ضرباهنگ کاوی مصرف فضا در فضاهای مرکز شهر مطالعه موردی: سبزه‌میدان زنجان

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی - کاربردی

نویسنده

گروه جغرافیا دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران.

10.22059/jurbangeo.2024.370077.1899

چکیده

ضرباهنگ کاوی روشی ریتمیک برای شناخت نوع و الگوهای مصرف فضا در مقیاس زمانی و مکانی است. هدف پژوهش حاضر شناخت تجربه زیست روزمره افراد در فضاهای عمومی مرکز شهر زنجان و تبیین الگوی رفتاری آن‌ها در فضاهای مزبور است. این پژوهش به شیوه کیفی و ماهیت استقرایی - تفسیری، باهدف ضرباهنگ کاوی فضاهای تجدید حیات شده مرکز شهر زنجان پرداخته است. شیوه گردآوری داده‌ها با استفاده از روش مشاهده، پایش مستمر و مصاحبه‌های دوستانه است. مقیاس زمانی پژوهش ماه‌های شهریور و مهر، روزهای اول، میان و آخر هفته (شنبه، سه‌شنبه و پنج‌شنبه) و ساعت 8 تا 10، 11 تا 13 و 17 تا 19 و مقیاس مکانی دربرگیرنده سه سکانس و 6 ایستگاه مکانی است. داده‌های جمع‌آوری‌شده به روش کیفی تفسیری تحلیل و نتایج آن به‌صورت گزارش تفسیری، جداول کیفی و مدل پراکنش راداری انجام پذیرفت. متغیرهای پژوهش شامل تراکم، قشربندی، مورفولوژی، مجاورت، گستردگی، برجستگی، تداوم، توالی، سرعت، تکرار، حرکت، همگام‌سازی است. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد علی‌رغم اتصال پیوسته مجموعه سبزه‌میدان زنجان، ضرباهنگ فضا متفاوت از هم بوده و متناسب با قشربندی اجتماعی افراد تغییر می‌یابد. تمرکز زمانی رفتارهای اختیاری - اجتماعی در بازه زمانی عصرگاهی و رفتارهای اجباری - ضروری در بازه زمانی صبح است. در فضاهای سنتی و هویتی ضرباهنگ مکانی و زمانی عمدتاً مردانه، تکرارپذیر، مداوم منظم و رادار رفتارهای اجتماعی - اختیاری با گرایش به پیرامون آن دارای الگوی رفتاری نسبتاً پایدار روزانه و هفتگی است

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Rhythm Analysis of the Use of Space in the Public Spaces of the City Center the Case Study of Zanjan Sabzehmeydan

نویسنده [English]

  • esmaeil Daviran
Department of Geography Education, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

ABSTRACT
The research aims to know the daily life experience of people in the public spaces of the center and to explain their behavioral patterns in the said spaces. This research is qualitative and inductive-interpretative, to explore the rhythm of revitalized spaces with the example of Zanjan Square Green. The method of data collection is observation, continuous monitoring, and friendly interviews. The time scale of the research is the months of Shahrivar and Mehr, the first, middle, and weekend days (Saturday, Tuesday, and Thursday) and 8 to 10, 11 to 13, and 17 to 19, and the spatial scale includes three sequences and 6 local stations. The collected data were analyzed using the interpretive qualitative method, and the results were analyzed in the form of an interpretive report, qualitative tables, and a radar dispersion model. Research variables include density, stratification, morphology, proximity, extent, prominence, continuity, sequence, speed, repetition, movement, and synchronization. The findings show that despite the continuous connection of the Sabzehmeydan complex, the rhythm of the space is different and changes according to the social stratification of people. The temporal concentration of voluntary-social behaviors is in the evening, and mandatory-necessary behaviors are in the morning. In traditional and identity spaces, the spatial and temporal rhythm is mostly masculine, repeatable, continuous, and regular, and the radar of social-voluntary behaviors with a tendency towards its surroundings has a relatively stable daily and weekly behavioral pattern
Extended Abstract
Introduction
The investigation of the rhythmic effect of the use of urban public spaces is called the "exploratory rhythm." The "exploratory rhythm" is a term whose roots in urban space literature go back to Henri Lefebvre. Rhythm mining is a method to explain the pattern of movement, periodicity, permanence, cause, repeatability, and continuity in both linear and cyclic types that shows the lived experience of people in different spaces. Investigating the temporal and spatial rhythms of revitalized spaces in the context of the central texture of the city is essential because by explaining the rhythm of movement, pause, and stop in the context of the main elements of geography (time, space, and human activity), the way of production and consumption of space is mined and used its results in urban planning and management. The main research questions are:
- What is the rhythm of production and consumption in different spaces and sequences of Zanjan Square Green complex at different times and places?
-The production and consumption of space according to stratification is a function of which behavior pattern?
 
