69-75. [In Persian]
  36. Jencks, C. (2005). The Iconic Building - The Power of Enigma. London: Frances Lincoln.‌
  37. Kavaratzis, M. (2004). From city marketing to city branding: Towards a theoretical framework for developing city brands. Place branding, 1(1), 58-73.
  38. Kavaratzis, M., & Hatch, M. (2013). The dynamics of place brands: An identity-based approach to place branding theory. Marketing Theory, 13(1), 69–86.
  39. Kolotouchkina, O., & Seisdedos, G. (2017). Place branding strategies in the context of new smart cities: Songdo IBD, Masdar and Skolkovo. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 14(2), 115–124.
  40. Kotler, P. and Levy, S.J. (1969). Broadening the Concept of Marketing. Marketing, 33(1), 10-15.
  41. Kusumawati, A. Supriono (2020). City Branding Strategy to Improve the Competitiveness of Regional Tourism: Study on the City Branding Implementation in Malang Regency. Advanced Science and Technology, 29(9), 3959-3966.
  42. Lusher, L., Seaman, M., & Tsay, S. (2008). Streets to live by: how liveable street design can bring economic, health and quality-of-life benefits to New York City. Transportation Alternatives.
  43. Ma, L., Chen, H., Yan, H., Wu, L. & Zhang, W. (2019). Food safety knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of street food vendors and consumers in Handan, a third tier city in China. BMC Public Health, 19(1128), 1-13.
  44. Mohammadi Bidsardare, I. (2018).The impact of making place on the tourist place experience. ‌Conference on civil engineering, architecture & urbanism of the Islamic countries. Tabriz. Iran. [In Persian]‌
  45. Mohammadifar, Y., Rousta, A., Gharehche, M., & Hamidizadeh, M. (2018). The Necessities and Consequences of City Branding and Emphasizing the Economy of Urban Tourism. Urban Economics and Management, 6(21), 55-69.
  46. Motamedimehr, A., & Mesdaghi, H. (2011). Nutrition geography a modern approach in eastern Guilan ‌tourism. Studies of Human Settlements Planning, 6(15), 120-137. [In Persian]‌
  47. Movazaf Rostami, M.A. (2001). Principles of leisure time planning. Nasim Elahi. [In Persian]‌
  48. Nnejat, S., Shirkhodaei, M., Bahmani Tabrizi, H. (2017).Investigating effect of Nostalgic Brand ‌Experience, Brand Satisfaction, and sustainable Marketing on Brand Love and its Consequences. Brand management, 4(4), 13-39. [In Persian]‌
  49. Okumus, B. (2021). Food tourism research: a perspective article. Tourism Review, 76(1), 38-42.
  50. Panicker, R., & Priya, R. S. (2021). Paradigms of street food vending in sustainable development – a way forward in Indian context. Cities & Health, 5(3), 234-239.
  51. Pretty, G.H., Chipuer, H.M., & Bramston, P. (2003). Sense of place amongst adolescents and adults in two rural Australian towns: the discriminating features of place attachment, sense of community and place dependence in relation to place identity. Environmental Psychology, 23(3), 273-287.
  52. Rafieian, M., & Khodaei, Z. (2010). The Study of Determining Indices and Criteria of Citizen's Satisfaction with Urban Public Spaces. Strategy, 16(53), 227-248. [In Persian]
  53. Rapoport, A. (2013). The meaning of the built environment: a nonverbal communication approach. Translator: Habib, F. Processing and urban planning company. [In Persian]
  54. Rostami Zeitooni, A., Abbasi, R., Babashahi, J. & Assarian, R. (2020).Training Needs Assessment for Technical and Vocational Instructors. Karafan, 17(51), 45-66. [In Persian]
  55. Shirvani Dastgerdi, A., & De Luca, G. (2019).Strengthening the city’s reputation in the age of cities: an insight in the city branding theory. City, Territory and Architecture. 6(2), 1-7.
  56. Tahmasebi, A., Alizadeh, H., & Aslani, P. (2018).The Forming Indicators of Semantic- conceptual Environmental Quality, Case Study: Sanandaj Qatarchian Neighborhood. Architecture, urban design & urban planning, 11(25), 111-124. [In Persian]
  57. Tajzadeh Namin, A.A., & Esmaeil Moshrefi, F. (2013). Prioritization of the Components of Brand Equity from the View Point of Domestic Tourists. Tourism management studies, 8(24), 35-58. [In Persian]
  58. Trueman, M., Klemm, M., Giroud, A., & Lindley, T. (2001). Bradford in the Premier League? A multidisciplinary approach to branding and re-positioning a city, Working Paper 01/04, Bradford University School of Management, Bradford.
  59. Winfield-Pfefferkorn, J. (2005). The branding of cities exploring city branding and the Importance of brand image. Master’s Thesis. Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree in Master of Arts in Advertising Design at the Graduate School of Syracuse University.
  60. Zeithaml, V. A., (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.
  61. Zenker, S., Braun, E., & Petersen, S. (2017). Branding the destination versus the place: The effects of brand complexity and identification for residents and visitors. Tourism Management, 58, 15–27.
  62. Zhang, L. & Zhao, S.X. (2009). City branding and the Olympic effect: A case study of Beijing. Cities, 26(5), 245-254.