آینده‌پژوهی عوامل مؤثر بر تاب‌آوری کلان‌شهر تهران با تأکید بر کنش‌های مکانی- فضایی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی - کاربردی

نویسندگان

گروه جغرافیای انسانی و برنامه‌ریزی، دانشکده جغرافیا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

10.22059/jurbangeo.2023.349450.1743

چکیده

تاب‌آوری شهری عبارت است از توانایی بازیابی در سیستم شهر پس از رویدادهای غیرمنتظره است. هدف این پژوهش تحلیل فضایی مؤلفه‌های اثرگذار بر تاب‌آوری شهری کلان‌شهر تهران (پایتخت سیاسی و اقتصادی ایران) در قالب شاخص‌های کالبدی و‌ فضایی برای شناسایی مهم‌ترین عوامل اثرگذار بر تاب‌آوری شهری است. در ابتدا شاخص‌هایی در 24 دسته در محیط نرم‌افزار جی‌آی‌اس با استفاده از ابزارهای هم‌پوشانی وضعیت تاب‌آوری مناطق را نشان داد. بحث آینده‌پژوهی این مقاله متشکل از دو بخش است. در بخش دوم به‌منظور ایجاد پایگاهی از عوامل اولیه موجود درباره مؤلفه‌های تاب‌آوری کالبدی و فضایی از تکنیک پویش محیطی (بررسی مقالات و منابع چاپی، مصاحبه با متخصصان و پایش همایش‌ها و کنفرانس‌ها) و بررسی پیشینه ادبیات استفاده‌شده است. در بخش دوم از کارشناسان و نخبگان خواسته شد که مهم‌ترین مؤلفه‌های اثرگذار بر تاب‌آوری کالبدی ـ‌ فضایی را ظرف ۱۰ سال آینده مشخص نمایند؛ که نهایتاً به‌صورت دلفی 23 متغیر تعیین گردیدند و از نرم‌افزار MIC-MAC برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها استفاده می‌شود. یافته‌ها نشان داد تحلیل فضایی تاب‌آوری شهر تهران با در نظر گرفتن نمودار تحلیل اثر ـ وابستگی در وضعیت ناپایدار قرار دارد و نشان‌دهنده عدم ثبات متغیرهای تأثیرگذار و تداوم تأثیر آن‌ها بر سایر متغیرهاست

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Future study of effective factors in Tehran's resilience with an emphasis on Spatial Interaction

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ebrahim Farhadi
  • Ahmad Pourahmad
  • Keramatollah Ziari
  • Hasanali Faraji Sabokbar
Department of Human Geograohy and planning, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract
Introduction
For a long time, mankind has been trying to achieve a risk-free environment and prepare for possible incidents caused by accidents in order to protect his life, property, and family. Considering that the world is turning into an urban place and it is predicted that in 2025, more than 55% of the world's people will live in cities, and with the increase in the number and variety of natural disasters in human societies, a challenge has been created in the process of realizing sustainable development in the life of human societies. Recent surveys related to the damages caused by natural disasters around the world and in 2001 have led to the identification of 700 natural disasters, which resulted in 25,000 deaths, 36 billion dollars in economic losses, and 11.5 billion dollars in insurance losses (Munichregroup, 2001). Cities are always subject to various changes, which can be radical or gradual changes. To make a city resilient, the ability to continuously monitor various implementation conditions and all the trends that can affect them should be considered. Factors effective in reducing or eliminating the resilience of societies can be seen in natural characteristics, technological factors, economic factors, and human factors (Desouza and Flanery, 2013). The extent of 24% of the unstable tissues of Tehran and the residence of about 42% of the city's residents in crisis-causing tissues are other dangerous cases for citizens (Farhadi et al., 2023), which makes the path of Tehran's resilience difficult. The metropolis of Tehran is witnessing more unstable and unsafe constructions every day, and this is a serious warning for city managers.
 Ineffective urban neighborhoods and areas due to several reasons such as the special conditions of settlements, weak physical, social, economic, and environmental resistance and resilience, the poor condition of access and service networks, high population density, and the occurrence of natural disasters cause a serious and fundamental threat to the They are a disaster. In our research, we intend to examine and analyze the key factors affecting the physical and spatial resilience of Tehran in order to answer the question of this research, to reflect the contribution of the influencing factors in physical and spatial resilience in order to be able to make decisions in many fields. and urban and regional decision-making, be used.
 Therefore, the research in question can involve reaching the question of what key driving forces play a major role in the physical and spatial resilience of the city of Tehran.
 
