رفتار سنجی شهروندان تهرانی برای مشارکت در انجام کشاورزی شهری مطالعه موردی: منطقه 22 شهر تهران

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی - کاربردی

نویسندگان

گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

10.22059/jurbangeo.2023.343169.1699

چکیده

امروزه منابع تأمین‌کننده غذای بشر توسط عوامل گوناگونی از قبیل کاهش زمین‌های قابل کشت و حاصلخیز در مقیاس محلی، وابستگی روزافزون به سوخت‌های فسیلی برای تولید، فرآوری و حمل‌ونقل مواد غذایی در مقیاس جهانی مورد تهدید قرارگرفته است. بازاندیشی در روند تولید به مصرف و خودکفایی در رفع نیازهای شهری ازجمله راه‌حل‌هایی است که در قالب نوع جدیدی از کشاورزی به‌نام کشاورزی شهری ظهور می‌یابد. هدف از این مطالعه بررسی مشارکت و عوامل تأثیرگذار بر آن در جهت توسعه کشاورزی شهری در شهر تهران بود. این پژوهش از نوع توصیفی ـ همبستگی بود و به روش پیمایشی انجام‌شده است. برای جمع‌آوری داده‌ها از پرسشنامه محقق ساخته استفاده شد. گروهی از کارشناسان شهرداری تهران و تعدادی از اعضای هیئت‌علمی ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی روایی پرسشنامه را تأیید کردند. ضریب پایایی برای بخش‌های گوناگون پرسشنامه با انجام آزمون پیشاهنگی محاسبه و مقدار قابل‌قبول به دست آمد. بر اساس یافته‌های تحقیق، میانگین همه متغیرها به‌جز هنجار ذهنی بالاتر از حد متوسط می‌باشد. نتایج همبستگی بین متغیرها حاکی از آن است که بین همه متغیرها با رفتار شهروندان برای انجام کشاورزی شهری رابطه مثبت و معنی‌داری وجود دارد. از میان متغیرهای بررسی‌شده، کنترل رفتار ادراک‌شده دارای بیشترین همبستگی و اثر علی کل، و بعدازآن تمایل دارای بیشترین اثر علی کل بر رفتار شهروندان برای مشارکت در کشاورزی شهری می‌باشد. با توجه به نتایج تحقیق، پیشنهادهایی کاربردی در راستای ترویج و توسعه کشاورزی شهری در شهر تهران ارائه شد است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Behavior assessment of Tehran citizens to participate in urban agriculture the Case of District 22 of Tehran city

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sedighehsadat Hosseinimofrad
  • Enayat Abbasi
  • Hassan Sadighi
Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

A B S T R A C T
Today, human food supply sources are threatened by various factors, such as the reduction of arable and fertile land on a local scale, the increasing dependence on fossil fuels for the production, processing and transportation of food on a global scale. Rethinking the process of production to consumption and self-sufficiency in meeting urban needs are among the solutions that emerge in the form of a new type of agriculture called urban agriculture. This research aimed to investigate the participation and factors affecting it for developing urban agriculture in Tehran city. The research was descriptive and correlational which was conducted through a survey method. Questionnaire was the main tool for data gathering which was validated using some agricultural extension and education experts’ points of view. Cronbach's alpha for different parts of the questionnaire was calculaed and were acceptable. According to the findings, all the variables, except the subjective norm, have an average more than moderate. The results of the correlation between the variables indicate that there is a positive and significant relationship between all variables and citizens’ behavior to participate in urban agriculture. According to the findings, among the studied variables, perceived behavioral control has the highest correlation and total causal effect, and then the intention has the highest total causal effect on citizens' behavior to participate in urban agriculture. According to the results, practical suggestions have been presented for extension and development of urban agriculture in Tehran city
Extended Abstarct
Introduction
With its relatively large geographical area and high population, Tehran faces challenges that require complete and comprehensive planning for development and management of the city.
Air and noise pollution, land use changes and unauthorized construction, structural challenges and wrong policies in the field of urban land transfer, increasing the amount of runoff from municipal waste and increasing the volume of municipal wastewater has endangered the health and quality of life of citizens in this metropolis. In order to provide a suitable solution to face the problems created in Tehran, the idea of urban agriculture as a suitable and sustainable strategy, can be used in various economic, environmental and social fields. Urban agriculture in general is the production of edible and non-edible plants and horticultural and livestock products in the city and its suburbs. The overall goal of urban agriculture is to respect the potential for healthy living and nature in the city, and to achieve this goal, three goals are pursued: improving and protecting the ecological structure of the land, recreating social participation, and the urban economy.
District 22 is known as one of the 22 districts as a tourism hub and area of sustainable urban development and has been selected as a pilot area for urban agriculture due to its open spaces and numerous forest parks. Then, this research aimed to investigate the participation and factors affecting it for developing urban agriculture in this district.
 
