تبیین رابطه سرمایه اجتماعی و سرزندگی محله‌های شهری مطالعه موردی: شهر اهواز

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی - کاربردی

نویسندگان

1 دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشکده جغرافیا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشکده جغرافیا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

3 استاد جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشکده جغرافیا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

تقویت سرزندگی محله‌های شهری به‌عنوان کوچک‌ترین واحد مدیریت شهری و کانون جغرافیایی شکل‌گیری اجتماعات محلی، زیربنای ایجاد شهر سرزنده، پویا و پیشرو است. یکی از ابعاد مؤثر بر سرزندگی محله‌های شهری عوامل اجتماعی است. هدف اصلی پژوهش تأثیر سرمایه اجتماعی و مؤلفه‌های سازنده آن بر سرزندگی محله‌های شهری است. روش پژوهش توصیفی-تحلیلی و ازنظر هدف کاربردی است. بدین منظور به شیوه پیمایشی، 392 پرسشنامه در دو محله باغ‌شیخ و کیان‌آباد شهر اهواز تکمیل و نتایج آن از طریق آزمون‌های t تک متغیره و t مستقل در نرم‌افزار SPSS و مدل‌سازی معادله ساختاری در نرم‌افزارAmos graphic تحلیل شد. نتایج نشان می‌دهد پاسخگویان مؤلفه‌های سرمایه اجتماعی (اعتماد اجتماعی، مشارکت اجتماعی، انسجام اجتماعی، روابط اجتماعی) را در محله‌های موردمطالعه به‌طور معناداری بالاتر از میانگین ارزیابی نموده‌اند و مقدار مؤلفه‌های مذکور تفاوت معناداری در دو محله موردمطالعه ندارد. در ارزیابی معادله ساختاری طراحی‌شده، مقدار شاخص‌ها برازش معادله مذکور را تأیید می‌کند، لذا مدل مفهومی پژوهش قابل‌قبول است و تأثیر مثبت و معنادار سرمایه اجتماعی بر سرزندگی محله‌های شهری تأیید می‌شود. بیشترین سهم در تبیین سازه سرمایه اجتماعی مربوط به مشارکت اجتماعی و در مورد سرزندگی مربوط به مؤلفه حضور پذیری و تحرک است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Explaining the relationship between social capital and the vitality of urban neighborhoods, Case Study: Ahwaz City

نویسندگان [English]

  • Bahar Habibian 1
  • Hossein Hataminejad 2
  • Ahmad Pourahmad 3
  • Keramatolah Ziari 3
1 PhD in Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3 . Professor of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Abstract
Strengthening the vitality of urban neighborhoods as the smallest unit of urban management and the geographical center of the formation of local communities is the foundation of a vibrant, dynamic and pioneer city. One of the factors affecting the vitality of urban neighborhoods is social factor, and in various researches the effect of this notion on urban spaces development, social sustainability, local sustainable development, satisfaction of residents and local management has been investigated. Though the effect of social capital and its constructive components on the vitality of urban neighborhoods have been chosen as the main objective of the present study. The research methodology was descriptive-analytical and was practical in the terms of purpose. To this end, in a survey method, 392 questionnaires were completed in Bagh-e-Sheikh and KianAbad neighborhoods of Ahwaz city, and the obtained results were analyzed using one sample t-test and independent t-test in SPSS software and structural equation modeling in Amos graphic software. The results showed that the respondents evaluated the components of social capital (social trust, social participation, social cohesion and social relations) in the studied areas significantly higher than the average, and the amount of the mentioned components had no significant difference in the two mentioned neighborhood. In evaluating the designed structural equation, the value of the indices confirms the fitting of the mentioned equation, hence; the conceptual model of the research was acceptable and the positive and significant impact of the social capital on the vitality of the urban neighborhoods was confirmed. The largest contribution in explaining the social capital structure was related to the social participation, and in case of vitality, it was related to the availability and mobility components
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Vitality is one of the qualities of urban spaces that the most important of which is the self-evident presence of citizens in public spaces and the shaping of the vital force of the place. In fact, the vitality or active and passionate presence of people in urban spaces is one of the important and positive characteristics of such spaces that neglecting them causes urban spaces to lose their social function and appear cold and lifeless. Enhancing the vitality of urban neighborhoods as the smallest unit of urban management and the geographical focus of the formation of local communities is the infrastructure of the creation of a vibrant, dynamic and progressive city. Some of the effective factors on the vitality of urban neighborhoods is social factors and in various studies the impact of them on urban spaces development, social sustainability, local sustainable development, residents' satisfaction and local management has been investigated. In this study, however, the impact of social capital and its components on the vitality of urban neighborhoods has been selected as the main objective of the present study and the it seeks to answer the following questions: Do the components of social capital and vitality differ significantly in the studied neighborhoods? How is the impact of social capital on the formation of vitality in neighborhoods?
According to the research objectives and questions, the accuracy of the following hypotheses in the study was investigated:
- Social capital has a positive and significant impact on neighborhood vitality.
- The studied neighborhoods have significant differences in terms of social capital components.
- Kianabad neighborhood is significantly more vibrant than Bagh-e-Sheikh neighborhood.
 