Methodology
In terms of the goal, the research is of an applied type, which was carried out by a descriptive-analytical method based on documentary library studies and field surveys. Considering the nature of the data and the impossibility of controlling the behavior of the effective variables in the problem, this research was of a non-experimental type and was carried out in the framework of the analytical-case model.
In the first part, the method (Tracking Analyst Tools) was used in the process of network analysis (Spline Tools) in the ArcGIS software environment to spatialize the studied indicators at the level of the texture of the regions  In the second part, we extracted the key factors affecting the spatial-spatial resilience of Tehran by using the combined exploratory methods, assumption-based method, expert opinion-based method, and the method aimed at identifying the issue, and experts and elites (25 people) were asked to Determine the most important components affecting physical resilience within the next 10 years; Finally, 23 variables were determined by Delphi, and MIC-MAC software is used for data analysis.
 
Results and discussion
Resilience in Tehran is unstable and in such a way that the continuation of the current situation will lead to the formation of a disaster scenario, and in the best case, if the current situation continues, the physical resilience in the metropolis of Tehran will increase vulnerability, reduce the penetration coefficient of vital arteries and reduce improvement and strengthening measures. It will lead to the damage of historical buildings, the increase in the distribution of incompatible uses, the decrease in the quality of buildings, etc.
The evaluation results, in addition to the high compliance with the realities surrounding the urban resilience of Tehran, are such that it is possible to measure the overall situation in the framework of prospective studies and use the scenario approach.
Resilience and its stability or instability model were also obtained from the spatial distribution of variables in the level of graphs and output figures from Mic Mac software.
Also, the almost high percentage of the filling factor (95%) in the research variables confirms the validity and reliability of the research tools at an almost high level.
 
Conclusion
The results show that resilience in Tehran follows the macro structure of the economic system of this metropolis. So that more privileged areas have more resilience and less privileged areas have lower resilience. It can be said that the entire urban structure of Tehran is at an unfavorable level of resilience. Failure to improve, neglecting sustainable development and continuing the current situation will lead to bad scenarios in environmental, social and economic fields.   And in the event of a crisis, it will cause irreparable damage to Tehran.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
E.F. contributed to the data collection, analysis, and manuscript writing. A.P., K.Z. and H.F.S. supervised the article and provided the necessary guidance for analyzing and using the model. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
 
Conflict of Interest
All authors certify that they have no affiliation with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
 
Acknowledgments
 We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.
ABSTRACT
Urban resilience is the ability to recover in the city system after unexpected events. The purpose of this research is the spatial analysis of the factors influencing the urban resilience of Tehran's metropolis (the political and economic capital of Iran) in the form of physical and spatial indicators to identify the most important factors influencing urban resilience. At first, indicators in 24 categories including water transfer tanks, petrol pump stations, electrical substations, and ..., in the GIS software environment using Overlapping plots showed the resilience of the regions. The future research discussion of this article consists of two parts. In the second part, in order to create a database of existing primary factors about the components of physical and spatial resilience, the technique of environmental scanning (examination of published articles and sources, interviews with experts, and monitoring of conferences and meetings) and the review of the literature background have been used. In the second part, experts and elites were asked to identify the most important factors affecting physical-spatial resilience within the next 10 years; Finally, 23 variables were determined by Delphi, and MIC MAC software was used for data analysis. The findings showed that the resilience of Tehran city is unstable by considering the effect-dependency analysis diagram and indicates the instability of the influential variables and the continuity of their influence on other variables.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
For a long time, mankind has been trying to achieve a risk-free environment and prepare for possible incidents caused by accidents in order to protect his life, property, and family. Considering that the world is turning into an urban place and it is predicted that in 2025, more than 55% of the world's people will live in cities, and with the increase in the number and variety of natural disasters in human societies, a challenge has been created in the process of realizing sustainable development in the life of human societies. Recent surveys related to the damages caused by natural disasters around the world and in 2001 have led to the identification of 700 natural disasters, which resulted in 25,000 deaths, 36 billion dollars in economic losses, and 11.5 billion dollars in insurance losses (Munichregroup, 2001). Cities are always subject to various changes, which can be radical or gradual changes. To make a city resilient, the ability to continuously monitor various implementation conditions and all the trends that can affect them should be considered. Factors effective in reducing or eliminating the resilience of societies can be seen in natural characteristics, technological factors, economic factors, and human factors (Desouza and Flanery, 2013). The extent of 24% of the unstable tissues of Tehran and the residence of about 42% of the city's residents in crisis-causing tissues are other dangerous cases for citizens (Farhadi et al., 2023), which makes the path of Tehran's resilience difficult. The metropolis of Tehran is witnessing more unstable and unsafe constructions every day, and this is a serious warning for city managers.
 Ineffective urban neighborhoods and areas due to several reasons such as the special conditions of settlements, weak physical, social, economic, and environmental resistance and resilience, the poor condition of access and service networks, high population density, and the occurrence of natural disasters cause a serious and fundamental threat to the They are a disaster. In our research, we intend to examine and analyze the key factors affecting the physical and spatial resilience of Tehran in order to answer the question of this research, to reflect the contribution of the influencing factors in physical and spatial resilience in order to be able to make decisions in many fields. and urban and regional decision-making, be used.
 Therefore, the research in question can involve reaching the question of what key driving forces play a major role in the physical and spatial resilience of the city of Tehran.
 