Methodology
The current research is qualitative with an inductive-interpretive nature based on the rhythm mining method. The data collection method was based on observation and non-tangible case interviews. The community under study is the beneficiaries (users) of the public space of the large complex of Sabzehmeydan, which includes about 200 cases according to time and place, which are based on targeted sampling based on various social levels (children, teenagers, youths, elderly, middle-aged and retailers). The timing of harvesting is on the first days of the week (Saturday), mid-week (Tuesday), and weekend (Thursday) leading to August to October 2023, which are in the morning (8-10), noon (11-13) and afternoon (17 to 19) necessary data was collected and documented. After collecting the data, the analysis was done by including the factor variables of time, place, activity, and behavioral characteristics. Based on the extent and difference of the studied spaces, the studied area is divided into several spatial sequences with the coordinates of the old space, the middle new open space, and the stepped space, and with the definition of 6 moving point stations, the field survey is carried out through continuous observation and case interviews. According to the spatial context of the collection, the observation pattern was vertically open, horizontally open, and horizontally closed. Because the investigated variables exist in rhythmic research, such as Habibi, Kurdestani, Barzegar, Jamshidi, Baghban, Doiran, Rikli, Burch, and Marko, the validity of the research is confirmed. However, to localize and strengthen the validity of the investigated variables, about 40 experts in related fields such as geography, social sciences, history, urban planning, psychology, and other urban experts were sent, and they were asked to assign coefficients of 1 to the variables (the least important) and 9 (the most important). The results of the data analysis obtained in the 25 responses show that the average coefficient obtained for different indicators is 7.60, which is a suitable coefficient for the validity of the variables.
 
Results and discussion
Space consumption in Zanjan Sabzehmeydan complex focuses on young people, teenagers, and the elderly; differences in the morphology of space design lead to differences in the rhythm of space consumption. The focus of the radar shows that the mass consumption of space is focused on the weekend days. The behavioral pattern of activities in the morning is linear and focused on compulsory-necessary activities. The behavior pattern of the space in the mid-afternoon and evening hours is focused on voluntary social activities. The rhythm of the behavioral pattern of the space in traditional and identity spaces (Old Sabzehmeydan) with the spatial division based on the stratification of the elderly and retailers until sunset is based on social-optional activity, and after that, it is a necessary and mandatory activity. The rhythm of space consumption in the identity-traditional places of the city center has a regular and stable daily and weekly pattern; the rhythm of space consumption in the new public spaces of the city center does not have a regular and stable daily and weekly pattern and is currently focused on weekends. The rhythm of the mandatory-necessary behavior pattern is linear, and the social-optional behavior pattern is dotted, wide, and rotating.
 