 Methodology
This descriptive and correlational research was conducted through a survey method. The statistical population consisted of all citizens in district 22 of Tehran Municipality (N~ 560000). Using the Krejcie and Morgan’s table and simple random sampling method 384 people were selected as sample (n = 384) and finally 300 questionnaires were collected and analyzed. Questionnaire was the main tool for data gathering, which was validated using some agricultural extension and education experts’ points of view. Cronbach's alpha for different sections of the questionnaire was calculated between 0.84 and 0.92. Behavior, intention, attitude, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control are the main components of the questionnaire which have been measured based on the Ajzen’s theory of planned behavior. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS software version 26. The statistics used in the descriptive statistics section are: central dispersion index (mean, frequency, percentage, minimum and maximum) and dispersion indices (standard deviation and coefficient of variation). In the inferential statistics section, according to the type of the data, Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients and in order to investigate the direct and indirect effects of the studied independent variables on the dependent variable, path analysis technique was used.
 
 Results and discussion
Regarding the level of familiarity with urban agriculture, about 17% of citizens stated that they are familiar and 83% stated that they are not familiar with this type of agriculture. Comparison of information sources of familiarity with urban agriculture indicates that from viewpoints of the first group familiarity with people who had experience in urban agriculture and watching TV programs mentioned as the first and second priorities of their familiarity with this type of agriculture. The second group mentioned watching TV and questions from those who have experience in this type of agriculture as their sources of information for familiarity with urban agriculture.
The mean of the main variables (behavior, intention, attitude, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control) indicates that except for subjective norms, all other variables have a mean more the average (3). The results showed that there were positive and significant relationship between all main variables. According to the findings, among the studied variables, perceived behavioral control has the highest correlation and total causal effect, and then the intention has the highest total causal effect on citizens' behavior to participate in urban agriculture.
 
