گونه‌بندی توسعه مبتنی بر حمل‌ونقل عمومی (TOD) در ایستگاه‌های جنوب خط یک مترو شهر اصفهان بر مبنای مدل گره-مکان-سیستم پشتیبان

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی - کاربردی

نویسندگان

گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

10.22059/jurbangeo.2024.380033.1968

چکیده

در سال‌های اخیر، شهرها، به محل اصلی زندگی انسان‌ها تبدیل‌شده است و شهرنشینی پایدار از جمله دغدغه­های اصلی سکونتگاه­های شهری امروزی محسوب می‌شود. رویکرد توسعه مبتنی بر حمل‌ونقل عمومی به‌عنوان یکی از راهبردهای یکپارچه‌سازی سیستم حمل‌ونقل و کاربری زمین مطرح‌شده است. گونه‌بندی توسعه مبتنی بر حمل‌ونقل عمومی، موضوعی نوظهور محسوب می‌شود که به دنبال توجه به تفاوت‌های محلی برای سیاست‌گذاری توسعه پایدار است. این پژوهش با روش توصیفی-تحلیلی به دنبال گونه‌بندی توسعه مبتنی بر حمل‌ونقل عمومی در فاصله 500 متری از هفت ایستگاه مترو واقع در بخش جنوبی خط یک مترو شهر اصفهان با استفاده از مدل گره-مکان- سیستم پشتیبان می‌باشد. هدف از گونه‌بندی ایستگاه‌های مترو موردمطالعه، ارزیابی نحوه یکپارچگی حمل‌ونقل و کاربری زمین و ارائه پیشنهاد‌ها مکان محور برای تحقق توسعه پایدار است. بدین منظور ابتدا شاخص‌های گونه‌بندی با مرور ادبیات نظری معتبر استخراج‌شده و داده‌ها با استفاده از روش‌های کتابخانه ای و میدانی جمع آوری می گردد. سپس وضعیت ایستگاه ها از نظر شاخص ها، تحلیل و مقدار سه بعد گره، مکان و سیستم پشتیبانی برای هریک از آنها محاسبه می‌شود. نتایج این پژوهش نشان می دهد، وضعیت حمل‌ونقل و کاربری زمین در پیرامون ایستگاه‌های سی­وسه­پل، کارگر و دانشگاه در حالت تعادل، در ایستگاه­های آزادی، دفاع­مقدس و کوی­امام با غلبه سیستم حمل­و­نقل و در ایستگاه شریعتی با غلبه سیستم کاربری زمین می‌باشد و به طور کلی 5 گونه توسعه مبتنی بر حمل‌ونقل عمومی در جنوب خط یک مترو اصفهان وجود دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Typology of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) at Metro Stations on Isfahan's Southern Line 1 Using the Node-Place-System Support Model

نویسندگان [English]

  • Homayoon Nooraie
  • Mahsa Fatahian
  • Pouria Salsabilian
Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Art, Isfahan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Typology of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) at Metro Stations on Isfahan's Southern Line 1 Using the Node-Place-System Support Model
ABSTRACT
In recent years, cities have become the primary habitats for humans, with sustainable urbanization emerging as a major concern for modern settlements. Transit-oriented development (TOD) has been introduced as a critical strategy for integrating transportation systems with land use in sustainable planning. A new area of focus within TOD is its categorization, which addresses local variations to create tailored policies and programs for urban development. This study employs a descriptive-analytical method to categorize TOD within a 500-meter radius of seven metro stations in the southern section of Isfahan’s Metro Line 1 using the node-place-supportive system model. The goal is to evaluate the integration of transportation and land use systems and provide location-specific recommendations for advancing TOD in Isfahan. Key indicators for categorization were identified through a literature review, followed by data collection via library research and field studies. The stations were analyzed based on these indicators, and the node, place, and supportive system dimensions were calculated for each, forming the basis of the categorization. Results indicate that transport and land use are balanced around Si-o-Se Pol, Kargar, and University stations, while Azadi, Defa-e Moghaddas, and Kuy-e Imam stations are dominated by transportation and Shariati stations by land use. Overall, five distinct TOD categories were identified in the southern section of Isfahan’s first metro line
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Urban communities face significant challenges due to the growing reliance on private vehicles and the scarcity of environmental resources, which impede sustainable development. The Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) approach addresses these issues by integrating public transportation with land use and fostering compact, mixed-use environments that offer pedestrian and bicycle-friendly access to transit stations. This strategy considers local variations and supports planners in effectively advancing TOD principles. In Isfahan, rising traffic congestion has amplified interest in TOD. The development of Metro Line 1 presents a unique opportunity to reduce car dependency and promote sustainable urban growth. This study categorizes TOD at seven metro stations along Line 1 in Isfahan and provides practical recommendations for fully implementing TOD principles.
 
