تهران سالمند واقعیتی گریزناپذیر: تحلیل پیشران‌های مؤثر بر سالمندی شهر تهران

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی - کاربردی

نویسندگان

1 گروه جامعه‌شناسی، پژوهشگاه علوم‌انسانی و مطالعات اجتماعی جهاد دانشگاهی، تهران، ایران

2 گروه تاریخ و جامعه‌شناسی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران

3 گروه پردازش داده‌ها و اطلاع‌رسانی، پژوهشکده آمار، تهران، ایران

4 گروه جامعه‌شناسی، دانشگاه بین‌المللی امام خمینی، قزوین، ایران

5 گروه معماری و منظر، پژوهشگاه علوم‌انسانی و مطالعات اجتماعی جهاد دانشگاهی، تهران، ایران

10.22059/jurbangeo.2025.385987.2015

چکیده

افزایش جمعیت شهری و سالخوردگی جمعیت دو مشخصه اصلی قرن بیست و یکم عنوان شده است. سالخوردگی جمعیت در سطح جهانی پدیده‌ای فراگیر بوده که از عوامل متعددی نشات می‌گیرد. هدف این پژوهش تحلیل پیشران‌های مؤثر بر سالمندی شهر تهران است. روش پژوهش، روش ترکیبی است. برای شناسایی اولیه پیشران‌ها از روش مرور دامنه‌ای و مصاحبه نیمه‌ساخت‌یافته بر اساس مدل STEEPV، برای تکمیل فهرست پیشران‌ها و تعیین میزان اهمیت آن‌ها از روش دلفی و برای تحلیل تأثیرات متقاطع از تحلیل ساختاری میک‌مک استفاده‌شده است. یافته‌ها نشان داد متغیرهای رکود اقتصادی، جهانی‌شدن و ارزش‌های مدرن و قدرت خرید به‌عنوان پیشران‌های مستقل و متغیرهای وضعیت اقتصادی جامعه، فقر، نرخ بیکاری و اشتغال، نابرابری اقتصادی، سبک زندگی، کیفیت زندگی، نرخ مهاجرت، ثبات سیاسی، فردگرایی و ارزش‌های فردی، شهرنشینی، باورها و ارزش‌های اجتماعی، نابرابری اجتماعی، سرمایه اجتماعی به‌عنوان متغیرهای دووجهی بیش از سایر متغیرها در تعیین وضعیت سالمندی شهر تهران نقش خواهند داشت. نتایج نشان داد باتوجه‌به وضعیت موجود، ماهیت پیشران‌ها و چشم‌انداز تغییرات اجتماعی و اقتصادی، جمعیت شهر تهران با سرعت بیشتری به سمت سالمندی حرکت خواهد کرد و تحقق سالمندی مفرط در شهر تهران واقعیتی گریزناپذیر است؛ بنابراین توصیه می‌شود برای مدیریت پدیده سالمندی و پیامدهای آن، در کنار سیاست‌گذاری برای بهبود وضعیت اقتصادی و مدیریت تغییرات اجتماعی برای کاهش سرعت سالمندی، نسبت به اجرای راهبرد سالمندی فعال و بهبود و اصلاح محیط کالبدی و اجرای سیاست‌های شهر دوستدار سالمند اهتمام ویژه داشته باشند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Tehran's Aging: An Inevitable Reality; Analyzing the Driving of Aging in Tehran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hossein Heidari 1
  • Esmaeil Jahanidolatabad 2
  • Mohammad Shiri 3
  • Morteza Ghelich 4
  • Hamid Ramazani 5
1 Department of Sociology, Institute for Humanities and social Studies, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of History and Sociology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
3 Statistical Research and Training Center, Tehran, Iran
4 Department of Sociology, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran
5 Institute for Humanities and social Studies, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