Conclusion
Various and different rhythms are formed according to the way of designing the space, location, history, and identity of the space, each of which requires the purposeful action of urban planning. This research showed that different rhythms in space and time create different ways of using space, which have different behavioral and living patterns despite being in an integrated spatial system. The pattern of behavior that suits the stratification of users, the type of morphology of design, the extent of space, speed, movement, sequence and continuity, repetition, etc., has rhythmic variety and shapes the spatial organization of daily life.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
 We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Open Space
  • Behavior
  • Rhythm
  • Zanjan
  1. احمدی، حسن؛ حق بیان، رسول و نبی‌زاده، مازیار. (1399). بررسی الگوهای رفتاری استفاده‌کنندگان فضای شهری جهت پایداری اجتماعی محیط (مطالعه موردی: محور تجاری محله ساغریسازان شهر رشت). مطالعات برنامه‌ریزی سکونتگاه‌های انسانی، 15(2). 560-545. Doi: 20.1001.1.25385968.1399.15.2.12.0
  2. اعظمی، زهرا؛ ندیمی، حمید و عزیزی، شادی. (1401). جستاری در وجوه مفهوم ضرباهنگ و چگونگی تجلی آن‌ها در معماری (نمونه موردی: مجتمع آموزشی دخترانه تزکیه. دو فصلنامه فضای زیست. 1(2)، 26-1.  Doi:10.22034/ias.2021.293251.1648
  3. باغبان مشیری، نیلوفر؛ کاظمی، عباس؛ ربیعی، کامران و احمدی‌پور، زهرا. (1401). تولید فضا و ضرباهنگ کاوی فضای شهری تهران: رهیافت هانری لوفور. جامعه پژوهی فرهنگی، 13(3)، 27-56.Doi:10.30465/scs.2022.41389.2568
  4. برزگر، سپیده و حبیبی، میترا. (1399). کاوش ضرباهنگ زندگی روزانه در ساماندهی مصرف فضای شهری (مورد پژوهی: پیاده راه شهر رشت). دانش شهرسازی، 4(1)، 71-49. https://doi.org/10.22124/upk.2020.15758.1404
  5. برغمدی، مجتبی و مشکینی، ابوالفضل. (1400). انسان، محوری‌ترین وجه افتراق مفاهیم مکان - فضا باتوجه‌به آرای هایدگر و لوفور. برنامه‌ریزی و آمایش فضا، ۲۵ (۲)، ۱۲۰-۸۹. https//doi.org/ 20.1001.1.16059689.1400.25.2.5.2
  6. ترکمه، آیدین. (1393). درآمدی بر «ضرب‌آهنگ کاوی فضا، زمان و زندگی روزمره» هانری لوفور. نمایه نقد اقتصاد سیاسی.
  7. جمشیدی، مژده و حبیبی، میترا. (1399). تحلیل ضرباهنگ کنش‌های مغایر با گفتمان رسمی و خوانش فضای عمومی شهری. نشریه هنرهای زیبا (معماری و شهرسازی)، 25(2)، 56-43. https://doi.org/ 10.22059/jfaup.2021.316800.672570
  8. جهانزاد، نریمان. (1402). آنری لوفور در مقام فیلسوف؛ مقاله دوم: نظریه تولید فضا. فصلنامه فضا و دیالکتیک، 25، 38-1.
  9. حبیبی، میترا و برزگر، سپیده. (1397). معیارهای ضرب‌آهنگ کاوی زندگی روزانه در تولید اجتماعی فضای شهری با تکیه‌بر تجارب پژوهشی. فصلنامه صفه، 28(2)، 47-64. https://doi.org/10.22124/upk.2020.15758.1404
  10. حبیبی، میترا و محمودی کردستانی، پیام. (1401) بررسی تجربه زیسته شهروندان در فضای شهری؛ نمونه موردی: پیاده راه فردوسی شهر سنندج. فصلنامه مطالعات طراحی شهری و پژوهش‌های شهری،4(5)، 14-1.
  11. دویران، اسماعیل. (1402). ضرباهنگ کاوی قرارگاه‌های رفتاری در بوستان‌های شهری (نمونه موردی بوستان ابن‌سینا و بهارستان زنجان). فصلنامه مطالعات شهری، 12(48)، 28-17.doi: 10.34785/J011.2022.024
  12. ستاری، سهند. (1394). دیالکتیک سه‌گانه تولید فضای هانری لوفور. فلسفه تحلیلی (جستارهای فلسفی -پژوهش‌های فلسفی)، 11(28)، 114-85.
  13. فرمهینی فراهانی، بهزاد و صرافی، مظفر. (1400). نقش طرح‌واره‌های ذهنی در تولید فضا (نقد سه‌گانه فضایی لوفور از منظر مکتب ویگوتسکی‌ای‌ای شناخت). معماری و شهرسازی ایران، 12(1)، 5-25. doi: 10.30475/isau.2020.223709.1376
  14. Ahmadi, H., haghbayan, R., & Nabizadeh, M. (2020). The Investigating of Behavioral Patterns of Urban Space Users in the Social Sustainability of the Environment (Case Study: Business Axis of Sagharizan Neighborhood in Rasht). Journal of Studies of Human Settlements Planning, 15(2), 545-560. Doi: 20.1001.1.25385968.1399.15.2.12.0 [in Persian].