Methodology
This applied research employs a descriptive-analytical method, focusing on categorizing Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) at metro stations to enhance station area planning. Relevant indicators were initially derived from theoretical foundations and then screened based on criteria such as data accessibility, recency, and relevance. The data required for this study included census statistics, reports, revised master plan maps, and metro data from the Isfahan Urban Railway Organization. An extended version of Bertolini's categorization model was applied for data analysis, introducing a new dimension called "System." The Node-Place-System Support (NPS) model evaluates three dimensions: transportation, land use, and system support. Data analysis and final categorization were carried out using ArcMap and Excel software. Finally, after processing the data using Shannon's entropy method in eight stages, the position of each station in the three dimensions of the NPS model was determined, and station categorization was established using 3D charts.
 
 
Results and Discussion
The primary aim of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) is to create urban environments that are both accessible and sustainable by effectively integrating land use and transportation systems. A key aspect of achieving TOD is ensuring that major destinations are within a walkable distance of public transit stations—typically within 500 meters. This study applies the Node-Place-System Support (NPS) model to assess metro stations along Line 1 in Isfahan, focusing on three critical dimensions: Node, Place, and System Support.
The results of the analysis categorize the stations as follows:
Si-o-Se Pol Station scores 0.89 for Node, 0.60 for Place, and 1.00 for System Support, placing it in the N-P- category. This suggests a balanced system that, although stable, has limited potential for further expansion.
Shariati Station has scores of 0.16 for Node, 1.00 for Place, and 0.54 for System Support, falling into the N- category. This indicates an imbalance where land use has been overdeveloped while public transport infrastructure is insufficient to meet demand.
Azadi Station, characterized by an overdeveloped transport infrastructure, falls into the N+ category. It requires more diverse land uses to complement its transport systems effectively.
Daneshgah and Kargar Stations fall into the NP category, demonstrating effective transportation and land use coordination. These stations are well-balanced in terms of land use and transport integration, showing strong potential for sustainable development.
Koye Emam Station also fits within the N+ category, indicating a need to increase land use diversity and mix to enhance the station's functionality and surrounding area.
Defa-e-Moghadas Station, which shows low land use development and public transport capacity scores, is categorized as P-. This highlights the station's need for significant infrastructure and public transport capacity improvements.
These findings emphasize the importance of tailored development strategies for each station, taking into account their specific contexts and needs to improve TOD effectiveness and contribute to sustainable urban growth.
 