ABSTRACT
The growth of urban populations and population aging have been identified as two defining characteristics of the 21st century. Population aging is a global and widespread phenomenon driven by various factors. This study aims to analyze the key drivers influencing population aging in Tehran. A mixed-methods approach was adopted. The initial identification of drivers was carried out through a scoping review and semi-structured interviews based on the STEEPV model. To refine the list of drivers and evaluate their significance, the Delphi method was utilized, and the MICMAC structural analysis method was employed for cross-impact analysis. The findings revealed that variables such as economic stagnation, globalization, modern values, and purchasing power are independent drivers. Meanwhile, variables including the economic status of society, poverty, unemployment and employment rates, economic inequality, lifestyle, quality of life, migration rates, political stability, individualism and personal values, urbanization, social beliefs and values, social inequality, and social capital are dual-role variables with significant influence on determining the aging trajectory of Tehran. The results indicate that, given the current circumstances, the nature of these drivers, and the projected social and economic changes, Tehran’s population is moving toward aging at an accelerated pace. The emergence of advanced aging within Tehran is considered an inevitable reality. Therefore, it is recommended that, in addition to policies aimed at improving economic conditions and managing social changes to decelerate the aging process, special focus be placed on implementing strategies for active aging, improving and adapting the physical environment, and promoting age-friendly urban policies.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
The growth of urban populations and the aging of societies are among the defining challenges of the 21st century. Population aging has become a global phenomenon, with projections indicating that by 2050, the proportion of the global population aged 65 and above will rise from 13% to 21%, reaching 23% by the end of the century. National projections for Iran suggest that by 2041, approximately 19% of the population will be elderly. Specifically in Tehran, estimates indicate that by 2036, the elderly will constitute nearly 20% of the province’s population. This suggests a more pronounced aging trend in Tehran compared to the national average, positioning it as one of the city's significant demographic challenges in the coming decades. Accordingly, this study aims to identify and evaluate the primary drivers of aging in Tehran, examining their relative significance and analyzing their influence on the city’s demographic transition.
 
Methodology
This research employs a mixed-methods approach grounded in futures studies methodology. To identify initial aging drivers, a scoping review of the literature, both global and local, theoretical and empirical, was conducted using the STEEPV (Social, Technological, Economic, Environmental, Political, and Values) framework. Semi-structured expert interviews complemented this. The preliminary list of drivers was refined through two rounds of the Delphi method, and their significance was assessed using the Marcus matrix method. Ultimately, 36 variables with Marcus' final coefficients greater than 0.2 were selected as final drivers. These were incorporated into a cross-impact matrix for structural analysis, which was conducted using MICMAC (Matrix of Cross Impact Multiplications Applied to a Classification) software.
 
Results and discussion
The structural analysis of direct impacts identified economic recession, globalization, modern values, and purchasing power as independent variables. Dual-impact variables included economic conditions, poverty, unemployment, economic inequality, lifestyle, quality of life, migration rates, political stability, individualism, urbanization, social values, social inequality, and social capital. Dependent variables encompassed marginalization, family orientation, fertility rate, single-person households, average age of marriage, divorce rate, mortality rate, emigration, and internal migration. Autonomous variables included mobility, health technologies, healthcare legislation, retirement and insurance policies, family support laws, health monitoring technologies, environmental risks, and the condition of pension funds. Indirect impact analysis indicated that economic conditions, poverty, economic recession, employment and unemployment rates, and economic inequality had the highest indirect influence. In contrast, pension funds, average age of marriage, health technologies, family support laws, and health monitoring systems had the least indirect influence. Additionally, lifestyle, average age of marriage, single-person households, marginalization, and fertility rate showed the highest levels of indirect dependency. At the same time, pension funds, environmental risks, insurance legislation, healthcare policies, and health monitoring technologies demonstrated minimal indirect dependency.
 
Conclusion
The findings underscore the significant role of economic factors, particularly economic conditions, poverty, unemployment, and inequality, in influencing the aging process in Tehran. These drivers primarily exert their influence through economic pathways and their interactions with other demographic drivers. Furthermore, dual-impact variables such as economic recession, globalization, modern values, and purchasing power illustrate the complex interplay of economic and socio-cultural dimensions shaping aging trends. Macroeconomic conditions at both national and global levels heavily influence these. Other key drivers, including lifestyle, quality of life, migration, political stability, individualism, urbanization, social values, and social capital, carry strong socio-cultural dimensions and function as strategic target variables, shaping the trajectory of other influences. Meanwhile, social and ecological factors such as marginalization, fertility rates, delayed marriage, divorce, mortality, and migration are predominantly shaped by overarching economic and social forces. Addressing population aging in Tehran requires comprehensive policy responses and strategic interventions targeting these drivers. However, attempts to shift certain dynamics, such as increasing fertility rates or reducing the average age of marriage, are likely to encounter resistance due to entrenched individualistic values and evolving lifestyles. Given the current socio-political and economic landscape, the aging trajectory in Tehran is accelerating, rendering severe population aging a likely and pressing reality. As such, the need for long-term planning and integrated policy frameworks in both the social and economic sectors is urgent. Policymakers must prioritize the aging issue in both Tehran and Iran and develop actionable strategies to manage its main drivers. Despite the limited potential for short-term reversal of these trends, preparations for a rapidly aging society are essential. Key recommendations include the promotion of active aging strategies, physical environment adaptation, and the implementation of age-friendly city policies tailored to the needs of an aging population.
 
