استفاده از رویکرد پس‌نگری در تدوین نقشه راه برای چشم‌انداز شهر تهران

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی - کاربردی

نویسندگان

گروه برنامه‌ریزی و مدیریت شهری، دانشکده شهرسازی، دانشکدگان هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

10.22059/jurbangeo.2023.362508.1846

چکیده

پس‌نگری، ناظر بر چشم‌انداز آینده مطلوب و نگاه به عقب برای چگونگی دستیابی به آن، رویکردی هنجاری، هدفگرا و متمرکز بر حل مسئله است. علی‌رغم توجه جهانی فزاینده به پس‌نگری و کارآمدی آن در حوزه‌های مختلف، این رویکرد در برنامه‌ریزی و طرح‌ریزی شهری و مواجهه با مسائل و تحولات پیچیده شهر در کشور، موردتوجه قرار نگرفته است. ازاین‌رو، مقاله حاضر به دنبال استفاده از رویکرد پس‌نگری در تدوین نقشه راه برای چشم‌انداز شهر تهران است. تلقی این مطالعه از چشم‌انداز آینده مطلوب، همان چیزی است که در سند طرح راهبردی- ساختاری (جامع) تهران تدوین‌شده و این‌چنین، گویای کاربست پس‌نگری متخصص محور با برگشت از چشم‌انداز آینده مطلوب تهران در افق 1405 به مبدأ وضعیت موجود در سال 1385 است. آرمان‌های چشم‌انداز توسعه در قالب ارکان هفت‌گانه به‌عنوان چشم‌انداز آینده مطلوب، مورد مداقه قرارگرفته‌اند. شناخت وضعیت موجود ذیل ارکان مذکور، با تحلیل محتوای کیفی سند طرح جامع تهران انجام‌شده است. متعاقباً، تدوین نقشه راه با تعیین گام‌ها و مقاصد کلیدی که ازنظر ماهیت در سه دسته متمایز قرار می‌گیرند، دنبال شده است. بر این اساس، چشم‌انداز آینده مطلوب تهران از مسیر سه خرد چشم‌انداز «تهران، شهری آگاه نسبت به ماهیت وجودی خود با اشراف جامع به امکانات و محدودیت‌ها برای تثبیت و تعدیل»، «تهران، شهری ظرفیت ساز برای خدمات زیربنایی و روبنایی، توانمند ازنظر اجتماعی و سازمانی و مستعد برای توسعه همه‌جانبه» و «تهران، شهری شکوفا و پایدار ازنظر انسجام و تاب‌آوری، مرفه از حیث کیفیت زندگی و تأثیرگذار در سطح فراملی»، قابل تحقق خواهد بود

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Using Backcasting Approach in Developing a Roadmap for Tehran’s Vision

نویسندگان [English]

  • Parsa Arbab
  • Mohammadhassan Keshavarz Shargh
  • Mahdi Kiaee
  • Aryan Nosrati
Department of Urban Planning and Management, School of Urban Planning, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

ABSTRACT
Backcasting is a normative, target-oriented, and problem-solving approach, focusing on the desirable future vision and looking back for how to achieve it. Despite the growing global attention to backcasting and its efficiency in various fields, this approach has not been considered in urban planning and facing the complex issues and evolvements of the city in Iran. Therefore, this article uses the backcasting approach to develop a roadmap for Tehran’s vision. The presumption of this study from the desirable future vision is the same as that compiled in Tehran’s Strategic-Structural (Comprehensive) Plan. Thus, it indicates applying expert-based backcasting by stepping back from Tehran’s desirable future vision on the horizon of 2026 to the origin of the current situation in 2006. The ideals of the development perspective in the seven pillars have been scrutinized as the desirable future vision. Studying the current situation has been done by the qualitative content analysis of the document of Tehran’s Comprehensive Plan. Then, the roadmap was followed by defining key steps and targets, essentially placed in three distinct categories. Accordingly, Tehran’s desirable future vision will be realized through the pathway of three short visions, including “Tehran is aware of its existential nature with comprehensive knowledge about facilities and limitations for consolidation and modification,” “Tehran is the capacity builder for infrastructure and facility services, socially and organizationally capable, and prepared to all-round development,” and “Tehran is a prosperous and sustainable regarding cohesion and resilience, wealthy concerning the quality of life, and influential on a transnational level.”
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Backcasting is a normative, target-oriented, and problem-solving approach, focusing on the desirable future vision and looking back for how to achieve it. Despite the growing global attention to backcasting and its efficiency in various fields, this approach has not been considered in urban planning and facing the complex issues and evolvements of the city in Iran. Therefore, this article uses the backcasting approach to develop a roadmap for Tehran’s vision. There is a difference between predictive, explorative, and normative methods that seek to study probable, possible, and preferable futures. In this way, the backcasting is distinguished from other future studies approaches. Forecasting goes from the present to the future, but backcasting starts from the future and connects to the present. Hence, backcasting as a process and not a method involves identifying a preferable future with desired goals aspired by the planning client and creating milestones or decisive steps on the pathway from that desirable future vision back to the present. It is relevant when short-term directional studies and longer-term forecasts indicate that the goals and targets will not be achieved within the designated time.
 