Methodology
The method of this study is analytical quantitative and after library studies the data were collected through questionnaire. To select the sample, two neighborhoods of Ahvaz were selected by clustering method and questionnaires were distributed among the analysis units (households) according to the population of the neighborhoods. The sample size was estimated to be 384 using the Cochran formula according to the sample population that in order to complete not less than 100 questionnaires in each neighborhood, a total of 400 questionnaires were completed by systematically classified method. After refining the completed questionnaires, totally the information of 392 questionnaires including 101 questionnaires in Bagh-e-Sheikh neighborhood and 291 questionnaires in Kianabad neighborhood were analyzed. Data were analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistics including univariate and independent t-tests in SPSS software and structural equation modeling using Amos Graphic software.
 
Results and discussion
The results showed that, contrary to the third hypothesis, residents' evaluation of the vitality of Bagh-e-Sheikh neighborhood is higher that factors such as neighborhood safety, more use at night, convenient access to nearby locations, and meeting needs through downtown has had a significant impact on this issue. However, it should be noted that the evaluation of vitality in this study was not based on objective factors and residents' evaluation of the components of vitality included presence, attractiveness and satisfaction which is certainly influenced by variables such as rooting and attachment to residence, the case that has not been investigated. Although the mean of the components of vitality was evaluated higher than the average from the viewpoints of residents (and the difference is statistically significant), the score of the attractiveness of the component was lower than the assumed average and the weakness of the studied sample are evident in terms of the presence of meeting spaces and hangouts, the possibility of walking, the presence of traditional and modern markets, and the amusement facilities in the neighborhoods. Considering the social capital with regard to the characteristics and antiquity of Bagh-e-Sheikh neighborhood, it was expected that the stronger social capital would be achieved in this neighborhood. The results show that although the social capital of Bagh-e-Sheikh neighborhood is slightly higher than Kianabad and there is more standard deviation in Kianabad neighborhood, there is no significant difference in social capital and its components in studied neighborhoods. Intervention and the impact of downtown commercial context (adjoining dense context and transferring its traffic passing), population displacement caused by burnout and slow renovation and also the conversion of large-scale neighborhoods into cellar and deserted neighborhoods may be the reason for the decline of the social capital in the neighborhood that has made its social capital not significantly different from the relatively modern Kianabad neighborhood. In Bagh-e-Sheikh neighborhood, the participation and the social cohesion were higher and the social trust was the lowest component, and in particular, institutional trust items in this neighborhood have been evaluated weak as indicating dissatisfaction with the performance of urban managers and the inefficiency of programs in this worn-out and old context of the town. In evaluating the designed structural equation, the value of the indices confirms the fit of the mentioned equation, so the conceptual model of the research is acceptable and the positive and significant impact of the social capital on the vitality of urban neighborhoods is confirmed. The greatest contribution to explaining the structure of the social capital is related to social participation and is case of the vitality is related to the component of presence and mobility.
 