Funding
This article is derived from the futures study and compilation of the strategic document of Tehran's aging project. The project was funded by the Research and Planning Center of Tehran and implemented by the Institute for Humanities and Social Studies of the Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research (ACECR).
 
Authors’ Contributions
All authors contributed to all stages and sections of the article.
 
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Research and Planning Center of Tehran, the General Department of Health of Tehran Municipality, and the Institute for Humanities and Social Studies for their support and collaboration throughout the course of this research.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Futures Studies
  • Aging Drivers
  • Population Aging
  • Tehran
  1. ادیب‌روشن، فرشته؛ پیمانی‌زاد، حسین؛ طالب‌پور، مهدی و پورعزت، علی‌اصغر. (1399). تصاویر آینده سالمندان ایران باتوجه‌به جایگاه ورزش. مدیریت و توسعه ورزش، 9(3)، 53-70. doi: 10.22124/jsmd.2020.4499
  2. دهقان بنادکی، مهدیه. (1402). بررسی وضعیت سالمندی در ایران آینده و چالش‌های آن (1) (19086). ماهنامه گزارش‌های کارشناسی مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی، 31(4)، 1-18. doi: 20.1001.1.29809525.1402.1402.4.84.4
  3. زنجری، نسیبه؛ کلانتری بنادکی، سیده زهرا؛ صادقی، رسول و دلبری، احمد. (1403). آینده‌پژوهی چالش‌ها و پیشران‌های سالخوردگی جمعیت در ایران: رویکرد تحلیل سناریو. سالمند: مجله سالمندی ایران. ۱۹ (۲)، ۲۵۸-۲۷۵.doi: 10.32598/sija.2023.3692.1
  4. سازمان مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی استان تهران. (1400). پیش‌بینی جمعیت استان تهران. تهران: سازمان مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی استان تهران.
  5. سعادت، رحمان. (1387). برآورد روند سرمایة اجتماعی در ایران (با استفاده از روش فازی). فصلنامه تحقیقات اقتصادی، 43(2).
  6. سوری، علی. (1393). سرمایه اجتماعی و رشد در ایران. پژوهش‌ها و سیاست‌های اقتصادی، ۲۲ (۶۹)، ۴۹-۶۴.
  7. ضرغامی، حسین؛ میرزایی، محمد. (1396). سالخوردگی جمعیت ایران در چهار دهه پیشرو. مطالعات الگوی پیشرفت اسلامی ایرانی، 3(6)، 73-94.
  8. فتحی، الهام. (1399). پدیده سالخوردگی جمعیت در ایران. مجله بررسی‌های آمار رسمی ایران، ۳۰ (۲)،۳۸۷-۴۱۳.
  9. کلانتری بنادکی، سیده زهرا؛ آذر، عادل و عباسی شوازی، محمد جلال. (1396). بررسی تحولات جمعیتی ایران با استفاده از رویکرد پویایی سیستم. نامه انجمن جمعیت‌شناسی ایران، 12(24)، 7-41. doi: 20.1001.1.1735000.1396.12.24.1.2
  10. مددی، امیرعلی؛ شاکری‌خویی، احسان و جوانپور هروی، عزیز. (1400). تحلیل روندهای جمهوری اسلامی ایران بر پایه آینده‌پژوهی. سیاست جهانی، 10(3)، 219-247. doi: 10.22124/wp.2021.18573.2720
  11. مدرسه عالی حکمرانی شهید بهشتی. (1401). آینده‌پژوهی روندها، رویدادها و پیشران‌ها در جهان. خلاصه سیاستی.
  12. مدنی قهفرخی، سعید. (1400). گزارش وضعیت سالمندی در ایران. تهران: مؤسسه راهبردهای بازنشستگی صبا.
  13. مشفق، محمود؛ محمودی، محمدجواد و مطیع حق‌شناس، نادر. (1391). چشم‌انداز تحولات جمعیتی ایران: لزوم تجدیدنظر در سیاست‌های جمعیتی. مطالعات راهبردی زنان، 14(55)، 151-172. Doi: 20.1001.1.20082827.1391.14.55.5.9
  14. مولایی، محمدمهدی؛ طالبیان، حامد. (1395). آینده‌پژوهی مسائل ایران با روش تحلیل ساختاری. مجلس و راهبرد، 23(86)، 5-32.
  15. Adib Roshan, F., Peymani Zad, H., Talebpour, M., Pourazzat, A. A. (2020). Images of the Future of Iranian Elders with regard to sport status. Sport Management and Development, 9(3):53-70. https://doi.org/10.22124/jsmd.2020.4499 [In Persian]
  16. Arcade, J., Godet, M., Meunier, F., & Roubelat, F. (1999). Structural analysis with the MICMAC method & Actor's strategy with MACTOR method. Futures Research Methodology, American Council for the United Nations University: The Millennium Project, 2010.
  17. Arcade, J., Godet, M., Meunier, F., Roubelat, F., & Glenn, J. (1999). Futures Research Methodology. The Millennium Project. Structural Analysis with the MICMAC Method & Actor’s Strategy with MACTOR Method, 1-69.
  18. Barrett, D., & Heale, R. (2020). What are Delphi studies?. Evidence-based nursing, 23(3), 68-69. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2020-103303
  19.  Bobadilla, L. G., Trigoso, J. A. C., Chavez, M. D. P. B., Trujillo, P. A. R., & Oliva, M. (2024). Structural analysis of the future of the coffee industry in the Amazonas region using a MICMAC approach. Heliyon, 10(7). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27827