 Conclusion
Despite the role of attitude and perceived behavioral control, the role of citizens' subjective norms in motivating them to engage in urban agriculture is low evaluated. This means that the role of both citizen’s past experiences and those around them in motivating them to engage in urban agriculture are small. The perceived behavior control variable has the greatest causal effect on the citizens' motivation to participate in urban agriculture. According to the Ajzen's theory of planned behavior perceived behavioral control consists of three sub-components: self-efficacy, facilitation and access to resources. In fact, citizens decide on the actual behavior according to their abilities and self-reliance, as well as the available conditions and available facilities. According to the information obtained from the study area, it is suggested that in order to develop urban agriculture in District 22 and to stimulate the intention of the citizens to participate in doing urban agriculture, the conditions for access to facilities and resources should be provided.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Food Security
  • Urban Environment Management
  • Intention to Urban Agriculture
  • Behavioural Assessment
  1. حسینی‌مفرد، صدیقه‌السادات. (1400). امکان‌سنجی توسعه و سنجش تمایل شهروندان به مشارکت در انجام کشاورزی شهری در شهر تهران. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.
  2. شهرداری منطقه 22. (1401). پورتال شهرداری منطقه 22 قابل‌دسترسی در: Available at: https://region22.tehran.ir/Default.aspx?tabid=835.
  3. شرقی، علی؛ مهدی‌نژاد، جمال‌الدین و مولایی، مرضیه. (1395 ، کشاورزی در منظر شهری با رویکرد توسعه و شناخت چالش‌های آن. هفت شهر، 4(55 و 56)، 118 ـ 124.
  4. شرقی، علی؛ رزاقی‌اصل، سینا و جمال گندمانی، زهرا. (1400). کشاورزی شهری، راهبردی برای پایداری شهرهای آینده. ششمین همایش ملی معماری و شهر پایدار، دانشکده مهندسی معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه شهید رجایی، اسفند 1400.
  5. عباسی، عنایت؛ باسامی، احمد و کابلی، نرجس. (1392). بررسی تمایل شهروندان به مشارکت در فعالیت‌های حفاظت و توسعه فضای سبز شهر تهران. نشریه محیط‌زیست طبیعی، 66 (4)، 410-399.
  6. مثنوی، محمدرضا؛ بانگیان، حسین؛ صرامی، جلال و راه‌ساز، امیر. (1391). کشاورزی شهری راه‌کاری محیطی برای حفظ و احیاء ساختار اکولوژیک شهر. دومین کنفرانس برنامه‌ریزی و مدیریت محیط‌زیست، تهران، دانشگاه تهران.
  7. مشکینی، ابوالفضل؛ برهانی، کاظم و شعبان‌زاده نمینی، رضا. (1392). تحلیل فضایی سنجش پایداری اجتماعی شهری (موردمطالعه: مناطق 22 گانه شهر تهران). نشریه جغرافیا، 11 (39)، 211-186.
  8. Abbasi, E., Basami, A., & Kaboli, N. (2014). Investigating the willingness of citizens to participate in green space protection and development activities in Tehran. Journal of Natural Environment, 66 (4), 399-410. [In Persian].
  9. Ajzen, I. (2002). Constructing a TpB Questionnaire: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations.
  10. Babakhani, R., & Shahbazi, M. (2017). Investigating the effectiveness of urban agriculture in reviving the quality of defenseless spaces in Tehran based on the concept of knowledge-based landscape. The First National Conference on Knowledge-based Architecture and Urbanism, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian].
  11. Behbahanimotlagh, M., Sharifzadeh, A., & Sardar, F. (2013). Urban agriculture: a context for business development and entrepreneurship. The first national conference on policies towards sustainable development (agriculture, natural resources and environment). Tehran, March 2013. [In Persian].
  12. Diekmann, L. O., Gray, L. C., & Thai, C. L. (2020). More than food: The social benefits of localized urban food systems. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4, 1-15.
  13. District 22 Municipality. 2022. [In Persian]. Available at: https://region22.tehran.ir/Default.aspx?tabid=835.
  14. Doreen, T., & Dominic, M. (2010). Urban Farming, Its Relevance, Sustainability and Policy Implications: A Case Study of Gweru and Masvingo Urban Areas. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 12(3), 361-372.
  15. Faleyimu, O.I. (2014). Public Perceptions of Urban Forests in Okitipupa Nigeria: Implication for Environmental Conservation global. Journal of Science Frontier Research: Agriculture and Veterinary, 14(1), 1-12.
  16. FAO. (2007). Profitability and Sustainability of Urban and Peri-Urban Agriculture. Agricultural Management, Marketing and Finance Occasional Paper. Rome.
  17. Firoozpour, A., Marzban, E., & Pourezzat, A.A. (2021). Alternative future images of Tehran: scenario-based analysis. The Journal of Future Studies Strategic Thinking and Policy, 23(2), 201-225.
  18. Golden, S. (2013). Urban Agriculture Impacts: Social, Health, and Economic: A literature Review. UC Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program, Agricultural Sustainability Institute at UC Davis. University of California.
  19. Hosseinimofrad, S.S. (2021). Feasibility Study of Tehran Urban Agricultural Development and Measuring Citizens' Willingness to Participate in the Process. M.Sc. Thesis, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian].
  20. Jafari, N., Mohd Yunos, M.Y., Utaberta, N., Ismail, N.A., Ismail, S., & Jafari, N. (2014). The Preference of High-Rise Buildings’ Residents toward Rooftop Garden to Promote Urban Agriculture: A Case Study of Malaysia. Advances in Environmental Biology, 9 (5), 400-403.
  21. Kanosvamhira, T. P., & Tevera, D. (2020). Urban agriculture as a source of social capital in the Cape Flats of Cape Town. African Geographical Review, 39(2), 175-187.
  22. Krasny, M. & Doyle, R. (2002). Participatory Approaches to Program Development and Engaging Youth in Research: The Case of an Intergenerational Urban Community Gardening Program. Journal of Extension, 40(5), 1-21.
  23. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
  24. Masnavi, M., Bangian, H., Sarami, J., Rahsaz, A., & Paziresh, R. (2012). Urban Agriculture, an Environmental Solution to Preserve and Restore the Ecological Structure ff the City. The 2nd Conference on Environmental Planning and Management, 15-16 May 2012, faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian].
  25. Meshkini, A., Borhani, K., & Shabanzadehnamni, R. (2014). Spatial analysis of urban social sustainability (Case of: 22 districts of Tehran). Journal of Geography, 11(39), 186-211. [In Persian].
  26. Mirtorabi, M. (2016). Designing a Strategic Model of Urban Agriculture Extension in Tehran Metropolitan Area. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Tehran. [In Persian].
  27. Park, J. (2003). Understanding consumer intention to shop online: A model comparison, dissertation presented to the faculty of the Graduate school partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy. University of Missouri- Columbia.
  28. Peng, J., Liu, Z., Liu, Y., Hu, X., & Wang, A. (2015). Multifunctionality assessment of urban agriculture in Beijing City, China. Science of the Total Environment, 537, 343-351.
  29. Petit-Boix, A., & Apul, D. (2018). From cascade to bottom-up ecosystem services model: How does social cohesion emerge from Urban Agriculture?. Sustainability, 10(4), 1-13.
  30. United Nations. (2020). United Nations Secretary-General’ Message on World Cities Day, 31 October 2020. Available at: https://iran.un.org/en/98201-some-68-cent-worlds-population-will-be-city-dwellers-2050-guterres.
  31. Zezza, A., & Tasciotti, L. (2010). Urban Agriculture, Poverty, and Food Security: Empirical Evidence from a Sample of Developing Countries. Food Policy, 35, 265–273.
  32. Zhang, Y. & Zheng, B. (2011). Assessments of Citizen Willingness to Support Urban Forestry: An Empirical Study in Alabama. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, 37(3), 118–125.
  33. Zhang, Y., Hussain, A., Deng, J., & Letson, N. (2007). Public Attitudes toward Urban Trees and Supporting Urban Tree Programs. Environment and Behavior, 39(6), 797-814.