Conclusion
The results show that the respondents evaluated the social capital components (social trust, social participation, social cohesion, and social relations) as significantly higher than the mean in the studied neighborhoods, and the value of the mentioned components was not significantly different in the two studied neighborhoods. Investigating the structural equation of research shows that the stronger the social capital and its components in urban neighborhoods, the more likely to have a vibrant neighborhood. This issue demonstrates the importance of neighborhood social actions in line of enhancing the presence of people in public spaces. Neighborhood social relations are formed in the context of public spaces. The impact of social capital on the development and quality of this space has also been confirmed in previous studies. For example, Rezazadeh et al. (1392) have examined the role of the social capitals in addition to the physical capital in local sustainable development in the investigation of the asset-based approach to the local sustainable development, in which vitality, dynamism, adaptation and diversity considered the principles of the local sustainability and they have endorsed the relationship between the social capitals and the sustainable local development. Consequently, the results of this study are in line with the above research. According to the results of the study, it is recommended that in order to enhance the vitality of the studied neighborhoods, the policy making to enhance participation (the most influential component of the social capital formation) and social trust (the weakest component of social capital in the studied neighborhoods) should be implemented through mechanisms related to various areas of urban management and socio-cultural management to enhance the vitality of neighborhoods through social capital as well.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • urban vitality
  • social capital
  • social participation
  • attractiveness
  • satisfaction
  • Ahvaz
  • Kianabad
  • Bagh-e-Sheikh