Conclusion
This study utilizes the Node-Place-System Support (NPS) model to evaluate Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) at metro stations along Line 1 in Isfahan. The findings highlight that each station requires unique strategies to optimize development. Specifically:
Si-o-Se Pol Station needs to maintain a balance between land use and public transport to preserve its stability.
Shariati Station requires better integration between land use and transport infrastructure to address the current imbalance.
Azadi Station should diversify its land use to complement its overdeveloped transport infrastructure effectively.
Daneshgah and Kargar Stations should continue to enhance their coordination between transportation and land use, leveraging their strong potential for sustainable development.
Koye Emam Station needs to increase land use diversity and mix to enhance its functionality and the surrounding area.
Defa-e-Moghadas Station requires significant improvements in amenities, infrastructure, and safe pedestrian pathways to boost both land use development and public transport capacity.
For further advancements in TOD, future studies should explore the impact of local cultural and economic factors, develop hybrid models, and examine the potential role of emerging technologies.,
incorporating community engagement and stakeholder collaboration can provide more comprehensive strategies tailored to the unique needs of each station area. By addressing these factors, Isfahan can more effectively implement TOD principles, leading to sustainable urban growth and reduced dependency on private vehicles.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
All authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of this article. Each author has reviewed and approved the content of the manuscript and is in agreement with all aspects of the work. The authors declare that there are no competing interests.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants who contributed to this paper.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Transit Oriented Development
  • Typology (TOD)
  • Node-Place-System Support model
  1. بهزادفر، مصطفی و گلریزان، فاطمه. (1387). حمل‌ونقل پایدار. راه و ساختمان، 6(55)، 16-29.
  2. زالی، نادر و منصوری، سارا. (1394). تحلیل عوامل کلیدی مؤثر بر توسعه حمل‌ونقل پایدار در افق 1404 ش کلانشهر تهران (روش تحلیل ساختاری). برنامه‌ریزی و آمایش فضا (مدرس علوم انسانی)، 19، 1-13.
  3.  ساریخانی، شادی. (1399). حمل‌ونقل و توسعه پایدار. هشتمین کنفرانس ملی شهرسازی، معماری، عمران و محیط‌زیست، شیروان، صفحات 29-45.
  4. سلطانی‌پور، فرزانه و دماری، بهزاد. (1395). وضعیت توسعه پایدار در ایران. مجله دانشکده بهداشت و انستیتو تحقیقات بهداشتی، 14(4)، 14-1.
  5. سجادی، مسعود و تقوایی، مسعود. (1395). ارزیابی و تحلیل شاخص‌های حمل‌ونقل پایدار شهری. معماری و شهرسازی پایدار، 4(1)، 1-18. DIO: 20.1001.1.25886274.1395.4.1.1.8
  6. کلانتری، محسن؛ احدنژاد روشتی، محسن؛ مشکینی، ابوالفضل و نوروزی، محمد جواد. (1399). تحلیل ساختاری-کارکردی توسعه حمل‌ونقل محور در محدوده طرح ترافیک کلانشهر تهران. فصلنامه برنامه‌ریزی منطقه‌ای، 10(38)، 125-142. Dor: 20.1001.1.22516735.1399.10.38.9.9
  7. Afrin, T., & Yodo, N. (2020). A survey of road traffic congestion measures towards a sustainable and resilient transportation system. Sustainability, 12(11), 4660. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114660.
  8. Ahmed, A. N. R., Yoshida, Y., & Arnott, R. J. (2022). A new way of evaluating the optimality of a transportation improvement in a class of urban land use models. Journal of Urban Economics, 128, 103406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2021.103406.
  9. Al-Harami, A., & Furlan, R. (2020). Qatar National Museum - Transit oriented development: The masterplan for the urban regeneration of a green TOD. Journal of Urban Management, 9(1), 115–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2019.09.003.
  10. Appleyard, B., & Frost, A. R. (2020). Livability as a framework for understanding and guiding transportation and land use integration. In Transportation, Land Use, and Environmental Planning (pp. 151–167). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815167-9.00008-6.
  11. Behzadfar, M., & Golrizan, F. (2010). Sustainable transportation. Rah va Sakhteman, 6(55), 16–29. [In Persian].
  12. Bertolini, L. (1999). Spatial development patterns and public transport: The application of an analytical model in the Netherlands. Planning Practice and Research, 14(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459915724.
  13. Calthorpe, P. (1993). The next American metropolis: Ecology, community, and the American dream. Princeton Architectural Press.
  14. Cao, Z., Asakura, Y., & Tan, Z. (2020). Coordination between node, place, and ridership: Comparing three transit operators in Tokyo. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 87, 102518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102518.
  15. Chen, X., & Lin, L. (2015). The node-place analysis on the "hubtropolis" urban form: The case of Shanghai Hongqiao air-rail hub. Habitat International, 49, 445–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.06.013
  16. Goetz, A. (2013). Suburban sprawl or urban centres: Tensions and contradictions of smart growth approaches in Denver, Colorado. Urban Studies, 50(11), 2178–2195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013478238.
  17. Groenendijk, L., & Homem de Almeida Correia, G. (2018). Incorporating the travellers' experience value in assessing the quality of transit nodes: A Rotterdam case study. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.07.007.
  18. Guerra, E., Cervero, R., & Tischler, D. (2012). Half-mile circle: Does it best represent transit station catchments?. World Transit Research. https://doi.org/10.3141/2276-12.
  19. Häll, C. H., Lundgren, J. T., & Värbrand, P. (2008). Evaluation of an integrated public transport system: a simulation approach. Archives of Transport, 20(1-2), 29-46.
  20. Hank, D., & Gloria, O. (2012). The new transit town: Best practices in transit-oriented development. Island Press, Washington.
  21. Higgins, C. D., & Kanaroglou, P. S. (2016). A latent class method for classifying and evaluating the performance of station area transit-oriented development in the Toronto region. Journal of Transport Geography, 52, 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.02.012.