Methodology
In terms of the goal, the research is of an applied type, which was carried out by a descriptive-analytical method based on documentary library studies and field surveys. Considering the nature of the data and the impossibility of controlling the behavior of the effective variables in the problem, this research was of a non-experimental type and was carried out in the framework of the analytical-case model.
In the first part, the method (Tracking Analyst Tools) was used in the process of network analysis (Spline Tools) in the ArcGIS software environment to spatialize the studied indicators at the level of the texture of the regions  In the second part, we extracted the key factors affecting the spatial-spatial resilience of Tehran by using the combined exploratory methods, assumption-based method, expert opinion-based method, and the method aimed at identifying the issue, and experts and elites (25 people) were asked to Determine the most important components affecting physical resilience within the next 10 years; Finally, 23 variables were determined by Delphi, and MIC-MAC software is used for data analysis.
 
Results and discussion
Resilience in Tehran is unstable and in such a way that the continuation of the current situation will lead to the formation of a disaster scenario, and in the best case, if the current situation continues, the physical resilience in the metropolis of Tehran will increase vulnerability, reduce the penetration coefficient of vital arteries and reduce improvement and strengthening measures. It will lead to the damage of historical buildings, the increase in the distribution of incompatible uses, the decrease in the quality of buildings, etc.
The evaluation results, in addition to the high compliance with the realities surrounding the urban resilience of Tehran, are such that it is possible to measure the overall situation in the framework of prospective studies and use the scenario approach.
Resilience and its stability or instability model were also obtained from the spatial distribution of variables in the level of graphs and output figures from Mic Mac software.
Also, the almost high percentage of the filling factor (95%) in the research variables confirms the validity and reliability of the research tools at an almost high level.
 
Conclusion
The results show that resilience in Tehran follows the macro structure of the economic system of this metropolis. So that more privileged areas have more resilience and less privileged areas have lower resilience. It can be said that the entire urban structure of Tehran is at an unfavorable level of resilience. Failure to improve, neglecting sustainable development and continuing the current situation will lead to bad scenarios in environmental, social and economic fields.   And in the event of a crisis, it will cause irreparable damage to Tehran.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
E.F. contributed to the data collection, analysis, and manuscript writing. A.P., K.Z. and H.F.S. supervised the article and provided the necessary guidance for analyzing and using the model. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
 
Conflict of Interest
All authors certify that they have no affiliation with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
 