Methodology
The backcasting approach can be classified as expert-based backcasting, participative backcasting, and interactive backcasting. Expert-based backcasting focuses on the technical analysis of future policy recommendations in a top-down process. In contrast, participative and interactive backcasting mainly emphasize defining future visioning in a bottom-up manner. After defining the desirable future vision in the first phase, the second phase is to look back to the present, study, and analyze the current situation compared to that vision. Accordingly, in the third phase, a roadmap is developed, including decisive steps and key targets providing short visions to achieve the end vision. The presumption of this study from the desirable future vision is the same as that compiled in Tehran’s Strategic-Structural (Comprehensive) Plan. Thus, it indicates applying expert-based backcasting by stepping back from Tehran’s desirable future vision on the horizon of 2026 to the origin of the current situation in 2006. The ideals of the development perspective in the seven pillars have been scrutinized as the desirable future vision. Studying the current situation under the mentioned pillars has been done by the qualitative content analysis of the document of Tehran’s Comprehensive Plan, including 11 volumes or main study areas. Then, the roadmap was followed by defining key steps and targets, essentially placed in three distinct categories.
 
Results and discussion
The seven pillars of the desirable future vision include “Iranian-Islamic originality and identity,” “intelligence, smartness, and globality,” “greenness, beauty, and vitality,” “security and resistance against crises and risks,” “structural stability and coherence,” “prosperous, well-equipped, and fair,” and “centralized with national and global functions.” According to the pillars mentioned above, studying the current situation is the result of the content analysis of the plan and the inspection of the instances included in it, which generally have a physical-spatial nature and mainly indicate the inappropriateness of the context resulted in the occurrence of widespread functional disorders in Tehran. Accordingly, the roadmap to realize Tehran’s desirable future vision has been developed based on the current situation following the framework of the seven pillars. This roadmap includes normative key steps and targets, and their number varies in the pathway of connecting the current situation to the desirable future vision in the seven pillars. It means that in achieving the desirable future vision from the current situation, the number and priority of the steps and targets could differ depending on the pillars’ nature.
 
Conclusion
Accordingly, Tehran’s desirable future vision will be realized through the pathway of three short visions, including “Tehran is aware of its existential nature with comprehensive knowledge about facilities and limitations for consolidation and modification,” “Tehran is the capacity builder for infrastructure and facility services, socially and organizationally capable, and prepared to all-round development,” and “Tehran is a prosperous and sustainable regarding cohesion and resilience, wealthy concerning the quality of life, and influential on a transnational level.” By forecasting the current situation, these visions and targets could be considered as a basis for backcasting for a constant and continuous pathway towards the gradual realization of the desirable future vision and, simultaneously, as a topic for further related research. Meanwhile, using participatory and interactive backcasting approaches in differentiating or complementing expert-based ones is a significant field for study in the future.
 
Authors’ Contribution
All authors contributed equally to the preparation of this manuscript.
 