  20. Brenner, N., & Schmid, C. (2014). The ‘urban age’in question. International journal of urban and regional research38(3), 731-755. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12115
  21. Buhaug, H., & Urdal, H. (2013). An urbanization bomb? Population growth and social disorder in cities. Global environmental change23(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.10.016
  22. Chakraborty, S., Chatterjee, P., & Das, P. P. (2024). Measurement Alternatives and Ranking according to Compromise Solution (MARCOS) Method. In Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Manufacturing Environments (pp. 297-307). Apple Academic Press.
  23. Chen, J. (2020). An extensional micmac method to identify the key factors. Acad J Bus Manag, 2, 75-81. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2020.020508
  24. Clarke, A., & Warren, L. (2007). Hopes, fears and expectations about the future: what do older people's stories tell us about active ageing?. Ageing & Society, 27(4), 465-488. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X06005824
  25. Dalkey, N. C. (2018). Delphi. In An introduction to technological forecasting (pp. 25-30). Routledge.
  26. Dehghan Banadaki, M. (2023). An Analysis of the Aging Situation in Future Iran and Its Challenges. Monthly Report of Expert Studies, 31(4), 1-18. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.29809525.1402.1402.4.84. [In Persian]
  27. del Mar Delgado-Serrano, M., Vanwildemeersch, P., London, S., Ortiz-Guerrero, C. E., Semerena, R. E., & Rojas, M. (2016). Adapting prospective structural analysis to strengthen sustainable management and capacity building in community-based natural resource management contexts. Ecology and Society, 21(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08505-210236
  28. Demir, G., Chatterjee, P., Kadry, S., Abdelhadi, A., & Pamučar, D. (2024). Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to Compromise Solution (MARCOS) Method: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 7(2), 313-336. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame7220241137
  29. Fathi, E. (2020). The Phenomenon of Population Aging in Iran. Iranian Journal of Official Statistics Studies, 30(2), 387-413. [In Persian] https://doi.org/20.1001.1.25385798.1398.30.2.7.6
  30. Flick, C., Zamani, E. D., Stahl, B. C., & Brem, A. (2020). The future of ICT for health and ageing: unveiling ethical and social issues through horizon scanning foresight. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155, 119995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119995
  31. Godet, A., Meunier, M., Roubelat, F. (2003). Structural analysis with the MICMAC method & actors’ strategy with MACTOR method. Futures research methodology, 7(4),1-11.
  32. Gu, D., Andreev, K., & Dupre, M. E. (2021). Major trends in population growth around the world. China CDC weekly3(28), 604. https://doi.org/10.46234/ccdcw2021.160
  33. Jang, H. Y., & Lee, Y. M. (2020). Investigating the perception of the elderly on the future of labour market. Trade and Global Markets, 13(1), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTGM.2020.104905
  34. Jarzebski, M. P., Elmqvist, T., Gasparatos, A., Fukushi, K., Eckersten, S., Haase, D.,... & Pu, J. (2021). Ageing and population shrinking: Implications for sustainability in the urban century. Npj Urban Sustainability1(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-021-00023-z
  35. Kalantari-Banadaki, S. Z., Azar, A., Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J. (2018). System Dynamics and Iran's Population Changes. Journal of Population Association of Iran, 12(24), 7-41. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.1735000.1396.12.24.1.2 [In Persian]
  36. Lloyd, K., Devine, P., & Carney, G. M. (2018). Imagining their future selves: Children's attitudes to older people and their expectations of life at age 70. Children & Society, 32(6), 444-456. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12289
  37. Madadi, A. A. (2021). Khooee ES, Haravi AJ. Analysis of trends in the Islamic Republic of Iran based on future studies. World Politics, 10(3), 219-247. https://doi.org/10.22124/wp.2021.18573.2720 [In Persian]
  38. Milner, C. (2013). Building the foundation for active aging. Journal on Active Aging. 12(3).