Acknowledgments
 We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Resilience
  • Spatial analysis
  • Future studies
  • MIC-MAC
  • Tehran City
  1. اجزا شکوهی، محمد و شاکرمی، کیان. (1397). شناسایی متغیرهای موثر بر توسعه اقتصادی- اجتماعی آینده شهرستان‌های ایران با رویکرد برنامه‌ریزی سناریو مبنا (نمونه موردی: شهرستان خرم‌آباد). فصل‌نامه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری چشم‌انداز زاگرس، 10(38)، 49-72.
  2. امیری فهلیانی محمدرضا. (1400). تحلیل متغیرهای کلیدی سرمایۀ اجتماعی بر آیندۀ بیماری‌های واگیردار و کووید-۱۹ (مورد مطالعه؛ شهر نورآباد ممسنی). مسائل اجتماعی ایران، ۱۲ (۱)، ۳۲-۵.
  3. پوراحمد، احمد؛ فرهادی، ابراهیم؛ سجودی، مریم؛ قربانی، رامین و عبدالله حسین، شاخوان. (1399). فرا تحلیلی بر پژوهش‌های تاب‌آوری شهری در نشریات علمی پژوهشی جغرافیایی ایران. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای اقتصادی، 1(2)، 1-19.
  4. حاتمی‌نژاد، حسین؛  لطیفی، امید؛ فرهادی، ابراهیم و عباسی، مژگان. (1400). تحلیلی بر تاب‌آوری اقتصادی و نهادی در برابر سیلاب (موردشناسی: محلات شهر ایذه). جغرافیا و آمایش شهری منطقه‌ای، 11(40)، 131-158.
  5. حیدری، اکبر؛ رهنما، محمد رحیم؛ شکوهی، محمد اجزاء و خوارزمی، امید علی. (1395). تحلیل تحولات فضایی محیط‌زیست شهری در کلان‌شهر مشهد با استفاده از الگوی آینده‌پژوهی گام طبیعی. جغرافیا و پایداری محیط، 6(1)، 1-19.
  6. زنگنه شهرکی، سعید؛ زیاری، کرامت اله و پوراکرمی، محمد. (1401). ارزیابی و تحلیل میزان تاب‌آوری کالبدی منطقه 12 شهر تهران در برابر زلزله با استفاده از مدل FANP و ویکور. جغرافیا ( فصلنامه علمی انجمن جغرافیایی ایران)، 15(52)، 81-102.
  7. زیاری، کرامت اله؛ ربانی، طاها و ساعد موچشی، رامین. (1396). آینده‌پژوهی پارادایمی نوین در برنامه‌ریزی با تأکید بر برنامه‌ریزی شهری و منطقه‌ای (مبانی، مفاهیم، رویکردها و روش‌ها). تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
  8. شیعه، اسماعیل. (1395)، مبانی برنامه‌ریزی شهری. چاپ سی و هشتم، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه علم و صنعت،.
  9. فرهادی، ابراهیم. (1401). آینده‌پژوهی تاب‌آوری در ساختار فضایی شهر تهران. تز دوره تخصصی دکتری PhD، به راهنمایی احمد پوراحمد، دانشکده جغرافیا، دانشگاه تهران.
  10. قربانی پارام، افشین. (1400). ارائه الگوی جدید برج‌سازی بر مبنای توسعه پایداری اجتماعی در استان تهران. فصلنامه آینده‌پژوهی شهری، 1(3)، 25-48.
  11. قربانی، رامین؛ فرهادی، ابراهیم و زیاری، کرامت اله. (1400). تحلیل نیروهای پیشران کلیدی تاب‌آوری اقتصادی با رویکرد سناریویی در شهر تبریز. اقتصاد شهری، 6(2)، 1-20.
  12. Agar, J. C. (2023). Evaluating the increasing trend of strength and severe wind hazard of Philippine typhoons using the Holland-B parameter and regional cyclonic wind field modeling. Sustainability, 15(1), 535. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010535
  13. Ainuddin, S., & Routray, J. K. (2012). Community resilience framework for an earthquake prone area in Baluchistan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2, 25–36.
  14. Ajza Shokoohi, M., & Shakermi, K. (2018). Identification of effective variables on the future socio-economic development of Iranian counties using a scenario-based planning approach (Case study: Khorramabad County). Zagros Landscape, Quarterly of Urban Geography and Planning, 10(38), 49–72. [In Persian]
  15. Allan, P., & Bryant, M. (2010, March). The critical role of open space in earthquake recovery: A case study. In EN: Proceedings of the 2010 NZSEE Conference (pp. 1–10).
  16. Amiri Fahliayani, M. R. (2021). Analysis of key social capital variables on the future of infectious diseases and COVID-19 (Case study: Nourabad Mamasani). Social Issues of Iran, 12(1), 32–45. [In Persian]
  17. Aqbelaghi, A. S., Ghorbani, M., Farhadi, E., & Shafiee, H. (2018). Environmental approach in modelling of urban growth: Tehran City, Iran. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, 15(2), 47–56.
  18. Arjan Wardekker, A., Wilk, B., Brown, V., Uittenbroek, C., Mees, H., Driessen, P., & Runhaar, H. (2020). A diagnostic tool for supporting policymaking on urban resilience. Cities, 101, 102691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102691
  19. Buckle, P. (2000). New approaches to assessing vulnerability and resilience. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 15(2), 8–15.