مراجع

  1. اسداللهی‌کیا، سمانه. (1384). طراحی شهری در شهر جدید هشتگرد با رویکرد سرزندگی و حس تعلق به مکان، بلوار انقلاب حدفاصل میدان‌ها یادبود ساعت. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد رشته طراحی شهری دانشگاه تهران، استاد راهنما حسین بحرینی.
  2. افضلیان، سحر. (1393). باز زنده سازی ساختار کالبدی محلات تاریخی با رویکرد ارتقاء کیفیات فضایی و سرزندگی، نمونه موردی جویباره اصفهان. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد رشته طراحی شهری دانشگاه تهران، استاد راهنما دکتر فرح حبیب.
  3. الوانی، سید مهدی و نقوی، میرعلی. (1381). سرمایه اجتماعی: مفاهیم و نظریه‌ها. فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت، 34، 26-9.
  4. امان پور، سعید ومودت الیاس. (1395). سنجش فضایی سرمایه اجتماعی جهت توسعه پایدار اجتماعی شهرها با مدل  VIKOR  (موردمطالعه: کلان‌شهر اهواز). فصلنامه مطالعات توسعه اجتماعی ایران، 8 (3)، 85-69.
  5. باسخا، مهدی؛ عاقلی کهنه شهری، لطفعلی و مسائلی، ارشک. (1389). رتبه‌بندی شاخص کیفیت زندگی در استان‌های کشور. فصلنامه رفاه اجتماعی، 9 (37)، 112-95.
  6. بحرینی، سید حسین؛ بلوکی، بهناز و تقابن، سوده. (1393). تحلیل مبانی نظری طراحی شهری معاصر. جلد اول: اواخر قرن 19 تا دهه هفتم قرن 20 میلادی، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
  7. براتی، ناصر و یزدان پناه شاه آبادی، محمدرضا. (1390). بررسی ارتباط مفهومی سرمایة اجتماعی و کیفیت زندگی در محیط شهر، نمونه موردی: شهر جدید پردیس. جامعه پژوهی فرهنگی، 2 (1)، 49-25.
  8. پاتنام، رابرت. (1380). دموکراسی و سنت‌های مدنی. ترجمه محمدتقی دل‌فروز، تهران: دفتر مطالعات سیاسی وزارت کشور.
  9. پاکزاد، جهانشاه. (1382). معیارهای کیفی سنجش فضای شهری. مجله آبادی، 39، 103-94.
  10. پاکزاد، جهانشاه. (1388). راهنمای طراحی فضاهای شهری، تهران: وزارت مسکن و شهرسازی.
  11. پامیر، سای. (1392). آفرینش مرکز شهری سرزنده: اصول طراحی شهری و بازآفرینی. ترجمه مصطفی بهزادفر و امیر شکیبامنش، چاپ سوم، تهران: انتشارات علم و صنعت.
  12. جعفری مهرآبادی، مریم؛ امامی، فاطمه و سجودی، مریم. (1395). بررسی مؤلفه‌های سرمایه اجتماعی مؤثر بر رضایتمندی گردشگران، مطالعه موردی: شهر ماسوله. مجله برنامه‌ریزی و توسعه گردشگری، 5 (18)، 33-19.
  13. جیکوبز، جین. (1386). مرگ و زندگی در شهرهای بزرگ آمریکایی. ترجمه حمیدرضا پارسی و آرزو افلاطونی، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
  14. چپ‌من، دیوید. (1386). آفرینش محلات و مکان‌ها در محیط انسان‌ساخت. ترجمه منوچهر طبیبیان و شهرزاد فریادی، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
  15. خوشفر، غلامرضا؛ بارگاهی، رضا و کرمی، شهاب. (1392). سرمایه اجتماعی و پایداری شهری مطالعه موردی: شهر گرگان. مطالعات شهری، 8، 46-31.
  16. رضازاده، راضیه؛ محمدی آیدغمیش، فاطمه و رفیعیان، مجتبی. (1392). نقش رویکرد دارایی مبنا در توسعه پایدار محلی، مطالعه موردی: محله امامزاده حسن تهران. باغ نظر، 25 (10)، 48-39.
  17. ستاری فرد، شهرام. (1394). بررسی نقش مراکز مذهبی در افزایش سرزندگی شهرهای معاصر، مطالعه موردی: محدوده امامزاده صالح تجریش، تهران. فصلنامه مدیریت شهری، 14 (40)، 157-141.
  18. سلیمانی مقدم، پرویز؛قندهاری، محمد و پیری، فاطمه. (1397). تحلیل زیست پذیری و سرزندگی بافت‌های فرسوده (مطالعه موردی: محله عامری شهر اهواز). فصلنامه مطالعات ساختار و کارکرد شهری، 5 (17)، 114-93.
  19. شیخی، ایوب؛ سهی، زهرا؛ رنجبر، مریم و اوالدی، مریم. (1395). تبیین رابطه بین سرمایه اجتماعی و مدیریت شهری با نقش میانجی مشارکت شهروندان، مطالعه موردی: شهرداری کرمان. مدیریت شهری، 43، 423-411.
  20. صفایی‌پور، مسعود و احمدی، زهرا. (1393). ارزیابی و سنجش شاخص‌های کیفیت زندگی در منطقه 4 اهواز. فصلنامه توسعه اجتماعی، 9 (2)، 84-63.
  21. طباطبایی، سید محمود. (1381). فرایند تدوین و اجرا و تفسیر ستاده­های یک مدل لیزرل، یک مثال عینی، دانشگاه تبریز، سالنامه پژوهشی، 1، 85-125.
  22. طبیبیان، منوچهر و موسوی، میرجلال. (1395). بررسی نقش زیباسازی و ارتقاء کیفیت محیط بر سرزندگی شهری نمونه موردی: باغ شهر تاریخی مراغه. آرمانشهر، 17، 262-249.
  23. غفاری، غلامرضا و امیدی، رضا. (1388). کیفیت زندگی، شاخص توسعه اجتماعی. تهران: شیرازه.
  24. کریر، راب. (1375). فضای شهری. ترجمه خسرو هاشمی نژاد، تهران: انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی.
  25. کمیسیون بهره‌وری استرالیا. (1387). سرمایه اجتماعی و تأثیر آن بر سیاست‌گذاری عمومی: گزارش تحقیقی کمیسیون بهره‌وری استرالیا مترجم مرتضی نصیری، تهران: پژوهشکده مطالعات فرهنگی و اجتماعی.
  26. گل، یان. (1387). زندگی در میان ساختمان‌ها. ترجمه شیما شصتی، تهران: انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی.