  15. Altman, I., & Werner, M. (eds). (2001). Home Environments (Vol. 8). New York: Plenum Press.
  16. Azami, Z., Nadimi, H., & Azizi, S. (2022). A Search for Aspects of Concept of Rhythm and Their Manifestation in Architecture (Case study: Tazkieh (2) Girls' Educational Complex). Life Space Journal, 2(1), 1-26. Doi:10.22034/ias.2021.293251.1648 [in Persian].
  17. Baghban Moshiri, N., Kazemi, A., Rabiei, K., & Ahmadipour, Z. (2022). Production of Space and Rhythmanalysis of Urban Space in Tehran: Henri Lefebvre Approach. Sociological Cultural Studies, 13(3), 25-56. Doi:10.30465/scs.2022.41389.2568 [in Persian].
  18. Barghamadi, M & Meshkini, A. (2021). Man, the most central aspect of the differentiation of spacespace concepts according to Heidegger and Lefebvre. Planning and preparation of space. 25 (2), 89-121. https//doi.org/ 20.1001.1.16059689.1400.25.2.5.2 [inPersian].
  19. Barker, C., & Jane, e. (2016). cultural stadies. Theory and Practice(5th). SAGE Publications Ltd.
  20. Barzegar, S & Habibi, M. (2020). Exploring the rhythm of daily life in organizing the use of urban space (case study: Rasht city sidewalk). Knowledge of Urbanization, 4(1), 49-71. https://doi.org/10.22124/upk.2020.15758.1404 [in Persian].
  21.  Bodnar, J. (2015). Reclaiming public space. Urban Studies, 52(12), 2090–2104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015583626
  22. Borch, Ch., Hansen, K., & Lange, A. (2015). Markets, bodies and rhythms: A rhythmanalysis of financial markets from open-outcry trading to highfrequency trading. Society and Space, 33 (6), 1080-1097. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775815600444
  23. Brighenti, A., & Kärrholm, M. (2018). Beyond Rhythmanalysis: Towards a Territoriology of Rhythms and Melodies in Everyday Spatial Activities. City, Territory and Architecture, 5(4),1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-018-0080-x
  24. Carr, A. (2017). The Quick and the Dead: Temporality, Temporal Structure, and the Architectural Chronotope. Architectural Research Quarterly, 21(2), 94-112.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135517000409
  25. daviran, E. (2023). Examining the rhythm of behavioral hangouts in urban parks (Case study: Baharestan and Ibn Sina Zanjan Gardens). Motaleate Shahri, 12(48), 17-28. doi: 10.34785/J011.2022.024 [in Persian].
  26. Elden, S. (2004). Between Marx and Heidegger: Politics, Philosophy and Lefebvre’s The Production of Space. Antipode, 36(1), 86-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2004.00383.x
  27. Farmahini Farahani, B & Sarrafi, M. (2021). The Role of Mental Schemata in Production of Space (Criticism of Lefebvre's Spatial Triad from the Perspective of Vygotskian School of Cognitive Psychology). Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism(JIAU), 12(1), 5-21. [in Persian]. doi: 10.30475/isau.2020.223709.1376
  28. Gehl, J. (1987). Life between Building: Using Public Space. Translated by Koch, J. (1th Ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  29. Habibi, M& Barzegar, S. (2017). The beat criteria of mining daily life in the social production of urban space based on research experiences. Sofe, 28(2), 47-64. https://doi.org/10.22124/upk.2020.15758.1404 [in Persian].
  30. Habibi, M., & Mahmoudi Kurdestani, P. (2023) investigating the lived experience of citizens in the urban space; Case example: Ferdowsi footpath in Sanandaj city. Quarterly Journal of Urban Design Studies and Urban Research, 4(5), 1-14 [in Persian].
  31. Henriques, J., Tiainen, M., & Väliaho, P. (2014). Rhythm Returns: Movement and Cultural Theory. Body & Society, 20(3–4), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X14547393
  32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468797617717637
  33. Jahanzad, N. (2023). Henri Lefebvre as a philosopher; The second article: The theory of space production. Space and dialectics quarterly. 25, 38-1 [in Persian].
  34. Jamshidi, M., & habibi, M. (2020). Analyzing the rhythm of Contradictory practice to the formal discourse & reading urban public space. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Memary Va Shahrsazi, 25(2), 43-56. https://doi.org/ 10.22059/jfaup.2021.316800.672570 [in Persian].
  35. Judson, D. (2011). Beyond Space? Exploring the Temporality of Architecture. Master’s Thesis. Department of Architecture, Carleton University. https://doi.org/10.22215/etd/2011-09380
  36. Kinkaid, E. (2020). Re-encountering Lefebvre: Toward a critical phenomenology of social space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 38(1), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775819854765
  37. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith, Blachwell, p.
  38. Lefebvre, H. (2002). Critique of Everyday Life. Vol. II, Translated by: John Moore,London. New York: Verso.
  39. Lefebvre, H. (2004). Rhythmanalysis: Time, Space and Everyday Life. Translated by: Stuart Elden & Gerald Moore, London. New York: Continuum.
  40. Lefebvre, H. (2013). Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time, and Everyday Life. London: Continuum.Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
  41. Lefebvre, H. (2016). The Production of Space. (Translated From English to Persian by M.Abdollahzadeh). Tehran: Markaz-e Motale’at va Barnamerizi-e Shahr-e Tehran. (Original work published 1974).
  42. Marcu, S. (2017).Tears of time: A Lefebvrian rhythmanalysis approach to explore the mobility experiences of young Eastern Europeans in Spain. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, doi:10.1111/tran.12174/full
  43. Massy, D (1984). Spatial division of labour. 1 edition, Macmillan, London.
  44. Mehta, V. (2014). Evaluating Public Space. Journal of Urban Design, 19(1), 53–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.854698
  45. Michon, P. (2020). Could Rhythm Become a New Scientific Paradigm for the Humanities? In rhythm and Critique: Technics, Modalities, Practices. London & New York:Routledge.
  46. Rickly, Jilian M. (2017). They all have a different vibe”: A rhythmanalysis of climbing mobilities and the Red River Gorge as a place. Tourist Studies, 17(3), 1-22.
  47. Sagan, H. (2015). Specters of ’68: Protest, Policing, and Urban Space. University of California, Berkeley.
  48. Sattari,S. (2016). Henri Lefebvre’s Three Dimensional Dialectic of Production of Space. Analytic philosophy, 12(28), 85-114 [in Persian].
  49. Schmid, Ch. (2008). Henri Lefebvre’s theory of the production of space: Towards a three-dimensional dialectic. In: Kipfer S, Goonewardena K, Schmid C, et al. 1st Edition, Routledge.
  50. Shakibamanesh, Amir & Ghorbanian, Mahshid. (2017). Toward Time-based Design: Creatingan Applied Time Evaluation Checklist for Urban Design Research. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 6(3), 290-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2017.05.004
  51. Turkmeh, A. (2013). An introduction to Henri Lefebvre's "exploring rhythm of space, time and everyday life". Criticism profile of political economy. [in Persian].
  52. Wunderlich, F. M. (2008). Symphonies of Urban Places: Urban Rhythms as Traces of Time in Space. A Study of ‘Urban Rhythms.’ Koht Ja Paik / Place and Location Studies in Environmental Aesthetics and Semiotics VI. 91-111.