  20. Cutter, S. L. (2014). Building disaster resilience: Steps toward sustainability. Challenges in Sustainability, 1(2), 72–79.
  21. Dakey, S., Morey, B., Sukhwani, V., & Deshkar, S. (2023). Applying socio-ecological perspective for fostering resilience in rural settlements—Melghat Region, India. Sustainability, 15(3), 1812. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031812
  22. Das, S. (2019). Geospatial mapping of flood susceptibility and hydro-geomorphic response to the floods in Ulhas basin, India. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 14(3), 60–74.
  23. Davis, I., & Izadkhah, Y. (2006). Building resilient urban communities. OHI, 31(1), 11–21.
  24. Desouza, K. C., & Flanery, T. H. (2013). Designing, planning, and managing resilient cities: A conceptual framework. Cities, 10, 99–99.
  25. DFID. (2011). Defining disaster resilience: A DFID approach paper. Department for International Development.
  26. Farhadi, E. (2022). Foresight of Resilience in the Spatial Structure of Tehran City (PhD dissertation, supervised by A. Pourahmad). Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran. [In Persian]
  27. Farhadi, E., Pourahmad, A., Ziari, K., Faraji Sabokbar, H., & Tondelli, S. (2022). Indicators affecting the urban resilience with a scenario approach in Tehran Metropolis. Sustainability, 14(19), 12756.
  28. Ghorbani Param, A. (2021). A new model of tower construction based on social sustainability development in Tehran Province. Urban Foresight Quarterly, 1(3), 25–48. [In Persian]
  29. Ghorbani, R., Farhadi, E., & Ziari, K. (2021). Analysis of key driving forces of economic resilience with a scenario-based approach in Tabriz City. Urban Economics, 6(2), 1–20. [In Persian]
  30. Ghorbaniparam, A. (2022). Presenting a new model of tower construction based on social sustainability development in Tehran province. Urban Futurology, 1(3), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.30495/uf.2022.1950274.1024. [In Persian]
  31. Gralepois, M. (2020). What can we learn from planning instruments in flood prevention? Water, 12(6), 18–41.
  32. Hashemi Petrudi, S., Jafarnejad, A., Sadeghi Moghadam, M., & Safari, H. (2017). Governance challenges of disaster management network: A case study of Tehran city. Journal of Public Administration, 9(3), 379–402. [In Persian]
  33. Hatami-Nejad, H., Latifi, O., Farhadi, E., & Abbasi, M. (2021). An analysis of economic and institutional resilience against floods (Case study: Neighborhoods of Izeh City). Regional Urban Geography and Planning, 11(40), 131–158. [In Persian]
  34. Hawley, R. J., Bledsoe, B. P., Stein, E. D., & Haines, B. E. (2012). Channel evolution model of semiarid stream response to urban-induced hydro modification. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 48(4), 722–744.
  35. Heydari, A., Rahnama, M. R., Ajza Shokoohi, M., & Kharazmi, O. A. (2016). Analysis of urban environmental spatial changes in Mashhad metropolis using the Natural Step foresight model. Geography and Environmental Sustainability, 6(1), 1–19.
  36. Holling, C. S., & Gunderson, L. H. (2002). Resilience and adaptive cycles. In Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems (pp. 25–62).
  37. Hosseini, A., Farhadi, E., Hussaini, F., Pourahmad, A., & Seraj Akbari, N. (2022). Analysis of spatial (in)equality of urban facilities in Tehran: An integration of spatial accessibility. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(5), 6527–6555.
  38. Jabareen, Y. (2013). Planning the resilient city: Concepts and strategies for coping with climate change and environmental risk. Cities, 31(20), 220–229.
  39. Kamrholm, A., Mechler, R., Mochizuki, J., Kunreuther, H., Bayer, J., Hanger, S., ... & Egan, C. (2014). Operationalizing resilience against natural disaster risk: Opportunities, barriers, and a way forward. Zurich Flood Resilience Alliance White Paper.
  40. Lechner, S., Jacometti, J., McBean, G., & Mitchison, N. (2016). Resilience in a complex world–Avoiding cross-sector collapse. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 19(4), 84–91.
  41. León, J., & March, A. (2014). Urban morphology as a tool for supporting tsunami rapid resilience: A case study of Talcahuano, Chile. Habitat International, 43(21), 250–262.
  42. Liu, N., Wang, S., Su, F., & Ye, J. (2023). Research on coupling coordination of China’s new-type urbanization and urban resilience—Taking Yangtze River Economic Belt as an example. Sustainability, 15(1), 456. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010456
  43. Matyas, D., & Pelling, M. (2015). Positioning resilience for 2015: The role of resistance, incremental adjustment and transformation in disaster risk management policy. Disasters, 39(S1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12107
  44. Mayunga, J. S. (2007). Understanding and applying the concept of community disaster resilience: A capital-based approach. Texas A&M University. https://www.ucursos.cl/usuario/3b514b53bcb4025aaf9a6781047e4a66/mi_blog/r/11._Joseph_S._Mayunga.pdf
  45. Meerow, S., & Newell, J. P. (2019). Urban resilience for whom, what, when, where, and why? Urban Geography, 40(3), 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
  46. Mitchell, T., & Harris, K. (2012). Resilience: A risk management approach. ODI Background Note, 1–7.
  47. Munich Re Group. (2001). Annual report: How much risk can the world take? Munich, Germany.
  48. Nelson, V., Lamboll, R., & Arendse, A. (2008). Climate change adaptation, adaptive capacity and development. DSA-DFID Policy Forum Discussion Paper.
  49. Norris, F. H., Sherrieb, K., & Pfefferbaum, B. (2011). Community resilience: Concepts, assessment, and implications. In Resilience and Mental Health: Challenges Across the Lifespan (pp. 162–175).
  50. Pede, E. (2020). Planning for resilience: New paths for managing uncertainty. Springer.
  51. Pourahmad, A., Farhadi, E., Sojoodi, M., Ghorbani, R., & Abdullah Hussein, Sh. (2020). A meta-analysis of research on urban resilience in Iranian geographical scientific journals. Economic Geography Research, 1(2), 1–19. [In Persian]
  52. Rashid, H. (2011). Interpreting flood disasters and flood hazard perceptions from newspaper discourse: Tale of two floods in the Red River valley, Manitoba, Canada. Applied Geography, 31(1), 35–45.
  53. Rockefeller Foundation. (2019). 100 resilient cities initiative. http://www.100resilientcities.org
  54. Serre, D., & Heinzlef, C. (2018). Assessing and mapping urban resilience to floods with respect to cascading effects through critical infrastructure networks. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 30, 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.018
  55. Shie’a, E. (2016). Foundations of Urban Planning (38th ed.). Tehran: Iran University of Science and Technology Press. [In Persian]
  56. Sun, H., Zhen, F., & Xie, Z. (2021). Urban resilience assessment based on contradiction between supply and demand of the daily activity–environment system: A case study on Nanjing, China. Science of The Total Environment, 765(14), 45–67.
  57. Tobin, G. (1999). Sustainability and community resilience: The holy grail of hazards planning? Environmental Hazards, 1, 13–25.
  58. UN/ISDR. (2004). Living with risk – A global review of disaster reduction initiatives. https://www.unisdr.org/eng/about_isdr/bd-lwr-2004-eng.htm
  59. Yodmani, S. (2000). Disaster risk management and vulnerability reduction: Protecting the poor. Paper presented at The Asia and Pacific Forum on Poverty, Asian Development Bank.
  60. Zangane, S., Ziari, K., & Poorakrami, M. (2022). Evaluation and analysis of the physical resilience of the 12th district of Tehran against earthquakes using FANP and Vicor models. Geography, 15(52), 81–102.
  61. Zangeneh Shahraki, S., Ziari, K., & Pourakrami, M. (2022). Evaluation and analysis of physical resilience of District 12 of Tehran against earthquakes using FANP and VIKOR models. Geography (Scientific Quarterly of the Iranian Geographical Society), 15(52), 81–102. [In Persian]
  62. Ziari, K., Rabani, T., & Saed Mocheshi, R. (2017). The new paradigm planning future studies with an emphasis on urban and regional planning. University of Tehran Press. [In Persian]