  27. گل، یان. (1392). شهر انسانی. ترجمه علی غفاری و لیلا غفاری، تهران: موسسه علم معمار..
  28. گلکار، کوروش. (1386). مفهوم کیفیت سرزندگی در طراحی شهری. نشریه صفه، 16 (44)، 75-66.
  29. لینچ، کوین. (1392). تئوری شکل خوب شهر. ترجمه سید حسین بحرینی، چاپ پنجم، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
  30. محمدی آوندی، بابک؛ رجبی، آزیتا و اقبالی، ناصر. (1396). بررسی رابطه بین سرمایه اجتماعی و توسعه پایدار محلات شهر اهواز، مطالعه موردی محلات کیانپارس و لشکرآباد. فصلنامه جغرافیا، 15 (66)، 280-267.
  31. مدنی پور، علی. (1387). فضاهای عمومی و خصوصی شهر. ترجمه فرشاد نوریان، جلد اول، تهران: شرکت پردازش و برنامه‌ریزی شهری.
  32. مدیری، آتوسا و ادهمی، قاسم. (1394). تبیین نقش فضاهای عمومی در ارتباط با سرمایه اجتماعی، مطالعه موردی؛ شهر آمل، توسعه اجتماعی- فرهنگی، 3 (4)، 281 -252.
  33. مزرعاوی، عماد. (1392). شناسایی و تعیین حدود محلات شهری اهواز. طرح پژوهشی، کارفرما: شهرداری اهواز، معاونت برنامه‌ریزی و توسعه سرمایه انسانی.
  34. مصطفی پور، احسان؛ حقیقتیان، منصور و محمدی، اصغر. (1397). تبیین جامعه‌شناختی میزان سرمایه اجتماعی محله‌های شهر تهران. مطالعات جامعه‌شناسی، 10 (38)، 20-7.
  35. ملکی، سعید؛رحیم‌پور، نگار؛ عبیات،  نورا و اشکوردلیلی، سینا. (1397). سنجش تأثیر سرزندگی بر امنیت در بافت‌های مختلف شهر اهواز. فصلنامه مطالعات امنیت اجتماعی،  9 (2)، 272-229.
  36. نادری، سید مجید؛ حبیب، فرح؛ فیروزآبادی، سید احمد و جهانشاهلو، لعال. (1395). بررسی رابطه بعد اجتماعی کیفیت محیطی فضاهای شهری با سرمایه اجتماعی، مورد پژوهی: محورهای سعادت‌آباد، آیت و مدائن تهران. مدیریت شهری، 43، 236-225.
  37. نوابخش، مهرداد. (1392). ضرورت احیاء سرمایه اجتماعی در توسعه فضاهای شهری. مجله مطالعات توسعه اجتماعی ایران، 5 (4)، 17-1.
  38. نوروزیان ملکی، سعید. (1392). معیارهای طراحانه ارتقای سرزندگی محلات مسکونی (واحد همسایگی بانشاط و سرزنده). رساله دکتری رشته معماری دانشگاه علم و صنعت، استادان راهنما محسن فیضی و سید باقر حسینی.
  1. Afzalian, S. (2013). Revitalization of the physical structure of historical neighborhoods with the approach of improving spatial qualities and vitality, a case study of Joibare Isfahan. Master's thesis in the field of urban design, University of Tehran, supervisor Dr. Farah Habib. [In Persian].
  2. Alwani, S. M., & Naqvi, M. A. (2002). Social capital: concepts and theories. Management Studies Quarterly, 34, 9-26. [In Persian].
  3. Amanpour, S., & Maudet E. (2015). Spatial measurement of social capital for sustainable social development of cities with VIKOR model (case study: Ahvaz metropolis). Iranian Social Development Studies Quarterly, 8 (3), 69-85. [In Persian].
  4. Asadollahikia, S. (2005). Urban design in the new city of Hashtgerd with an approach of vitality and a sense of belonging to the place. Master's thesis in the field of urban design, University of Tehran, supervisor Hossein Bahraini. [In Persian].
  5. Australian Productivity Commission. (2008). Social capital and its impact on public policy: Australian Productivity Commission Research Report 2003. Translated by Morteza Nasiri, Tehran: Research Institute of Cultural and Social Studies. [In Persian].
  6. Bahraini, S. H., Blouki, B., & Taghaban, S. (2013). Analysis of the theoretical foundations of contemporary urban design. The first volume: the end of the 19th century to the seventh decade of the 20th century, Tehran: Tehran University Press. [In Persian].
  7. Barati, N., & Yazdan Panah Shahabadi, M. (2011). Investigating the conceptual relationship between social capital and quality of life in the city environment, a case study: new city of Pardis. Society for Cultural Studies, 2 (1), 25-49. [In Persian].
  8. Baskha, M., Aqli Kohneshahri, L., & Masalami, A. (2010). Ranking of the quality of life index in the provinces of the country. Social Welfare Quarterly, 9 (37), 112-95. [In Persian].
  9. Carrier, R. (1996). urban space. Translated by Khosrow Hashminejad, Tehran: Jihad Academic Press. [In Persian].
  10. Chapman, D. (2007). Creation of neighborhoods and places in man-made environment. Translated by Manouchehr Tabibian and Shahrazad Faryadi, Tehran: Tehran University Press. [In Persian].
  11. Chion, M. (2013). Producing Urban Vitality: The Case of Dance in San Francisco, Urban Geography, 30(4), 416-439.
  12. Ghaffari, G., & Omidi, R. (2011). Quality of life, social development index, Tehran: Shirazeh. [In Persian].
