نوع مقاله : پژوهشی - بنیادی
نویسندگان
1 گروه شهرسازی- دانشکده هنر و معماری- دانشگاه تربیت مدرس- تهران- ایران
2 گروه شهرسازی - دانشگاه تربیت مدرس
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The complexity and plurality of opinions in the philosophy of pragmatism makes it difficult to understand this philosophical approach and pragmatic planning. While pragmatism helps us not to be passive in the face of the plural future and the rapid and unpredictable changes of the country's urban communities and to provide efficient urban planning based on real needs.
For this purpose, this research has been done with the aim of describing the characteristics of pragmatism and neo-pragmatism planning and comparing it with other traditions of urban planning.
The findings of this research show that contextualism, learning from experience, emphasis on continuity, continuity, evaluation, openness and error proneness are the most important characteristics of pragmatic planning. Also, pragmatic planning in terms of features such as: effective scientific philosophy, the future situation from the point of view of the planner, definition of planning, relationship with power, rationality, laws and policies, present or future, relying on the ideas of philosophers, the perspective of contradictions , planner's concern and attention, planner's role, planning process, consensus-based planning, market or government, planner's goal, relationship with people, direction of planning, perspective on democracy, method of achieving truth, planner's vision , values, type of judgment, process or product, method, methods and techniques of planning, widely used tool and the nature of planning is closest to agonistic planning and farthest from comprehensive planning.
The results of this research show that pragmatic planning, especially its new reading, can work more effectively than other planning traditions.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)