  22. Huang, R., Grigolon, A., Madureira, M., & Brussel, M. (2018). Measuring transit-oriented development (TOD) network complementarity based on TOD node typology. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 11(1), 305–324. http://dx.doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2018.1110.
  23. Ibraeva, A., Correia, G. H. de A., Silva, C., & Antunes, A. P. (2020). Transit-oriented development: A review of research achievements and challenges. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 132, 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.10.018.
  24. Kalantari, M., Ahadnejad Roshti, M., Meshkini, A., & Noroozi, M. J. (2020). Structural-functional explanation of the Physical development on transit oriented development in metropolitan cities (Case study: Tehran metropolitan). Regional Planning Quarterly, 10(38), 125–142. Dor: 20.1001.1.22516735.1399.10.38.9.9. [In Persian].
  25. Kamruzzaman, Md., Baker, D., Washington, S., & Turrell, G. (2014). Advance transit oriented development typology: Case study in Brisbane, Australia. Journal of Transport Geography, 34, 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.11.002.
  26. Li, Z., Han, Z., Xin, J., Luo, X., Su, S., & Weng, M. (2019). Transit oriented development among metro station areas in Shanghai, China: Variations, typology, optimization, and implications for land use planning. Land Use Policy, 82, 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.003.
  27. Lyu, G., Bertolini, L., & Pfeffer, K. (2016). Developing a TOD typology for Beijing metro station areas. Journal of Transport Geography, 55, 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.07.002.
  28. Ma, J., Shen, Z., Xie, Y., Liang, P., Yu, B., & Chen, L. (2022). Node-place model extended by system support: Evaluation and classification of metro station areas in Tianfu new area of Chengdu. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.990416.
  29. Monajem, S., & Ekram Nosratian, F. (2015). The evaluation of the spatial integration of station areas via the node place model; an application to subway station areas in Tehran. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 40, 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.07.009.
  30. Papa, E., Carpentieri, G., & Angiello, G. (2018). A TOD classification of metro stations: An application in Naples. In: Smart Planning: Sustainability and Mobility in the Age of Change. Green Energy and Technology. (pp. 285–300). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77682-8_17.
  31. 2030 Palette. (n.d.). Transit-oriented development. Retrieved December 5, 2024, from https://2030palette.org/transit-oriented-development/.
  32. Phani Kumar, P., Ravi Sekhar, Ch., & Parida, M. (2020). Identification of neighborhood typology for potential transit-oriented development. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 78, 102186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.11.015.
  33. Renne, J. L. (2009). From transit-adjacent to transit-oriented development. Local Environment, 14(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549830802522376.
  34. Renne, J. L., & Listokin, D. (2019). The opportunities and tensions of historic preservation and transit oriented development (TOD). Cities, 90, 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.040.
  35. Reusser, D., Loukopoulos, P., Stauffacher, M., & Scholz, R. (2008). Classifying railway stations for sustainable transitions – balancing node and place functions. Journal of Transport Geography, 16, 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2007.05.004.
  36. Sajadi, M., & Taghvaee, M. (2016). Evaluation and analysis of sustainable urban transport Indicators. Sustainable Architecture and Urban Planning, 4(1), 1–18. Dor: 20.1001.1.25886274.1395.4.1.1.8.  [In Persian].
  37. Sarikhani, S. (2020). Transportation and sustainable development. In Proceedings of the 8th National Conference on Urban Planning, Architecture, Civil Engineering, and Environment (pp. 29–45). Shirvan. [In Persian].
  38. Shin, Y., Kim, D.-K., & Kim, E.-J. (2022). Activity-based TOD typology for Seoul transit station areas using smart-card data. Journal of Transport Geography, 105, 103459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103459.
  39. Singh, Y. J., Lukman, A., Flacke, J., Zuidgeest, M., & Van Maarseveen, M. F. A. M. (2017). Measuring TOD around transit nodes—Towards TOD policy. Transport Policy, 56, 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.03.013.
  40. Soltanipour, F., & Damari, B. (2016 The Situation of Sustainable Development in Iran. Sjsph, 14(4), 1–14. http://sjsph.tums.ac.ir/article-1-5446-fa.html. [In Persian].
  41. Su, S., Zhang, H., Wang, M., Weng, M., & Kang, M. (2021). Transit-oriented development (TOD) typologies around metro station areas in urban China: A comparative analysis of five typical megacities for planning implications. Journal of Transport Geography, 90, 102939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102939.
  42. Sung, H., & Oh, J.-T. (2011). Transit-oriented development in a high-density city: Identifying its association with transit ridership in Seoul, Korea. Cities, 28(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2010.09.004.
  43. Tong, X., Wang, Y., Chan, E. H. W., & Zhou, Q. (2018). Correlation between transit-oriented development (TOD), land use catchment areas, and local environmental transformation. Sustainability, 10(12), 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10124622.
  44. Yang, L., & Song, X. (2021). TOD typology based on urban renewal: A classification of metro stations for Ningbo City. Urban Rail Transit, 7(3), 240–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40864-021-00153-8.
  45. Zali, N., & Mansouri, S. (2015). Analysis of key factors affecting sustainable transportation development in Tehran metropolis horizon 2025 (structural analysis method). Planning and Spatial Development (Modares Human Sciences), 19(2), 1–13. [In Persian].
  46. Zhang, Y., Marshall, S., & Manley, E. (2019). Network criticality and the node-place-design model: Classifying metro station areas in Greater London. Journal of Transport Geography, 79, 102485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102485.