  13. Golkar, K. (2007). The concept of quality of life in urban design. Safeh Quarterly, 16 (44), 75-66. [In Persian].
  14. Gul, I. (2008). Life among the buildings, translated by Shima Shasti, Tehran: Jihad University Publications. [In Persian].
  15. Gul, I. (2012). Human City. translated by Ali Ghaffari and Leila Ghaffari, Tehran: Institute of Architect Science. [In Persian].
  16. Jacobs, Jane. (2007). Life and death in big American cities. Translated by Hamidreza Parsi and Arezoo Platoni, Tehran: Tehran University Press. [In Persian].
  17. Jafari Mehrabadi, M., Emami, F., & Sojoudi, M. (2015). Investigating the components of social capital affecting tourists' satisfaction, case study: Masoleh city. Journal of Tourism Planning and Development, 5 (18), 19-33. [In Persian].
  18. Jalaladdini, S., & Oktay, D. (2012). ‘Urban Public Spaces and Vitality: A Socio-Spatial Analysis in the Streets of Cypriot Towns’, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35, 664 – 674.
  19. Kay, A. (2005). Social Capital, The Social Economy and Community Development, Oxford University Press and Community, Development Journal, Advance Access.
  20. Khanian, M., Bolouhar, B., Gheitarany, N., & ManteghiNezhad, Sh. (2013). Studying the Causes of Vitality in Traditional Markets of Iran, Case Study: Shoemaking Order of Central Market of Hamadan. World Applied Sciences Journal, 22(6), 831-835.
  21. Khodarahmi, Z. (2014). Vitality and Place Attachment Formation within Urban Spaces in Sustainable District. Journal of Social Issues & Humanities, 2(7), 225-233.
  22. Khoshfar, G., Bargahi, R., & Karmi, Sh. (2012). Social capital and urban sustainability, a case study: Gorgan city. Urban Studies, 8, 46-31. [In Persian].
  23. Kordjazi, M., & Mirsaeedy, L. (2014). A Study on Criteria of Vitality and How They Affect Urban Spaces. International Journal of Basic Sciences & Applied Research, 3(SP), 98-103
  24. London department of environment. (1994). Vital and Viable Town Centres: meeting the challenge, URBED, HMSO, London.
  25. Lotfi, S., & Solaimani, K. (2009). An assessment of Urban Quality of Life by Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach, Case study: Comparative Study of Quality of Life in the North of Iran. Journal of Social Sciences, 5(2), 123-133.
  26. Lynch, K. (2012). The theory of good city form. Translated by Seyyed Hossein Bahraini, fifth edition, Tehran: Tehran University Press. [In Persian].
  27. Madanipour, A. (2008). Public and private spaces of the city. Translated by Farshad Noorian, first volume, Tehran: Urban Planning and Processing Company. [In Persian].
  28. Maleki, S., Rahimpour, N., Abiyat, N., & Eshkurdelili, S. (2017). Measuring the impact of vitality on security in different contexts of Ahvaz city. Social Security Studies Quarterly, 9 (2), 272-229. [In Persian].
  29. Manzo, L. C. (2006). Finding Common Ground: The Importance of place attachment to community participation and planning. Journal of Planning literature, 20(4), 335-350.
  30. Mazraavi, E. (2012). Identifying and determining the boundaries of Ahvaz urban areas, research project, client: Ahvaz Municipality, Vice President of Planning and Human Capital Development. [In Persian].
  31. Moderi, A., & Adhami, Q. (2014). Explaining the role of public spaces in relation to social capital, a case study; Amol city, socio-cultural development, 3 (4), 281-252. [In Persian].
  32. Mohammadi Avendi, B., Rajabi, A., & Iqbali, N. (2016). Investigating the relationship between social capital and sustainable development of Ahvaz city neighborhoods, a case study of Kianpars and Lashkarabad neighborhoods. Geography Quarterly, 15 (66), 280-267. [In Persian].
  33. Montgomery, J. (1995). Urban Vitality and the Culture of Cities. The Planner, 10 (2), 101-110.
  34. Montgomery, J. (1998). Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 3)1), 93-116.
  35. Mostafapour, E., Chakhtiyan, M., & Mohammadi, A. (2017). Sociological explanation of the amount of social capital in the neighborhoods of Tehran. Sociological Studies, 10 (38), 7-20. [In Persian].