  39. Milner, C. (2024). Redefining what it means to grow older. Journal on Active Aging, 23(3).
  40. Molaei, M. M. (2016). Talebian H. Foresight on Iran's Issues Using Structural Analysis Method. Majles & Strategy, 23(86):5-32. [In Persian]
  41. Moshfegh, M., Mahmoudi, MJ., Haghshenas, NM. (2012). Prospects of Iran's Demographic Changes, the Necessity of Review in Population Policies. Women's Strategic Studies, 14(55),151-72. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.20082827.1391.14.55.5.9 [In Persian]
  42. Mozaffari, Z., Habibi, F., Amani, R. (2024). Estimation of Social Capital Index in Iran Using the Fuzzy Logic. Iranian Economic Review, 28(2), 580-605. http://dx.doi.org/10.22059/ier.2024.340069.1007404 [In Persian]
  43. National Research Council. (2012). Aging and the Macroeconomy: Long-Term Implications of an Older Population. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13465.
  44. Navaneetham, K., & Arunachalam, D. (2023). Global Population Aging, 1950–2050. In Handbook of Aging, Health, and Public Policy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1914-4_154-1
  45. Retief, F., Bond, A., Pope, J., Morrison-Saunders, A., & King, N. (2016). Global megatrends and their implications for environmental assessment practice. Environmental Impact Assessment Review61, 52-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.07.002
  46. Roux, A., & Viljoen, D. (2018). Using Futures Studies Methodologies to Explore the Economic Participation of the Older Cohorts of South Africa's Population Towards 2030. Journal of Futures Studies, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.6531/JFS.201809_23(1).0002
  47. Saadat, R. (2008). The Estimation of Social Capital in Iran. Journal of Economic Research (Tahghighat- E- Eghtesadi), 43(2), 41-56. http://dx.doi.org/20.1001.1.00398969.1387.43.2.3.2 [In Persian]
  48. Saritas, O. (2013). Systemic foresight methodology. Science, technology and innovation policy for the future: Potentials and limits of foresight studies, 83-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31827-6_6
  49. Shahid Beheshti School of Governance. (2022). Foresight of Trends, Events, and Drivers in the World. Policy Summary. Supreme National Defense University. [In Persian]
  50. Souri, a. (2014). Social Capital and its Growth in Iran. Quarterly Economic Research and Policies, 22(69), 49-64. [In Persian]
  51. Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Puška, A., & Chatterjee, P. (2020). Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of alternatives and ranking according to COmpromise solution (MARCOS). Computers & industrial engineering, 140, 106231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106231
  52. Szpilko, D., Glinska, E., & Szydlo, J. (2020). STEEPVL and structural analysis as a tools supporting identification of the driving forces of city development. European Research Studies Journal, 3(3), 340-363. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/1642
  53. Taylor, E. (2020). We agree, don’t we? The Delphi method for health environments research. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 13(1), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586719887709
  54. Tehran Province Management and Planning Organization. (2021). Population Projection of Tehran Province. Tehran: Tehran Province Management and Planning Organization. [In Persian]
  55. Veenman, S. A. (2013). Futures studies and uncertainty in public policy: A case study on the ageing population in the Netherlands. Futures53, 42-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2013.08.008
  56. Wright, D., Buys, L., Vine, D., Xia, B. (2014). Skitmore M, Drogemuller R, et al. EUTOPIA 75+: Exploratory futures scenarios for baby boomers' preferred living spaces. Futures Studies,19(2), 41-60.
  57. Zanjari, N., Kalantari Banadaki, S. Z., Sadeghi, R., & Delbari, A. (2024). A Futures Study of the Challenges and Drivers of Population Aging in Iran Using the Scenario Analysis Technique. Iranian Journal of Ageing19(2), 258-275. https://doi.org/10.32598/sija.2023.3692.1 [In Persian]
  58. Zarghami, H., Mirzaei, M. (2017). Population Aging in Iran in the Next Four Decades. Islamic-Iranian Progress Model Studies, 3(6), 73-94. [In Persian] https://doi.org/20.1001.1.23295599.1394.3.6.3.8