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
 
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
 
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and constructive remarks.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Backcasting
  • Future Studies
  • Roadmap
  • Strategic Planning
  • Vision
  1. ارباب، پارسا. (1401). واکاوی علل محتوایی ناکارآمدی برنامه‌ریزی شهری بر اساس رویکرد طرح‌های جامع (مطالعه موردی: طرح جامع نوشهر). آمایش سرزمین، 14(1)، 93-61. https://doi.org/10.22059/jtcp.2021.332798.670267
  2. بهزادفر، مصطفی. (1394). طرح‌ها و برنامه‌های شهرسازی. تهران: نشر شهر.
  3. ثقفی، فاطمه؛ علی احمدی، علیرضا؛ قاضی نوری، سیدسپهر و حورعلی، منصوره. (1393). دستیابی به آینده مطلوب خدمات دولت الکترونیک ایران مبتنی بر روش پس‌نگری. فصلنامه علوم مدیریت ایران، 9(34)، 144-125.
  4. حاجیانی، ابراهیم. (1395). روش‌شناسی طراحی و تدوین الگوی مطلوب در پژوهش‌های راهبردی. راهبرد، 25(1)، 28-25.
  5. خداداد حسینی، سید حمید؛ لشکر بلوکی، مجتبی و فرخی، فاطمه. (1391). رویکردهای جایگزین طراحی استراتژی در شرایط عدم قطعیت: رویکردی تحلیلی- تطبیقی. پژوهش‌های مدیریت عمومی، 5(18)، 63-45. https://doi.org/10.22111/jmr.2013.1015
  6. دبیرخانه شورای عالی شهرسازی و معماری ایران. 1395. مقررات شهرسازی و معماری و طرح‌های توسعه و عمـران مصـوب شـورای عالی شهرسازی و معماری ایران. انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
  7. عبادی‌نژاد، مریم؛ طاهری دمنه، محسن و ذاکری، علی. (1400). پس‌نگری برای تحقق شهر هوشمند در افق ۱۴۲۰ (مطالعه موردی: شهر اصفهان). فصلنامه چشم‌انداز شهرهای آینده، 2(4)، 23-1.
  8. کاظمی، معصومه؛ قرونه، حسن؛ کاظمی، نفیسه و بابکی راد، اعظم. (1397). بررسی مفاهیم و مبانی پس‌نگری و مقایسه آن با پیش‌بینی و چشم‌انداز سازی. آینده‌پژوهی مدیریت، 29(114)، 37-16.
  9. معینی. سید معین، و زرین، شهرام. (1385). تاریخ‌نگاری 40 ساله شهرسازی تهران. شهر نگار، 36، 33-29.
  10. نصیری، محمدرضا؛ جبل عاملی، محمد سعید و علی احمدی، علیرضا. (1398). ارائه مدل جامع برنامه‌ریزی سناریویی با رویکرد پیش‌نگری. آینده‌پژوهی دفاعی، 4(12)، 37-7. https://doi.org/10.22034/dfsr.2019.36254
  11. نهاد مطالعه و تهیه طرح‌های توسعه شهری تهران. (1386). سند اصلی طرح ساختاری- راهبردی (جامع) تهران. شورای عالی شهرسازی و معماری ایران.
  12. هادی زنوز، بهروز. (1395). ارزیابی تحقق‌پذیری طرح‌های شهری در تهران. هفت شهر، 4(53-54)، 35-8.
  13. Abou Jaoude, G., Mumm, O., & Carlow, V. M. (2022). An overview of scenario approaches: a guide for urban design and planning. Journal of Planning Literature37(3), 467-487. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122221083546
  14. Aoki, K., Kishita, Y., Nakamura, H., & Masuda, T. (2020). The use of backcasting to promote urban transformation to sustainability: The case of Toyama City, Japan. In: Saito, O., Subramanian, S., Hashimoto, S., Takeuchi, K. (Eds.) Managing Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes for Sustainable Communities in Asia. (pp. 45-66). Science for Sustainable Societies. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1133-2_4
  15. Arbab, P. (2022). Exploring the substantial reasons for the inefficiency of urban planning based on comprehensive plans approach (Case study: Nowshahr’s Comprehensive Plan). Town and Country Planning14(1), 61-93. https://doi.org/10.22059/jtcp.2021.332798.670267 [in Persian]
  16. Behzadfar, M. (2014). Plans and Programs in Urban Development. Shahr Press. [in Persian]
  17. Bibri, S. E. (2018). Backcasting in futures studies: A synthesized scholarly and planning approach to strategic smart sustainable city development. European Journal of Futures Research6, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-018-0142-z
  18. Bibri, S. E. (2020). A methodological framework for futures studies: integrating normative backcasting approaches and descriptive case study design for strategic data-driven smart sustainable city planning. Energy Informatics3, 1-42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42162-020-00133-5
  19. Bibri, S. E., & Krogstie, J. (2019). A scholarly backcasting approach to a novel model for smart sustainable cities of the future: Strategic problem orientation. City. Territory and Architecture6, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-019-0102-3
  20. Damsø, T., Christensen, T. B., & Kjær, T. (2014). Back to the Future: A backcasting based approach to planning for an energy system transition in the Danish region of Zealand. The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies13(2), 12-23.
  21. Dreborg, K. H. (1996). Essence of backcasting. Futures, 28(9), 813-828. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(96)00044-4
  22. Eames, M., Dixon, T., May, T., & Hunt, M. (2013). City futures: Exploring urban retrofit and sustainable transitions. Building Research & Information41(5), 504-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2013.805063
  23. Ebadinejad, M, Taheri Demneh, M, & Zackery, A. (2022). Backcasting for the smart city in horizon 1420 Case study: Isfahan city. Journal of Future Cities Vision, 2 (4),1-23. [in Persian]
  24. González-González, E., Cordera, R., Stead, D., & Nogués, S. (2023). Envisioning the driverless city using backcasting and Q-methodology. Cities133, 104159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104159
  25. Hadi Zonooz, B. (2016). Assessment of Implantation of Urban Plans in Tehran. HAFTSHAHR4(53-54), 8-35. [in Persian]
  26. Hajiani, E. (2016). Strategic research methodology to design and develop the desired pattern. Strategy25(1), 5-28. [in Persian]
  27. Hines, A., Schutte, J., & Romero. M. (2019). Transition scenarios via backcasting. Journal of Futures Studies24(1), 1-14.
  28. Höjer, M., & Mattsson, L. G. (2000). Determinism and backcasting in future studies. Futures32(7), 613-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(00)00012-4
  29. Holmberg, J., & Robèrt, K. H. (2000). Backcasting—A framework for strategic planning. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology7(4), 291-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500009470049
  30. Kazemi, M., Ghoroneh, H., Kazemi, N., & Babakiraad, A. (2018). Studying the concepts and basics of backcasting and comparing it with forecasting and visioning. Future study Management29(114), 16-37. [in Persian]
  31. Khodadad Hosseini, S. H., Lashkarbolouki, M., & Farrokhi, F. (2013). Alternative approaches for strategy designing in uncertain conditions: An analytical-comparative approach. Public Management Researches, 5(18), 45-63. https://doi.org/10.22111/jmr.2013.1015 [in Persian]
  32. Moeini, S. M., & Zarrin, S. (2006). 40 Years history of Tehran’s urban planning. SHAHRNEGAR, 36, 29-33. [in Persian]
  33. Nasiri, M. R., Jabalameli, M. S., & Aliahmadi, A. (2019). The comprehensive scenario planning model with a forecasting approach. Defensive Future Studies4(12), 7-37. [in Persian] https://doi.org/10.22034/dfsr.2019.36254
  34. Neuvonen, A., & Ache, P. (2017). Metropolitan vision making–using backcasting as a strategic learning process to shape metropolitan futures. Futures86, 73-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.10.003
  35. Norton, R. K. (2008). Using content analysis to evaluate local master plans and zoning codes. Land Use Policy, 25(3), 432-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.10.006
  36. Quist, J., & Vergragt, P. (2006). Past and future of backcasting: The shift to stakeholder participation and a proposal for a methodological framework. Futures38(9), 1027-1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2006.02.010
  37. Robinson, J. (2003). Future subjunctive: Backcasting as social learning. Futures, 35(8), 839-856. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(03)00039-9
  38. Robinson, J. B. (1982). Energy backcasting: A proposed method of policy analysis. Energy Policy, 10(4), 337-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(82)90048-9
  39. Robinson, J. B. (1990). Futures under glass: A recipe for people who hate to predict. Futures, 22(8), 820-842. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(90)90018-D
  40. Saghafi, F., Aliahmadi, A., Ghazinoori, S. S., & Hourali, M. (2014). Achieving the desired future e-government services of Iran based on the backcasting. Iranian Journal of Management Sciences9(34), 125-144. [in Persian]
  41. Sandström, C., Kanyama, A. C., Räty, R., Sonnek, K. M., Nordström, E. M., Mossing, A., & Nordin, A. (2020). Policy goals and instruments for achieving a desirable future forest: Experiences from backcasting with stakeholders in Sweden. Forest Policy and Economics, 111, 102051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102051
  42. Secretariat of Iran’s Supreme Council for Planning and Architecture. (2016). Urban planning and architecture regulations and development and construction plans approved by Iran’s Supreme Council for Planning and Architecture. University of Tehran Press. [in Persian]
  43. Tehran’s Institution of Studies and Preparation of Urban Development Plans. (2007). Main Document of Tehran's Strategic-structural (Comprehensive) Plan. Iran’s Supreme Council for Planning and Architecture. [in Persian]
  44. Timilsina, R. R., Nakagawa, Y., & Kotani, K. (2020). Exploring the possibility of linking and incorporating future design in backcasting and scenario planning. Sustainability, 12(23), 9907. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239907
  45. Vergragt, P. J., & Quist, J. (2011). Backcasting for sustainability: Introduction to the special issue. Technological Forecasting and Social Change78(5), 747-755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.010
  46. Zaleckis, K., Grazuleviciute Vileniske, I., Vitkuviene, J., Tranaviciutė, B., Dogan, H. A., Sinkiene, J., & Grunskis, T. (2019). Integrating content analysis into urban research: Compatibility with sociotope method and multimodal graph. SAGE Open, 9(1), 2158244019840115. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019840115
  47. Zammit, A. (2017). Unlocking policy documents: Policy analysis in urban design. In: Carmona, M. (Ed.) Explorations in Urban Design: An urban design research primer (pp. 137-148). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315581606