  36. Naderi, S. M., Habib, F., Firozabadi, S. A., & Jahanshahlou, L. (2015). Investigating the relationship between the social dimension of the environmental quality of urban spaces and social capital, case study: Saadat Abad, Ayat and Madain areas of Tehran. Urban Management, 43, 236-225. [In Persian].
  37. Navabakhsh, M. (2012). The necessity of revitalizing social capital in the development of urban spaces. Iranian Journal of Social Development Studies, 5 (4), 1-17.
  1.  Norouzian Maleki, S. (2012). Design criteria for improving the vitality of residential neighborhoods (vibrant and lively neighborhood unit). Doctoral dissertation in the field of architecture of the University of Science and Technology, supervisors Mohsen Faizi and Seyed Baqer Hosseini. [In Persian].
  1. Pakzad, J. (2003). Qualitative criteria for measuring urban space. Abadi Journal, 39, 103-94.
  2. Pakzad, J. (2009). Urban Space Design Guide. Tehran: Ministry of Housing and Urban Development. [In Persian].
  3. Pamir, S. (2012). Creation of a lively urban center: principles of urban design and regeneration, translated by Mustafa Behzadfar and Amir Shakibamanesh. third edition, Tehran: Alam and Sanat Publications. [In Persian].
  4. Payton, M.A. (2003). Influence of Place Attachment and Social Capital on Civic Action: A Study at Sherburne National Wildlife Refuge. master’s thesis of Natural Resources Science and Management Program, University of Minnesota, June 2003.
  5. Perkins, D.D., Hughey, J., & Speer, P. W. (2002). Community psychology perspectives on social capital theory and community development practice. Journal of the Community Development Society, 33(1): 33–52.
  6. Putnam, R. (2001). Democracy and civil traditions. Translated by Mohammad Taghi Delfaroz, Tehran: Political Studies Office of the Ministry of Interior. [In Persian].
  7. Rezazadeh, R., Mohammadi Aidghmish, F., & Rafiyan, M. (2012). The role of asset-based approach in local sustainable development, case study: Hassan Imamzadeh neighborhood of Tehran. Bagh Nazar, 25 (10), 48-39. [In Persian].
  8. Safaipour, M., & Ahmadi, Z. (2013). Evaluation and measurement of quality of life indicators in the 4th region of Ahvaz. Social Development Quarterly, 9(2), 63-84. [In Persian].
  9. Satari Fard, Sh. (2014). Investigating the role of religious centers in increasing the vitality of contemporary cities, case study: Imamzadeh Saleh area of ​​Tajrish, Tehran. Urban Management Quarterly, 14(40), 157-141. [In Persian].
  10. Sheikhi, A., Sohi, Z., Ranjbar, M., & Ovaldi, M. (2015). Clarifying the relationship between social capital and urban management with the mediating role of citizens' participation, case study: Kerman Municipality. Urban Management, 43, 423-411. [In Persian].
  11. Soleimani Moghadam, P., Kandahari, M., & Piri, F. (2017). Analysis of viability and vitality of worn tissues (case study: Ameri neighborhood of Ahvaz city). Quarterly Journal of Urban Structure and Function Studies, 5 (17), 114-93. [In Persian].
  12. Tabatabai, Seyyed Mahmoud. (2002). The process of compiling, implementing and interpreting the results of a Lisrel model, a concrete example, Tabriz University, Research Yearbook, 1, 85-125. [In Persian].
  13. Tabibian, M., & Mousavi, M. (2015). Investigating the role of beautification and improving the quality of the environment on urban vitality, case study: Maragheh Historical City Garden. Armanshahr, 17, 262-249. [In Persian].
  14. Taylor, M. (2000). Communities in the lead: Power, organizational capacity and social capital. Urban Studies, 37(5-6), 1019-1035.
  15. Thomas, D. F., & Cross, J. E. (2007). Organizations as place builders. Journal of Behavioral & Applied Management, 9(1), 33-61.
  16. Zaidin, N., Mohd Hussain, M.R., Tukiman, I., & Mohd Shahli, F. (2016). Place Attachment in Relation to Urban Street Vitality. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 7 (1), 9-20.
  17. Zhou, J. (2012). Urban Vitality in Dutch and Chinese New Towns, A comparative study between Almere and Tongzhou. PhD thesis of urban design, TU Delft, Faculty of Architecture, Urbanism department, Holland, Almere.
پژوهش‌های جغرافیای برنامه‌ریزی شهری
دوره 10، شماره 1
اردیبهشت 1401
صفحه 1-22

فایل ها

اشتراک گذاری

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار